Rate Carthaginian general

[Deleted member 3328]

Jfl Prussia was extremely exhausted too, they had barealy an army to fight with anymore, russia was close in Poland with a huge army, the only nation not exhausted in the war was Russia cause it had a massive modern army with brilliant logistics and brilliant generals like Suvorov who btw never lost a battle and was a field marshal

I didn't say Prussia wasn't exhausted. But so was Austria and France.

I'm saying that most Russia would take is east Prussia. Prussian economy was heavily concentrated in today's Germany so it wouldn't be a major problem.

 

[Deleted member 3328]

massive modern army with brilliant logistics and brilliant generals like Suvorov who btw never lost a battle and was a field marshal

Massive army and a brilliant general would be a correction here

 

[TsarTsar444]

I didn't say Prussia wasn't exhausted. But so was Austria and France.

I'm saying that most Russia would take is east Prussia. Prussian economy was heavily concentrated in today's Germany so it wouldn't be a major problem.

Jfl how could Prussia do anything againts an untouched, modern, 5 times the number Russian army headed by probably one of the best generals in history, Suvorov

Also Berlimn was briefly captured in the 1760 by Russian troops jfl

 

[Deleted member 10987]

He was descent but definitely not top 5. Top 10 would be Napoleon, Nader Shah, Ceaser, Khalid, Alexander, Subotai, Alexandar Suvorov, Hannibal, Skenderbeg, Phyrus

Pyrrus ?????

 

[Deleted member 10987]

Jfl Prussia was extremely exhausted too, they had barealy an army to fight with anymore, russia was close in Poland with a huge army, the only nation not exhausted in the war was Russia cause it had a massive modern army with brilliant logistics and brilliant generals like Suvorov who btw never lost a battle and was a field marshal

He fought inline too
He was a manlet Chad like many great generals of history

 

[TsarTsar444]

He fought inline too
He was a manlet Chad like many great generals of history

Frederick?

 

[Deleted member 10987]

Frederick?

Suorov

 

[TsarTsar444]

Suorov

He was a mogger, he isn't underrated by military historians, majority frequently put him as one of the top 10 generals in history, but he is severely underrated by pop cultures. Guy fought over 200 battles and completely mogged the enemy of Russia but he isn't as well known as super overrated generals like Saladin

 

[Deleted member 10987]

He was a mogger, he isn't underrated by military historians, majority frequently put him as one of the top 10 generals in history, but he is severely underrated by pop cultures. Guy fought over 200 battles and completely mogged the enemy of Russia but he isn't as well known as super overrated generals like Saladin

I agree for Saladin
He was more of a leader than general
They dont even talk about Khalid or Tariq who were insane Moggers

 

[Deleted member 10987]

He was a mogger, he isn't underrated by military historians, majority frequently put him as one of the top 10 generals in history, but he is severely underrated by pop cultures. Guy fought over 200 battles and completely mogged the enemy of Russia but he isn't as well known as super overrated generals like Saladin

He also loved his troops and his troops loved him
He was very close to them
Like a Big brother

 

[StressShady]

literally who?

You, you are the Phucking Bastard

 

[Deleted member 3328]

Jfl how could Prussia do anything againts an untouched, modern, 5 times the number Russian army headed by probably one of the best generals in history, Suvorov

Also Berlimn was briefly captured in the 1760 by Russian troops jfl

it wasn't as modern as French or Prussian army, they were always behind in time in everything.

And no, to your surprise you couldn't just blob irl like you do in EU4. Most you would take is just one state, otherwise you would face the coalitions of the whole Europe afterwards.

 

[MrGlutton]

Napoleon Bonaparte
Frederick the Great
Alexander the Great
and many more mog

Frederick and alexander are definitely not better than hannibal..

casuals me

 

[TsarTsar444]

it wasn't as modern as French or Prussian army, they were always behind in time in everything.

And no, to your surprise you couldn't just blob irl like you do in EU4. Most you would take is just one state, otherwise you would face the coalitions of the whole Europe afterwards.

Russia during the 7 years war was at its peak in army quality, almost on par with Prussia but with 5 times the quantity as well and a general on the same level as Frederick if not even greater givibg his long absurdly brilliant military career.

I never said Russia would blob in that war, but it would have defeated the extremely exhausted army of Frederick and maybe took East Prussia for themselves

 

[Deleted member 3328]

Frederick and alexander are definitely not better than hannibal..

casuals me

They were. I would put Hannibal in top 10 but definitely not in the top 3.

 

[TsarTsar444]

Frederick and alexander are definitely not better than hannibal..

casuals me

Based aff, Alexander is overated as well, the biggest reason he is so celebrated today was cause of mythical status from conquering a huge "super power". In reality Alexander conquered Persia cause they were already in ruins from massive revolts in Egypy and Anatolia, and because Alexanders army was heavily modernized by his father Philip. Not saying he wasn't a really good general tho

 

[Deleted member 3328]

Russia during the 7 years war was at its peak in army quality, almost on par with Prussia but with 5 times the quantity as well and a general on the same level as Frederick if not even greater givibg his long absurdly brilliant military career.

I never said Russia would blob in that war, but it would have defeated the extremely exhausted army of Frederick and maybe took East Prussia for themselves

Are you actually reading the posts? I said that Russia would win and take east Prussia for itself myself. It however wouldn't be a big hit for Prussia.

 

[TsarTsar444]

Are you actually reading the posts? I said that Russia would win and take east Prussia for itself myself. It however wouldn't be a big hit for Prussia.

It would definitely be a moderate hit at least, East Prussia was a important sea port in the Baltic, if Russia took it it would be even more strengthened in the Baltic and Prussia would get even more insignificant. Also they definitely wouldn't just take territory, there would probably be some diplomatic or monetary gains from the war as well

 

[Deleted member 3328]

Even as someone who's whole nation got conquered by Napoleon I can say that Napoleon is undisputed best general of all time.

 

[Deleted member 3328]

It would definitely be a moderate hit at least, East Prussia was a important sea port in the Baltic, if Russia took it it would be even more strengthened in the Baltic and Prussia would get even more insignificant. Also they definitely wouldn't just take territory, there would probably be some diplomatic or monetary gains from the war as well

I'm trying to tell you that almost all of Prussian industry was in territory of today's Germany (Brandenburg) and Silesia which was very rich with natural resources like coal and iron.

East Prussia was always less developed, main income was trade which wasn't all that significant at the time.

 

[MrGlutton]

Based aff, Alexander is overated as well, the biggest reason he is so celebrated today was cause of mythical status from conquering a huge "super power". In reality Alexander conquered Persia cause they were already in ruins from massive revolts in Egypy and Anatolia, and because Alexanders army was heavily modernized by his father Philip. Not saying he wasn't a really good general tho

exactly lol

his armies were technologically advanced compared to the shit armies of the persians

that he had his FATHER to thank for