Racemixing appreciation (Cortisol spike guaranteed!!)

[EmperorVon]

african americans raised in white families are as smart as their white brother, iq being genetic doesn't mean it is racial.
small pp is more due to malnutrition.
persians never conquered india proper and greeks were raped en masse after alexander left.

That’s not even true, the twin studies showed that they were still lower iq than whites and it made no significant difference showing it was mostly genetic, can’t expect a troll to know actual studies though

 

[Jgns]

View attachment 4754058

can't wait to reach htn and slay that

 

[unstable]

That’s not even true, the twin studies showed that they were still lower iq than whites and it made no significant difference showing it was mostly genetic, can’t expect a troll to know actual studies though

https://www.nytimes.com/1976/04/18/archives/an-iq-study-of-black-children-in-white-homes.html

 

[EmperorVon]

https://www.nytimes.com/1976/04/18/archives/an-iq-study-of-black-children-in-white-homes.html

Find something legitimate like this

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251574021_The_Minnesota_Transracial_Adoption_Study_Parent_Reports_of_Psychosocial_Adjustment_at_Late_Adolescence

 

[mr007]

Why do guys celebrate other people’s slays just because they share the same race?

Cuck mentality

 

[unstable]

Find something legitimate like this

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251574021_The_Minnesota_Transracial_Adoption_Study_Parent_Reports_of_Psychosocial_Adjustment_at_Late_Adolescence

nigga its the same study
mine is a summary

 

[unstable]

Cuck mentality

i don't support jeets marrying white women but
the original video is not bragging chads but is talking about jeet smv

 

[EmperorVon]

nigga its the same study
mine is a summary

Here’s an analysis of the data by something that is unbiased and not retarded like you that shows the 85 black - 100 white average is accurate.

The most accurate and relevant study is the Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study (MTAS; Scarr & Weinberg 1976 initial report; Weinberg, Scarr & Waldman 1992 10-year follow-up). It is by far the largest, best-designed, and only longitudinal Black-White transracial adoption study (N ≈ 265 children initially tested at ~age 7 in 1975; 196 retested at ~age 17 in 1985). All children were adopted into upper-middle-class White families in Minnesota (adoptive parents' mean IQ > 110–115, well above the population mean of 100). This equalizes post-adoption environment (SES, schooling, parenting style, cultural exposure) far better than any other design. Black and mixed-race children were placed early (though on average later than White adoptees), allowing a strong test of nurture's power to close racial gaps.

No other transracial study matches its scale, duration, or rigor for Black-White comparisons. The Eyferth study (1961; German children of Black vs. White U.S. soldiers raised by White mothers) found essentially no gap (~96.5 vs. 97.2) but is widely regarded as less accurate due to heavy selection bias (only high-IQ soldiers were deployed; many “Black” fathers were actually North African), no adult follow-up, and short-term testing. Smaller or non-longitudinal studies (e.g., Moore 1986) exist but lack power and controls.

Key IQ Data from MTAS (Published Means; Unadjusted for Flynn Effect)​

These are the figures reported in the original papers and reproduced in major reviews (e.g., Rushton & Jensen 2005). Flynn-effect corrections (IQ norms drift upward ~0.3 points/year) lower all scores by several points but do not change the pattern or gaps substantially.

At age 7:

• White biological children of the adoptive parents (N=143): 117
• White adoptees (two White biological parents, N=25): 112
• Mixed-race adoptees (one Black + one White biological parent, N=68): 109
• Black adoptees (two Black biological parents, N=29): 97

At age 17 (follow-up):

• White biological children (N=104): 109
• White adoptees (N=16): 106
• Mixed-race adoptees (N=55): 99
• Black adoptees (N=21): 89

Evidence That Genetics Played the Bigger Role Than Nurture​

• The gap persisted and followed a genetic “dose-response” pattern. Despite identical high-SES White rearing environments from early childhood, Black adoptees scored ~17–18 points below White adoptees at age 17 (and only ~4 points above the national Black average of ~85). Mixed-race adoptees scored exactly intermediate—precisely what a partial-genetic model predicts. This hierarchical ordering (White > Mixed > Black) tracks degree of Sub-Saharan African ancestry and held after statistical controls for pre-adoption factors.
• Nurture had limited effect on the group mean. Adoption into advantaged White homes raised Black adoptees’ IQ somewhat (from the national ~85 to 89–97), but nowhere near White levels. By adolescence, shared-family environment effects on IQ shrink toward zero (behavior-genetic studies show heritability rising to ~70–80% in adulthood), while genetic effects dominate—exactly as seen here.
• Individual differences within groups were more genetic. IQ correlations were higher with biological parents’ characteristics than with adoptive parents’, even though the children never lived with their biological families.
• School achievement followed the same genetic pattern (GPA, class rank, aptitude tests ranked Black < Mixed < White adoptees).

 

[unstable]

Here’s an analysis of the data by something that is unbiased and not retarded like you that shows the 85 black - 100 white average is accurate.

The most accurate and relevant study is the Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study (MTAS; Scarr & Weinberg 1976 initial report; Weinberg, Scarr & Waldman 1992 10-year follow-up). It is by far the largest, best-designed, and only longitudinal Black-White transracial adoption study (N ≈ 265 children initially tested at ~age 7 in 1975; 196 retested at ~age 17 in 1985). All children were adopted into upper-middle-class White families in Minnesota (adoptive parents' mean IQ > 110–115, well above the population mean of 100). This equalizes post-adoption environment (SES, schooling, parenting style, cultural exposure) far better than any other design. Black and mixed-race children were placed early (though on average later than White adoptees), allowing a strong test of nurture's power to close racial gaps.

No other transracial study matches its scale, duration, or rigor for Black-White comparisons. The Eyferth study (1961; German children of Black vs. White U.S. soldiers raised by White mothers) found essentially no gap (~96.5 vs. 97.2) but is widely regarded as less accurate due to heavy selection bias (only high-IQ soldiers were deployed; many “Black” fathers were actually North African), no adult follow-up, and short-term testing. Smaller or non-longitudinal studies (e.g., Moore 1986) exist but lack power and controls.

Key IQ Data from MTAS (Published Means; Unadjusted for Flynn Effect)​

These are the figures reported in the original papers and reproduced in major reviews (e.g., Rushton & Jensen 2005). Flynn-effect corrections (IQ norms drift upward ~0.3 points/year) lower all scores by several points but do not change the pattern or gaps substantially.

At age 7:

• White biological children of the adoptive parents (N=143): 117
• White adoptees (two White biological parents, N=25): 112
• Mixed-race adoptees (one Black + one White biological parent, N=68): 109
• Black adoptees (two Black biological parents, N=29): 97

At age 17 (follow-up):

• White biological children (N=104): 109
• White adoptees (N=16): 106
• Mixed-race adoptees (N=55): 99
• Black adoptees (N=21): 89

Evidence That Genetics Played the Bigger Role Than Nurture​

• The gap persisted and followed a genetic “dose-response” pattern. Despite identical high-SES White rearing environments from early childhood, Black adoptees scored ~17–18 points below White adoptees at age 17 (and only ~4 points above the national Black average of ~85). Mixed-race adoptees scored exactly intermediate—precisely what a partial-genetic model predicts. This hierarchical ordering (White > Mixed > Black) tracks degree of Sub-Saharan African ancestry and held after statistical controls for pre-adoption factors.
• Nurture had limited effect on the group mean. Adoption into advantaged White homes raised Black adoptees’ IQ somewhat (from the national ~85 to 89–97), but nowhere near White levels. By adolescence, shared-family environment effects on IQ shrink toward zero (behavior-genetic studies show heritability rising to ~70–80% in adulthood), while genetic effects dominate—exactly as seen here.
• Individual differences within groups were more genetic. IQ correlations were higher with biological parents’ characteristics than with adoptive parents’, even though the children never lived with their biological families.
• School achievement followed the same genetic pattern (GPA, class rank, aptitude tests ranked Black < Mixed < White adoptees).

The conclusions drawn by the researchers, Sandra Scarr‐Salapatek and Richard A. Weinberg of the University of Minnesota, were that environmental factors do exert strong influence on intelligence and that the black‐white IQ gap apparently is neither inevitable nor unchangeable.

and this is just after civil rights era btw.

 

[EmperorVon]

and this is just after civil rights era btw.

That’s what you got from this? The studies found that blacks raised by white families scored 89 IQ on average just 4 higher than the national average and whites raised by biological parents were 109 vs adopted whites who were 106, that’s undeniable and still shows the 15-17 point gap even with environmental differences

 

[Latinolooksmaxxer]

They’re not a couple but imagine being the mulatto spawn of these two

theyre chopped tho

youd need Adriana Lima levels of luck with the genetic recomb apart from height genes

 

[unstable]

That’s what you got from this? The studies found that blacks raised by white families scored 89 IQ on average just 4 higher than the national average and whites raised by biological parents were 109 vs adopted whites who were 106, that’s undeniable and still shows the 15-17 point gap even with environmental differences

did you even read my quote fool the authors themselves said that the iq gap is not racial

also the tizard 1974 study shows adopted blacks having higher iq

 

[unstable]

theyre chopped tho

youd need Adriana Lima levels of luck with the genetic recomb apart from height genes

if its a male then he can mog ngl
the female has excellant jaw

 

[EmperorVon]

did you even read my quote fool the authors themselves said that the iq gap is not racial

also the tizard 1974 study shows adopted blacks having higher iq

Yes only 4 points higher than the average black American, my god your ragebait is either trash or you’re retarded

 

[unstable]

Yes only 4 points higher than the average black American, my god your ragebait is either trash or you’re retarded

The conclusions drawn by the researchers, Sandra Scarr‐Salapatek and Richard A. Weinberg of the University of Minnesota, were that environmental factors do exert strong influence on intelligence and that the black‐white IQ gap apparently is neither inevitable nor unchangeable.

 

[EmperorVon]

The conclusions drawn by the researchers, Sandra Scarr‐Salapatek and Richard A. Weinberg of the University of Minnesota, were that environmental factors do exert strong influence on intelligence and that the black‐white IQ gap apparently is neither inevitable nor unchangeable.

The MTAS authors (Scarr, Weinberg, Waldman) emphasized that the data do not prove genetics as the sole cause of the average racial gap; they noted confounds such as slightly later adoption and more pre-adoption placements for Black children, and argued the environment still played a “dominant” role in raising Black IQs above the national mean. Some reanalyses (e.g., adjusting for attrition or Flynn effect) shrink the age-17 Black-White gap to ~11–12 points. However, even these adjusted figures leave a substantial residual gap that aligns with genetic influence once shared environment is equalized.

In short, the MTAS—still the gold-standard transracial design—provides the clearest empirical data showing that, for IQ group differences, genetic factors outweigh the equalizing power of even excellent adoptive nurture. The pattern of means, the dose-response with ancestry, the failure of high-SES rearing to close the gap, and converging East Asian adoption results all point in the same direction.

 

[unstable]

The MTAS authors (Scarr, Weinberg, Waldman) emphasized that the data do not prove genetics as the sole cause of the average racial gap; they noted confounds such as slightly later adoption and more pre-adoption placements for Black children, and argued the environment still played a “dominant” role in raising Black IQs above the national mean. Some reanalyses (e.g., adjusting for attrition or Flynn effect) shrink the age-17 Black-White gap to ~11–12 points. However, even these adjusted figures leave a substantial residual gap that aligns with genetic influence once shared environment is equalized.

In short, the MTAS—still the gold-standard transracial design—provides the clearest empirical data showing that, for IQ group differences, genetic factors outweigh the equalizing power of even excellent adoptive nurture. The pattern of means, the dose-response with ancestry, the failure of high-SES rearing to close the gap, and converging East Asian adoption results all point in the same direction.

1. authors themselves denied racial iq differences and i'd rather believe them than an incel
2. 10 point iq difference is not enough to categorize whites as smarter and black as any less smart

imp:
3. also later studies like (moore 1886) conclude blacks as having similar 115 iq points.

 

[EmperorVon]

1. authors themselves denied racial iq differences and i'd rather believe them than an incel
2. 10 point iq difference is not enough to categorize whites as smarter and black as any less smart

imp:
3. also later studies like (moore 1886) conclude blacks as having similar 115 iq points.

More proof your retarded, no population on earth averages 115 proving it’s a bullshit study, my god you actually are retarded

 

[unstable]

More proof your retarded, no population on earth averages 115 proving it’s a bullshit study, my god you actually are retarded

nigga that minnesota study it self shows whites as 115 iq jfl

White biological children of the adoptive parents (N=143): 117

quote from you btw

your cope doesn't finish even after i give you studies lol

 

[EmperorVon]

nigga that minnesota study it self shows whites as 115 iq jfl


quote from you btw

your cope doesn't finish even after i give you studies lol

Yeah children scores are higher than adult scores why are you so fn slow

 

[unstable]

Yeah children scores are higher than adult scores why are you so fn slow

so nigga why are you saying no group as 117 iq do you even understand what you are saying?

 

[EmperorVon]

so nigga why are you saying no group as 117 iq do you even understand what you are saying?

Yes no adult group, adult scores are the ones that matter

 

[unstable]

Yes no adult group, adult scores are the ones that matter

and where did i say they were adults
this is what happens when you strawman too much.

 

[EmperorVon]

and where did i say they were adults
this is what happens when you strawman too much.

The fact that’s your response shows why your hopeless

 

[unstable]

The fact that’s your response shows why your hopeless

me when i get exposed for being a low iq fallacy spammer

 

[EmperorVon]

me when i get exposed for being a low iq fallacy spammer

Its genuinely over for you, I hope you graduate somehow

 

[unstable]

Its genuinely over for you, I hope you graduate somehow

come on nigga i don't expect this from you have you run out of copes already
that ghen nigga was better than you

 

[EmperorVon]

come on nigga i don't expect this from you have you run out of copes already
that ghen nigga was better than you

I’ve already proved you wrong, you initially said there was no difference between white and black, I’ve shown that there still is a gap even accounting for environmental factors and yet you don’t seem to understand

 

[unstable]

I’ve already proved you wrong, you initially said there was no difference between white and black, I’ve shown that there still is a gap even accounting for environmental factors and yet you don’t seem to understand

and how i showed you that the study you referenced it self denies any racial iq differences
and other studies showing equal iqs

 

[EmperorVon]

and how i showed you that the study you referenced it self denies any racial iq differences
and other studies showing equal iqs

It doesn’t deny it still shows a similar gap to the national average, where did you show they were equal you fuckng brainlet, I’m done with you unless you provide evidence and don’t just say shit

 

[unstable]

It doesn’t deny it still shows a similar gap to the national average, where did you show they were equal you fuckng brainlet, I’m done with you unless you provide evidence and don’t just say shit

Racial IQ Differences among Transracial Adoptees: Fact or Artifact? - PMC

Some academic publications infer from studies of transracial adoptees’ IQs that East Asian adoptees raised in the West by Whites have higher IQs than Western Whites, and that White adoptees raised by Whites have higher IQs than Black adoptees raised ...

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

more evidence for you

 

[LTNUser]

Why do guys celebrate other people’s slays just because they share the same race?

That nigga(the one making video)might be the most retarded Indian blackpiller I've come across
It's good that he promotes ethnic chads but the problem arises when he starts talking shit about the white race
Not to mention the fact that the dudes he posts are top 1% facially
Muh "Chads are their own ethnicity saar !"
Who is going to tell him that the white man will have an edge in the dating market or just life if in general ?
He is a disaster for the Indian BP community
You would be shocked to see his ratings of men.

Dude posts some bums(not always) instead of glazing real chads like Abhishek Sharma

His facial averageness is insane
Same tier as men in the below pictures

@Jager @LXR @Chadeep

 

[unstable]

That nigga(the one making video)might be the most retarded Indian blackpiller I've come across
It's good that he promotes ethnic chads but the problem arises when he starts talking shit about the white race
Not to mention the fact that the dudes he posts are top 1% facially
Muh "Chads are their own ethnicity saar !"
Who is going to tell him that the white man will have an edge in the dating market or just life if in general ?
He is a disaster for the Indian BP community
You would be shocked to see his ratings of men.

Dude posts some bums(not always) instead of glazing real chads like Abhishek Sharma
View attachment 4754966View attachment 4754976

His facial averageness is insane
Same tier as men in the below pictures

View attachment 4754987View attachment 4754991View attachment 4754996View attachment 4755008

@Jager @LXR @Chadeep

hmm except eye color he is pretty similar i guess
yes when you have to bring others down you have a problem
also the women were mostly ltbs
some of the niggas were genuine subhumans ngl

shivam dube is a mogger ngl

 

[Jager]

mixing gold skinned jeets with pale white women is abomination.

the average mixed jeet looks like this:

darker genes are dominant its water knowledge these copers think mixing with white ltbs will produce a son with blue eyes and dark skin with a caucasoid facial structure

 

[Lefty Rankin]

Why do guys celebrate other people’s slays just because they share the same race?

I celebrate jeets, blackards and chinks getting hot white girls.

 

[Jager]

I celebrate jeets, blackards and chinks getting hot white girls.

arent you white? thats kind of cuckish if you ask me

 

[Lefty Rankin]

arent you white? thats kind of cuckish if you ask me

I've only ever liked Asian women.

 

[Jager]

I've only ever liked Asian women.

seems like the stereotypes are true

 

[Lefty Rankin]

seems like the stereotypes are true

What stereotypes?

 

[Jager]

What stereotypes?

that white men love asian women

 

[Lefty Rankin]

that white men love asian women

Most white men don't though.

 

[Jager]

Most white men don't though.

i have seen too many wmaf couples online to believe this

 

[Lefty Rankin]

i have seen too many wmaf couples online to believe this

Most white men go for their own race.