
Slothmaxxer
Iron
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2024
- Posts
- 104
- Reputation
- 57
- OP
- #51
High effort gotta give it to you, though I mog the morph.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
High effort gotta give it to you, though I mog the morph.
Like what?He's capped at high mtn for some unfixable failos he has
Bro you’re more down grown than the morphHigh effort gotta give it to you, though I mog the morph.
I haven't measured it but my gonial angle looks ideal, gonions are below the mouth line too so how am I downgrown? If anything my jaw frontal angle is probably a tad too obtuse.Bro you’re more down grown than the morph
Midface ratio is my biggest flawLike what?
flat face but crazy display of the power of leaning. bravo sigma
what did the invisalign even do? What did you need it for?
Corrected deep crossbite and a couple of crooked teeth.what did the invisalign even do? What did you need it for?
i think hmtn because low appeal
very beautiful my smegmaCorrected deep crossbite and a couple of crooked teeth.
Bump
Bumpedy Bump BumpBump
The "midface ratio" doesn't tell the full story as it takes into account multiple factors, and it's not 1.15 it's more like 1.13.I'm pretty sure that I'm capped by too high of a midface ratio (~1.15) and other issues downstream from that, so I would need a lefort 1 or something to ascend any further, not planning to hardmaxx tho.
High effort response bhai, the morph is definitely an improvement though I don't entirely agree.The "midface ratio" doesn't tell the full story as it takes into account multiple factors, and it's not 1.15 it's more like 1.13.
Your midface doesn't look significantly compact enough to be a falio (your skull is also meso) - the problem is purely with your eye spacing.
Here's a shitty morph so you can hopefully see what I mean:
View attachment 3730039
All I did here was make your eyes closer. Loses a lot of the weird uncanny look.
Your problem is your ESR. Unfortunately unfixable without extreme procedures like OBO.
Your actual midface and skull isn't wide, bro. Plus your skull index is Meso.High effort response bhai, the morph is definitely an improvement though I don't entirely agree.
My esr is like 0.48, which is slightly outside of the ideal range for White men of 0.443-0.477 according to Creating Attractive, and 0.445-0.475 according to FaceIQ. I would certainly benefit from a lower esr (like 0.45-0.46) since currently mine sits in the White female ideal range, though other guys like Orlando Bloom with a similar esr don't have such squished midface ratios (he's like 1.04 iirc). My facial thirds from top to bottom are 33/30/37, with the ideal masculine distribution being 31/33/36, so my nose is definitely too short, and that doesn't even take into consideration that my philtrum is very short too. At least my unideal high chin to philtrum ratio is very masculinizing and might balance out some of the feminizing effect of having such a short midface. My eyes are simply too big, since they are like 0.93 eyes apart iirc, while the esr is too high. What would you rate me in my most recent pics?
So realbefore: LTN
now: high LTN
After is high mtn
ehh looks good but nice zygos
If you measure fWHR like that with an almost diagonal line it will give a lower reading jfl, it's closer to 2.1 if you measure correctly. 2.1 is ok by itself but there would be no harm in going lower in the 1.9-2.1 ideal range. My tFWHR is 1.31, slightly shorter than the ideal of 1.33-1.38 so I would benefit from a bit more midface length.Your actual midface and skull isn't wide, bro. Plus your skull index is Meso.
View attachment 3731008
If anything, your philtrum itself is the problem along with the dolphin IPD - rather than the actual midface / skull.
A chin to philtrum of 3 is a falio, not a halo like most crimson chin enthusiasts like to yap on here about.
I'd also like to mention that fixing your dolphin IPD fixes your midface ratio for the most part, putting it in the ideal range:
View attachment 3731033
Take this autistic idea of getting a Lefort out of your mind. You don't have SFS, you will become a deformed horse:
View attachment 3731034
If you don't believe me, take a picture of your smile right now - you most definitely have normal upper teeth show, meaning Lefort will not benefit you whatsoever.
Rating before and after bhai?ehh looks good but nice zygos
It's still ~2-2.05, my apologies for the slightly slanted line - I was trying to account for the eyebrow edges being low set.If you measure fWHR like that with an almost diagonal line it will give a lower reading jfl, it's closer to 2.1 if you measure correctly. 2.1 is ok by itself but there would be no harm in going lower in the 1.9-2.1 ideal range. My tFWHR is 1.31, slightly shorter than the ideal of 1.33-1.38 so I would benefit from a bit more midface length.
I said my chin to philtrum is unideal, but it is masculinizing and, given my short philtrum/ midface, better than being a chinlet in the 2.05-2.55 ideal range. Without a tall 37% lower third my face would look very neotenous/ feminine.
What is the esr of the morph exactly? Going from 0.48 to 0.46 would reduce my midface ratio from 1.13 to 1.08, which is still well above 1:1. Jordan Barrett gets clowned for being compact and his midface ratio is around 1.08. An esr of 0.48 is quite common whereas a midface ratio of 1.13 is rare in among White men, the further something is from averageness the more important it is to address.
Yeah I have normal tooth show and wouldn't do an extreme surgerymaxx like lefort anyway, but if operations were done on photoshop and I could address one thing it would be midface length rather than ipd.
Anyway what would you rate before and after softmaxxing?
LTN to ~High MTN. You look better in some selfies because selfies already dolphinmax the normal person, so it kind of hides your eye spacing falio.Rating before and after bhai?
I get it, it's hard to measure stuff accurately anyway, like if you watch 3 facial analysis videos of the same person each rater will give slightly different ratios, angles etc based on different photo angles/ lens distortion/ misidentification of craniofacial landmarks.It's still ~2-2.05, my apologies for the slightly slanted line - I was trying to account for the eyebrow edges being low set.
Still within the ideal.
View attachment 3731134
Jordan's FWHR is more like ~2.25. He's known for his squished midface because of this alone.
Midface ratio itself is irrelevant - FWHR and skull index matter more. O'pry has a midface ratio of 1.1 in a lot of pictures.
View attachment 3731141
Your midface is undoubtedly compact, but not significant enough to be a falio on its own.
Your chin to philtrum, IPD, are falios worth talking about.
This pic was at prime leanness though I had very little muscle mass, currently working on getting to that bf% again.You have good bones, judging by this selfie here:
View attachment 3731172
Your eye spacing truly rapes you, without that falio I would rate you mid HTN.
Thanks bhai, I'm cursed with autism so will probably be hanging around on here for a while longer jfl, I've been meeting foids from tinder recently but not NT enough to escalate. What would you rate before and after though?Good looking guy, honestly bro keep up the good habits like diet and softmaxxes and just get off here. You don’t need to do much else unless you really want to ascend using the surgery route (which if you do then fine)
I suck at rating as of now but HTN sounds about right considering it’s rare to see dudes with your bones irlThanks bhai, I'm cursed with autism so will probably be hanging around on here for a while longer jfl, I've been meeting foids from tinder recently but not NT enough to escalate. What would you rate before and after though?
dead average but dont listen to him you are around low-midish htn imoWhat percentile is high LTN according to your rating scale