orcish.
Iron
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2026
- Posts
- 7
- Reputation
- 2
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
currently i think hmtn
yeah i know my canthal tilt is bad. i didn’t think my eyebrows were an issue, i could try trimming them a bit
lmtncurrently i think hmtn
howis not always the canthal thilt too.
if you have everything it shouldn't matter
ill recommend you to fix your your face thirds
dont listen to this looksflatoinlmtn
Not looksflationdont listen to this looksflatoin
considering he would have been rated even htn 2 years ago here, yes it isNot looksflation
His jaw is too flat, his canthal tilt is almost in the negatives, and his eyebrows are too high set + really bulbous and long nasal birdgeconsidering he would have been rated even htn 2 years ago here, yes it is
this guy has more flaws than that yet people rated him htn few years agoiHis jaw is too flat, his canthal tilt is almost in the negatives, and his eyebrows are too high set + really bulbous and long nasal birdge
I don't see him as above mtn
Well no point in using outdated methodology if no one else is
hes not way better looking he has worse ang, better harmony, slightly better misc and dimo, they are closeWell no point in using outdated methodology if no one else is
besides this guy is way better looking
Only "better" harmony is an understatementhes not way better looking he has worse ang, better harmony, slightly better misc and dimo, they are close
Better misc toohes not way better looking he has worse ang, better harmony, slightly better misc and dimo, they are close
his harmony is not really that good front harmony is like 66 ive measured it, and his side is way worst too since he has a short ramus and high gonial angle overall harm is like 6.3, and his ang is like in the 5 rangeOnly "better" harmony is an understatement
Have you seen this guys sidehis harmony is not really that good front harmony is like 66 ive measured it, and his side is way worst too since he has a short ramus and high gonial angle overall harm is like 6.3, and his ang is like in the 5 range

this guys side is still better than the other guys trust me his side is shit his gonial angle is like 130 degreesHave you seen this guys side
66% harmony isn't bad anyway, but have you estimated this guys harmony
hes not way better looking he has worse ang, better harmony, slightly better misc and dimo, they are close
I'm sure your ratings are very accuratechad for your age

This dudes harmony is like 40%this guys side is still better than the other guys trust me his side is shit his gonial angle is like 130 degrees
first guys harmony is probably in the lower 50s, but his ang is way better, misc isnt that much lower, dimo is similar
both are like very high mid mtn overall
also conisder the guy i posted is in a professional photo while OP is in a selfie cam so it nerfs him
i guarantee its not, its in the 50s, but cant measure from selfie cam due to lens distortion, so get him to take a picture from back cam 6ft away so can measure itThis dudes harmony is like 40%
Why do you think he is better looking other than his pillars are just betteri guarantee its not, its in the 50s, but cant measure from selfie cam due to lens distortion, so get him to take a picture from back cam 6ft away so can measure it
i dont think hes better looking, but hes not that much lowerWhy do you think he is better looking other than his pillars are just better
Well why do you think they're similari dont think hes better looking, but hes not that much lower
because they are,Well why do you think they're similar
His pillars are just better brahbecause they are,
you cant deny first guys ang is better
their harmony also isnt as far apart as you think and we can prove that if he sends an undistorted pic for use
dimo is similar
second guy misc is only slightly higher, look how dogshit his undereye region is
both somewhere in the mtn range, exact number cant be determined without a proper pic from first guy
not significantly, and his ang certainly isnt betterHis pillars are just better brah![]()
Why do you think he is better looking other than his pillars are just better
Here was my questionbecause they are,
you cant deny first guys ang is better
their harmony also isnt as far apart as you think and we can prove that if he sends an undistorted pic for use
dimo is similar
second guy misc is only slightly higher, look how dogshit his undereye region is
both somewhere in the mtn range, exact number cant be determined without a proper pic from first guy
i dont think hes better looking, and pillars is simply the only reason since thats how you rate a face, based on estimations of each pillarsHere was my question
How retarded are youi dont think hes better looking, and pillars is simply the only reason since thats how you rate a face, based on estimations of each pillars
i answered your questionHow retarded are you![]()
I'm asking why you think he's a similar rating to Hayden other than saying his pillars are just better. It's very vaguei dont think hes better looking, and pillars is simply the only reason since thats how you rate a face, based on estimations of each pillars
pillars are the only reason, why would i have another reasonI'm asking why you think he's a similar rating to Hayden other than saying his pillars are just better. It's very vague