rate cycle

AtrophicPyra

AtrophicPyra

Diamond
Joined
Feb 6, 2026
Posts
1,425
Reputation
670
8 iu hgh dose

taking test testosterone enanthate twice a week 150mg monday 150mg thursday and arimidex 0.25mg when you start seeing high estrogenic symptoms then build up if symptoms dont improve in a week up it to 0.5mg.(or take aromasin) taking HCG during whole cycle 500 iu , then clomid as a pct

hgh 5ius if u can fund it 8-10 ius

tb500 and bpc157 for androgen and igf1 sensitivity.

RU58841 for no baldness from dht from testosterone

all this for 20 weeks

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

opinions on teriparatide idc abt you follower niggas saying its cope give me real answers
 
Last edited:
sell vapes and you have money for hgh
 
sell vapes and you have money for hgh
:feelswhy: old retarded thread,
everything i listed in my stack is cool and all im sticking to min 8 instead of 5 and i researched all abt bones ik that teriparatide is cope as shit now

you got any info on how to prevent prostate growth due to dht tho?
 
you got any info on how to prevent prostate growth due to dht tho?
Dutasteride, its the standard treatment for enlarged prostates for a reason
 
:feelswhy: old retarded thread,
everything i listed in my stack is cool and all im sticking to min 8 instead of 5 and i researched all abt bones ik that teriparatide is cope as shit now

you got any info on how to prevent prostate growth due to dht tho?
Or you could dip a dildo in ru58841
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: iblamethebulk and AtrophicPyra
Dutasteride, its the standard treatment for enlarged prostates for a reason
dont wanna block dht fully, 3-5x more androgenic than testosterone when it comes to bone androgen receptors
 
dont wanna block dht fully, 3-5x more androgenic than testosterone when it comes to bone androgen receptors
Still has no effect on any relevant looksmetric, theres a reason 5ar deficiency has little to no effect on facial aesthetics, ar's dont affect much nor do they have a high ceeling in terms of that type of growth, its highly regulated we are not rats so supraphysiological levels has no benefit. And 2 ar receptor activation doesnt say much, its a highly complex receptor with a fuck ton of genes it controls expression of, the nitty gritty would be important if 1 didnt disprove the theory

But if you wanna be a coping retard do pussy doses to only partly lower it, but if you dont wanna lower it systemically at all, the dildo might be your best bet, make sure its a 12x8inch dildo or its ineffective
 
Still has no effect on any relevant looksmetric, theres a reason 5ar deficiency has little to no effect on facial aesthetics, ar's dont affect much nor do they have a high ceeling in terms of that type of growth, its highly regulated we are not rats so supraphysiological levels has no benefit. And 2 ar receptor activation doesnt say much, its a highly complex receptor with a fuck ton of genes it controls expression of, the nitty gritty would be important if 1 didnt disprove the theory

But if you wanna be a coping retard do pussy doses to only partly lower it, but if you dont wanna lower it systemically at all, the dildo might be your best bet, make sure its a 12x8inch dildo or its ineffective
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28067796/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18595795/

trust me dht is more powerful than u think.
Androgen receptor signaling does affect bone growth, especially periosteal expansion

ill keep the dildo idea in mind shit might actually work:lul:
 
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28067796/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18595795/

trust me dht is more powerful than u think.
Androgen receptor signaling does affect bone growth, especially periosteal expansion

ill keep the dildo idea in mind shit might actually work:lul:
Did you read these?
First study
"Here we investigated the mutual effects of androgen and GH on osteoblastic marker expression using mouse" not even gonna read the rest of that bullshit
its highly regulated we are not rats
The second study also does not mention anything applicable to you in any sort of way, they very clearly describe it as lacking density by talking about strentgh and quality, which is not relevant what so ever

Stop coping man
 
Did you read these?
First study
"Here we investigated the mutual effects of androgen and GH on osteoblastic marker expression using mouse" not even gonna read the rest of that bullshit

The second study also does not mention anything applicable to you in any sort of way, they very clearly describe it as lacking density by talking about strentgh and quality, which is not relevant what so ever

Stop coping man
mouse bones and human bones r nearly the same in composition lol wtf.

1773175460037


wym, the second study says this
 
Composition ≠ function

Small predated mamals rely much more on androgens and rapid growth as it is essential evolutionarily
EXACTLY their bone turnover is rapid which is why they r the perfect mammals to test shit on over a short period of time.


like literally their bone layers/structure r nearly identical to humans
 
EXACTLY their bone turnover is rapid which is why they r the perfect mammals to test shit on over a short period of time.
Because the actuall function is totally fundementally different, and thats what matters
like literally their bone layers/structure r nearly identical to humans
I could get all the ingredients myself and sculpt a bone pretty much identical to a human or mouse bone, does that mean its gonna grow if i soak it in dht?
 
2/10 cycle dnr
8 iu hgh dose

taking test testosterone enanthate twice a week 150mg monday 150mg thursday and arimidex 0.25mg when you start seeing high estrogenic symptoms then build up if symptoms dont improve in a week up it to 0.5mg.(or take aromasin) taking HCG during whole cycle 500 iu , then clomid as a pct

hgh 5ius if u can fund it 8-10 ius

tb500 and bpc157 for androgen and igf1 sensitivity.

RU58841 for no baldness from dht from testosterone

all this for 20 weeks

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

opinions on teriparatide idc abt you follower niggas saying its cope give me real answers
 
  • JFL
Reactions: AtrophicPyra
yeah assuming
Because the actuall function is totally fundementally different, and thats what matters

I could get all the ingredients myself and sculpt a bone pretty much identical to a human or mouse bone, does that mean its gonna grow if i soak it i

identical structure = identical function

both have osteoblasts, osteoclasts, osteocytes, bone androgen receptors, etc.

if they got the identical structures then that means they have identical functions
 
Last edited:
identical structure = identical function

both have osteoblasts, osteoclasts, osteocytes, bone androgen receptors, etc.

if they got the identical structures then that means they have identical functions
If they were avtually identical, you said nearly, remove all receptors and the bones are still nearly identical
 
If they were avtually identical, you said nearly, remove all receptors and the bones are still nearly identical
bruh my point is that they have same structure and cells otherwise scientists and researchers wouldnt use them as mammals to cunduct experiments on and there is proof of that
 
bruh my point is that they have same structure and cells otherwise scientists and researchers wouldnt use them as mammals to cunduct experiments on and there is proof of that
They are not very similar, the last common ancestor lived about 75-90 million years ago a lot closer than a fish or some ad they are mamals obv but still very different, start by take a look at them. They are very practical ad they grow and reproduce super quickly(which humans cant nor need to do), theres no cultural ethical issues etc which is why you cant do mouse studies then just start human trials, nevermind conclude that it works and sell it.

Its clear that you do not understand the biology even slightly, otherwise you would've made an argument from biology not from reasonable assumption
 
They are not very similar, the last common ancestor lived about 75-90 million years ago a lot closer than a fish or some ad they are mamals obv but still very different, start by take a look at them. They are very practical ad they grow and reproduce super quickly(which humans cant nor need to do), theres no cultural ethical issues etc which is why you cant do mouse studies then just start human trials, nevermind conclude that it works and sell it.

Its clear that you do not understand the biology even slightly, otherwise you would've made an argument from biology not from reasonable assumption
nigga wtf does this have to do with how they have structurally identical bones and have identical bone cells:feelswah:
 
nigga wtf does this have to do with how they have structurally identical bones and have identical bone cells:feelswah:
It doesnt, because that was not the argument you made
bruh my point is that they have same structure and cells otherwise scientists and researchers wouldnt use them as mammals to cunduct experiments on and there is proof of that
Your argument was that it was reasonable to assume that to be the case, i refuted that claim because it was fucking stupid
 
It doesnt, because that was not the argument you made

Your argument was that it was reasonable to assume that to be the case, i refuted that claim because it was fucking stupid
mb i meant they have the same *bone* structure and *bone cells* otherwise scientists and researchers wouldnt use them as mammals to cunduct experiments on

im still right, they have nearly the same cells as humans, i can show u proof if u want:feelswat:
 
mb i meant they have the same *bone* structure and *bone cells* otherwise scientists and researchers wouldnt use them as mammals to cunduct experiments on

im still right, they have nearly the same cells as humans, i can show u proof if u want:feelswat:
Show proof then, please also include their cellular sensence systems compared to ours and that our cells dont WAY easier stop abnormally fast cell growth

And its still the same argument, an unreasonable assumtion, the same argument goes
 
Show proof then, please also include their cellular sensence systems compared to ours and that our cells dont WAY easier stop abnormally fast cell growth

And its still the same argument, an unreasonable assumtion, the same argument goes
your right their bone turnover and cell growth is faster which is why they r used to be experimented on

you can google wtv yourself ill just tell u what i know, they have the same bones, muscle contractions, liver, + other animals can compensate for the "different" cells that the mice do compared to humans, one thing ik they have different is their immune responses to certain drugs unrelated to the ones we were discussing abt

animals are 100% reliable to find out whether smth is working or not you just gotta recalculate the dose

their cellular sensence systems r identical in many ways just google it yourself bec im lazy as shit.
 
i can show u proof if u want:feelswat:
you can google wtv yourself ill just tell u what i know
5911092 war of the worlds ice cube1

Have i missed something? Are you god? Because it seems like your implying that what you know=proof
they have the same bones, muscle contractions, liver,
other animals can compensate for the "different" cells that the mice do compared to humans
one thing ik they have different is their immune responses to certain drugs unrelated to the ones we were
Nigga you relize you just wrote something then no fake no curveball no nothing just contradicted yourself. If they worked the same they would walk on 2 legs, be omnivores and be long distance runners, youd also be able to not see the difference between a mouse and a random dude



animals are 100% reliable to find out whether smth is working or not you just gotta recalculate the dose
But still even though you twice admitted difference you said this?????? Well to bad there isnt any reliable institution of science that would aggree with you, because its so wrong i dont even know where to begin, also i forgot to mention you addmitted they have difference in growth patterns like i said, that implies a totally diffferent system, thats why mice studies arent used to justify efficacy in humans but to create and improve hypothesises. You have 0 clue what you are talking about

their cellular sensence systems r identical in many ways just google it yourself bec im lazy as shit.
Werent you gonna provide proof just a second ago? You realize this statement and
your right their bone turnover and cell growth is faster
Could not be true at the same time? The first statement prevent the other. You saying this also just implies youre not critical of sources at all

Not even gonna waste my time with retards like you from how incredibly stupid this post was
 
View attachment 4750976
Have i missed something? Are you god? Because it seems like your implying that what you know=proof



Nigga you relize you just wrote something then no fake no curveball no nothing just contradicted yourself. If they worked the same they would walk on 2 legs, be omnivores and be long distance runners, youd also be able to not see the difference between a mouse and a random dude




But still even though you twice admitted difference you said this?????? Well to bad there isnt any reliable institution of science that would aggree with you, because its so wrong i dont even know where to begin, also i forgot to mention you addmitted they have difference in growth patterns like i said, that implies a totally diffferent system, thats why mice studies arent used to justify efficacy in humans but to create and improve hypothesises. You have 0 clue what you are talking about


Werent you gonna provide proof just a second ago? You realize this statement and

Could not be true at the same time? The first statement prevent the other. You saying this also just implies youre not critical of sources at all

Not even gonna waste my time with retards like you from how incredibly stupid this post was
having identical structures and cells is not = to identical dna oh my low iq:feelswhy: this is why mice dont have 2 walking legs.

yk im right not even tryna be a dick but sometimes u gotta just admit ur wrong. we have been arguing abt 3 different topics in the same subject bec everytime u tried to prove a point abt a topic relating from dht, to bones, to cells, now arguing abt the genes of mice:lul: i said smth to counteract that point which disproved your false ideologies and in response u moved onto another topic to try again im crine son

you dont want proof or studies u jus wanna prove your right. i alr linked a study to you and in response u moved onto another topic. if u rlly wanna see if im right or wrong do the research yourself.

mice have different growth patterns because they live for 2-3 years:feelswah:

btw mice r used to for early efficacy testing before human trials. so idk were u got the fact they dont from.
 

Similar threads

ashdod_mogger
Discussion Rate cycle (19M)
Replies
31
Views
123
ashdod_mogger
ashdod_mogger
ashdod_mogger
Replies
24
Views
139
ashdod_mogger
ashdod_mogger
AtrophicPyra
Replies
71
Views
601
MindOfBeni
MindOfBeni
Azie555
Replies
14
Views
238
Azie555
Azie555
123.5
Replies
24
Views
140
fgfr3
F

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top