Rate Guy from Reddit

[Deleted member 91663]

 

[Deleted member 91663]

Please click on image to see it properly.

 

[Deleted member 119452]

brutal lips

 

[Deleted member 114837]

below average in a bad way : he gives off aspie/non nt vibes on top on having below average looks.

 

[Deleted member 91663]

below average in a bad way : he gives off aspie/non nt vibes on top on having below average looks.

Please vote, good sir.

 

[Deleted member 114837]

Please vote, good sir.

i don't see incel looks option. He's below average + looks aspie = truecel/incel looks tier.

 

[Deleted member 91663]

i don't see incel looks option. He's below average + looks aspie = truecel/incel looks tier.

I didn't provide the option because he's doesn't qualify as a truecel.

 

[Deleted member 114837]

I didn't provide the option because he's doesn't qualify as a truecel.

I think you are wrong. Looks count also the vibe you give off. That forehead, those lips, this eye stare, the vibe, to most women he will look not just ugly, but creepy ugly. that's way worse. meanwhile a similar LTN with nt approchable vibes will be seen as medium ugly or "cute" or whatever.

 

[Deleted member 91663]

I think you are wrong. Looks count also the vibe you give off. That forehead, those lips, this eye stare, the vibe, to most women he will look not just ugly, but creepy ugly. that's way worse. meanwhile a similar LTN with nt approchable vibes will be seen as medium ugly or "cute" or whatever.

I consider a truecel someone who literally cannot get into an relationship of any kind because of their looks.

Blackops2cel is a classic example:

 

[Deleted member 91663]

I think you are wrong. Looks count also the vibe you give off. That forehead, those lips, this eye stare, the vibe, to most women he will look not just ugly, but creepy ugly. that's way worse. meanwhile a similar LTN with nt approchable vibes will be seen as medium ugly or "cute" or whatever.

I consider a truecel someone who literally cannot get into an relationship of any kind because of their looks.

Blackops2cel is a classic example:
View attachment 3584873

These two are not reasonably in the same category.

 

[Deleted member 114837]

I consider a truecel someone who literally cannot get into an relationship of any kind because of their looks.

Blackops2cel is a classic example:
View attachment 3584873

i've seen many such cases of this looks level being into a relationship, thanks to above average height. but BO2 also has that non nt vibe, albeit a bit less worse than the one in OP.

 

[Deleted member 114837]

These two are not reasonably in the same category.

to us they aren't. to women they might as well be.
Women at the same time rate higher and lower than us : if you give non nt vibe and are below htn looks you will look ugly. anything nt or average+ can look pretty to them.
for me BO2 is textbook truecel. While op is LTN. but both will be perceived as incel for the later and truecel for the former at best.

 

[Deleted member 134910]

Average if im trying not to be rude

 

[Deleted member 91663]

Women at the same time rate higher and lower than us : if you give non nt vibe and are below htn looks you will look ugly. anything nt or average+ can look pretty to them.

I don't believe for a second that the second guy is considered more attractive.

for me BO2 is textbook truecel. While op is LTN. but both will be perceived as incel for the later and truecel for the former at best.

I'm sure the guy I posed could get some matches on Tinder with some decent photos.
No way is he incel.

 

[Deleted member 134910]

I think you are wrong. Looks count also the vibe you give off. That forehead, those lips, this eye stare, the vibe, to most women he will look not just ugly, but creepy ugly. that's way worse. meanwhile a similar LTN with nt approchable vibes will be seen as medium ugly or "cute" or whatever.

Looks is what attracts, personality and compatibility is what keeps them together. You need both. Obvs if she sees you as 8+ you HAVE A LOOOOOOOT OF LEVERAGE in the relatiosnhip

 

[Deleted member 91663]

Average if im trying not to be rude

I consider him a textbook MTN.

 

[Sicilian Cyclops]

needs forehead reduction ASAP, ltn-mtn

 

[Deleted member 114837]

Looks is what attracts, personality and compatibility is what keeps them together

false. I see everyday hundreds of below average/ugly men with gfs. it's promiscuity pill and just be there, and have a normal personnality.

 

[Deleted member 134910]

I consider him a textbook MTN.

He wouldnt be considered average by many women tho

 

[Deleted member 91663]

He wouldnt be considered average by many women tho

I agree, women consider the vast majority of men unattractive.
I'm just looking at this in relation to other guys.

 

[Deleted member 114837]

I don't believe for a second that the second guy is considered more attractive.

I'm sure the guy I posed could get some matches on Tinder with some decent photos.
No way is he incel.

tinder isn't the cursor for anything, the algorithm is skewed.
If we are talking from a halo effect standpoint which is the hardest to get and the most important in looks, then you get it at chadlite+, with someone like francisco lachowski prime is textbook chad to me.
I consider myself HTN in that rating scale at the moment - everyone would consider me as chadlite+ -, and make your conclusions about the guys you posted compared to chico if the later is just "chad". truecels/incels are accurate.

 

[Deleted member 134910]

false. I see everyday hundreds of below average/ugly men with gfs. it's promiscuity pill and just be there, and have a normal personnality.

Dk ime the more attractive she finds you the easier it is to lack other meterialistic things, except for personality and compatibility, that and looks are a need for genuine attraction

 

[Deleted member 114837]

Dk ime the more attractive she finds you the easier it is to lack other meterialistic things, except for personality and compatibility, that and looks are a need for genuine attraction

This doesn't work for the average relationship. Looks are vastly overated when it comes to ltr. It's way more important for halo effect in general quality of life.
Women when looking for a relationship don't quite as much as men care about looks.

 

[Deleted member 91663]

tinder isn't the cursor for anything, the algorithm is skewed.

It tells us something. Is it not an algorithm leveraged used en masse by millions of women around the world to find attractive men?

If we are talking from a halo effect standpoint which is the hardest to get and the most important in looks, then you get it at chadlite+, with someone like francisco lachowski prime is textbook chad to me.

I don't think the guy I posted is good looking, just an MTN - which I consider to be within average range.

I consider myself HTN in that rating scale at the moment - everyone would consider me as chadlite+ -, and make your conclusions about the guys you posted compared to chico if the later is just "chad". truecels/incels are accurate.

I just don't think the reddit guy is anywhere near the truecel or incel category like you said.

 

[Deleted member 114837]

It tells us something. Is it not an algorithm leveraged used en masse by millions of women around the world to find attractive men?

it's far from that easy. it puts forward white men over non white men. It also favors some types of pictures and vibes. You should look up documentaries about it, and all the recent class actions regarding the biased algorithm.
The only indicator is IRL.

I just don't think the reddit guy is anywhere near the truecel or incel category like you said.

To put it simply, looks are way more binary than we think.
Ugly
average
good looking
striking.

With some variation given your vibe/aura. and given that ugly/average are the same to women unless you have some ntness.
LTN equals between ugly and average, which i agree. On top he is non nt/aspie, which leads to ugly. period.

 

[Deleted member 91663]

it's far from that easy. it puts forward white men over non white men.

Because almost all ethnic groups prefer white men.

It also favors some types of pictures and vibes. You should look up documentaries about it, and all the recent class actions regarding the biased algorithm.

It's an algorithm designed to find attractive men and is used by millions of poeple. It has some validity, even if we accept your criticisms.

The only indicator is IRL.

It's easier in real life than OLD.

 

[Deleted member 134910]

This doesn't work for the average relationship. Looks are vastly overated when it comes to ltr. It's way more important for halo effect in general quality of life.
Women when looking for a relationship don't quite as much as men care about looks.

Well mine did care a lot about looks at the beginning bc this how it was before vs now. She basically said at the beginning it was 90% looks 10% personality, and now its 60% looks and 40% personality

 

[Deleted member 91663]

View attachment 3584842

Here's one more picture, to help people decide:

 

[Deleted member 114837]

It's an algorithm designed to find attractive men and is used by millions of poeple. It has some validity, even if we accept your criticisms.

Many more accurate dating apps out there than tinder. very bad example, and then again, the people who use OLD are not the people you want to date. It also favors sex appeal over prettyness while it's the later that matters in life and for halo effect.

It's easier in real life than OLD.

The opposite. But it depends what you mean. Talking about halo effect? It's extremely extremely hard to have it in the west. while having 99+ likes in an hour is easy for a lot of men.

Because almost all ethnic groups prefer white men.

Not true. People prefer looks over ethnicities.

 

[Deleted member 134910]

Here's one more picture, to help people decide:



View attachment 3584923

Kinda looks like david laid. If thats you lowkey bro, i think you would be put in the categody of cute by women, like a 6 maybe 7.

 

[Deleted member 91663]

Many more accurate dating apps out there than tinder. very bad example, and then again, the people who use OLD are not the people you want to date. It also favors sex appeal over prettyness while it's the later that matters in life and for halo effect.

I just used Tinder as an example.

The opposite. But it depends what you mean. Talking about halo effect? It's extremely extremely hard to have it in the west. while having 99+ likes in an hour is easy for a lot of men.

In OLD, you're competing with potentially hundreds of thousands of men in a ten mile radius if you live in a big city.

Not true. People prefer looks over ethnicities.

And white males are considered more attractive by virtually every single ethnic group.

I will attach below, from OkCupid data :

 

[Deleted member 114837]

And white males are considered more attractive by virtually every single ethnic group.

I will attach below, from OkCupid data :

the datas are extremely old. Now in appeal black/mulatto and kpop dudes match and outperform white guys online and offline.
Again, the only true indicator that won't fluctuate over time is looks level.
It's symptomatic of how skewed tinder algorithm is when an ethnic chadlite/chad has constantly less matches than a white normie with nt vibes. Niko69 is a prime example of that. A slightly above average white guy with nt vibes with very good results.

In OLD, you're competing with potentially hundreds of thousands of men in a ten mile radius if you live in a big city.

to get a date.
While to get the halo effect you need to have unreal looks level that turn head of half+ of the human population in any given place.

 

[Deleted member 91663]

Kinda looks like david laid. If thats you lowkey bro, i think you would be put in the categody of cute by women, like a 6 maybe 7.

It's not me. It's a guy from reddit.
I will leave the link below:

 

[Deleted member 91663]

the datas are extremely old. Now in appeal black/mulatto and kpop dudes match and outperform white guys online and offline.

It's just on example. There are other more modern surveys validating this.

A slightly above average white guy with nt vibes with very good results.

I'm sure there are fluctuations in the algorithm but generally these apps are algorithms with a heuristic for finding good looking men.
An MTN guy with decent photos can do well.

While to get the halo effect you need to have unreal looks level that turn head of half+ of the human population in any given place.

The vast majority of guys will never get the Halo effect. You don't need to be in one of the top percentiles to get a relationship.

 

[Deleted member 134910]

It's not me. It's a guy from reddit.
I will leave the link below:

Imo would be labelled as cute by some women. Hes not gonna die alone.

 

[Deleted member 91663]

Imo would be labelled as cute by some women. Hes not gonna die alone.

I think MTN is fair and is consistent with the poll results.

 

[Deleted member 134910]

I think MTN is fair and is consistent with the poll results.

Well in that case im not so far awat from him since im only HTN wich surprises me tbh

 

[Deleted member 114837]

The vast majority of guys will never get the Halo effect. You don't need to be in one of the top percentiles to get a relationship.

I agree with the rest. But about this one : I have way above average looks level. But i lack ntness due to many factors. So my coping option is to get halo effect tier looks to compensate for everything else. it's a form of cope but many cope with cars and watches so.
and to get halo effect you need striking looks. i can pm you mine, i consider myself as a htn in my book. objectively i'm chadlite to most people.

 

[Deleted member 134910]

I agree with the rest. But about this one : I have way above average looks level. But i lack ntness due to many factors. So my coping option is to get halo effect tier looks to compensate for everything else. it's a form of cope but many cope with cars and watches so.
and to get halo effect you need striking looks. i can pm you mine, i consider myself as a htn in my book. objectively i'm chadlite to most people.

Pm me well see

 

[Deleted member 114837]

Pm me well see

don't trust you. you seem too narcy and bipolar from what i can tell.

 

[Deleted member 91663]

Well in that case im not so far awat from him since im only HTN wich surprises me tbh

I think this site is warping my conception of looks.

This guy is honestly better looking than I’d say 6-7 out of 10 guys I saw during my time at college.

You’re a defacto chadlite in my book.

Maybe I’m delusional. I don’t quite frankly know anymore.

 

[Deleted member 134910]

don't trust you. you seem too narcy and bipolar from what i can tell.

Brother, im not gonna roast you

 

[Deleted member 91663]

I agree with the rest. But about this one : I have way above average looks level. But i lack ntness due to many factors. So my coping option is to get halo effect tier looks to compensate for everything else. it's a form of cope but many cope with cars and watches so.
and to get halo effect you need striking looks. i can pm you mine, i consider myself as a htn in my book. objectively i'm chadlite to most people.

Agreed.
I think being socially functional is absolutely critical.

 

[Deleted member 114837]

I think this site is warping my conception of looks.

This guy is honestly better looking than I’d say 6-7 out of 10 guys I saw during my time at college.

You’re a defacto chadlite in my book.

Maybe I’m delusional. I don’t quite frankly know anymore.

Overate. but honestly rating gets tiring. as i said, there are three levels :
Ugly
Good looking
Striking.
none of us here are striking. nobody in this godamn forum is. and pretty much nobody irl either, it's 1 in 100k at best.

 

[Deleted member 134910]

don't trust you. you seem too narcy and bipolar from what i can tell.

If youre chadlite what do you fear?

 

[Deleted member 114837]

Brother, im not gonna roast you

i don't mind roast. I mind doxxing.

 

[Deleted member 134910]

i don't mind roast. I mind doxxing.

How the hell am i gonna doxx you? Like if im some type of hacker jeez. Anyways do what you want

 

[Deleted member 91663]

Overate. but honestly rating gets tiring. as i said, there are three levels :
Ugly
Good looking
Striking.
none of us here are striking. nobody in this godamn forum is. and pretty much nobody irl either, it's 1 in 100k at best.

I’m not sure.
When I try and rate someone, I imagine a line-up of ten guys and try to imagine where they fit on it.

 

[White_Bwoi]

Shave this facial hair, would look better, also blue eyes would help in this case but not bad

 

[superpsycho]

solid HMTN