the BULL
Looks mafia associate (accept the mog)
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2021
- Posts
- 62,877
- Reputation
- 100,992
your ratings are shitChadlite? Maybe 5%.
Chad? Maybe 1%.
I use normie scale. 1-10/10. I rate like this:
1 - genetically deformed
2 - deformed due to health issues or severe trauma, also extremely old people
3 - conventionally ugly, or what is called sub-5. Most fat people, older people. The MAJORITY of people are here. Like 50%.
4 - Low tier normie. The LOT of men here. Just your chubby (not obese), bald dude, whose jaw is slightly visible due to non-severe birdcellism, and who grooms himself.
5 - mid tier normie, Already distinguishes himself. No glaring extreme failos, and pleasant to look at. Can also have failos, but then should have hailos like coloring or age to compensate. Overall, the face should look pleasant, AND be forgettable easily enough.
6 - high tier normie. Here i put most athletes with chiselled jawlines, who, however, have shit forward growth, or just bad harmony. Masculine, but not beautiful. Or harmony, with some shit feature which feminizes the face.
7 - here i put people with either extremely good harmony, or no failos, or unique traits like insane jaw but ugly eyes. Sth like crisick-unfrauded.
8 - chad. Pretty much no failos. Face pleasant to look at. Or really good harmony which overrides the failos (rare).
9 - gigachad. People who have no failos, and huge hailos, like extremely good jawlines, cheekbones, and exceptional harmony. Also, people with failos but UNIQUE features/look to them. Many fashion models here: even though they have shit look, their cheekbones give a somewhat unique appearance. Would rate Barrett here. Gay alien, but unique.
10 - many world fashion models. i call them gigachads too, but for me they are the same as 9/10, except i like these guys more.
Many people you dislike i rate high. Like Gosling i rate Chad. And Travolta i rate GigaChad. The first has very good harmony, pleasant to look at. The second has unique features, and striking look.
ANd i do not rate on this bones-autism. I SPECIFICALLY open the pic, and IMMEDIATELY RATE. I justify the features AFTER i rate, not before. I want to rate just according to how i PERCEIVE the person. i do not give a shit what kind of autistic features you invent here.
Hope my position is clear
you have no idea of chadlites on tinder
it's way more over than you think