rate my friend 15y 182cm/6ft

tryingtocope101

tryingtocope101

Iron
Joined
Jan 16, 2025
Posts
10
Reputation
5
Ik hes a sub 5 but if u could give me exactly his rating itd be very appriciated. Also if u have any tips on how he could better himself and find his inner light please tell me so i can tell it to him

IMG 7660
IMG 7659
 

Attachments

  • 1737211605749.png
    1737211605749.png
    9 MB · Views: 170
  • IMG_7659.jpg
    IMG_7659.jpg
    2 MB · Views: 141
deepest apologies for the upper pictures its my first time posting and idk why it looks retarded af
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 110111
Tell your friend im sorry, but hes a subhuman
 
  • +1
Reactions: Prøphet
  • +1
Reactions: Prøphet
Side profile is low ltn.
Front is high ltn.

Clear skin, fillers to mandible and cheekbones and long hair that is below his ear region will ascend him to high mtn to low htn.
 
  • +1
Reactions: anxiety and tryingtocope101
Side profile is low ltn.
Front is high ltn.

Clear skin, fillers to mandible and cheekbones and long hair that is below his ear region will ascend him to high mtn to low htn.
Rate me on my thread also
 
You are subhuman
 
Rate me on my thread also
Post an unfrauded pic?
 
Me seeing the front: oh he isn’t really bad he’s pretty average I don’t see wha-

Side profile: OHHHH MYYY GOODNESS.

Front = MTN. Side = Subhuman
 
  • +1
Reactions: anxiety
Side profile is low ltn.
Front is high ltn.

Clear skin, fillers to mandible and cheekbones and long hair that is below his ear region will ascend him to high mtn to low htn.
More like MTN front Subhuman Side
 
  • +1
Reactions: anxiety
You are subhuman
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 92615
htn
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 92615
Front SMV maybe low mtn cuz he's white. Ain't no way, he's objectively MTN lmao.
From the front he’s MTN definitely. He’s average objectively. Not enough failos on the front to be below average, with a few minor halos too.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Ogionth
Front SMV maybe low mtn cuz he's white. Ain't no way, he's objectively MTN lmao.
IMG 6960

He looks pretty decent even in this god awful lighting. It’s just his side that is the issue. In proper lighting he’s objectively mid high mtn from the front
 
From the front he’s MTN definitely. He’s average objectively. Not enough failos on the front to be below average, with a few minor halos too.
Low MTN if you cope too much, but high ltn to me, honesty.

But let's just end this here.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 92615
Low MTN if you cope too much, but high ltn to me, honesty.

But let's just end this here.
That’s decently below average. You are saying facially his looksmatch is Jeremy Allen white
 
That’s decently below average. You are saying facially his looksmatch is Jeremy Allen white
High LTN to Low MTN is average. He's average objectively but his SMV is a bit above.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 92615
High LTN to Low MTN is average. He's average objectively but his SMV is a bit above.
MTN is 50% percentile. Did you come from discord or something?
 
MTN is 50% percentile. Did you come from discord or something?
Didn't come from discord. Saw a similar thread arguing about what the average was, and also had a similar opinion to the majority voting in that thread (High LTN to Low MTN).
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 92615
its over for this guy. low ltn
 
Didn't come from discord. Saw a similar thread arguing about what the average was, and also had a similar opinion to the majority voting in that thread (High LTN to Low MTN).
The average for Beckie’s is rated “MTB” so I don’t see why it shouldn’t be equal to them
 
The average for Beckie’s is rated “MTB” so I don’t see why it shouldn’t be equal to them
Your rating is based upon the presupposition that avg female looks = avg male looks which is inherently incorrect.

There's a reason why good looking men are rarer than good looking women

That's one of the reasons why men struggle more in finding partners.

Average does not mean equality.

Don't start an argument here again, just go and search, you will probably find some threads discussing this.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 92615
He could normie maxx ig
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 92615
Your rating is based upon the presupposition that avg female looks = avg male looks which is inherently incorrect.

There's a reason why good looking men are rarer than good looking women

That's one of the reasons why men struggle more in finding partners.

Average does not mean equality.

Don't start an argument here again, just go and search, you will probably find some threads discussing this.
😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹
 
cmon dude he is a kid he will grow up
 

Similar threads

kawz
Replies
4
Views
40
ZekeAngloSaxon
ZekeAngloSaxon
F
  • Article
Replies
2
Views
75
foid_consumer32
F
true pelikan
Replies
4
Views
89
true pelikan
true pelikan
sub5cidxcjj
Replies
4
Views
121
Zizzy
Zizzy
1
Replies
0
Views
30
1nsecure
1

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →