R
rl⠀
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
- Joined
- May 6, 2023
- Posts
- 2,378
- Reputation
- 3,321
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
high iq bait thread
autism test
17 years 364 days old cousin
View attachment 2297847
English mistake by rl. @slop slinger
not sure where to go from here and who to look up to as the pundit of the English language of the forum now
think we could poach a teacher from this school in vallettaView attachment 2297847
English mistake by rl. @slop slinger
not sure where to go from here and who to look up to as the pundit of the English language of the forum now
something to do with parallel lines? in the first row each box has four sets of parallel lines. after that it goes to shit though with box 6 being extra confusing
Oh come on
IQ requirement?
hint?
What the hell is even that
solution? my iq is tested 170+ (profoundly gifted). and i couldnt solve it jfll
mind reading tier nglok, since all of you (170 iq monsters included) are obviously not particularly sharp ...
figure 1: 4 right angles + 9 lines within the rectangle = 13
figure 2: 4 right angles + 8 lines within the rectangle = 12
figure 3: 3 right angles + 8 lines within the rectangle = 11
figure 4: 2 right angles + 8 lines ... = 10
figure 5: 4 right angles + 5 lines ... = 9
figure 6: 4 right angles + 4 lines ... = 8
figure 7: 2 right angles + 5 lines ... = 7
figure 8: 4 right angles + 2 lines ... = 6
figure 9: any combination that satisfies the /[number of right angles + number of lines within the rectangle] = 5\ criteria
eh.
mind reading tier ngl
0 benefitfeels so fucking orgasmic to be in the 99.99995th percentile IQ-wise while looking like a braindead jock
0 benefit
you are only more depressed than us average iq people
feels so fucking orgasmic to be in the 99.99995th percentile IQ-wise while looking like a braindead jock
i dont see any right angles. most of the lines dont even intersect. shit puzzleok, since all of you (170 iq monsters included) are obviously not particularly sharp ...
figure 1: 4 right angles + 9 lines within the rectangle = 13
figure 2: 4 right angles + 8 lines within the rectangle = 12
figure 3: 3 right angles + 8 lines within the rectangle = 11
figure 4: 2 right angles + 8 lines ... = 10
figure 5: 4 right angles + 5 lines ... = 9
figure 6: 4 right angles + 4 lines ... = 8
figure 7: 2 right angles + 5 lines ... = 7
figure 8: 4 right angles + 2 lines ... = 6
figure 9: any combination that satisfies the /[number of right angles + number of lines within the rectangle] = 5\ criteria
eh.
i dont see any right angles. most of the lines dont even intersect. shit puzzle
two lines need to intersect to create a right angle . this is 3rd grade mathematics by the way.profound retard detected
who told you your iq was 170, your mom? (assuming you weren't joking)
and who mentioned intersecting as a relevant factor? there's exactly one intersection in the entire matrix (8), only a complete idiot would think that was relevant
either way, let me draw it for you, einstein:
View attachment 2309012
jesus
not sure what's more "plausible", psl retards' claims about their iq, height or dick size
mind reading tier ngl
every single problem in existence is a mind reading problem because objective facts are a myththis is a mind reading tier problem:
View attachment 2311105
the one from this thread's original post is based on principles so rudimentary that it just can't be labeled as a "mind reading tier" problem
every single problem in existence is a mind reading problem because objective facts are a myth
QED