Rate this boy? Uncanny LTN?

D

Deleted member 75313

Silver
Joined
May 30, 2024
Posts
661
Reputation
525
Is this boy an uncanny LTN? Or MTN as he claims?
+picture pre ascension
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7972.jpeg
    IMG_7972.jpeg
    365.1 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_8251.jpeg
    IMG_8251.jpeg
    1.1 MB · Views: 0
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: sub2trvecell, jules-pill, flatcheck213 and 3 others
How are we supposed to know if he’a fat as fuck anyway
 
Is this boy an uncanny LTN? Or MTN as he claims?
+picture pre ascension
In the leaner photo? mid to high MTN, YES I SAID HIGH MTN. He has highly attractive features and good symmetry, even when he's not as lean as he could be.

He's a high MTN facially, but he doesn't have high appeal, feminine/youthful face, ethnic and non-ideal body fat. Plus his teeth are kinda fucked up.

Great example of why PSL doesn't always translate to high appeal.
 
So it is you :lul:
like 90% of the NOT OP posts are the person publishing them if the person showed is not famous or a woman, are you really surprised?
 
not that bad he's just like 9 let him grow a bit
 
No idea but he's one fat ugly nigga
 
  • +1
Reactions: dionbsant
HMTN. Lowkey insane ascension but he still chubb. Fix that LHTN. Sucks that hes indian.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 75313
In the leaner photo? mid to high MTN, YES I SAID HIGH MTN. He has highly attractive features and good symmetry, even when he's not as lean as he could be.

He's a high MTN facially, but he doesn't have high appeal, feminine/youthful face, ethnic and non-ideal body fat. Plus his teeth are kinda fucked up.

Great example of why PSL doesn't always translate to high appeal.
He’s 14 and 31% body fat I’m sure when he gets older he’ll ascend
 
bro has got potential and you know it
 

Similar threads

D
Replies
4
Views
635
Yliaster
Yliaster
kranerman23123
Replies
26
Views
2K
kranerman23123
kranerman23123
AspiringMogger
Replies
3
Views
149
Allandro
Allandro
Esteban1997
OP Rate
Replies
16
Views
376
Deleted member 24278
D
D
Replies
27
Views
1K
Rabbi
Rabbi

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top