Rate Mattia Basso

moggs for 1.65 point basso, sounds fair but hes high cl borderline, im still thinking basso is a perfect mid cl
Dude you cannot tell me you can actually put Yerger and Basso within 0.25 difference. And no he would mog Basso by a whole point since Yerger stands at higher end of mcl and so does Basso but in the htn range
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: SilvioMoltisantiDan and Mansur
' insult ' why do you take it so hard to heart

if you have 2 working eyes and a healthy mind you should be able to see that the person infront of you resembles more of a female than a man, on this image at least
Trans man doing “masculine makeup” type look jfl
 
  • +1
Reactions: True Spaniard
and in inhibeth analysis is ideal too,
come on bro, average dimo is literally hella underrated, your avg joe doesnt have that jaw/fwhr/zygos etc
Feminine features can lower the dimorpho rating though even if he has some masculine features
 
  • +1
Reactions: True Spaniard and Mansur
' insult ' why do you take it so hard to heart
only argument of basso being low dimo
if you have 2 working eyes and a healthy mind you should be able to see that the person infront of you resembles more of a female than a man, on this image at least
lens distorsion
wtf? you talked literally? how t fuck you use a ruler to measure a image? what? use imagemeter dude
 
  • +1
Reactions: True Spaniard
Dude you cannot tell me you can actually put Yerger and Basso within 0.25 difference. And no he would mog Basso by a whole point since Yerger stands at higher end of mcl and so does Basso but in the htn range
basso has 86%h bro, the most important pillar, his other pillares are also solid 7+ besides of dimo
 
  • +1
Reactions: True Spaniard
moggs for 1.65 point basso, sounds fair but hes high cl borderline, im still thinking basso is a perfect mid cl
According to you, basso is within a point of dimorpho with Yerger JFL
 
  • +1
Reactions: True Spaniard and Mansur
wtf? you talked literally? how t fuck you use a ruler to measure a image? what? use imagemeter dude
too much effort, had a ruler infront of me and divided the distance
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: True Spaniard and SilvioMoltisantiDan
you got Alzheimer or smth dude?
ok, i just showed u a literally most accurate analysis of him and the midface, forehead length, lips ratios are ideal (besides mars)
what the fuck is your point, 1.05 midface? where did you even got that
 
  • +1
Reactions: True Spaniard
ok, i just showed u a literally most accurate analysis of him and the midface, forehead length, lips ratios are ideal (besides mars)
what the fuck is your point, 1.05 midface? where did you even got that
nah you know what youre right

these people are just 2 points away in terms of masculinity

1790630401511
1790630499826
1790630536759



1790630272232
 
  • +1
Reactions: SilvioMoltisantiDan, UserE_7.random and True Spaniard
basso has 86%h bro, the most important pillar, his other pillares are also solid 7+ besides of dimo
Neither of his other 3 pillars are 7+, could perhaps argue misc edges 7s but doesnt reach imo. And both dimo and ang are low 6s
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mansur
Neither of his other 3 pillars are 7+, could perhaps argue misc edges 7s but doesnt reach imo. And both dimo and ang are low 6s
his misc and ang are quite high, ang dependent on lighting but hes def lacking in dimo. Harmony isnt that high as well
 
  • +1
Reactions: SilvioMoltisantiDan and True Spaniard
Neither of his other 3 pillars are 7+, could perhaps argue misc edges 7s but doesnt reach imo. And both dimo and ang are low 6s
0 argumentns
100% ratings biased
 
  • JFL
Reactions: True Spaniard
his misc and ang are quite high, ang dependent on lighting but hes def lacking in dimo. Harmony isnt that high as well
Off-topic but I genuinely will always love discussing about autistic ratings with filthy incels on forums dude
 
  • +1
Reactions: CountPrescient and Mansur
Neither of his other 3 pillars are 7+, could perhaps argue misc edges 7s but doesnt reach imo. And both dimo and ang are low 6s
just ballparked some of his measurements and came out at about low cl, prob lower in of harmony

7.5 harm
7 ang
8.25 misc
4.5 dimo
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: SilvioMoltisantiDan and True Spaniard
just ballparked some of his measurements and came out at about low cl, prob lower in of harmony

7.5 harm
7 ang
8.25 misc
4.5 dimo
4.5 dimo what
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mansur
Off-topic but I genuinely will always love discussing about autistic ratings with filthy incels on forums dude
almost 100% of face raters have close to no knowledge about facial anatomy, incl CA faceiq and all of the other ones. Even when considering just the sheets themselves
 
  • JFL
Reactions: True Spaniard
just ballparked some of his measurements and came out at about low cl, prob lower in of harmony

7.5 harm
7 ang
8.25 misc
4.5 dimo
Nah misc and angularity are way too high and underrate on dimo. Harmony seems accurate taking onto account side and prolly media used for front is not very good either
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mansur
romulus would be someone who is closer to a 7. Has the bone structure, thinner lips and just overall more dimorphic looking
you meant his horrible forehead length,nose witdh and short midface?
 
Nah misc and angularity are way too high and underrate on dimo. Harmony seems accurate taking onto account side and prolly media used for front is not very good either
there are really no deductions in misc, maybe his skin sometimes but seems like he fixed it. I was considering even pushing it higher.
angularity isnt too high, his angularity is pretty decent in most of the lighting. Noone has good ang in bad lighting
Dimo debateable but in the low 5s at best.
 
  • +1
Reactions: True Spaniard and CountPrescient
Harmony not dimorphism. A higher forehead is more dimorphic anyway same with a bigger nose
It technically is true that men tend to have taller foreheads however I personally would disagree. My opinion doesnt matter but taller upper thirds just make the lower third appear shorter and looks less dominant overall
 
  • +1
Reactions: CountPrescient
there are really no deductions in misc, maybe his skin sometimes but seems like he fixed it. I was considering even pushing it higher.
I mean I could name a few that surely doesnt even let him stand at 7.5+. Undertones, infraorbital region health and darkness, super wide temples, assymetries, eyelash tilt, vermellion border fineness, little uee, slight scleral redness, overall unhealthy skin tone, little norwooding and certainly skipped quite a few
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mansur
I mean I could name a few that surely doesnt even let him stand at 7.5+. Undertones, infraorbital region health and darkness, super wide temples, assymetries, eyelash tilt, vermellion border fineness, little uee, slight scleral redness, overall unhealthy skin tone, little norwooding and certainly skipped quite a few
his undertones are fine, he has very mild redness thats unnoticeable, undereye region is ideal, temples isnt misc, assymetry is cope for the most part, lash tilt is even a bonus in his case as majority of people have downturned ones.

I mean if we take miscoscopic flaws obv we will be able to find everything but in social interactions the flaws are mostly unnoticeable to the human eye so there is no point in deducting for it
 

Similar threads

ascension22
Replies
1
Views
28
jbranop
jbranop
orbitlet
Replies
4
Views
59
Sett
Sett
WELOVELOOKS
Replies
1
Views
23
Vincent Freeman
Vincent Freeman
dimocel
Replies
61
Views
247
GoodLittleFoidBoy
GoodLittleFoidBoy
hexum.dnd
Replies
5
Views
51
motionmantris
motionmantris

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Zeuus5
Back
Top