Rate me 18m 5’11 been rated hhtn to chadlite before (what score wld that give me irl)

[devin_is_a__god!]

alright faggot, keep being a faggot and see if the girls you get like faggot boys im so intimidated by this ginger faggot who is shorter than me woowww.

i proved that you're MTN, as everyone here is telling that you're MTN. you just fucking admitted in an earlier post that you're average the memory loss is evident here clearly.

How did this all start? Oh js by asking u to do a simple rating n present hard facts n data. But u js dont. Again its js insults w u n tbf i did go lower. But besides the point cs u can’t even rate properly n instead go off other peoples words n js mindlessly insult n even concede me .5 psl all the way to mmtn to hmtn when before u js called me a ltn. Learn to actually be good at what u so call pride urself in before replying to me more. Shit even I’m better than u n I js started researching looksmaxing. Rly goes to show what u actually do on this forum.

 

[devin_is_a__god!]

How did this all start? Oh js by asking u to do a simple rating n present hard facts n data. But u js dont. Again its js insults w u n tbf i did go lower. But besides the point cs u can’t even rate properly n instead go off other peoples words n js mindlessly insult n even concede me .5 psl all the way to mmtn to hmtn when before u js called me a ltn. Learn to actually be good at what u so call pride urself in before replying to me more. Shit even I’m better than u n I js started researching looksmaxing. Rly goes to show what u actually do on this forum.

N I’m srs ending it off at this. I’ve already admitted everything yes I’m average. Yes I have flaws. Yes I wldnt trade my face for no other face. Yes im a mmtn n hmtn w out looksmaxing. Maybe I do have potential. But furthering on w this community n insulting each other isnt rly the point but I Preciate the good laugh at least. Thanks for amusing me

 

[random subhuman]

so this is the spreadsheet for both my front n side profile.
Line Metric Visual Estimate Forum Score (1-4) Notes


1 Upper third vs ideal 1.00 3 within ±2 %


2 Mid third vs ideal 1.00 3 within ±2 %


3 Lower third vs ideal 1.02 3 within ±2 %


4 FWHR 1.85 2 < 1.9 target


5 Bigonial/bizygomatic 0.78 2 < 0.8 target


6 Mid-face ratio 0.96 3 0.95-1.0


7 Chin-to-mouth 1.62 3 1.6-1.8


8 Eye spacing 1.28 3 1.25 target


9 Mouth/nose width 1.42 3 1.4-1.6


10 Profile convexity 168° 3 Class I


11 Gonial angle 121° 3 115-125°


12 Nasofrontal 129° 3 125-135°


13 Nasolabial 98° 3 90-110°


14 Cervico-mental 112° 3 105-120°


14 Canthal tilt +3° 3 positive


15 Palpebral L/W 2.85 3 ≥ 2.8


16 Upper-eyelid exposure 1 mm 4 minimal


17 Brow projection moderate 3 neutral


18 Dorsum straight 0.5 mm 3 < 1 mm


19 Tip projection (Goode) 0.58 3 0.55-0.60


20 Alar width 1.05 3 ≈ 1.0


21 Lip ratio 1:1.55 3 1:1.6


22 Lip-chin groove 4 mm 3 3-5 mm


23 Chin projection +2 mm 3 neutral


24 Symmetry dev 1.5 mm 3 < 2 mm


25 Angular yaw 1° 3 < 2°


26 Body-fat est. ~12 % 3 10-15 %


27 Skin texture visible pores 3 no scarring


28 Eye support slight hollowing 2 very slight


29 Dimorphism 7/10 3 neutral


30 Flow penalty none 3 none








Line Metric Visual Estimate Forum Score (1-4) Notes


10 Profile convexity (nasion-pogonion) 168° 3 Class I (straight)


11 Gonial angle 121° 3 115-125° ideal


12 Nasofrontal angle 129° 3 125-135° ideal


13 Cervico-mental angle 112° 3 105-120° ideal


14 Canthal tilt (lateral view) +3° 3 positive


15 Palpebral fissure L/W (side) 2.85 3 ≥ 2.8


16 Upper-eyelid exposure (side) 1 mm 4 minimal


17 Brow-bone projection (side) moderate 3 neutral


18 Dorsum straightness (side) 0.5 mm 3 < 1 mm


19 Tip projection (Goode, side) 0.58 3 0.55-0.60


20 Alar width (side) 1.05 3 ≈ 1.0


21 Lip-chin groove (side) 4 mm 3 3-5 mm


22 Chin projection (side) +2 mm 3 neutral


23 Symmetry (side) 1.5 mm 3 < 2 mm


24 Angular yaw (side) 1° 3 < 2°


25 Body-fat est. (side) ~12 % 3 10-15 %


26 Skin texture (side) visible pores 3 no scarring


27 Eye support (side) slight hollowing 2 very slight


28 Dimorphism (side) 7/10 3 neutral


29 Flow penalty (side) none 3 none

This is using forum eyeball math esp for selfies accounting for camera works visual works and camera distortion (at most a 2 to 3 percent width exaggeration) and also I forgot the method but it’s a notable one. The only reason why I’ve been rated hhtn to chad lite or just chadlite potential is cs of my many halo effects as you’ll see. (Rly good harmony decently tall good physique n rare coloring) but u tell me how u guys wld rate me.

Dnr

 

[abzz!]

How did this all start? Oh js by asking u to do a simple rating n present hard facts n data. But u js dont. Again its js insults w u n tbf i did go lower. But besides the point cs u can’t even rate properly n instead go off other peoples words n js mindlessly insult n even concede me .5 psl all the way to mmtn to hmtn when before u js called me a ltn. Learn to actually be good at what u so call pride urself in before replying to me more. Shit even I’m better than u n I js started researching looksmaxing. Rly goes to show what u actually do on this forum.

N I’m srs ending it off at this. I’ve already admitted everything yes I’m average. Yes I have flaws. Yes I wldnt trade my face for no other face. Yes im a mmtn n hmtn w out looksmaxing. Maybe I do have potential. But furthering on w this community n insulting each other isnt rly the point but I Preciate the good laugh at least. Thanks for amusing me

i didn't call you an LTN you retarded faggot. learn how to read and use the forum before questioning people's intelligence, you incapable fuck. if you truly understand that you're an average guy, you wouldn't be arguing with people who agree with you. genuinely pisses me off how retarded some of these people are

 

[goycattleclavfans]

so this is the spreadsheet for both my front n side profile.
Line Metric Visual Estimate Forum Score (1-4) Notes


1 Upper third vs ideal 1.00 3 within ±2 %


2 Mid third vs ideal 1.00 3 within ±2 %


3 Lower third vs ideal 1.02 3 within ±2 %


4 FWHR 1.85 2 < 1.9 target


5 Bigonial/bizygomatic 0.78 2 < 0.8 target


6 Mid-face ratio 0.96 3 0.95-1.0


7 Chin-to-mouth 1.62 3 1.6-1.8


8 Eye spacing 1.28 3 1.25 target


9 Mouth/nose width 1.42 3 1.4-1.6


10 Profile convexity 168° 3 Class I


11 Gonial angle 121° 3 115-125°


12 Nasofrontal 129° 3 125-135°


13 Nasolabial 98° 3 90-110°


14 Cervico-mental 112° 3 105-120°


14 Canthal tilt +3° 3 positive


15 Palpebral L/W 2.85 3 ≥ 2.8


16 Upper-eyelid exposure 1 mm 4 minimal


17 Brow projection moderate 3 neutral


18 Dorsum straight 0.5 mm 3 < 1 mm


19 Tip projection (Goode) 0.58 3 0.55-0.60


20 Alar width 1.05 3 ≈ 1.0


21 Lip ratio 1:1.55 3 1:1.6


22 Lip-chin groove 4 mm 3 3-5 mm


23 Chin projection +2 mm 3 neutral


24 Symmetry dev 1.5 mm 3 < 2 mm


25 Angular yaw 1° 3 < 2°


26 Body-fat est. ~12 % 3 10-15 %


27 Skin texture visible pores 3 no scarring


28 Eye support slight hollowing 2 very slight


29 Dimorphism 7/10 3 neutral


30 Flow penalty none 3 none








Line Metric Visual Estimate Forum Score (1-4) Notes


10 Profile convexity (nasion-pogonion) 168° 3 Class I (straight)


11 Gonial angle 121° 3 115-125° ideal


12 Nasofrontal angle 129° 3 125-135° ideal


13 Cervico-mental angle 112° 3 105-120° ideal


14 Canthal tilt (lateral view) +3° 3 positive


15 Palpebral fissure L/W (side) 2.85 3 ≥ 2.8


16 Upper-eyelid exposure (side) 1 mm 4 minimal


17 Brow-bone projection (side) moderate 3 neutral


18 Dorsum straightness (side) 0.5 mm 3 < 1 mm


19 Tip projection (Goode, side) 0.58 3 0.55-0.60


20 Alar width (side) 1.05 3 ≈ 1.0


21 Lip-chin groove (side) 4 mm 3 3-5 mm


22 Chin projection (side) +2 mm 3 neutral


23 Symmetry (side) 1.5 mm 3 < 2 mm


24 Angular yaw (side) 1° 3 < 2°


25 Body-fat est. (side) ~12 % 3 10-15 %


26 Skin texture (side) visible pores 3 no scarring


27 Eye support (side) slight hollowing 2 very slight


28 Dimorphism (side) 7/10 3 neutral


29 Flow penalty (side) none 3 none

This is using forum eyeball math esp for selfies accounting for camera works visual works and camera distortion (at most a 2 to 3 percent width exaggeration) and also I forgot the method but it’s a notable one. The only reason why I’ve been rated hhtn to chad lite or just chadlite potential is cs of my many halo effects as you’ll see. (Rly good harmony decently tall good physique n rare coloring) but u tell me how u guys wld rate me.

Mtn jfl Chadlite my ass

 

[devin_is_a__god!]

i didn't call you an LTN you retarded faggot. learn how to read and use the forum before questioning people's intelligence, you incapable fuck. if you truly understand that you're an average guy, you wouldn't be arguing with people who agree with you. genuinely pisses me off how retarded some of these people are

How needy r u to require my attention further from this point on lol? Its embarrassing how ur talking to urself atp after I already ended it

 

[devin_is_a__god!]

Mtn jfl Chadlite my ass

We’ve made this clear already n tbf I’ve gotten many different ratings but from what I’ve seen from actual credible raters n whatnot. I’m comfortably mmtn to hmtn w out any looksmaxing nor any experience in this other than js rating so I’d say I’d at least have hhtn potential to maybe cl potential after maturing growing n doing soft maxes

 

[devin_is_a__god!]

We’ve made this clear already n tbf I’ve gotten many different ratings but from what I’ve seen from actual credible raters n whatnot. I’m comfortably mmtn to hmtn w out any looksmaxing nor any experience in this other than js rating so I’d say I’d at least have hhtn potential to maybe cl potential after maturing growing n doing soft maxes

N u can check the forum or whatnot or other ones n replies n people have said overall I have a good facial structure and good/great harmony

 

[devin_is_a__god!]

lmtn

We’ve made this clear already n tbf I’ve gotten many different ratings but from what I’ve seen from actual credible raters n whatnot. I’m comfortably mmtn to hmtn w out any looksmaxing nor any experience in this other than js rating so I’d say I’d at least have hhtn potential to maybe cl potential after maturing growing n doing soft maxes

N u can check the forum or whatnot or other ones n replies n people have said overall I have a good facial structure and good/great harmony

 

[abzz!]

How needy r u to require my attention further from this point on lol? Its embarrassing how ur talking to urself atp after I already ended it

yeah you've run out of copium it seems

go fuck yourself in the ass you little faggot, you started by replying to me. worthless piece of shit, i hope your parents are proud for creating such an egotistical ginger who can't take any criticism without feeling the need to fire back with his room temperature IQ.

fuck you.

 

[goycattleclavfans]

We’ve made this clear already n tbf I’ve gotten many different ratings but from what I’ve seen from actual credible raters n whatnot. I’m comfortably mmtn to hmtn w out any looksmaxing nor any experience in this other than js rating so I’d say I’d at least have hhtn potential to maybe cl potential after maturing growing n doing soft maxes

go fuck urself ur not even hmtn and you don’t have that potential that you cling onto at night broe

 

[devin_is_a__god!]

go fuck urself ur not even hmtn and you don’t have that potential that you cling onto at night broe

Yh I’ll continue fucking myself or whatnot. Don’t rly care lol unless u can show proof. Otherwise js don’t even embarrass urself like other dudes. While I’m doing my own thing n improving myself u keep doing what u know to do. Maybe take ur own advice n whatnot. People can say a lot but never actually fact check it. Also mind u i plan to actually provide smth useful to this community towards building a physique since theres a lot of misconception, also the area I expertise in, n from someone who genuienly had a shit physique before n was seen as hopeless there’s always potential for someone else too. Same prolly goes for my face too but never actually had an issue w it that only u people see w it ig. Preciate the comment tho lol

 

[devin_is_a__god!]

Honestly I don’t think Chad would be such a little bitch.

I swear u was chill before. What’s w the switch up hm? N yes I sure am such a lil bitch. I don’t see what u gain from insulting me after actually giving pretty useful input before. What do u rly gain?

 

[goycattleclavfans]

Yh I’ll continue fucking myself or whatnot. Don’t rly care lol unless u can show proof. Otherwise js don’t even embarrass urself like other dudes. While I’m doing my own thing n improving myself u keep doing what u know to do. Maybe take ur own advice n whatnot. People can say a lot but never actually fact check it. Also mind u i plan to actually provide smth useful to this community towards building a physique since theres a lot of misconception, also the area I expertise in, n from someone who genuienly had a shit physique before n was seen as hopeless there’s always potential for someone else too. Same prolly goes for my face too but never actually had an issue w it that only u people see w it ig. Preciate the comment tho lol

Asks for rate
Doesn’t get what he wants
Goes crazy
Jfl

 

[curt0121]

so this is the spreadsheet for both my front n side profile.
Line Metric Visual Estimate Forum Score (1-4) Notes


1 Upper third vs ideal 1.00 3 within ±2 %


2 Mid third vs ideal 1.00 3 within ±2 %


3 Lower third vs ideal 1.02 3 within ±2 %


4 FWHR 1.85 2 < 1.9 target


5 Bigonial/bizygomatic 0.78 2 < 0.8 target


6 Mid-face ratio 0.96 3 0.95-1.0


7 Chin-to-mouth 1.62 3 1.6-1.8


8 Eye spacing 1.28 3 1.25 target


9 Mouth/nose width 1.42 3 1.4-1.6


10 Profile convexity 168° 3 Class I


11 Gonial angle 121° 3 115-125°


12 Nasofrontal 129° 3 125-135°


13 Nasolabial 98° 3 90-110°


14 Cervico-mental 112° 3 105-120°


14 Canthal tilt +3° 3 positive


15 Palpebral L/W 2.85 3 ≥ 2.8


16 Upper-eyelid exposure 1 mm 4 minimal


17 Brow projection moderate 3 neutral


18 Dorsum straight 0.5 mm 3 < 1 mm


19 Tip projection (Goode) 0.58 3 0.55-0.60


20 Alar width 1.05 3 ≈ 1.0


21 Lip ratio 1:1.55 3 1:1.6


22 Lip-chin groove 4 mm 3 3-5 mm


23 Chin projection +2 mm 3 neutral


24 Symmetry dev 1.5 mm 3 < 2 mm


25 Angular yaw 1° 3 < 2°


26 Body-fat est. ~12 % 3 10-15 %


27 Skin texture visible pores 3 no scarring


28 Eye support slight hollowing 2 very slight


29 Dimorphism 7/10 3 neutral


30 Flow penalty none 3 none








Line Metric Visual Estimate Forum Score (1-4) Notes


10 Profile convexity (nasion-pogonion) 168° 3 Class I (straight)


11 Gonial angle 121° 3 115-125° ideal


12 Nasofrontal angle 129° 3 125-135° ideal


13 Cervico-mental angle 112° 3 105-120° ideal


14 Canthal tilt (lateral view) +3° 3 positive


15 Palpebral fissure L/W (side) 2.85 3 ≥ 2.8


16 Upper-eyelid exposure (side) 1 mm 4 minimal


17 Brow-bone projection (side) moderate 3 neutral


18 Dorsum straightness (side) 0.5 mm 3 < 1 mm


19 Tip projection (Goode, side) 0.58 3 0.55-0.60


20 Alar width (side) 1.05 3 ≈ 1.0


21 Lip-chin groove (side) 4 mm 3 3-5 mm


22 Chin projection (side) +2 mm 3 neutral


23 Symmetry (side) 1.5 mm 3 < 2 mm


24 Angular yaw (side) 1° 3 < 2°


25 Body-fat est. (side) ~12 % 3 10-15 %


26 Skin texture (side) visible pores 3 no scarring


27 Eye support (side) slight hollowing 2 very slight


28 Dimorphism (side) 7/10 3 neutral


29 Flow penalty (side) none 3 none

This is using forum eyeball math esp for selfies accounting for camera works visual works and camera distortion (at most a 2 to 3 percent width exaggeration) and also I forgot the method but it’s a notable one. The only reason why I’ve been rated hhtn to chad lite or just chadlite potential is cs of my many halo effects as you’ll see. (Rly good harmony decently tall good physique n rare coloring) but u tell me how u guys wld rate me.

Mmtn

 

[livelifetofullest]

mtn

 

[petergriffin445]

N

so this is the spreadsheet for both my front n side profile.
Line Metric Visual Estimate Forum Score (1-4) Notes


1 Upper third vs ideal 1.00 3 within ±2 %


2 Mid third vs ideal 1.00 3 within ±2 %


3 Lower third vs ideal 1.02 3 within ±2 %


4 FWHR 1.85 2 < 1.9 target


5 Bigonial/bizygomatic 0.78 2 < 0.8 target


6 Mid-face ratio 0.96 3 0.95-1.0


7 Chin-to-mouth 1.62 3 1.6-1.8


8 Eye spacing 1.28 3 1.25 target


9 Mouth/nose width 1.42 3 1.4-1.6


10 Profile convexity 168° 3 Class I


11 Gonial angle 121° 3 115-125°


12 Nasofrontal 129° 3 125-135°


13 Nasolabial 98° 3 90-110°


14 Cervico-mental 112° 3 105-120°


14 Canthal tilt +3° 3 positive


15 Palpebral L/W 2.85 3 ≥ 2.8


16 Upper-eyelid exposure 1 mm 4 minimal


17 Brow projection moderate 3 neutral


18 Dorsum straight 0.5 mm 3 < 1 mm


19 Tip projection (Goode) 0.58 3 0.55-0.60


20 Alar width 1.05 3 ≈ 1.0


21 Lip ratio 1:1.55 3 1:1.6


22 Lip-chin groove 4 mm 3 3-5 mm


23 Chin projection +2 mm 3 neutral


24 Symmetry dev 1.5 mm 3 < 2 mm


25 Angular yaw 1° 3 < 2°


26 Body-fat est. ~12 % 3 10-15 %


27 Skin texture visible pores 3 no scarring


28 Eye support slight hollowing 2 very slight


29 Dimorphism 7/10 3 neutral


30 Flow penalty none 3 none








Line Metric Visual Estimate Forum Score (1-4) Notes


10 Profile convexity (nasion-pogonion) 168° 3 Class I (straight)


11 Gonial angle 121° 3 115-125° ideal


12 Nasofrontal angle 129° 3 125-135° ideal


13 Cervico-mental angle 112° 3 105-120° ideal


14 Canthal tilt (lateral view) +3° 3 positive


15 Palpebral fissure L/W (side) 2.85 3 ≥ 2.8


16 Upper-eyelid exposure (side) 1 mm 4 minimal


17 Brow-bone projection (side) moderate 3 neutral


18 Dorsum straightness (side) 0.5 mm 3 < 1 mm


19 Tip projection (Goode, side) 0.58 3 0.55-0.60


20 Alar width (side) 1.05 3 ≈ 1.0


21 Lip-chin groove (side) 4 mm 3 3-5 mm


22 Chin projection (side) +2 mm 3 neutral


23 Symmetry (side) 1.5 mm 3 < 2 mm


24 Angular yaw (side) 1° 3 < 2°


25 Body-fat est. (side) ~12 % 3 10-15 %


26 Skin texture (side) visible pores 3 no scarring


27 Eye support (side) slight hollowing 2 very slight


28 Dimorphism (side) 7/10 3 neutral


29 Flow penalty (side) none 3 none

This is using forum eyeball math esp for selfies accounting for camera works visual works and camera distortion (at most a 2 to 3 percent width exaggeration) and also I forgot the method but it’s a notable one. The only reason why I’ve been rated hhtn to chad lite or just chadlite potential is cs of my many halo effects as you’ll see. (Rly good harmony decently tall good physique n rare coloring) but u tell me how u guys wld rate me.

Not considering your physique, lhtn. Your asymmetrical and face seems kinda bloated.

 

[chadzay]

ngl bro i would say lmtn based off frontal there’s not much dimorphism or anything it looks like your a kid. maybe that photo doesn’t do u justice but ur saying ur gonna softmaxing and that can get u to hhtn/ cl but what exact are u gonna do. because tbh i don’t really see much. and stop coping with ratios if ur chad everyone knows it. you can’t argue your chad/cl/hhtn physique is good but writing genuine essay looks pathetic lockin man

 

[jewmaxing69]

ltn, who the hell said you were cl

 

[jewmaxing69]

ltn gymcell

 

[Apchun144]

You have no upper lip, your eye area isn’t the best either. What’s the point of those measures if overall your lip just overshadows it

 

[babadook]

so now we’re lying out of our asses. Even when I provide the proper harmony spreadsheet mind u this is a harmony spreadsheet that includes all of my data u still wanna say I have 0 harmony and appeal. When u can come at me with hard data and actually disprove my rating w ur own spreadsheet than I’ll stand wronged otherwise don’t even bother commenting

0 dimo besides the ramus. but that shit dont matter anyway your gonions are inward. Youre stuck with me in mtn hell and we will never make it out of here

 

[babadook]

Oh boy when r the insults gonna stop n the hard data actually come thru. I already told u wsp js be a good boy n stfu already even if u ain’t got nth else going for u other than to shit on other people w no proof to back it up js to satisfy ur fragile twink boy ego

do a cbct scan and youll truly see how boneless and asymmetrical you are. just a guess but I think youre projecting and somewhat narcissistic cuz why the hell would you do all this shit and have your username be a god. You literally look like a jacked boneless kid nothing else idk what you wanted to hear

 

[JimCallsbp]

so this is the spreadsheet for both my front n side profile.
Line Metric Visual Estimate Forum Score (1-4) Notes


1 Upper third vs ideal 1.00 3 within ±2 %


2 Mid third vs ideal 1.00 3 within ±2 %


3 Lower third vs ideal 1.02 3 within ±2 %


4 FWHR 1.85 2 < 1.9 target


5 Bigonial/bizygomatic 0.78 2 < 0.8 target


6 Mid-face ratio 0.96 3 0.95-1.0


7 Chin-to-mouth 1.62 3 1.6-1.8


8 Eye spacing 1.28 3 1.25 target


9 Mouth/nose width 1.42 3 1.4-1.6


10 Profile convexity 168° 3 Class I


11 Gonial angle 121° 3 115-125°


12 Nasofrontal 129° 3 125-135°


13 Nasolabial 98° 3 90-110°


14 Cervico-mental 112° 3 105-120°


14 Canthal tilt +3° 3 positive


15 Palpebral L/W 2.85 3 ≥ 2.8


16 Upper-eyelid exposure 1 mm 4 minimal


17 Brow projection moderate 3 neutral


18 Dorsum straight 0.5 mm 3 < 1 mm


19 Tip projection (Goode) 0.58 3 0.55-0.60


20 Alar width 1.05 3 ≈ 1.0


21 Lip ratio 1:1.55 3 1:1.6


22 Lip-chin groove 4 mm 3 3-5 mm


23 Chin projection +2 mm 3 neutral


24 Symmetry dev 1.5 mm 3 < 2 mm


25 Angular yaw 1° 3 < 2°


26 Body-fat est. ~12 % 3 10-15 %


27 Skin texture visible pores 3 no scarring


28 Eye support slight hollowing 2 very slight


29 Dimorphism 7/10 3 neutral


30 Flow penalty none 3 none








Line Metric Visual Estimate Forum Score (1-4) Notes


10 Profile convexity (nasion-pogonion) 168° 3 Class I (straight)


11 Gonial angle 121° 3 115-125° ideal


12 Nasofrontal angle 129° 3 125-135° ideal


13 Cervico-mental angle 112° 3 105-120° ideal


14 Canthal tilt (lateral view) +3° 3 positive


15 Palpebral fissure L/W (side) 2.85 3 ≥ 2.8


16 Upper-eyelid exposure (side) 1 mm 4 minimal


17 Brow-bone projection (side) moderate 3 neutral


18 Dorsum straightness (side) 0.5 mm 3 < 1 mm


19 Tip projection (Goode, side) 0.58 3 0.55-0.60


20 Alar width (side) 1.05 3 ≈ 1.0


21 Lip-chin groove (side) 4 mm 3 3-5 mm


22 Chin projection (side) +2 mm 3 neutral


23 Symmetry (side) 1.5 mm 3 < 2 mm


24 Angular yaw (side) 1° 3 < 2°


25 Body-fat est. (side) ~12 % 3 10-15 %


26 Skin texture (side) visible pores 3 no scarring


27 Eye support (side) slight hollowing 2 very slight


28 Dimorphism (side) 7/10 3 neutral


29 Flow penalty (side) none 3 none

This is using forum eyeball math esp for selfies accounting for camera works visual works and camera distortion (at most a 2 to 3 percent width exaggeration) and also I forgot the method but it’s a notable one. The only reason why I’ve been rated hhtn to chad lite or just chadlite potential is cs of my many halo effects as you’ll see. (Rly good harmony decently tall good physique n rare coloring) but u tell me how u guys wld rate me.

cl

 

[johnjohn234]

so this is the spreadsheet for both my front n side profile.
Line Metric Visual Estimate Forum Score (1-4) Notes


1 Upper third vs ideal 1.00 3 within ±2 %


2 Mid third vs ideal 1.00 3 within ±2 %


3 Lower third vs ideal 1.02 3 within ±2 %


4 FWHR 1.85 2 < 1.9 target


5 Bigonial/bizygomatic 0.78 2 < 0.8 target


6 Mid-face ratio 0.96 3 0.95-1.0


7 Chin-to-mouth 1.62 3 1.6-1.8


8 Eye spacing 1.28 3 1.25 target


9 Mouth/nose width 1.42 3 1.4-1.6


10 Profile convexity 168° 3 Class I


11 Gonial angle 121° 3 115-125°


12 Nasofrontal 129° 3 125-135°


13 Nasolabial 98° 3 90-110°


14 Cervico-mental 112° 3 105-120°


14 Canthal tilt +3° 3 positive


15 Palpebral L/W 2.85 3 ≥ 2.8


16 Upper-eyelid exposure 1 mm 4 minimal


17 Brow projection moderate 3 neutral


18 Dorsum straight 0.5 mm 3 < 1 mm


19 Tip projection (Goode) 0.58 3 0.55-0.60


20 Alar width 1.05 3 ≈ 1.0


21 Lip ratio 1:1.55 3 1:1.6


22 Lip-chin groove 4 mm 3 3-5 mm


23 Chin projection +2 mm 3 neutral


24 Symmetry dev 1.5 mm 3 < 2 mm


25 Angular yaw 1° 3 < 2°


26 Body-fat est. ~12 % 3 10-15 %


27 Skin texture visible pores 3 no scarring


28 Eye support slight hollowing 2 very slight


29 Dimorphism 7/10 3 neutral


30 Flow penalty none 3 none








Line Metric Visual Estimate Forum Score (1-4) Notes


10 Profile convexity (nasion-pogonion) 168° 3 Class I (straight)


11 Gonial angle 121° 3 115-125° ideal


12 Nasofrontal angle 129° 3 125-135° ideal


13 Cervico-mental angle 112° 3 105-120° ideal


14 Canthal tilt (lateral view) +3° 3 positive


15 Palpebral fissure L/W (side) 2.85 3 ≥ 2.8


16 Upper-eyelid exposure (side) 1 mm 4 minimal


17 Brow-bone projection (side) moderate 3 neutral


18 Dorsum straightness (side) 0.5 mm 3 < 1 mm


19 Tip projection (Goode, side) 0.58 3 0.55-0.60


20 Alar width (side) 1.05 3 ≈ 1.0


21 Lip-chin groove (side) 4 mm 3 3-5 mm


22 Chin projection (side) +2 mm 3 neutral


23 Symmetry (side) 1.5 mm 3 < 2 mm


24 Angular yaw (side) 1° 3 < 2°


25 Body-fat est. (side) ~12 % 3 10-15 %


26 Skin texture (side) visible pores 3 no scarring


27 Eye support (side) slight hollowing 2 very slight


28 Dimorphism (side) 7/10 3 neutral


29 Flow penalty (side) none 3 none

This is using forum eyeball math esp for selfies accounting for camera works visual works and camera distortion (at most a 2 to 3 percent width exaggeration) and also I forgot the method but it’s a notable one. The only reason why I’ve been rated hhtn to chad lite or just chadlite potential is cs of my many halo effects as you’ll see. (Rly good harmony decently tall good physique n rare coloring) but u tell me how u guys wld rate me.

low to mid mtn, would be hltn w out body halo. just face is generally not that attractive, im sure u would pull cuz body halo, nt n hopeuflly above 5'9. great bod lad tho forsures but biggest flaws r colouring n pretty narrow jaw.

 

[ChangINO33]

mtn nowhere near htn or cl

 

[Topkra]

"Hhtn" "Cl"
Mtn son

 

[iblamefranklin]

so this is the spreadsheet for both my front n side profile.
Line Metric Visual Estimate Forum Score (1-4) Notes


1 Upper third vs ideal 1.00 3 within ±2 %


2 Mid third vs ideal 1.00 3 within ±2 %


3 Lower third vs ideal 1.02 3 within ±2 %


4 FWHR 1.85 2 < 1.9 target


5 Bigonial/bizygomatic 0.78 2 < 0.8 target


6 Mid-face ratio 0.96 3 0.95-1.0


7 Chin-to-mouth 1.62 3 1.6-1.8


8 Eye spacing 1.28 3 1.25 target


9 Mouth/nose width 1.42 3 1.4-1.6


10 Profile convexity 168° 3 Class I


11 Gonial angle 121° 3 115-125°


12 Nasofrontal 129° 3 125-135°


13 Nasolabial 98° 3 90-110°


14 Cervico-mental 112° 3 105-120°


14 Canthal tilt +3° 3 positive


15 Palpebral L/W 2.85 3 ≥ 2.8


16 Upper-eyelid exposure 1 mm 4 minimal


17 Brow projection moderate 3 neutral


18 Dorsum straight 0.5 mm 3 < 1 mm


19 Tip projection (Goode) 0.58 3 0.55-0.60


20 Alar width 1.05 3 ≈ 1.0


21 Lip ratio 1:1.55 3 1:1.6


22 Lip-chin groove 4 mm 3 3-5 mm


23 Chin projection +2 mm 3 neutral


24 Symmetry dev 1.5 mm 3 < 2 mm


25 Angular yaw 1° 3 < 2°


26 Body-fat est. ~12 % 3 10-15 %


27 Skin texture visible pores 3 no scarring


28 Eye support slight hollowing 2 very slight


29 Dimorphism 7/10 3 neutral


30 Flow penalty none 3 none








Line Metric Visual Estimate Forum Score (1-4) Notes


10 Profile convexity (nasion-pogonion) 168° 3 Class I (straight)


11 Gonial angle 121° 3 115-125° ideal


12 Nasofrontal angle 129° 3 125-135° ideal


13 Cervico-mental angle 112° 3 105-120° ideal


14 Canthal tilt (lateral view) +3° 3 positive


15 Palpebral fissure L/W (side) 2.85 3 ≥ 2.8


16 Upper-eyelid exposure (side) 1 mm 4 minimal


17 Brow-bone projection (side) moderate 3 neutral


18 Dorsum straightness (side) 0.5 mm 3 < 1 mm


19 Tip projection (Goode, side) 0.58 3 0.55-0.60


20 Alar width (side) 1.05 3 ≈ 1.0


21 Lip-chin groove (side) 4 mm 3 3-5 mm


22 Chin projection (side) +2 mm 3 neutral


23 Symmetry (side) 1.5 mm 3 < 2 mm


24 Angular yaw (side) 1° 3 < 2°


25 Body-fat est. (side) ~12 % 3 10-15 %


26 Skin texture (side) visible pores 3 no scarring


27 Eye support (side) slight hollowing 2 very slight


28 Dimorphism (side) 7/10 3 neutral


29 Flow penalty (side) none 3 none

This is using forum eyeball math esp for selfies accounting for camera works visual works and camera distortion (at most a 2 to 3 percent width exaggeration) and also I forgot the method but it’s a notable one. The only reason why I’ve been rated hhtn to chad lite or just chadlite potential is cs of my many halo effects as you’ll see. (Rly good harmony decently tall good physique n rare coloring) but u tell me how u guys wld rate me.

cl??? this is cl??? what are you on about??

 

[iblamefranklin]

coping hard with this one
nigger writing out whole fucking essays
"muhh, formula, muhh harmonyyy"

KAKAAAAAAA

 

[mirinnn]

so this is the spreadsheet for both my front n side profile.
Line Metric Visual Estimate Forum Score (1-4) Notes


1 Upper third vs ideal 1.00 3 within ±2 %


2 Mid third vs ideal 1.00 3 within ±2 %


3 Lower third vs ideal 1.02 3 within ±2 %


4 FWHR 1.85 2 < 1.9 target


5 Bigonial/bizygomatic 0.78 2 < 0.8 target


6 Mid-face ratio 0.96 3 0.95-1.0


7 Chin-to-mouth 1.62 3 1.6-1.8


8 Eye spacing 1.28 3 1.25 target


9 Mouth/nose width 1.42 3 1.4-1.6


10 Profile convexity 168° 3 Class I


11 Gonial angle 121° 3 115-125°


12 Nasofrontal 129° 3 125-135°


13 Nasolabial 98° 3 90-110°


14 Cervico-mental 112° 3 105-120°


14 Canthal tilt +3° 3 positive


15 Palpebral L/W 2.85 3 ≥ 2.8


16 Upper-eyelid exposure 1 mm 4 minimal


17 Brow projection moderate 3 neutral


18 Dorsum straight 0.5 mm 3 < 1 mm


19 Tip projection (Goode) 0.58 3 0.55-0.60


20 Alar width 1.05 3 ≈ 1.0


21 Lip ratio 1:1.55 3 1:1.6


22 Lip-chin groove 4 mm 3 3-5 mm


23 Chin projection +2 mm 3 neutral


24 Symmetry dev 1.5 mm 3 < 2 mm


25 Angular yaw 1° 3 < 2°


26 Body-fat est. ~12 % 3 10-15 %


27 Skin texture visible pores 3 no scarring


28 Eye support slight hollowing 2 very slight


29 Dimorphism 7/10 3 neutral


30 Flow penalty none 3 none








Line Metric Visual Estimate Forum Score (1-4) Notes


10 Profile convexity (nasion-pogonion) 168° 3 Class I (straight)


11 Gonial angle 121° 3 115-125° ideal


12 Nasofrontal angle 129° 3 125-135° ideal


13 Cervico-mental angle 112° 3 105-120° ideal


14 Canthal tilt (lateral view) +3° 3 positive


15 Palpebral fissure L/W (side) 2.85 3 ≥ 2.8


16 Upper-eyelid exposure (side) 1 mm 4 minimal


17 Brow-bone projection (side) moderate 3 neutral


18 Dorsum straightness (side) 0.5 mm 3 < 1 mm


19 Tip projection (Goode, side) 0.58 3 0.55-0.60


20 Alar width (side) 1.05 3 ≈ 1.0


21 Lip-chin groove (side) 4 mm 3 3-5 mm


22 Chin projection (side) +2 mm 3 neutral


23 Symmetry (side) 1.5 mm 3 < 2 mm


24 Angular yaw (side) 1° 3 < 2°


25 Body-fat est. (side) ~12 % 3 10-15 %


26 Skin texture (side) visible pores 3 no scarring


27 Eye support (side) slight hollowing 2 very slight


28 Dimorphism (side) 7/10 3 neutral


29 Flow penalty (side) none 3 none

This is using forum eyeball math esp for selfies accounting for camera works visual works and camera distortion (at most a 2 to 3 percent width exaggeration) and also I forgot the method but it’s a notable one. The only reason why I’ve been rated hhtn to chad lite or just chadlite potential is cs of my many halo effects as you’ll see. (Rly good harmony decently tall good physique n rare coloring) but u tell me how u guys wld rate me.

Cl?? Facially you are a strong mtn max other than that frame is pretty good