Rate this chart from r/truerateme

[Avtarius]

Tell me how this maps onto looksmax.org rankings. In my opinion it is far more comprehensive than the system we have.

Here is my theory:
0 - 3: Sub-3
3.5 - 4: Sub-5
4.5 - 5.5: LTN
5.5 - 6.5: MTN
6.5 - 8: HTN
8.5: Chadlite
9: Chad
9.5: Adamlite
10: Adam

I think this is a pretty accurate telling of how these faces would rank on .org. What do you guys think?

 

[Frenchshortcel123]

how tf is jeremy lin higher than araki (havent read the rest of it yet but ts stood out to me)

 

[Frenchshortcel123]

also sanjaya malakar isnt above average son

 

[Frenchshortcel123]

and atesh salih too high hes good but not hexum level, prolly more things but i cant be bothered to gro thru all of it

 

[Avtarius]

also sanjaya malakar isnt above average son

I would rate him average

 

[Avtarius]

how tf is jeremy lin higher than araki (havent read the rest of it yet but ts stood out to me)

Honestly I sort of agree that its imperfect but overall its a pretty good list

Theres no phenotype bias in this chart which makes me think it was made by normies

 

[Frenchshortcel123]

Honestly I sort of agree that its imperfect but overall its a pretty good list

Theres no phenotype bias in this chart which makes me think it was made by normies

yeah considering browns are a lot higher than the average ND would put them, but id say its a fairly decent list and i think the way it describes the scores is good jst that some of the examples arent great but it works fine

 

[Avtarius]

yeah considering browns are a lot higher than the average ND would put them, but id say its a fairly decent list and i think the way it describes the scores is good jst that some of the examples arent great but it works fine

What # would you place HTN and MTN

 

[Frenchshortcel123]

What # would you place HTN and MTN

id say MTN is between 4.5 to 5.5 and then 5.6 to 6.9 is HTN

 

[supersaiyancarp27]

kinda ass

 

[supersaiyancarp27]

why is sub 5 separated from ltn

 

[Avtarius]

why is sub 5 separated from ltn

I think for the other ones theres a clear ambiguity for the other ones. A 6.5 could be called HMTN or LHTN. However, a 4 is pretty firmly sub-5. Only 4 I see that could maybe be LLTN is Ed Sheeran but he is probably makeupmaxxed in that Hollywood photo.

 

[Avtarius]

called

id say MTN is between 4.5 to 5.5 and then 5.6 to 6.9 is HTN

That is incredibly generous. That would mean 1 in 4 men is htn. A top 25% man would get rated lmtn on .org, maybe even lower.

Also no 4.5 is ever seeing hltn let alone mtn.

 

[Frenchshortcel123]

That is incredibly generous. That would mean 1 in 4 men is htn. A top 25% man would get rated lmtn on .org, maybe even lower.

Also no 4.5 is ever seeing hltn let alone mtn.

MTN means mid means average (to me at least) the average man is between a 4.5 to a 5.5

 

[Frenchshortcel123]

but ur right im pretty generous with the HTN ratings it should be from 6 to like 7

 

[supersaiyancarp27]

I think for the other ones theres a clear ambiguity for the other ones. A 6.5 could be called HMTN or LHTN. However, a 4 is pretty firmly sub-5. Only 4 I see that could maybe be LLTN is Ed Sheeran but he is probably makeupmaxxed in that Hollywood photo.

ltn has always been sub 5 also adamlite tier is unnecessary

 

[Avtarius]

MTN means mid means average (to me at least) the average man is between a 4.5 to a 5.5

Sub5 means below a 5, which is average. That means that whatever is directly above sub5 would be average, in this case LLTN. This is based on the bp doctrine that women consider the bottom 50% of men to be subhuman.

Mtn in practice would be the top 20-30% of men in my opinion. Raters on .org have a massive bias due to posters skewing more attractive than average (very few fat people posting here despite the majority of American men being obese).

I think if we ever were to rework the system then it would be a good idea to make MTN more attainable but right now MTN as average is unrealistic.

 

[Avtarius]

ltn has always been sub 5 also adamlite tier is unnecessary

Ltn is a different tier than sub 5

I was raised on tiktok which told me that the most attractive people (aka true adam candidates) are adamlites. True in daily life it means nothing, 90% of people will never see a chad in their lifetime and of that 10% maybe 1% see an adamlite.

 

[supersaiyancarp27]

Ltn is a different tier than sub 5

well for the 1-10 chart ig also i saw this tierlist made a long long time ago and it was pretty ass but what do you think about it also hi

 

[carti lover]

Tell me how this maps onto looksmax.org rankings. In my opinion it is far more comprehensive than the system we have.

Here is my theory:
0 - 3: Sub-3
3.5 - 4: Sub-5
4.5 - 5.5: LTN
5.5 - 6.5: MTN
6.5 - 8: HTN
8.5: Chadlite
9: Chad
9.5: Adamlite
10: Adam

I think this is a pretty accurate telling of how these faces would rank on .org. What do you guys think?

Dogshit what the fuck

this is not a 8.5

 

[Avtarius]

well for the 1-10 chart ig also i saw this tierlist made a long long time ago and it was pretty ass but what do you think about it also hiView attachment 5184132

No one on .org follows this, also 4 PSL in this is way more attractive than average so you would have to declare 3 PSL as average.

 

[Avtarius]

Dogshit what the fuck View attachment 5184135 this is not a 8.5

I think its a good chart overall but there are things that look weird like that I agree.

 

[supersaiyancarp27]

No one on .org follows this, also 4 PSL in this is way more attractive than average so you would have to declare 3 PSL as average.

yeah i guess but we do follow 1-8 tho