rate my friend 15y 182cm/6ft

tryingtocope101

tryingtocope101

Iron
Joined
Jan 16, 2025
Posts
3
Reputation
1
Ik hes a sub 5 but if u could give me exactly his rating itd be very appriciated. Also if u have any tips on how he could better himself and find his inner light please tell me so i can tell it to him

IMG 7660
IMG 7659
 

Attachments

  • 1737211605749.png
    1737211605749.png
    9 MB · Views: 106
  • IMG_7659.jpg
    IMG_7659.jpg
    2 MB · Views: 93
deepest apologies for the upper pictures its my first time posting and idk why it looks retarded af
 
  • +1
Reactions: LKSMAXPerson
Tell your friend im sorry, but hes a subhuman
 
Side profile is low ltn.
Front is high ltn.

Clear skin, fillers to mandible and cheekbones and long hair that is below his ear region will ascend him to high mtn to low htn.
 
  • +1
Reactions: anxiety and tryingtocope101
Side profile is low ltn.
Front is high ltn.

Clear skin, fillers to mandible and cheekbones and long hair that is below his ear region will ascend him to high mtn to low htn.
Rate me on my thread also
 
You are subhuman
 
Rate me on my thread also
Post an unfrauded pic?
 
Me seeing the front: oh he isn’t really bad he’s pretty average I don’t see wha-

Side profile: OHHHH MYYY GOODNESS.

Front = MTN. Side = Subhuman
 
  • +1
Reactions: anxiety
Side profile is low ltn.
Front is high ltn.

Clear skin, fillers to mandible and cheekbones and long hair that is below his ear region will ascend him to high mtn to low htn.
More like MTN front Subhuman Side
 
  • +1
Reactions: anxiety
You are subhuman
 
  • +1
Reactions: CookieGuy
htn
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: CookieGuy
Front SMV maybe low mtn cuz he's white. Ain't no way, he's objectively MTN lmao.
From the front he’s MTN definitely. He’s average objectively. Not enough failos on the front to be below average, with a few minor halos too.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Ogionth
Front SMV maybe low mtn cuz he's white. Ain't no way, he's objectively MTN lmao.
IMG 6960

He looks pretty decent even in this god awful lighting. It’s just his side that is the issue. In proper lighting he’s objectively mid high mtn from the front
 
From the front he’s MTN definitely. He’s average objectively. Not enough failos on the front to be below average, with a few minor halos too.
Low MTN if you cope too much, but high ltn to me, honesty.

But let's just end this here.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: CookieGuy
Low MTN if you cope too much, but high ltn to me, honesty.

But let's just end this here.
That’s decently below average. You are saying facially his looksmatch is Jeremy Allen white
 
That’s decently below average. You are saying facially his looksmatch is Jeremy Allen white
High LTN to Low MTN is average. He's average objectively but his SMV is a bit above.
 
  • +1
Reactions: CookieGuy
High LTN to Low MTN is average. He's average objectively but his SMV is a bit above.
MTN is 50% percentile. Did you come from discord or something?
 
MTN is 50% percentile. Did you come from discord or something?
Didn't come from discord. Saw a similar thread arguing about what the average was, and also had a similar opinion to the majority voting in that thread (High LTN to Low MTN).
 
  • +1
Reactions: CookieGuy
its over for this guy. low ltn
 
Didn't come from discord. Saw a similar thread arguing about what the average was, and also had a similar opinion to the majority voting in that thread (High LTN to Low MTN).
The average for Beckie’s is rated “MTB” so I don’t see why it shouldn’t be equal to them
 
The average for Beckie’s is rated “MTB” so I don’t see why it shouldn’t be equal to them
Your rating is based upon the presupposition that avg female looks = avg male looks which is inherently incorrect.

There's a reason why good looking men are rarer than good looking women

That's one of the reasons why men struggle more in finding partners.

Average does not mean equality.

Don't start an argument here again, just go and search, you will probably find some threads discussing this.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: CookieGuy
He could normie maxx ig
 
  • +1
Reactions: CookieGuy
Your rating is based upon the presupposition that avg female looks = avg male looks which is inherently incorrect.

There's a reason why good looking men are rarer than good looking women

That's one of the reasons why men struggle more in finding partners.

Average does not mean equality.

Don't start an argument here again, just go and search, you will probably find some threads discussing this.
😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹
 
cmon dude he is a kid he will grow up
 

Similar threads

connorb
Replies
4
Views
147
poloralf
poloralf
PKK
Replies
7
Views
153
roidsuser2
R
m_ncey
Replies
0
Views
14
m_ncey
m_ncey
G
Replies
39
Views
635
slitmogger
slitmogger
∆lois:+
Replies
7
Views
131
AverageCurryEnjoyer
AverageCurryEnjoyer

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top