Rate this looks scale

[zemult]

5 probably

More like 5.5 if we're using this chart

 

[Raja Porus]

Moose above Gandy ?????

 

[Deleted member 19325]

I think josh mcgregor should definitely be higher , he mogs mukasa & welling in psl

 

[brownmutt42]

Good scale IMO

 

[brownmutt42]

Good scale IMO

But why is strijd above ballou?

 

[Deleted member 81171]

the mens scale is decent but womens scale is completely retarded

 

[St.Rotter]

moose ali khan is cl imo, penn badgley is mid htn, mbj and karl aikens are either lhtn or hmtn, and whoever this dude is View attachment 3534713 is legit mtn max

also think chico and o pry are like 8.0 but doesn't matter as much to me because chad is chad anyways. i just think they're overrated

all imho given how myself and other niggas here like you, @St.Rotter, @lestoa , @ey88, and @zemult seem to rate

ratings can never be consistent except when they're limited by convential objective things like ratios, i see lots of retarded ass ratings a lot tho and it lets u know who has good knowledge and who doesnt, but in general this scale is pretty good, idk about the gandy rating tho he mogs hard as fuck

 

[castizo_ascender]

the mens scale is decent but womens scale is completely retarded

Fuck I didn't even look at that one. It is totally retarded jfl

 

[castizo_ascender]

ratings can never be consistent except when they're limited by convential objective things like ratios, i see lots of retarded ass ratings a lot tho and it lets u know who has good knowledge and who doesnt, but in general this scale is pretty good, idk about the gandy rating tho he mogs hard as fuck

Yeah and when ur limited by ratios/bonemass you end up neglecting things like coloring/features that are harder to quantify but still important

That's why i usually give a small range instead of trying to split hairs. Some things like coloring are somewhat subjective yet still relevant bhai

 

[Neucher]

The ~3 faces all look like convicted felons

 

[pfl]

Yeah and when ur limited by ratios/bonemass you end up neglecting things like coloring/features that are harder to quantify but still important

That's why i usually give a small range instead of trying to split hairs. Some things like coloring are somewhat subjective yet still relevant bhai

Features were taken account in this list

 

[Neucher]

Not a single bald guy

 

[NarrowBoneMarrow]

This is such a shitty chart

 

[pfl]

This is such a shitty chart

How so

 

[NarrowBoneMarrow]

How so

maybe this is a bad pic of him but wtf lol

and these guys need to be lower:

These are straight mtns or a 5.5 at best, imagine how they would be rated on org with no status

and there are even more examples

 

[pfl]

View attachment 3552966
maybe this is a bad pic of him but wtf lol

and these guys need to be lower:
View attachment 3552967View attachment 3552968View attachment 3552969View attachment 3552970View attachment 3552971View attachment 3552973
These are straight mtns or a 5.5 at best, imagine how they would be rated on org with no status

and there are even more examples

Org ratings don’t mean shit
These ratings are based off math that doesn’t lie and is completely objective
Also who vasily or moose?

 

[AuggyDauggy]

@charliewillascend @druiglooksmaxer @Jason Voorhees @castizo_ascender

finally a nigga who uses his brain. Yeah this is pretty good honestly

 

[NarrowBoneMarrow]

Org ratings don’t mean shit
These ratings are based off math that doesn’t lie and is completely objective
Also who vasily or moose?

Moose, he looks mega cyclops like my avi in that pic

and i dont care about whatever ai you used, you overrated a lot of people