Rate (14 6’4)

I literally agreed with ur logic that 6ft is “neutral” in some places but the smv difference between five ten and 6ft is negligible considering face above low MTN. And ur seriously mentally ill if you believe women who say they can tell 5’11 from 6’ft
Igh bro wtv man and yes they do they've told me
 
  • +1
Reactions: INDIAPAKISTAN

Attachments

  • IMG_4756.jpeg
    IMG_4756.jpeg
    314 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_4755.jpeg
    IMG_4755.jpeg
    103.7 KB · Views: 0
  • +1
Reactions: Tigermoggerlol
Igh bro wtv man and yes they do they've told me
I’ve been doing some thinking and I can definitely conclude ur deductions are wrong. With ur logic, you deduct a micro tier each inch from 6ft, but that is immensely flawed as you are weighing each inch the same. The drop from 5’9 to 5’8 is infinitely times worse than from 6ft to 5’11. The drop from 6ft to 5’11 should have no deductions, and should start once you drop below 5’11. The drop starting from 5’11 should be a quarter micro tier slowly rising as your heights gets lower.

I would make a full weighting system for your formula but I’m too lazy
 

Similar threads

ascendent
Replies
3
Views
30
ascendent
ascendent
fezzedismid
Replies
5
Views
86
foidlovingmtn
foidlovingmtn
yadidortega21
Replies
14
Views
130
dogshitinfras
dogshitinfras
needtohight
Replies
4
Views
77
caucasian05
caucasian05
ascendent
Replies
10
Views
117
NeverEnough4Me
NeverEnough4Me

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top