ICXCLuvr
Fuchsia
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2023
- Posts
- 11,271
- Reputation
- 15,444
@averagetotaluser
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
she is top 1 of all time
Do people actually gold this attractive bro I don’t care about ratios in women at this point like no I don’t find this attractive
she is top 1 of all time
she is top 1 of all time
Looks like a bug idkGood eye area
Why not? It’s objective. This is a bad eye area

i aint falling for the ragebait
How am I wrong though? I want to hear your thoughts because everyone just dismisses me as ragebait.i aint falling for the ragebait
she has the best harmony and dimo of all foidsHow am I wrong though? I want to hear your thoughts because everyone just dismisses me as ragebait.
she has the best harmony and dimo of all foids
0/10 0 smv for me
her bone structure is below average if im being realView attachment 5422694
She doesn’t + that alone isn’t enough to be top 1 or even top 1 million, her features are bad like he eye area imo
And her bone structure is average
I couldn’t name a single objectively good feature on her, you could say eye color but that’s not even objective0/10 0 smv for me
her bone structure is below average if im being real
I specifically asked for eye area forAttractive lips look a little dry tho
View attachment 5422677View attachment 5422678
Fogged by high averageness superiors @esoterik
A is better than B
That’s average. No way you think her eye area is better than this
i don’t find facial averageness as the best metric of attractionWh
That’s average. No way you think her eye area is better than this
View attachment 5422776
Btw what did u mean by “color” earlier. Any color can do
It’s the only scientifically accurate one. And dimorphism. And it’s mostly related to eyes as well.i don’t find facial averageness as the best metric of attraction
attraction is a non scientific process, it’s non absolute, if attraction was measurable then we would see empirical data of absolute results, it only helps, and anyway, facial averageness is somewhat governed by phenotype, and phenotype in general imo is much more important than pure ratiosIt’s the only scientifically accurate one. And dimorphism. And it’s mostly related to eyes as well.
All the “psl gods” with low averageness have less appeal.
my mannnattraction is a non scientific process, it’s non absolute, if attraction was measurable then we would see empirical data of absolute results, it only helps, and anyway, facial averageness is somewhat governed by phenotype, and phenotype in general imo is much more important than pure ratios

yes, that’s why i like dasha, you can find 1000 girls in russia that has better bones or ratios, but you can’t find that phenotype that easily, it’s hard to find a girl that genuinely looks like hermy mannn![]()
JFA is the biggest problem here
WhatJFA is the biggest problem here
So objectively she’s not fully there?yes, that’s why i like dasha, you can find 1000 girls in russia that has better bones or ratios, but you can’t find that phenotype that easily, it’s hard to find a girl that genuinely looks like her
JFA is the biggest problem here
Not eye area?Jaw Frontal Angle
noNot eye area?
It’s ass tho?