Rate me 18m 5’11 been rated hhtn to chadlite before (what score wld that give me irl)

[devin_is_a__god!]

so this is the spreadsheet for both my front n side profile.
Line Metric Visual Estimate Forum Score (1-4) Notes


1 Upper third vs ideal 1.00 3 within ±2 %


2 Mid third vs ideal 1.00 3 within ±2 %


3 Lower third vs ideal 1.02 3 within ±2 %


4 FWHR 1.85 2 < 1.9 target


5 Bigonial/bizygomatic 0.78 2 < 0.8 target


6 Mid-face ratio 0.96 3 0.95-1.0


7 Chin-to-mouth 1.62 3 1.6-1.8


8 Eye spacing 1.28 3 1.25 target


9 Mouth/nose width 1.42 3 1.4-1.6


10 Profile convexity 168° 3 Class I


11 Gonial angle 121° 3 115-125°


12 Nasofrontal 129° 3 125-135°


13 Nasolabial 98° 3 90-110°


14 Cervico-mental 112° 3 105-120°


14 Canthal tilt +3° 3 positive


15 Palpebral L/W 2.85 3 ≥ 2.8


16 Upper-eyelid exposure 1 mm 4 minimal


17 Brow projection moderate 3 neutral


18 Dorsum straight 0.5 mm 3 < 1 mm


19 Tip projection (Goode) 0.58 3 0.55-0.60


20 Alar width 1.05 3 ≈ 1.0


21 Lip ratio 1:1.55 3 1:1.6


22 Lip-chin groove 4 mm 3 3-5 mm


23 Chin projection +2 mm 3 neutral


24 Symmetry dev 1.5 mm 3 < 2 mm


25 Angular yaw 1° 3 < 2°


26 Body-fat est. ~12 % 3 10-15 %


27 Skin texture visible pores 3 no scarring


28 Eye support slight hollowing 2 very slight


29 Dimorphism 7/10 3 neutral


30 Flow penalty none 3 none








Line Metric Visual Estimate Forum Score (1-4) Notes


10 Profile convexity (nasion-pogonion) 168° 3 Class I (straight)


11 Gonial angle 121° 3 115-125° ideal


12 Nasofrontal angle 129° 3 125-135° ideal


13 Cervico-mental angle 112° 3 105-120° ideal


14 Canthal tilt (lateral view) +3° 3 positive


15 Palpebral fissure L/W (side) 2.85 3 ≥ 2.8


16 Upper-eyelid exposure (side) 1 mm 4 minimal


17 Brow-bone projection (side) moderate 3 neutral


18 Dorsum straightness (side) 0.5 mm 3 < 1 mm


19 Tip projection (Goode, side) 0.58 3 0.55-0.60


20 Alar width (side) 1.05 3 ≈ 1.0


21 Lip-chin groove (side) 4 mm 3 3-5 mm


22 Chin projection (side) +2 mm 3 neutral


23 Symmetry (side) 1.5 mm 3 < 2 mm


24 Angular yaw (side) 1° 3 < 2°


25 Body-fat est. (side) ~12 % 3 10-15 %


26 Skin texture (side) visible pores 3 no scarring


27 Eye support (side) slight hollowing 2 very slight


28 Dimorphism (side) 7/10 3 neutral


29 Flow penalty (side) none 3 none

This is using forum eyeball math esp for selfies accounting for camera works visual works and camera distortion (at most a 2 to 3 percent width exaggeration) and also I forgot the method but it’s a notable one. The only reason why I’ve been rated hhtn to chad lite or just chadlite potential is cs of my many halo effects as you’ll see. (Rly good harmony decently tall good physique n rare coloring) but u tell me how u guys wld rate me.

 

[justbebetterandnotu]

mtn

 

[mirinmymonsthahh.]

decently tall good physique n rare coloring

mtn

iqlets. bro js say how tall u r without claiming hhtn

 

[ochinchin]

5.5-5.75/10

 

[mXN3L]

so this is the spreadsheet for both my front n side profile.
Line Metric Visual Estimate Forum Score (1-4) Notes


1 Upper third vs ideal 1.00 3 within ±2 %


2 Mid third vs ideal 1.00 3 within ±2 %


3 Lower third vs ideal 1.02 3 within ±2 %


4 FWHR 1.85 2 < 1.9 target


5 Bigonial/bizygomatic 0.78 2 < 0.8 target


6 Mid-face ratio 0.96 3 0.95-1.0


7 Chin-to-mouth 1.62 3 1.6-1.8


8 Eye spacing 1.28 3 1.25 target


9 Mouth/nose width 1.42 3 1.4-1.6


10 Profile convexity 168° 3 Class I


11 Gonial angle 121° 3 115-125°


12 Nasofrontal 129° 3 125-135°


13 Nasolabial 98° 3 90-110°


14 Cervico-mental 112° 3 105-120°


14 Canthal tilt +3° 3 positive


15 Palpebral L/W 2.85 3 ≥ 2.8


16 Upper-eyelid exposure 1 mm 4 minimal


17 Brow projection moderate 3 neutral


18 Dorsum straight 0.5 mm 3 < 1 mm


19 Tip projection (Goode) 0.58 3 0.55-0.60


20 Alar width 1.05 3 ≈ 1.0


21 Lip ratio 1:1.55 3 1:1.6


22 Lip-chin groove 4 mm 3 3-5 mm


23 Chin projection +2 mm 3 neutral


24 Symmetry dev 1.5 mm 3 < 2 mm


25 Angular yaw 1° 3 < 2°


26 Body-fat est. ~12 % 3 10-15 %


27 Skin texture visible pores 3 no scarring


28 Eye support slight hollowing 2 very slight


29 Dimorphism 7/10 3 neutral


30 Flow penalty none 3 none








Line Metric Visual Estimate Forum Score (1-4) Notes


10 Profile convexity (nasion-pogonion) 168° 3 Class I (straight)


11 Gonial angle 121° 3 115-125° ideal


12 Nasofrontal angle 129° 3 125-135° ideal


13 Cervico-mental angle 112° 3 105-120° ideal


14 Canthal tilt (lateral view) +3° 3 positive


15 Palpebral fissure L/W (side) 2.85 3 ≥ 2.8


16 Upper-eyelid exposure (side) 1 mm 4 minimal


17 Brow-bone projection (side) moderate 3 neutral


18 Dorsum straightness (side) 0.5 mm 3 < 1 mm


19 Tip projection (Goode, side) 0.58 3 0.55-0.60


20 Alar width (side) 1.05 3 ≈ 1.0


21 Lip-chin groove (side) 4 mm 3 3-5 mm


22 Chin projection (side) +2 mm 3 neutral


23 Symmetry (side) 1.5 mm 3 < 2 mm


24 Angular yaw (side) 1° 3 < 2°


25 Body-fat est. (side) ~12 % 3 10-15 %


26 Skin texture (side) visible pores 3 no scarring


27 Eye support (side) slight hollowing 2 very slight


28 Dimorphism (side) 7/10 3 neutral


29 Flow penalty (side) none 3 none

This is using forum eyeball math esp for selfies accounting for camera works visual works and camera distortion (at most a 2 to 3 percent width exaggeration) and also I forgot the method but it’s a notable one. The only reason why I’ve been rated hhtn to chad lite or just chadlite potential is cs of my many halo effects as you’ll see. (Rly good harmony decently tall good physique n rare coloring) but u tell me how u guys wld rate me.

nowhere near chadlite

 

[NatureEnjoyer_]

Nigga talkin Bout some cl jfl , You’re Like mmtn

 

[devin_is_a__god!]

Nigga talkin Bout some cl jfl , You’re Like mmtn

When u properly analyze my face using the harmony spreadsheet in this site I get around a 375 total even when the spreadsheet heavily favors ideals when in reality perfect scores isn’t js what goes into it
#

Metric

data

Points

1

Nasal H/W

~ideal

+5

2

Bigonial/Bizygomatic

0.78 (<0.88)

+7 / 15

3

Chin : philtrum

1.62 (good, not elite)

+8 / 12.5

4

Bitemporal width

appears normal

+3 / 5

5

Face H/W

~1.35

+15

6

FWHR

1.85 (<1.9)

+15 / 25

7

Cheekbone set

moderate-high

+18 / 25

8

Mouth : nose

1.42

+10

9

Upper third

33%

+30

10

Mid third

~33–34%

+25 / 30

11

Lower third

~33%

+30

12

Lower-third prop

~0.34

+5

13

Lip height ratio

~1:1.55

+6 / 7.5

14

Midface ratio

0.96

+9 / 10

15

Eye separation

~ideal

+30 / 35

16

Eye spacing

within range

+10

17

Canthal tilt

+3° (<5)

+15 / 30

18

Eye WHR

2.85

+8 / 10

19

Eyebrow tilt

neutral

+3 / 5

20

Eyebrow low-set

neutral

+7 / 10

21

Orbital vector

slightly positive

+6 / 7.5

22

Jaw frontal angle

~88°

+25

23

Alar angle

within

+2.5

24

Alar-jaw deviation

minimal

+7



Front subtotal 225 / 307





Side profile, mapped into 193 point system



#

Metric

Your data

Points

1

Nasofrontal

129°

+15

2

Browridge inclination

moderate

+3 / 4

3

Nasal tip angle

~108°

+4

4

Nasolabial

98°

+7 / 7.5

5

Convexity (glabella)

168°

+10

6

Convexity (nasion)

168°

+5

7

Total convexity

~140°

+7.5

8

Nasal projection

0.58

+5

9

Nasomental

~128°

+5

10

Nasofacial

~33°

+9

11

Gonial angle

121°

+40

12

Mandibular plane

~18°

+12.5

13

Ramus/mandible

~0.65

+10

14

Mentolabial

~110°

+7

15

Frankfurt plane recession

none

+5

16

Gonion vs mouth

below

+6

17

Ricketts E-line

within

+5

18

Holdaway line

within

+5

19

Steiner S-line

within

+5

20

Burstone line

within

+5

21

Submental angle

112° (>100)

+5 / 10

22

Neck/jaw width

~95%

+10





Side subtotal 150/ 193

 

[devin_is_a__god!]

nowhere near chadlite

When u properly analyze my face using the harmony spreadsheet in this site I get around a 375 total even when the spreadsheet heavily favors ideals when in reality perfect scores isn’t js what goes into it
#

Metric

data

Points

1

Nasal H/W

~ideal

+5

2

Bigonial/Bizygomatic

0.78 (<0.88)

+7 / 15

3

Chin : philtrum

1.62 (good, not elite)

+8 / 12.5

4

Bitemporal width

appears normal

+3 / 5

5

Face H/W

~1.35

+15

6

FWHR

1.85 (<1.9)

+15 / 25

7

Cheekbone set

moderate-high

+18 / 25

8

Mouth : nose

1.42

+10

9

Upper third

33%

+30

10

Mid third

~33–34%

+25 / 30

11

Lower third

~33%

+30

12

Lower-third prop

~0.34

+5

13

Lip height ratio

~1:1.55

+6 / 7.5

14

Midface ratio

0.96

+9 / 10

15

Eye separation

~ideal

+30 / 35

16

Eye spacing

within range

+10

17

Canthal tilt

+3° (<5)

+15 / 30

18

Eye WHR

2.85

+8 / 10

19

Eyebrow tilt

neutral

+3 / 5

20

Eyebrow low-set

neutral

+7 / 10

21

Orbital vector

slightly positive

+6 / 7.5

22

Jaw frontal angle

~88°

+25

23

Alar angle

within

+2.5

24

Alar-jaw deviation

minimal

+7



Front subtotal 225 / 307





Side profile, mapped into 193 point system



#

Metric

Your data

Points

1

Nasofrontal

129°

+15

2

Browridge inclination

moderate

+3 / 4

3

Nasal tip angle

~108°

+4

4

Nasolabial

98°

+7 / 7.5

5

Convexity (glabella)

168°

+10

6

Convexity (nasion)

168°

+5

7

Total convexity

~140°

+7.5

8

Nasal projection

0.58

+5

9

Nasomental

~128°

+5

10

Nasofacial

~33°

+9

11

Gonial angle

121°

+40

12

Mandibular plane

~18°

+12.5

13

Ramus/mandible

~0.65

+10

14

Mentolabial

~110°

+7

15

Frankfurt plane recession

none

+5

16

Gonion vs mouth

below

+6

17

Ricketts E-line

within

+5

18

Holdaway line

within

+5

19

Steiner S-line

within

+5

20

Burstone line

within

+5

21

Submental angle

112° (>100)

+5 / 10

22

Neck/jaw width

~95%

+10





Side subtotal 150/ 193

 

[devin_is_a__god!]

mtn

When u properly analyze my face using the harmony spreadsheet in this site I get around a 375 total even when the spreadsheet heavily favors ideals when in reality perfect scores isn’t js what goes into it
#

Metric

data

Points

1

Nasal H/W

~ideal

+5

2

Bigonial/Bizygomatic

0.78 (<0.88)

+7 / 15

3

Chin : philtrum

1.62 (good, not elite)

+8 / 12.5

4

Bitemporal width

appears normal

+3 / 5

5

Face H/W

~1.35

+15

6

FWHR

1.85 (<1.9)

+15 / 25

7

Cheekbone set

moderate-high

+18 / 25

8

Mouth : nose

1.42

+10

9

Upper third

33%

+30

10

Mid third

~33–34%

+25 / 30

11

Lower third

~33%

+30

12

Lower-third prop

~0.34

+5

13

Lip height ratio

~1:1.55

+6 / 7.5

14

Midface ratio

0.96

+9 / 10

15

Eye separation

~ideal

+30 / 35

16

Eye spacing

within range

+10

17

Canthal tilt

+3° (<5)

+15 / 30

18

Eye WHR

2.85

+8 / 10

19

Eyebrow tilt

neutral

+3 / 5

20

Eyebrow low-set

neutral

+7 / 10

21

Orbital vector

slightly positive

+6 / 7.5

22

Jaw frontal angle

~88°

+25

23

Alar angle

within

+2.5

24

Alar-jaw deviation

minimal

+7



Front subtotal 225 / 307





Side profile, mapped into 193 point system



#

Metric

Your data

Points

1

Nasofrontal

129°

+15

2

Browridge inclination

moderate

+3 / 4

3

Nasal tip angle

~108°

+4

4

Nasolabial

98°

+7 / 7.5

5

Convexity (glabella)

168°

+10

6

Convexity (nasion)

168°

+5

7

Total convexity

~140°

+7.5

8

Nasal projection

0.58

+5

9

Nasomental

~128°

+5

10

Nasofacial

~33°

+9

11

Gonial angle

121°

+40

12

Mandibular plane

~18°

+12.5

13

Ramus/mandible

~0.65

+10

14

Mentolabial

~110°

+7

15

Frankfurt plane recession

none

+5

16

Gonion vs mouth

below

+6

17

Ricketts E-line

within

+5

18

Holdaway line

within

+5

19

Steiner S-line

within

+5

20

Burstone line

within

+5

21

Submental angle

112° (>100)

+5 / 10

22

Neck/jaw width

~95%

+10





Side subtotal 150/ 193

 

[NatureEnjoyer_]

When u properly analyze my face using the harmony spreadsheet in this site I get around a 375 total even when the spreadsheet heavily favors ideals when in reality perfect scores isn’t js what goes into it
#

Metric

data

Points

1

Nasal H/W

~ideal

+5

2

Bigonial/Bizygomatic

0.78 (<0.88)

+7 / 15

3

Chin : philtrum

1.62 (good, not elite)

+8 / 12.5

4

Bitemporal width

appears normal

+3 / 5

5

Face H/W

~1.35

+15

6

FWHR

1.85 (<1.9)

+15 / 25

7

Cheekbone set

moderate-high

+18 / 25

8

Mouth : nose

1.42

+10

9

Upper third

33%

+30

10

Mid third

~33–34%

+25 / 30

11

Lower third

~33%

+30

12

Lower-third prop

~0.34

+5

13

Lip height ratio

~1:1.55

+6 / 7.5

14

Midface ratio

0.96

+9 / 10

15

Eye separation

~ideal

+30 / 35

16

Eye spacing

within range

+10

17

Canthal tilt

+3° (<5)

+15 / 30

18

Eye WHR

2.85

+8 / 10

19

Eyebrow tilt

neutral

+3 / 5

20

Eyebrow low-set

neutral

+7 / 10

21

Orbital vector

slightly positive

+6 / 7.5

22

Jaw frontal angle

~88°

+25

23

Alar angle

within

+2.5

24

Alar-jaw deviation

minimal

+7



Front subtotal 225 / 307





Side profile, mapped into 193 point system



#

Metric

Your data

Points

1

Nasofrontal

129°

+15

2

Browridge inclination

moderate

+3 / 4

3

Nasal tip angle

~108°

+4

4

Nasolabial

98°

+7 / 7.5

5

Convexity (glabella)

168°

+10

6

Convexity (nasion)

168°

+5

7

Total convexity

~140°

+7.5

8

Nasal projection

0.58

+5

9

Nasomental

~128°

+5

10

Nasofacial

~33°

+9

11

Gonial angle

121°

+40

12

Mandibular plane

~18°

+12.5

13

Ramus/mandible

~0.65

+10

14

Mentolabial

~110°

+7

15

Frankfurt plane recession

none

+5

16

Gonion vs mouth

below

+6

17

Ricketts E-line

within

+5

18

Holdaway line

within

+5

19

Steiner S-line

within

+5

20

Burstone line

within

+5

21

Submental angle

112° (>100)

+5 / 10

22

Neck/jaw width

~95%

+10





Side subtotal 150/ 193

Nigga its Not all Abt measures You have 0 harmony and Low Appeal

 

[devin_is_a__god!]

5.5-5.75/10

U actually did a proper analysis instead of just claiming im average w out actually heavily favoring ideal ratios huh. Preciate it broski

 

[devin_is_a__god!]

Nigga its Not all Abt measures You have 0 harmony and Low Appeal

so now we’re lying out of our asses. Even when I provide the proper harmony spreadsheet mind u this is a harmony spreadsheet that includes all of my data u still wanna say I have 0 harmony and appeal. When u can come at me with hard data and actually disprove my rating w ur own spreadsheet than I’ll stand wronged otherwise don’t even bother commenting

 

[mXN3L]

When u properly analyze my face using the harmony spreadsheet in this site I get around a 375 total even when the spreadsheet heavily favors ideals when in reality perfect scores isn’t js what goes into it
#

Metric

data

Points

1

Nasal H/W

~ideal

+5

2

Bigonial/Bizygomatic

0.78 (<0.88)

+7 / 15

3

Chin : philtrum

1.62 (good, not elite)

+8 / 12.5

4

Bitemporal width

appears normal

+3 / 5

5

Face H/W

~1.35

+15

6

FWHR

1.85 (<1.9)

+15 / 25

7

Cheekbone set

moderate-high

+18 / 25

8

Mouth : nose

1.42

+10

9

Upper third

33%

+30

10

Mid third

~33–34%

+25 / 30

11

Lower third

~33%

+30

12

Lower-third prop

~0.34

+5

13

Lip height ratio

~1:1.55

+6 / 7.5

14

Midface ratio

0.96

+9 / 10

15

Eye separation

~ideal

+30 / 35

16

Eye spacing

within range

+10

17

Canthal tilt

+3° (<5)

+15 / 30

18

Eye WHR

2.85

+8 / 10

19

Eyebrow tilt

neutral

+3 / 5

20

Eyebrow low-set

neutral

+7 / 10

21

Orbital vector

slightly positive

+6 / 7.5

22

Jaw frontal angle

~88°

+25

23

Alar angle

within

+2.5

24

Alar-jaw deviation

minimal

+7



Front subtotal 225 / 307





Side profile, mapped into 193 point system



#

Metric

Your data

Points

1

Nasofrontal

129°

+15

2

Browridge inclination

moderate

+3 / 4

3

Nasal tip angle

~108°

+4

4

Nasolabial

98°

+7 / 7.5

5

Convexity (glabella)

168°

+10

6

Convexity (nasion)

168°

+5

7

Total convexity

~140°

+7.5

8

Nasal projection

0.58

+5

9

Nasomental

~128°

+5

10

Nasofacial

~33°

+9

11

Gonial angle

121°

+40

12

Mandibular plane

~18°

+12.5

13

Ramus/mandible

~0.65

+10

14

Mentolabial

~110°

+7

15

Frankfurt plane recession

none

+5

16

Gonion vs mouth

below

+6

17

Ricketts E-line

within

+5

18

Holdaway line

within

+5

19

Steiner S-line

within

+5

20

Burstone line

within

+5

21

Submental angle

112° (>100)

+5 / 10

22

Neck/jaw width

~95%

+10





Side subtotal 150/ 193

keep coping

 

[Light.]

nga spits gibberish numbers that have no correlation with a rating, how can you expect something more than m mtn.

Its really weird that ur face is giving the idea of a 12 yo kid and ur physique is maxxed loll.

 

[devin_is_a__god!]

keep coping

If u call this cope even when I provide hard data n u js don’t want to do a proper analysis js don’t bother commenting when u can’t even come at me w ur own hard data

 

[TheGreatMountTai]

so this is the spreadsheet for both my front n side profile.
Line Metric Visual Estimate Forum Score (1-4) Notes


1 Upper third vs ideal 1.00 3 within ±2 %


2 Mid third vs ideal 1.00 3 within ±2 %


3 Lower third vs ideal 1.02 3 within ±2 %


4 FWHR 1.85 2 < 1.9 target


5 Bigonial/bizygomatic 0.78 2 < 0.8 target


6 Mid-face ratio 0.96 3 0.95-1.0


7 Chin-to-mouth 1.62 3 1.6-1.8


8 Eye spacing 1.28 3 1.25 target


9 Mouth/nose width 1.42 3 1.4-1.6


10 Profile convexity 168° 3 Class I


11 Gonial angle 121° 3 115-125°


12 Nasofrontal 129° 3 125-135°


13 Nasolabial 98° 3 90-110°


14 Cervico-mental 112° 3 105-120°


14 Canthal tilt +3° 3 positive


15 Palpebral L/W 2.85 3 ≥ 2.8


16 Upper-eyelid exposure 1 mm 4 minimal


17 Brow projection moderate 3 neutral


18 Dorsum straight 0.5 mm 3 < 1 mm


19 Tip projection (Goode) 0.58 3 0.55-0.60


20 Alar width 1.05 3 ≈ 1.0


21 Lip ratio 1:1.55 3 1:1.6


22 Lip-chin groove 4 mm 3 3-5 mm


23 Chin projection +2 mm 3 neutral


24 Symmetry dev 1.5 mm 3 < 2 mm


25 Angular yaw 1° 3 < 2°


26 Body-fat est. ~12 % 3 10-15 %


27 Skin texture visible pores 3 no scarring


28 Eye support slight hollowing 2 very slight


29 Dimorphism 7/10 3 neutral


30 Flow penalty none 3 none








Line Metric Visual Estimate Forum Score (1-4) Notes


10 Profile convexity (nasion-pogonion) 168° 3 Class I (straight)


11 Gonial angle 121° 3 115-125° ideal


12 Nasofrontal angle 129° 3 125-135° ideal


13 Cervico-mental angle 112° 3 105-120° ideal


14 Canthal tilt (lateral view) +3° 3 positive


15 Palpebral fissure L/W (side) 2.85 3 ≥ 2.8


16 Upper-eyelid exposure (side) 1 mm 4 minimal


17 Brow-bone projection (side) moderate 3 neutral


18 Dorsum straightness (side) 0.5 mm 3 < 1 mm


19 Tip projection (Goode, side) 0.58 3 0.55-0.60


20 Alar width (side) 1.05 3 ≈ 1.0


21 Lip-chin groove (side) 4 mm 3 3-5 mm


22 Chin projection (side) +2 mm 3 neutral


23 Symmetry (side) 1.5 mm 3 < 2 mm


24 Angular yaw (side) 1° 3 < 2°


25 Body-fat est. (side) ~12 % 3 10-15 %


26 Skin texture (side) visible pores 3 no scarring


27 Eye support (side) slight hollowing 2 very slight


28 Dimorphism (side) 7/10 3 neutral


29 Flow penalty (side) none 3 none

This is using forum eyeball math esp for selfies accounting for camera works visual works and camera distortion (at most a 2 to 3 percent width exaggeration) and also I forgot the method but it’s a notable one. The only reason why I’ve been rated hhtn to chad lite or just chadlite potential is cs of my many halo effects as you’ll see. (Rly good harmony decently tall good physique n rare coloring) but u tell me how u guys wld rate me.

U mog me to death, but chadlite is kinda high, Htn

 

[devin_is_a__god!]

nga spits gibberish numbers that have no correlation with a rating, how can you expect something more than m mtn.

Its really weird that ur face is giving the idea of a 12 yo kid and ur physique is maxxed loll.

This is my harmony spreadsheet that is provided to the community on how to actually rate facial harmony.. r u rly saying that every rating using this formula and hard data even for everyone else is not factual?

 

[mXN3L]

If u call this cope even when I provide hard data n u js don’t want to do a proper analysis js don’t bother commenting when u can’t even come at me w ur own hard data

your data is cope your face is enough you need a reality check

 

[Light.]

This is my harmony spreadsheet that is provided to the community on how to actually rate facial harmony.. r u rly saying that every rating using this formula and hard data even for everyone else is not factual?

yeah, harmony spreadsheets are cope, ive seen the most chopped mfs having better values than hernan drago for instance, and looking like shit.

you have little to no bones expect for that supraorbital torus that makes you look like a Neanderthal man.

 

[OldSpice]

so this is the spreadsheet for both my front n side profile.
Line Metric Visual Estimate Forum Score (1-4) Notes


1 Upper third vs ideal 1.00 3 within ±2 %


2 Mid third vs ideal 1.00 3 within ±2 %


3 Lower third vs ideal 1.02 3 within ±2 %


4 FWHR 1.85 2 < 1.9 target


5 Bigonial/bizygomatic 0.78 2 < 0.8 target


6 Mid-face ratio 0.96 3 0.95-1.0


7 Chin-to-mouth 1.62 3 1.6-1.8


8 Eye spacing 1.28 3 1.25 target


9 Mouth/nose width 1.42 3 1.4-1.6


10 Profile convexity 168° 3 Class I


11 Gonial angle 121° 3 115-125°


12 Nasofrontal 129° 3 125-135°


13 Nasolabial 98° 3 90-110°


14 Cervico-mental 112° 3 105-120°


14 Canthal tilt +3° 3 positive


15 Palpebral L/W 2.85 3 ≥ 2.8


16 Upper-eyelid exposure 1 mm 4 minimal


17 Brow projection moderate 3 neutral


18 Dorsum straight 0.5 mm 3 < 1 mm


19 Tip projection (Goode) 0.58 3 0.55-0.60


20 Alar width 1.05 3 ≈ 1.0


21 Lip ratio 1:1.55 3 1:1.6


22 Lip-chin groove 4 mm 3 3-5 mm


23 Chin projection +2 mm 3 neutral


24 Symmetry dev 1.5 mm 3 < 2 mm


25 Angular yaw 1° 3 < 2°


26 Body-fat est. ~12 % 3 10-15 %


27 Skin texture visible pores 3 no scarring


28 Eye support slight hollowing 2 very slight


29 Dimorphism 7/10 3 neutral


30 Flow penalty none 3 none








Line Metric Visual Estimate Forum Score (1-4) Notes


10 Profile convexity (nasion-pogonion) 168° 3 Class I (straight)


11 Gonial angle 121° 3 115-125° ideal


12 Nasofrontal angle 129° 3 125-135° ideal


13 Cervico-mental angle 112° 3 105-120° ideal


14 Canthal tilt (lateral view) +3° 3 positive


15 Palpebral fissure L/W (side) 2.85 3 ≥ 2.8


16 Upper-eyelid exposure (side) 1 mm 4 minimal


17 Brow-bone projection (side) moderate 3 neutral


18 Dorsum straightness (side) 0.5 mm 3 < 1 mm


19 Tip projection (Goode, side) 0.58 3 0.55-0.60


20 Alar width (side) 1.05 3 ≈ 1.0


21 Lip-chin groove (side) 4 mm 3 3-5 mm


22 Chin projection (side) +2 mm 3 neutral


23 Symmetry (side) 1.5 mm 3 < 2 mm


24 Angular yaw (side) 1° 3 < 2°


25 Body-fat est. (side) ~12 % 3 10-15 %


26 Skin texture (side) visible pores 3 no scarring


27 Eye support (side) slight hollowing 2 very slight


28 Dimorphism (side) 7/10 3 neutral


29 Flow penalty (side) none 3 none

This is using forum eyeball math esp for selfies accounting for camera works visual works and camera distortion (at most a 2 to 3 percent width exaggeration) and also I forgot the method but it’s a notable one. The only reason why I’ve been rated hhtn to chad lite or just chadlite potential is cs of my many halo effects as you’ll see. (Rly good harmony decently tall good physique n rare coloring) but u tell me how u guys wld rate me.

didn't read much but did u use incel solutions by chance?

 

[C - M]

really weird that ur face is giving the idea of a 12 yo kid and ur physique is maxxed loll.

haha fr chad physique pre puberty face

 

[donpuro]

you retarded fag chadlite in the filthiest shit filled slums of new delhi keep fucking coping

 

[devin_is_a__god!]

U mog me to death, but chadlite is kinda high, Htn

yeah figured

your data is cope your face is enough you need a reality check

Js say u can’t accept the hard data and end it at that. Until u can actually provide ur own hard data ur rating is bunk asf

yeah, harmony spreadsheets are cope, ive seen the most chopped mfs having better values than hernan drago for instance, and looking like shit.

you have little to no bones expect for that supraorbital torus that makes you look like a Neanderthal man.

the only reason why I provided the spreadsheet is cs it’s hard data provided by the community to actually rate faces. Now if this is cope ok maybe I can accept that but even js eyeballing my face u can see I still have a dimorphic face and a good face overall. Doesn’t change the fact that I clearly have weak points n I’m a bit bloated as u can tell w out doing any of the notable soft maxes. Mind u these r not the best photos of myself n it’s quite frankly in shit lighting. Irl I look a whole lot better n in motion too

 

[devin_is_a__god!]

didn't read much but did u use incel solutions by chance?

U do a proper analysis of my face n come back w out the sarcasm that needs work. But points for trying.

 

[devin_is_a__god!]

you retarded fag chadlite in the filthiest shit filled slums of new delhi keep fucking coping

is this the new form of coping around here?

 

[hyperbeast]

Dnr all these irrepevant ratios, if you look like a chadlite you are chadlite

 

[notthatserious]

so now we’re lying out of our asses. Even when I provide the proper harmony spreadsheet mind u this is a harmony spreadsheet that includes all of my data u still wanna say I have 0 harmony and appeal. When u can come at me with hard data and actually disprove my rating w ur own spreadsheet than I’ll stand wronged otherwise don’t even bother commenting

nigga stop coping with the fucking metrics, mmtn, 0 appeal, ginger cunt rope maxx

 

[Light.]

yeah figured

Js say u can’t accept the hard data and end it at that. Until u can actually provide ur own hard data ur rating is bunk asf

the only reason why I provided the spreadsheet is cs it’s hard data provided by the community to actually rate faces. Now if this is cope ok maybe I can accept that but even js eyeballing my face u can see I still have a dimorphic face and a good face overall. Doesn’t change the fact that I clearly have weak points n I’m a bit bloated as u can tell w out doing any of the notable soft maxes. Mind u these r not the best photos of myself n it’s quite frankly in shit lighting. Irl I look a whole lot better n in motion too

so what would u rate urself then, im interested.. since seems u cant accept m mtn

 

[Futurehtn777]

ur ltn , however u ll day tomorrow so its over

 

[OldSpice]

U do a proper analysis of my face n come back w out the sarcasm that needs work. But points for trying.

bro why are u getting so pressed? I askd if u used a ratings website chill bro

 

[daxhAzcs]

so this is the spreadsheet for both my front n side profile.
Line Metric Visual Estimate Forum Score (1-4) Notes


1 Upper third vs ideal 1.00 3 within ±2 %


2 Mid third vs ideal 1.00 3 within ±2 %


3 Lower third vs ideal 1.02 3 within ±2 %


4 FWHR 1.85 2 < 1.9 target


5 Bigonial/bizygomatic 0.78 2 < 0.8 target


6 Mid-face ratio 0.96 3 0.95-1.0


7 Chin-to-mouth 1.62 3 1.6-1.8


8 Eye spacing 1.28 3 1.25 target


9 Mouth/nose width 1.42 3 1.4-1.6


10 Profile convexity 168° 3 Class I


11 Gonial angle 121° 3 115-125°


12 Nasofrontal 129° 3 125-135°


13 Nasolabial 98° 3 90-110°


14 Cervico-mental 112° 3 105-120°


14 Canthal tilt +3° 3 positive


15 Palpebral L/W 2.85 3 ≥ 2.8


16 Upper-eyelid exposure 1 mm 4 minimal


17 Brow projection moderate 3 neutral


18 Dorsum straight 0.5 mm 3 < 1 mm


19 Tip projection (Goode) 0.58 3 0.55-0.60


20 Alar width 1.05 3 ≈ 1.0


21 Lip ratio 1:1.55 3 1:1.6


22 Lip-chin groove 4 mm 3 3-5 mm


23 Chin projection +2 mm 3 neutral


24 Symmetry dev 1.5 mm 3 < 2 mm


25 Angular yaw 1° 3 < 2°


26 Body-fat est. ~12 % 3 10-15 %


27 Skin texture visible pores 3 no scarring


28 Eye support slight hollowing 2 very slight


29 Dimorphism 7/10 3 neutral


30 Flow penalty none 3 none








Line Metric Visual Estimate Forum Score (1-4) Notes


10 Profile convexity (nasion-pogonion) 168° 3 Class I (straight)


11 Gonial angle 121° 3 115-125° ideal


12 Nasofrontal angle 129° 3 125-135° ideal


13 Cervico-mental angle 112° 3 105-120° ideal


14 Canthal tilt (lateral view) +3° 3 positive


15 Palpebral fissure L/W (side) 2.85 3 ≥ 2.8


16 Upper-eyelid exposure (side) 1 mm 4 minimal


17 Brow-bone projection (side) moderate 3 neutral


18 Dorsum straightness (side) 0.5 mm 3 < 1 mm


19 Tip projection (Goode, side) 0.58 3 0.55-0.60


20 Alar width (side) 1.05 3 ≈ 1.0


21 Lip-chin groove (side) 4 mm 3 3-5 mm


22 Chin projection (side) +2 mm 3 neutral


23 Symmetry (side) 1.5 mm 3 < 2 mm


24 Angular yaw (side) 1° 3 < 2°


25 Body-fat est. (side) ~12 % 3 10-15 %


26 Skin texture (side) visible pores 3 no scarring


27 Eye support (side) slight hollowing 2 very slight


28 Dimorphism (side) 7/10 3 neutral


29 Flow penalty (side) none 3 none

This is using forum eyeball math esp for selfies accounting for camera works visual works and camera distortion (at most a 2 to 3 percent width exaggeration) and also I forgot the method but it’s a notable one. The only reason why I’ve been rated hhtn to chad lite or just chadlite potential is cs of my many halo effects as you’ll see. (Rly good harmony decently tall good physique n rare coloring) but u tell me how u guys wld rate me.

high ltn gym cel

 

[jaaba]

so this is the spreadsheet for both my front n side profile.
Line Metric Visual Estimate Forum Score (1-4) Notes


1 Upper third vs ideal 1.00 3 within ±2 %


2 Mid third vs ideal 1.00 3 within ±2 %


3 Lower third vs ideal 1.02 3 within ±2 %


4 FWHR 1.85 2 < 1.9 target


5 Bigonial/bizygomatic 0.78 2 < 0.8 target


6 Mid-face ratio 0.96 3 0.95-1.0


7 Chin-to-mouth 1.62 3 1.6-1.8


8 Eye spacing 1.28 3 1.25 target


9 Mouth/nose width 1.42 3 1.4-1.6


10 Profile convexity 168° 3 Class I


11 Gonial angle 121° 3 115-125°


12 Nasofrontal 129° 3 125-135°


13 Nasolabial 98° 3 90-110°


14 Cervico-mental 112° 3 105-120°


14 Canthal tilt +3° 3 positive


15 Palpebral L/W 2.85 3 ≥ 2.8


16 Upper-eyelid exposure 1 mm 4 minimal


17 Brow projection moderate 3 neutral


18 Dorsum straight 0.5 mm 3 < 1 mm


19 Tip projection (Goode) 0.58 3 0.55-0.60


20 Alar width 1.05 3 ≈ 1.0


21 Lip ratio 1:1.55 3 1:1.6


22 Lip-chin groove 4 mm 3 3-5 mm


23 Chin projection +2 mm 3 neutral


24 Symmetry dev 1.5 mm 3 < 2 mm


25 Angular yaw 1° 3 < 2°


26 Body-fat est. ~12 % 3 10-15 %


27 Skin texture visible pores 3 no scarring


28 Eye support slight hollowing 2 very slight


29 Dimorphism 7/10 3 neutral


30 Flow penalty none 3 none








Line Metric Visual Estimate Forum Score (1-4) Notes


10 Profile convexity (nasion-pogonion) 168° 3 Class I (straight)


11 Gonial angle 121° 3 115-125° ideal


12 Nasofrontal angle 129° 3 125-135° ideal


13 Cervico-mental angle 112° 3 105-120° ideal


14 Canthal tilt (lateral view) +3° 3 positive


15 Palpebral fissure L/W (side) 2.85 3 ≥ 2.8


16 Upper-eyelid exposure (side) 1 mm 4 minimal


17 Brow-bone projection (side) moderate 3 neutral


18 Dorsum straightness (side) 0.5 mm 3 < 1 mm


19 Tip projection (Goode, side) 0.58 3 0.55-0.60


20 Alar width (side) 1.05 3 ≈ 1.0


21 Lip-chin groove (side) 4 mm 3 3-5 mm


22 Chin projection (side) +2 mm 3 neutral


23 Symmetry (side) 1.5 mm 3 < 2 mm


24 Angular yaw (side) 1° 3 < 2°


25 Body-fat est. (side) ~12 % 3 10-15 %


26 Skin texture (side) visible pores 3 no scarring


27 Eye support (side) slight hollowing 2 very slight


28 Dimorphism (side) 7/10 3 neutral


29 Flow penalty (side) none 3 none

This is using forum eyeball math esp for selfies accounting for camera works visual works and camera distortion (at most a 2 to 3 percent width exaggeration) and also I forgot the method but it’s a notable one. The only reason why I’ve been rated hhtn to chad lite or just chadlite potential is cs of my many halo effects as you’ll see. (Rly good harmony decently tall good physique n rare coloring) but u tell me how u guys wld rate me.

HLTN you aren’t anywhere near CL

 

[devin_is_a__god!]

so what would u rate urself then, im interested.. since seems u cant accept m mtn

I’ve been rated countless times as mhtn to hhtn its a simple fact n I’ve experienced what its like to be ugly average n above average u can say. I only posted this js to be curious but i rly dont gain nth from interacting w this further cs ik i look good n Ive never had people tell me i look bad as I am rn. Appeal for u guys is diff but truth be told girls don’t rly care abt allat esp taken to these extremes. U have a good face or not n that goes for bone structure too. looks get u in first it’s how u carry urself and make em feel. But again that only works if ur actually attractive.

 

[devin_is_a__god!]

I’ve been rated countless times as mhtn to hhtn its a simple fact n I’ve experienced what its like to be ugly average n above average u can say. I only posted this js to be curious but i rly dont gain nth from interacting w this further cs ik i look good n Ive never had people tell me i look bad as I am rn. Appeal for u guys is diff but truth be told girls don’t rly care abt allat esp taken to these extremes. U have a good face or not n that goes for bone structure too. looks get u in first it’s how u carry urself and make em feel. But again that only works if ur actually attractive.

But again this is just me growing up it’s all genetics my mom was a model and my dad was a good looking guy esp even now as he’s turned 53

 

[devin_is_a__god!]

high ltn gym cel

I mean like u can stamp that type of rating onto me but no metrics or nth r being involved even when I prove by hard data that I am that it js rly makes no sense to me how this forum n website rly is when there’s no proof being shown. Seems to me it’s js ego n overly critical criticism w out any hard data.

HLTN you aren’t anywhere near CL

bro why are u getting so pressed? I askd if u used a ratings website chill bro

I didn’t use a website i measured every ratio myself n even fact checked it js to make sure. I js have overall good harmony n flow n before u say i dont any good rater wldnt actually heavily idealize or favor ideal ratios n instead look at the face overall and how it flows and see what works rly well. As u can see many of my ratios r actually ideal esp the important ones n the rest are slightly below ideal which shouldn’t automatically disqualify the whole score. Its simple rly.

ur ltn , however u ll day tomorrow so its over

 

[redgreenblue]

hltn gymcel

 

[NatureEnjoyer_]

so now we’re lying out of our asses. Even when I provide the proper harmony spreadsheet mind u this is a harmony spreadsheet that includes all of my data u still wanna say I have 0 harmony and appeal. When u can come at me with hard data and actually disprove my rating w ur own spreadsheet than I’ll stand wronged otherwise don’t even bother commenting

Nigga you Look like a fucking retard and used some Random incel harmony spreadsheet

 

[Firstname.Lastname]

Low Bodyfat, + amazing physique carrying you.

Your face looks like a 12 year old thou so kind hard to rate forsure not chad lite. Chad lite as hair on his balls.

Not much work to do though. Almost everyone who post rate me threads needs a fucking rhinoplasty. Your the first one that looks like you don't.

Tint your eyebrows a bit darker. Fix your skin, looks like mila or comedones ask a deerm. For fuck sake get your face laser to remove the massive amounts of red huge. 3ish rounds of vbeam/advatx should knock all the red tones out.

Then grow hair on your balls.

 

[Firstname.Lastname]

Oh yeah and keep this in mind. Since your face isn’t sexually mature yet it is going to go through significant change still. So who knows how you’ll look after that .

 

[devin_is_a__god!]

Low Bodyfat, + amazing physique carrying you.

Your face looks like a 12 year old thou so kind hard to rate forsure not chad lite. Chad lite as hair on his balls.

Not much work to do though. Almost everyone who post rate me threads needs a fucking rhinoplasty. Your the first one that looks like you don't.

Tint your eyebrows a bit darker. Fix your skin, looks like mila or comedones ask a deerm. For fuck sake get your face laser to remove the massive amounts of red huge. 3ish rounds of vbeam/advatx should knock all the red tones out.

Then grow hair on your balls.

type shi I have a huge baby face for some reason my dad had one too but he looks rly good rn even at 53 which I consider a blessing. still going thru changes as u can see that I’m 17 rn js about to turn 18 in 3 months so still smth to look forward to but other than that Preciate it.

 

[devin_is_a__god!]

Nigga you Look like a fucking retard and used some Random incel harmony spreadsheet

Oh boy when r the insults gonna stop n the hard data actually come thru. I already told u wsp js be a good boy n stfu already even if u ain’t got nth else going for u other than to shit on other people w no proof to back it up js to satisfy ur fragile twink boy ego

 

[EthnicCopemaxxer]

@Ascension_incoming thoughts

 

[orbicularis]

Nice nt post mirin

 

[Ascension_incoming]

@Ascension_incoming thoughts

Would say around mmtn is harmony is great but wouldn't make him cl because dimorphism + angularity are also very important. Mirin physique

 

[OldSpice]

I didn’t use a website i measured every ratio myself n even fact checked it js to make sure. I js have overall good harmony n flow n before u say i dont any good rater wldnt actually heavily idealize or favor ideal ratios n instead look at the face overall and how it flows and see what works rly well. As u can see many of my ratios r actually ideal esp the important ones n the rest are slightly below ideal which shouldn’t automatically disqualify the whole score. Its simple rly.

 

[devin_is_a__god!]

This isn’t actual rating u do realize that right? This again is a common case of heavily favoring ideal ratios esp on a website that doesn’t even account for camera works visual angles or any significant rating format. and calling it significantly flawed js cs it’s not in the ideal ratios. That’s like saying chicos face or Jordan Barrett’s face is mid js cs some of their ratios being sub ideal. That’s an extreme example but to put it into perspective js off of holistic eyeballing my features all flow tgth rly well already n if one ratio was off from what it was right now I’d look comical. That’s how harmony works. N js to further prove my point, everyone of my ratios sits inside ideal ±5 %, not “noticeably flawed” as this website is saying it is. I would stop rating faces off of websites and actually measure the ratios urself and learn how to do allat which I’ve previously mentioned before

 

[devin_is_a__god!]

This isn’t actual rating u do realize that right? This again is a common case of heavily favoring ideal ratios esp on a website that doesn’t even account for camera works visual angles or any significant rating format. and calling it significantly flawed js cs it’s not in the ideal ratios. That’s like saying chicos face or Jordan Barrett’s face is mid js cs some of their ratios being sub ideal. That’s an extreme example but to put it into perspective js off of holistic eyeballing my features all flow tgth rly well already n if one ratio was off from what it was right now I’d look comical. That’s how harmony works. N js to further prove my point, everyone of my ratios sits inside ideal ±5 %, not “noticeably flawed” as this website is saying it is. I would stop rating faces off of websites and actually measure the ratios urself and learn how to do allat which I’ve previously mentioned before

 

[abzz]

so this is the spreadsheet for both my front n side profile.
Line Metric Visual Estimate Forum Score (1-4) Notes


1 Upper third vs ideal 1.00 3 within ±2 %


2 Mid third vs ideal 1.00 3 within ±2 %


3 Lower third vs ideal 1.02 3 within ±2 %


4 FWHR 1.85 2 < 1.9 target


5 Bigonial/bizygomatic 0.78 2 < 0.8 target


6 Mid-face ratio 0.96 3 0.95-1.0


7 Chin-to-mouth 1.62 3 1.6-1.8


8 Eye spacing 1.28 3 1.25 target


9 Mouth/nose width 1.42 3 1.4-1.6


10 Profile convexity 168° 3 Class I


11 Gonial angle 121° 3 115-125°


12 Nasofrontal 129° 3 125-135°


13 Nasolabial 98° 3 90-110°


14 Cervico-mental 112° 3 105-120°


14 Canthal tilt +3° 3 positive


15 Palpebral L/W 2.85 3 ≥ 2.8


16 Upper-eyelid exposure 1 mm 4 minimal


17 Brow projection moderate 3 neutral


18 Dorsum straight 0.5 mm 3 < 1 mm


19 Tip projection (Goode) 0.58 3 0.55-0.60


20 Alar width 1.05 3 ≈ 1.0


21 Lip ratio 1:1.55 3 1:1.6


22 Lip-chin groove 4 mm 3 3-5 mm


23 Chin projection +2 mm 3 neutral


24 Symmetry dev 1.5 mm 3 < 2 mm


25 Angular yaw 1° 3 < 2°


26 Body-fat est. ~12 % 3 10-15 %


27 Skin texture visible pores 3 no scarring


28 Eye support slight hollowing 2 very slight


29 Dimorphism 7/10 3 neutral


30 Flow penalty none 3 none








Line Metric Visual Estimate Forum Score (1-4) Notes


10 Profile convexity (nasion-pogonion) 168° 3 Class I (straight)


11 Gonial angle 121° 3 115-125° ideal


12 Nasofrontal angle 129° 3 125-135° ideal


13 Cervico-mental angle 112° 3 105-120° ideal


14 Canthal tilt (lateral view) +3° 3 positive


15 Palpebral fissure L/W (side) 2.85 3 ≥ 2.8


16 Upper-eyelid exposure (side) 1 mm 4 minimal


17 Brow-bone projection (side) moderate 3 neutral


18 Dorsum straightness (side) 0.5 mm 3 < 1 mm


19 Tip projection (Goode, side) 0.58 3 0.55-0.60


20 Alar width (side) 1.05 3 ≈ 1.0


21 Lip-chin groove (side) 4 mm 3 3-5 mm


22 Chin projection (side) +2 mm 3 neutral


23 Symmetry (side) 1.5 mm 3 < 2 mm


24 Angular yaw (side) 1° 3 < 2°


25 Body-fat est. (side) ~12 % 3 10-15 %


26 Skin texture (side) visible pores 3 no scarring


27 Eye support (side) slight hollowing 2 very slight


28 Dimorphism (side) 7/10 3 neutral


29 Flow penalty (side) none 3 none

This is using forum eyeball math esp for selfies accounting for camera works visual works and camera distortion (at most a 2 to 3 percent width exaggeration) and also I forgot the method but it’s a notable one. The only reason why I’ve been rated hhtn to chad lite or just chadlite potential is cs of my many halo effects as you’ll see. (Rly good harmony decently tall good physique n rare coloring) but u tell me how u guys wld rate me.

did chatgpt rate you jfl

nice frame tho but Ur mtn

 

[devin_is_a__god!]

did chatgpt rate you jfl

nice frame tho but Ur mtn

I mean u can say what u wanna say but it’s quite simple chat gpt didn’t rate me I used a format that is commonly used n even converted it to another commonly used harmony format that is provided on this website n had many people measure my ratios and fact check everything while accounting for basic camera works and visual angles and a bit of distortion. It’s basic forum eyeball math. Be my guest tho try to get this type of rating from chat gpt n come back n prove me wrong lol

 

[abzz]

I mean u can say what u wanna say but it’s quite simple chat gpt didn’t rate me I used a format that is commonly used n even converted it to another commonly used harmony format that is provided on this website n had many people measure my ratios and fact check everything while accounting for basic camera works and visual angles and a bit of distortion. It’s basic forum eyeball math. Be my guest tho try to get this type of rating from chat gpt n come back n prove me wrong lol

yes you're right, i can say what i want. bullshit isn't tolerated on here, and rightfully so. stop being a fucking dumbass and believing these hyperinflated ratings. you're an average guy with body halo, just admit it instead of coping. fucking hell what a waste of space

@swaggers @xzylecrey this pmo