RATE 8 PSL UNFOGGABLE TERASTACY

[Deleted member 6723]

PERFECT BALANCE OF FEMININITY, MASCULINITY, AND NEOTENY FOR A FEMALE FOR AESTHETICS. PERFECT COLOURING, PERFECT BODY, AND PERFECT FACE.

LOOK AT HER HIGH HYOID, UPTURNED NOSE, AND FORWARD GROWTH IN THIS PHOTO OF HER SIDE PROFILE.

PEAK FEMALE AESTHETICS. HER BEING MENTALLY UNSTABLE MAKES IT EVEN CUTER. I DONT SIMP FOR HER BECAUSE IM NOT A CUCK BUT YOU CAN AGREE SHE IS UNFOGGABLE.

 

[bossman]

lol no

 

[Deleted member 6723]

lol no

whats your rating for her?

 

[SteveRogers]

@Toth's thot

 

[Looks234]

7/10

 

[Sikkunt23]

9:10

 

[Over]

PSL4.5

Kill yourself simp

 

[Deleted member 6997]

Fucking whore, I just woke up from a dream where she married some chad kys

 

[eduardkoopman]

FULL FRONTAL PIC IS NEEDED

 

[Deleted member 6128]

She would be on her knees before me BBC strikes again

 

[Deleted member 6723]

FULL FRONTAL PIC IS NEEDED

only one I could find by searching.

 

[Deleted member 6723]

ik it looks like she has neutral ct but she has pct from a video I've seen from her.

FULL FRONTAL PIC IS NEEDED

 

[eduardkoopman]

only one I could find by searching. View attachment 647341

SHE LOOKS GOOD. But TeraStacy she is not for me. More like Stacylite - Stacy range for me

She has 1 big failo: the erea above her eyes untill the eyebrows.
There is to much distance between it and some upper eyelid exposure.
Also here cathal tilt is neutral, whereas a Terastacy needs postive canthal tilt.

Here a comparison.
Of here eye erea.
And of Model Barbara Palvin God tier eye erea
One can see the difference
.

 

[eduardkoopman]

MIRIN THE JAWLINE.

 

[Shebe]

ive seen her irl she frauds hard online

 

[SteveRogers]

SHE LOOKS GOOD. But TeraStacy she is not for me. More like Stacylite - Stacy range for me

She has 1 big failo: the erea above her eyes untill the eyebrows.
There is to much distance between it and some upper eyelid exposure.
Also here cathal tilt is neutral, whereas a Terastacy needs postive canthal tilt.

Here a comparison.
Of here eye erea.
And of Model Barbara Palvin God tier eye erea
One can see the difference
.View attachment 647376

I think it's cute

 

[Deleted member 5187]

I can't panthom how some of you don't know about preferences

Not two males will have exact same ideal
Goes for females as well

 

[eduardkoopman]

I can't panthom how some of you don't know about preferences

Not two males will have exact same ideal
Goes for females as well

Although true.
There is common agreement often, to a large extend. On who is very attractrive and who si very ugly.
At the middle ranges, is where most disagreement heppens.

 

[Deleted member 5187]

Although true.
There is common agreement often, to a large extend. On who is very attractrive and who si very ugly.
At the middle ranges, is where most disagreement heppens.

OP makes it seem like she is ideal
Probaly is for him
Not for all

I think theres some features most find ugly or GL
But ideal is very personal

 

[goat2x]

jfl
chico mogs

 

[Hozay]

cool no tits no ass no care

 

[BonesAndHarmony]

Stacylite

 

[Deleted member 6723]

SHE LOOKS GOOD. But TeraStacy she is not for me. More like Stacylite - Stacy range for me

She has 1 big failo: the erea above her eyes untill the eyebrows.
There is to much distance between it and some upper eyelid exposure.
Also here cathal tilt is neutral, whereas a Terastacy needs postive canthal tilt.

Here a comparison.
Of here eye erea.
And of Model Barbara Palvin God tier eye erea
One can see the difference
.View attachment 647376

The girl in the left has her face tilted down in relation to the camera while Eva’s is the opposite. I’ve seen a TikTok of her where her face is in neutral tilt in relation to the camera, in the video there she has fox eyes with a slight PCT. Her distance between the eyes and eyebrows also “balance” her out, idk the girl’s eyes in the left look kinda masculine and Eva has a feminine/neotenic look to it which balance her other features out. She’s not my ideal in terms of sex appeal but she is ideal to me in terms of aesthetics. Her height is even my ideal (5’4) for a girl lol. I know aesthetics is like 10% subjective, but Eva literally completes the objective and my subjective part of aesthetics all at once.

 

[goat2x]

The girl in the left has her face tilted down in relation to the camera while Eva’s is the opposite. I’ve seen a TikTok of her where her face is in neutral tilt in relation to the camera, in the video there she has fox eyes with a slight PCT. Her distance between the eyes and eyebrows also “balance” her out, idk the girl’s eyes in the left look kinda masculine and Eva has a feminine/neotenic look to it which balance her other features out. She’s not my ideal in terms of sex appeal but she is ideal to me in terms of aesthetics. Her height is even my ideal (5’4) for a girl lol. I know aesthetics is like 10% subjective, but Eva literally completes the objective and my subjective part of aesthetics all at once.

Holy shit stop simping no need to write an essay

 

[Deleted member 6723]

Holy shit stop simping no need to write an essay

dw I don't simp for her. Her tiktoks are kinda cringy so only thing I really do to her tiktok is fap/admire her face.

 

[Deleted member 6723]

I can't panthom how some of you don't know about preferences

Not two males will have exact same ideal
Goes for females as well

I know about preferences since I made 2 threads on colouring and hair colour and almost no one had the same preference. She is terastacy for me but not for others.

 

[Deleted member 6723]

SHE LOOKS GOOD. But TeraStacy she is not for me. More like Stacylite - Stacy range for me

She has 1 big failo: the erea above her eyes untill the eyebrows.
There is to much distance between it and some upper eyelid exposure.
Also here cathal tilt is neutral, whereas a Terastacy needs postive canthal tilt.

Here a comparison.
Of here eye erea.
And of Model Barbara Palvin God tier eye erea
One can see the difference
.View attachment 647376

forgot about the eyebrows. I like high-set eyebrows as opposed to low-set because it gives her even more of an feminine look.

 

[eduardkoopman]

forgot about the eyebrows. I like high-set eyebrows as opposed to low-set because it gives her even more of an feminine look.

I notice I am deffo a fan of low set eyebrows.
Hunters eyes with low set eyebrows I somehow like.

 

[Swolepenisman]

Pitt still mogs

 

[mulattomaxxer]

She is gl but she isnt unfoggable. She is a stacy but bettter looking females exist. Take the rochepill buddy boyo.

 

[doll]

SHE LOOKS GOOD. But TeraStacy she is not for me. More like Stacylite - Stacy range for me

She has 1 big failo: the erea above her eyes untill the eyebrows.
There is to much distance between it and some upper eyelid exposure.
Also here cathal tilt is neutral, whereas a Terastacy needs postive canthal tilt.

Here a comparison.
Of here eye erea.
And of Model Barbara Palvin God tier eye erea
One can see the difference
.View attachment 647376

women are not supposed to have low set brows

that’s masculine trait

 

[Squirtoutmabooty]

it's over

 

[Deleted member 6723]

She is gl but she isnt unfoggable. She is a stacy but bettter looking females exist. Take the rochepill buddy boyo.

View attachment 648629

Roche looks good but hunter eyes are a masculine trait.

 

[eduardkoopman]

women are not supposed to have low set brows

that’s masculine trait

It's OVER then. For Barbara Palvin and Adriana Lima. I guess. The 2 highest payed and most popular Tera Stacie's of the last decades.

 

[eduardkoopman]

High or Low Brows What's Sexier? | Lam Facial Plastics

Unlock the allure of brows with Dr. Lam at Lam Facial Plastic Surgery Center, Dallas, TX. Discover if high or low brows are sexier, tailored to men and women.

www.lamfacialplastics.com

 

[doll]

It's OVER then. For Barbara Palvin and Adriana Lima. I guess. The 2 highest payed and most popular Tera Stacie's of the last decades.

obviously not everyone follows psl standards

there are exceptions and other reasons why they’re attractive

 

[Virgincel]

>no tits
>terastacy
kek

 

[eduardkoopman]

obviously not everyone follows psl standards

there are exceptions and other reasons why they’re attractive

studies have shown that a higher brow actually looks less attractive to subjects who viewed various individuals with different brow heights. A low brow was considered sexier, more alluring, and more attractive. We know that to be true in men like Tom Cruise who has a low brow but this may be surprising information: for women also! Even though common beleives are that for women a high-arched brow is the way to go.

A lower, fuller brow is the answer to a more attractive brow contour and position for both men and for women.

 

[Deleted member 6723]

>no tits
>terastacy
kek

Idk. look at my signature, small is hotter for me

 

[eduardkoopman]

Attractiveness of Eyebrow Position and Shape in Females Depends on the Age of the Beholder | Request PDF

Request PDF | Attractiveness of Eyebrow Position and Shape in Females Depends on the Age of the Beholder | Great diversity exists among individuals with respect to eyebrow position and shape, and the notion of an "ideal" eyebrow has changed quite... | Find, read and cite all the research you...

www.researchgate.net

 

[eduardkoopman]

plus above results was replicated:
" Of the 56 students, 73% chose the face with low eyebrows as the more attractive. This result replicated the finding of Feser et al. (2007) "

 

[eduardkoopman]

(PDF) A real-life illusion of assimilation in the human face: Eye size illusion caused by eyebrows and eye shadow

PDF | Does an assimilative illusion like the Delboeuf illusion occur in the human face? We investigated factors that might influence the perceived size... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate

www.researchgate.net

 

[Deleted member 6723]

plus above results was replicated:
" Of the 56 students, 73% chose the face with low eyebrows as the more attractive. This result replicated the finding of Feser et al. (2007) "

Did they show an example on how low? I believe the study but I wanna know how low is ideal.

 

[eduardkoopman]

Did they show an example on how low? I believe the study but I wanna know how low is ideal.

Figure 1 in this link.

A real-life illusion of assimilation in the human face: eye size illusion caused by eyebrows and eye shadow

Does an assimilative illusion like the Delboeuf illusion occur in the human face? We investigated factors that might influence the perceived size of the eyes in a realistic face. Experiment 1 manipulated the position of the eyebrows (high or low), the ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

" To see if eyebrow position has an effect on the perceived attractiveness of the current stimuli viewed by Japanese students, we conducted an additional survey presenting the face with high eyebrows (Figure (Figure11 top left) and with low eyebrows (Figure (Figure11 top right) and asking which face appeared more attractive than the other. The two faces were printed side by side on a sheet of paper with the left-right position being counterbalanced. Of the 56 students, 73% chose the face with low eyebrows as the more attractive. This result replicated the finding of Feser et al. (2007). Therefore, eyebrow position does influence perceived attractiveness, possibly by making the eyes appear larger. "

 

[Deleted member 6723]

Figure 1 in this link.

A real-life illusion of assimilation in the human face: eye size illusion caused by eyebrows and eye shadow

Does an assimilative illusion like the Delboeuf illusion occur in the human face? We investigated factors that might influence the perceived size of the eyes in a realistic face. Experiment 1 manipulated the position of the eyebrows (high or low), the ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

" To see if eyebrow position has an effect on the perceived attractiveness of the current stimuli viewed by Japanese students, we conducted an additional survey presenting the face with high eyebrows (Figure (Figure11 top left) and with low eyebrows (Figure (Figure11 top right) and asking which face appeared more attractive than the other. The two faces were printed side by side on a sheet of paper with the left-right position being counterbalanced. Of the 56 students, 73% chose the face with low eyebrows as the more attractive. This result replicated the finding of Feser et al. (2007). Therefore, eyebrow position does influence perceived attractiveness, possibly by making the eyes appear larger. "

The low eyebrows look as low as Eva’s. Palvin's and Lima's eyebrows look a lot lower than the low set too. Compare them and you'll see. So maybe ideal is still Eva's or lower but we do not have a study or poll on it yet that I've seen.

 

[eduardkoopman]

here reads about the first study I quoted with pics they used:

Attractiveness of Eyebrow Position and Shape in Females Depends on the Age of the Beholder | Semantic Scholar

There is not one single beauty ideal for eyebrows, but at least three, and the ideal a person prefers depends on his or her age. BackgroundGreat diversity exists among individuals with respect to eyebrow position and shape, and the notion of an “ideal” eyebrow has changed quite significantly...

www.semanticscholar.org

And a follow up study.

http://kiso.hus.osaka-u.ac.jp/morikawa/morikawa_pub_download/Eye_shape_illusions_induced_by_eyebrow_positions.pdf

 

[eduardkoopman]

" ung subjects up to 30 years of age preferred eyebrows in a lower position, and ruled out arched eyebrows. Subjects older than 50 years stated exactly the opposite "

pic used\;

 

[Deleted member 6723]

" ung subjects up to 30 years of age preferred eyebrows in a lower position, and ruled out arched eyebrows. Subjects older than 50 years stated exactly the opposite "

pic used\;

View attachment 650208

Damn. Low looks kinda intimidating for a girl and is really masculine. High looks angelic-like which is what I prefer.

 

[eduardkoopman]

The low eyebrows look as low as Eva’s. Palvin's and Lima's eyebrows look a lot lower than the low set too. Compare them and you'll see. So maybe ideal is still Eva's or lower but we do not have a study or poll on it yet that I've seen.

i agree. in that specific study, the low set eyebrows were not that low.
BUT, there are plenty more studies on this from recent (last 20 years time. And pretty constistently lower set is preffered with younge people in general.

There is some variation in opinion, and it's not 100%. Not a big factor.

BUT. I HAD TO debunk these false common perceptions and quotes. that low set eyes brows are masculine or unattractive on women in general. BECAUSE, it's not true in general. On average it's actually more appealing. AND deffo not a failo or masculine trait in general.

women are not supposed to have low set brows

that’s masculine trait

Roche looks good but hunter eyes are a masculine trait.

 

[Deleted member 6723]

i agree. in that specific study, the low set eyebrows were not that low.
BUT, there are plenty more studies on this from recent (last 20 years time. And pretty constistently lower set is preffered with younge people in general.

There is some variation in opinion, and it's not 100%. Not a big factor.

BUT. I HAD TO debunk these false common perceptions and quotes. that low set eyes brows are masculine or unattractive on women in general. BECAUSE, it's not true in general. On average it's actually more appealing. AND deffo not a failo or masculine trait in general.

About the hunter eyes it didn’t mean anything about the eyebrows but I agree with u.