Rate my eye area is it above average

also this image doesn’t even mention bizygo width. It doesn’t matter if you have ‘perfect’ 65mm ipd, if your breadth is too large, your eyes will appear close-set anyway.

just lol @ giant implants
You missed the part where EVERYTHING is secondary to orbital measurements. If the skull is average sized then they are absolute, not relative. Everything else (nose width, mouth width, byzygomatic and jaw width) are relative to the orbital measurements not the other way around.

Just like the order of operations in math PEMDAS there is an order of operations to aesthetics
1. Skull Size
2. Orbital Separation
3. Facial Height Metrics
4. Facial Width Metrics.
5. Nose and Lips

The order of 3 and 4 might be debatable or make no difference.

If you want some proof consider rhinoplasty can of laugh techniques. You can’t just narrow the alar base to match the narrow ICD - that hasn’t corrected or balanced anything, just made the face even worse.
 
  • +1
Reactions: NegativeNorwood
If u had my height, u would mog very hard
Thas why I said u mog, bug I do hv appeal with look looks ad my mysterious persona around girls
 
if he was like 4-5 inches taller he could slay in the west too

jfl at anyone denying the colesp pill

he was a shapeshifter when he had his acc here, but these pics are all relatively unfrauded (compared to his faceapped ones, at least) and he looks great
Thanks
 
You missed the part where EVERYTHING is secondary to orbital measurements. If the skull is average sized then they are absolute, not relative. Everything else (nose width, mouth width, byzygomatic and jaw width) are relative to the orbital measurements not the other way around.

Just like the order of operations in math PEMDAS there is an order of operations to aesthetics
1. Skull Size
2. Orbital Separation
3. Facial Height Metrics
4. Facial Width Metrics.
5. Nose and Lips

The order of 3 and 4 might be debatable or make no difference.

If you want some proof consider rhinoplasty can of laugh techniques. You can’t just narrow the alar base to match the narrow ICD - that hasn’t corrected or balanced anything, just made the face even worse.
Good analysis
 
  • +1
Reactions: RealSurgerymax
You missed the part where EVERYTHING is secondary to orbital measurements. If the skull is average sized then they are absolute, not relative.
Which means that what is actually primary is your skull size.

But there’s a difference between something being primary due to convention, or due to an actual hierarchical reason. Maybe you could argue that we perceive the ipd as an absolute measure even before computing the esr. This would actually mean that an absolute ideal range for it would make sense, even for people with non average sized skulls.

But consider this:

Which face is more attractive?

One has ideal ratios, but every single absolute measure of length or width is exactly 1 sd below the average.

Or the same exact same face (same features), but now some ratios are off, but most absolute measures are exactly average size.

I’d reckon the first one.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Magnum Opus and fuse
Leave this site, it servers no purpose besides waste of time
I do eeally love moneymaking and looksmaxxing threads tbh, sometimes they are really useful
 
But I still see some short guys slay
.hope I can do the same..I want to breed a tall western goddess or same height goddess so that I will have mogger sons in future
Dont spread your deathnik gene
 
Damian kater curry brother
 
stop squinting
 

Similar threads

pingu
Replies
3
Views
260
toracinno
toracinno
riaony000
Replies
18
Views
519
philtrumcell123
philtrumcell123
lunarflame
Replies
7
Views
127
sinbones
sinbones
V
Replies
11
Views
483
bombarchangel
bombarchangel
appealisLAW
Replies
2
Views
107
flatcheck213
flatcheck213

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top