rate my girlfriend: she s 24

I would say I probably also over rated him but still put at hhtn
yes im saying i agree with that, i would give him mhtn - hhtn on my scale, but org (which we are on) is very harsh im saying you need to subtract .5 to fit in with the ratings here, which makes sense since most people rated him lhtn on here, also celebrity bias is true because there is thousands of pictures of them available for us on google, so its easy to find the best ones and rate him based on those, if hes hhtn in his best picture hes def lower in most others, you cant just hand out hhtn on org like that, since the rarities are different here as opposed to other scales (LHTN being closer to top 1%)
 
I tried to do analysis on the pic u sent me it's basically the same ratios I did
I can even send it to u copy paste but it'll be the same as the video or be a bit off
esr 0.48
mfr 1.06
bw 0.86
tfwhr 1.3
ltp 0.36
neck width 0.99
ctp 2.0
et 4.67
eme 50.7
ct 4.2
ear 3.9
fwhr 2.00
lp 1.62
oea 1
pfl to bizygo 0.224
cbh 0.82
alar to icd 0.8
eh 0.93
ft 0.32 0.31 0.37
mtn 1.44
iaa 91.5
jfa 86.3
deviation 5.4
harmony 69.4%
angularity 6.3
dim 5.6
misc 7.8
overall 6.67
also 7.8 misc is an egregious overrate on his misc, the tiktoker who rated him gave him 7.7 misc and multiple comments told him thats too high, so he said its closer to low 7 which is accurate, he has ~ 6.9% harmony, 6.25 ang, 6.15 dimo, 6.85 misc = 6.55 overall
 
yes im saying i agree with that, i would give him mhtn - hhtn on my scale, but org (which we are on) is very harsh im saying you need to subtract .5 to fit in with the ratings here, which makes sense since most people rated him lhtn on here, also celebrity bias is true because there is thousands of pictures of them available for us on google, so its easy to find the best ones and rate him based on those, if hes hhtn in his best picture hes def lower in most others, you cant just hand out hhtn on org like that, since the rarities are different here as opposed to other scales (LHTN being closer to top 1%)
I just did analysis on ur GF
esr 0.44
mfr 0.91
fwhr 1.68
tfwhr 1.15
ltp 0.92
oea 0.52
pfl to bizygo 0.211
alar to icd 1.12
iaa 82.4
jfa 12.4
devation 6.8
harmonu 68.4
angularity 3.2
dim 7.5
on her best photo btw
 
  • +1
Reactions: jingle505
mirin bro
also 7.8 misc is an egregious overrate on his misc, the tiktoker who rated him gave him 7.7 misc and multiple comments told him thats too high, so he said its closer to low 7 which is accurate, he has ~ 6.9% harmony, 6.25 ang, 6.15 dimo, 6.85 misc = 6.55 overall
 
I just did analysis on ur GF
esr 0.44
mfr 0.91
fwhr 1.68
tfwhr 1.15
ltp 0.92
oea 0.52
pfl to bizygo 0.211
alar to icd 1.12
iaa 82.4
jfa 12.4
devation 6.8
harmonu 68.4
angularity 3.2
dim 7.5
on her best photo btw
basically a 5.4/10 a solid mtb-hmtb
 
  • +1
Reactions: jingle505
also 7.8 misc is an egregious overrate on his misc, the tiktoker who rated him gave him 7.7 misc and multiple comments told him thats too high, so he said its closer to low 7 which is accurate, he has ~ 6.9% harmony, 6.25 ang, 6.15 dimo, 6.85 misc = 6.55 overall
one of the first orgs to actually know anything about this matter ur pretty cool one of the best talks I've had in a while good one bro
 
  • +1
Reactions: jingle505
one of the first orgs to actually know anything about this matter ur pretty cool one of the best talks I've had in a while good one bro
yes everyone just underrates here so if you want to fit in you have to underrate a little bit hence why hayden was rated lhtn but hes closer to m - hhtn
 
yes everyone just underrates here so if you want to fit in you have to underrate a little bit hence why hayden was rated lhtn but hes closer to m - hhtn
W u deserve a follow
 
  • +1
Reactions: jingle505
how many things have arabs invented?
how many things have euros invented?
how many things have asians invented?

indians lack so little to be proud of they think just because they invented something 1 thousand years ago
makes them superiour
90% inventions that west takes credits for was invented in India first btw
 
Funniest thread I’ve ever read :lul:
 
Decent looking but no sex appeal. Idk how you can get hard to that
 
good looking to him only cuz attraction is subjective
only till a certain point, which is chadlite-chad and in this case stacylite-stacy, looks get more subjective the higher objectively attractive a person is
 
video shows how a person would look in motion and from a bit far distance the camera warps don't apply so either she's ltb or mtb depending on angles is what he's tryna imply
he said she looked as god as her best photo which i dont think is true
 
he said she looked as god as her best photo which i dont think is true
Of course it’s true because most people are looking better irl than phone cameras, only if it was a professional picture than maybe she would look better in that
 
Of course it’s true because most people are looking better irl than phone cameras, only if it was a professional picture than maybe she would look better in that
not really the close up photo one was her best one that was the only one she looks htb, which again could be frauded
 
not really the close up photo one was her best one that was the only one she looks htb, which again could be frauded
Do you not know how a camera works, I can educate you with the technology of cameras btw, it always makes it look different
 
No tan, no lips, no wide eyes
none of that matters with appeal, being pale is good for female sppeal, only her upper lip is thin lower is good, and what do you mean she got very large eyes
 
Do you not know how a camera works, I can educate you with the technology of cameras btw, it always makes it look different
yea i know different as in better or worse, those zoomed out photos are less distorted where she looks worse in (no offense)
 
yea i know different as in better or worse, those zoomed out photos are less distorted where she looks worse in (no offense)
Explain to me camera technology for this so you can prove you know it because what you are saying doesn’t correlate with how a cameras technology works
 
Explain to me camera technology for this so you can prove you know it because what you are saying doesn’t correlate with how a cameras technology works
i explained it the camera can distort ur face, but some ppl look better and others worse, making other features bigger or smaller which can change harmony
 
i explained it the camera can distort ur face, but some ppl look better and others worse, making other features bigger or smaller which can change harmony
Yes so explain the camera technology and maths that make it do that
 
none of that matters with appeal, being pale is good for female sppeal, only her upper lip is thin lower is good, and what do you mean she got very large eyes
What i described is all that matters for appeal.

Pale is not good for females hence why there's a multi billion dollar tanning industry for girls in the west and most girls wear fake tan etc
 
What i described is all that matters for appeal.

Pale is not good for females hence why there's a multi billion dollar tanning industry for girls in the west and most girls wear fake tan etc
Yeah well look at Asia beauty standards like Japan and Korea, they want to be more pale there so they stay away from the sun, and Asians women got more appeal to most western men because they are more feminie
 
why would i just take a photo of her at 2x zoom she will look worse
Because you are proving me you don’t know anything how a camera works
 
Yeah well look at Asia beauty standards like Japan and Korea, they want to be more pale there so they stay away from the sun, and Asians women got more appeal to most western men because they are more feminie
Asians get more appeal to most western men cos they're naturally tanned etc

You've got it all backwards
 
Asians get more appeal to most western men cos they're naturally tanned etc

You've got it all backwards
Chinese girls literally put on the makeup to make them look more pale
 
how this shit got 10 pages
 
bbc domination @IronMike
 
  • +1
Reactions: IronMike
guess she doesnt like being sexually satisfied

or shes bigging your ego up
No she likes those who are statistically superior, average Indian penis size is only 1cm than black, so you can’t say anything there
 
guess she doesnt like being sexually satisfied

or shes bigging your ego up
Indians men have hfihgher marriege rates to white women than black men do in USA and lower divorce rates
 
ill kill yo ass nigga on hood
 
when a slum nigger needs validation from random incels

@Mogs Me
 
when a slum nigger needs validation from random incels

@Mogs Me
Every single Indian can mog you no matter who they are or where they are from
 
Chinese girls do that to be more attractive in asia. Not to be more attractive to westerners
Well westerners find them more attractive like that because it is youthful feature and cumskins are pedos
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0057.jpeg
    IMG_0057.jpeg
    55.3 KB · Views: 0
  • JFL
Reactions: TheTallnUgly

Similar threads

subs3spanish
Replies
18
Views
261
subs3spanish
subs3spanish
Orpglobs
Replies
9
Views
99
Chudmann
Chudmann
G
Replies
27
Views
211
Genz2002
G
Nicoappeal
Replies
3
Views
55
cholera
cholera
S
Replies
2
Views
54
cholera
cholera

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →