Rarity ≠ attractiveness

[PlayersGetPlayed]

Many org users, and people in general, have this false notion that attractive features are only so because they're rare, and I beg to differ.

Let's start off with the most copious of all arguments: if everybody is attractive, nobody is.

I don't agree with this in the slightest. In a perfect world, each and every person would be 7 ft tall slayers, men and women. But it's not a perfect world, people don't always get what they want. That's why we fight wars, and why brads are so overcompetitive, in comparison to chads, who have it all.

So in conclusion, I must say that some rare features might give you a bit of a halo, but what is attractive is not defined by whether or not you're a rare pokemon. It's determined by whether or not you are of quality, lookswise. It just happens to be that being of such quality is quite rare. It's over it's over it's over

 

[PlayersGetPlayed]

Bimp

 

[PlayersGetPlayed]

Bomp

 

[PlayersGetPlayed]

Bømp

 

[Surfsup]

Rarity is defo a part of attraction
Thats why blue eyes are a halo
If 90 percent of the world had blue eyes
Black eyes would be a halo

 

[try2beme]

Nobody thinks like that

 

[try2beme]

In fact rare , good looking moggers get shit on heavily here. .org members dont like unique models but more conventional actors

 

[PlayersGetPlayed]

Nobody thinks like that

Read the reply above you