rate eye changes

IzDrizSub5

IzDrizSub5

AscendSoon
Joined
Jun 29, 2025
Posts
2,967
Reputation
2,552
you cant see my brows but they are darker + thicker, just looking for the skin,msucle,bone perspectives
IMG 0181
IMG 0183
IMG 0204
IMG 0205
IMG 0206
 
  • +1
Reactions: BronzeAlligator1, zombi3, Lord Vader and 2 others
Holy, good shit bro
 
  • +1
Reactions: ChudEater and IzDrizSub5
care to tell us how
 
  • +1
Reactions: IzDrizSub5
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Lord Vader, truefoidslayerpqoqo and IzDrizSub5


take into account im fried now so the uee droppy, and those photo were taken right after i got up (sober)

not flattering, but i think it shows it well enough lmk what u think
 
8 months and counting, im 17 turning 18 soon, so about 3-4 years of development left
IMG 0047
IMG 9580


my side is pretty ass but it also improved just not as impressive
 
Wow🤯🤯🤯 grow ur hair out!!!!! Very good ascension and very good base keep it up g
i amm its growing nicely, i appreciate it brother i wont be stopping anytime soon❤️
 
  • +1
Reactions: IzDrizSub5
  • +1
Reactions: Lord Vader
can you analyze this video compared to the original photos, i understand how angle and lighting can be to blame for the differencs
I'm not sure what you mean by "analyze". There aren't any discernible structural changes.

When it comes to softmaxxing the eyes, you're really only limited to growing and dying your lashes/brows.
 
I'm not sure what you mean by "analyze". There aren't any discernible structural changes.

When it comes to softmaxxing the eyes, you're really only limited to growing and dying your lashes/brows.
im confused, do you not see differences in my upper eyelid exposure and undereye sipport?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lord Vader
im confused, do you not see differences in my upper eyelid exposure and undereye sipport?
The angle is visibly different across each photo as well as the lighting. This is exactly what I am referencing when I argue that it's easy to fraud the eye area.

You cannot make structural support appear out of thin air.
 
  • +1
Reactions: BronzeAlligator1 and IzDrizSub5
The angle is visibly different across each photo as well as the lighting. This is exactly what I am referencing when I argue that it's easy to fraud the eye area.

You cannot make structural support appear out of thin air.
truth
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lord Vader
The angle is visibly different across each photo as well as the lighting. This is exactly what I am referencing when I argue that it's easy to fraud the eye area.

You cannot make structural support appear out of thin air.
agreed it was about an 8 month progress i can show you the progress if youd like

and what about in the video, the angle is neutral, and you same with lighting
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0047.jpeg
    IMG_0047.jpeg
    131.1 KB · Views: 0
  • +1
Reactions: Lord Vader
agreed it was about an 8 month progress i can show you the progress if youd like

and what about in the video, the angle is neutral, and you same with lighting
Undeniable ascension in terms of skin quality and leanness. The angles still aren't the same. One uses backdrop lighting with your face tilted downward versus direct lighting with your face tilted upward.

Not a huge concern, nobody expects you to take photos in the exact same room, position, and lighting every time, that would be retarded. Photos will just never be a good point of reference for quantifying any changes.
 

Similar threads

Mamory1337
Replies
3
Views
20
wannabechad_
wannabechad_
pwoanfrdg
Replies
6
Views
88
Vanta1
Vanta1
IzDrizSub5
Replies
8
Views
59
IzDrizSub5
IzDrizSub5
IzDrizSub5
Replies
4
Views
45
IzDrizSub5
IzDrizSub5
ArzymatFwhr
Replies
4
Views
53
truefoidslayerpqoqo
truefoidslayerpqoqo

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Altiera
  • IzDrizSub5
  • s1e
  • lowtide654
  • ChudEater
  • zombi3
  • D69mo
  • SubCoyote
  • Hunter85
  • prw
  • unknownslayer'
  • egyptianslayr
Back
Top