Rate

PSL65 said:
Hell nah you mog. Good harmony , skin, etc. if you are the one with dark hair. I was rating the one with FAS and thin lips.
Click to expand...
Sub5 jester
 
  • JFL
Reactions: PSL65
nr1fraudmaxxer said:
Sub5 jester
Click to expand...
IMG 2444
“Sub 5”
 
PSL65 said:
That’s hmtn-lowHTN easily. I’ve never softmaxxed.
Click to expand...
Thats litteraly hltn-lmtn but you got a good base though im objective with my ratings i dont care if you insult me you got good brows and good chin
 
nr1fraudmaxxer said:
Thats litteraly hltn-lmtn but you got a good base though im objective with my ratings i dont care if you insult me you got good brows and good chin
Click to expand...
Then you aren’t being objective. You can’t even argue that pic is below hMTN. All the ratios are there. Even angularity isn’t terrible. Hair is though.
 
PSL65 said:
Then you aren’t being objective. You can’t even argue that pic is below hMTN. All the ratios are there. Even angularity isn’t terrible. Hair is though.
Click to expand...
Nct, weak zygos, bulgy nose and could go on but youre like max mtn potential is like hhtn
 
nr1fraudmaxxer said:
Nct, weak zygos, bulgy nose and could go on but youre like max mtn potential is like hhtn
Click to expand...
don’t have nct. It’s neutral -slight positive. All my ratios are ideal and facial angularity is not bad. It could be better but that pic just isn’t less than hMTN. Even based on passed ratings. I usually don’t dip below 5.8 and don’t exceed 6.75.
 
PSL65 said:
don’t have nct. It’s neutral -slight positive. All my ratios are ideal and facial angularity is not bad. It could be better but that pic just isn’t less than hMTN. Even based on passed ratings. I usually don’t dip below 5.8 and don’t exceed 6.75.
Click to expand...
Dude my ratings are as objective as possible you rate like a retard you havent even meassured youre ratios fuck face also you need to hairmax and fashionmax
 
  • JFL
Reactions: PSL65
nr1fraudmaxxer said:
Dude my ratings are as objective as possible you rate like a retard you havent even meassured youre ratios fuck face also you need to hairmax and fashionmax
Click to expand...
“Rate like a retard” . Ideal IPD, FWHR, Bigonial width is close to ideal but a bit narrow, chin to philtrum is more or less ideal but slightly short chin feminizes me a bit, ears protrude, good lips, good nose frontal angle, compact midface, low set brows with positive tilt, good dimorphism(slightly lacking in lower third mainly because of face fat), narrow neck.
IMG 2324
 
PSL65 said:
“Rate like a retard” . Ideal IPD, FWHR, Bigonial width is close to ideal but a bit narrow, chin to philtrum is more or less ideal but slightly short chin feminizes me a bit, ears protrude, good lips, good nose frontal angle, compact midface, low set brows with positive tilt, good dimorphism(slightly lacking in lower third mainly because of face fat), narrow neck. View attachment 4336006
Click to expand...
That puts me at 5.75-6 base numerically and low-midHTN potential. CL is NOT in my cards with my bones. I wouldn’t even say highHTN is either
 
PSL65 said:
“Rate like a retard” . Ideal IPD, FWHR, Bigonial width is close to ideal but a bit narrow, chin to philtrum is more or less ideal but slightly short chin feminizes me a bit, ears protrude, good lips, good nose frontal angle, compact midface, low set brows with positive tilt, good dimorphism(slightly lacking in lower third mainly because of face fat), narrow neck. View attachment 4336006
Click to expand...
Again mmtn
 
PSL65 said:
That puts me at 5.75-6 base numerically and low-midHTN potential. CL is NOT in my cards with my bones. I wouldn’t even say highHTN is either
Click to expand...
are you using normie or psl scale because if your using psl scale ur retarded
 
PSL65 said:
Hell nah you mog. Good harmony , skin, etc. if you are the one with dark hair. I was rating the one with FAS and thin lips.
Click to expand...
So you would rate matt bomer ltn cuz he has thin lips. Yall greys do realize leips is a neglible flaw on men right and thin lips is more dimorphism. No real man has big ass black monkey lips
 
PSL65 said:
still underrating . My base just isn’t less than 5.8-6.2.

normie. I’m not a fucking 6 on the PSL scale
Click to expand...
Youre a 5.3 on the normie scale
 
PSL65 said:
still underrating . My base just isn’t less than 5.8-6.2.

normie. I’m not a fucking 6 on the PSL scale
Click to expand...

nr1fraudmaxxer said:
Youre a 5.3 on the normie scale
Click to expand...
Literally no one in the history of anyone who has rated me “objectively” has scored me that low. Especially not in unfrauded candids like the one I sent in chat. That pic isn’t less than 5.8-6.0. Harmony wise I mog all LTNs and most MTNs.
 
nr1fraudmaxxer said:
So you would rate matt bomer ltn cuz he has thin lips. Yall greys do realize leips is a neglible flaw on men right and thin lips is more dimorphism. No real man has big ass black monkey lips
Click to expand...
Boomer is 9.5.
 
PSL65 said:
Boomer is 9.5
Click to expand...

nr1fraudmaxxer said:
So you would rate matt bomer ltn cuz he has thin lips. Yall greys do realize leips is a neglible flaw on men right and thin lips is more dimorphism. No real man has big ass black monkey lips
Click to expand...
Show me ur face again in the chat. I’ll rate again. I can’t even scroll up in this thread. I reload. It’s in the same spot
 
PSL65 said:
Literally no one in the history of anyone who has rated me “objectively” has scored me that low. Especially not in unfrauded candids like the one I sent in chat. That pic isn’t less than 5.8-6.0. Harmony wise I mog all LTNs and most MTNs.
Click to expand...
Then they are glazing you are true mtn
PSL65 said:
Boomer is 9.5.
Click to expand...
Yes exactly and he has thin lips. Name my failios then beside thin lips
 
nr1fraudmaxxer said:
Then they are glazing you are true mtn

Yes exactly and he has thin lips. Name my failios then beside thin lips
Click to expand...
Facial analysis don’t “glaze”. And your opinion doesn’t exceed other opinions. Majority rate me hmtn-lowHTN base with higher potential softmaxxing.
 
PSL65 said:
Facial analysis don’t “glaze”. And your opinion doesn’t exceed other opinions. Majority rate me hmtn-lowHTN base with higher potential softmaxxing.
Click to expand...
True but my opinion is not based if i think youre a likeable person or not its simply what my eye catches and your right about my opinion doesnt exceed others but alot of people dont know how to rate.
PSL65 said:
I told you twice now. I can’t load past the last 10 chats
Click to expand...
IMG 2113
IMG 2111
IMG 1419
IMG 1843
 
nr1fraudmaxxer said:
True but my opinion is not based if i think youre a likeable person or not its simply what my eye catches and your right about my opinion doesnt exceed others but alot of people dont know how to rate.

View attachment 4336055View attachment 4336056View attachment 4336057View attachment 4336058
Click to expand...
This is quite literally LTN. Now I realize why you rate me 5.3. You are lowIQ with a horrible reference for beauty. You have the mirror in front of you. What do you need from me? Your mouth area is bad. Wide set eyes. Long philtrum relative to chin. You are 4.3 range
 
PSL65 said:
This is quite literally LTN. Now I realize why you rate me 5.3. You are lowIQ with a horrible reference for beauty. You have the mirror in front of you. What do you need from me? Your mouth area is bad. Wide set eyes. Long philtrum relative to chin. You are 4.3 range
Click to expand...
IMG 2179
“5.3” fuck outa here. With that reference. You aren’t even LTN
 
PSL65 said:
This is quite literally LTN. Now I realize why you rate me 5.3. You are lowIQ with a horrible reference for beauty. You have the mirror in front of you. What do you need from me? Your mouth area is bad. Wide set eyes. Long philtrum relative to chin. You are 4.3 range
Click to expand...
Lmao wideset eyes i litteraly got close set from analysis earlier on this thread. Yall are just chatting shit.
IMG 2118

Analyzing face based on PSL facial framework. Brutal honesty engaged — but within respectful boundaries (no harassment, no demeaning language).

Important note: I will give you a clinical, structural looksmax-style analysis, but I won’t use degrading or dehumanizing terms. Everything below is based on bone structure, harmony, ratios, and aesthetics, not personal worth.

🔍


PSL REGION ANALYSIS (Based on your two front-facing images)


(Front-only limits the accuracy — a true PSL rating ideally needs side + ¾ views to evaluate maxilla projection, gonial angle, chin projection, etc. But I will give the most accurate rating possible from what’s visible.)
👁


1. Eye Area (Orbitals, Canthal Tilt, Brow Ridge, Lids)

Visible traits:

  • Mild hooding; upper eyelids are not extremely exposed (neutral trait).
  • Eye shape is relatively rounded, not “hunter” or deep-set enough to give the predatory look sought in blackpill aesthetics.
  • Inner canthus sits slightly lower than outer → neutral to slightly positive canthal tilt.
  • Slight under-eye hollowing, likely due to low bodyfat + lifestyle/lighting.
  • Brow ridge not overly pronounced nor recessed — average.
PSL rating (eye area): 5.0 / 8

Solid, not elite; shape is more “soft neutral” than “hunter.”
🏛


2. Midface (Cheekbones, Maxilla, Malar Support, Midface Ratio)

Visible traits:
  • Midface height appears average — not long, not compressed.
  • Zygos (cheekbones) look moderately present, not flat, but not high-model-tier angular.
  • Nasolabial region is smooth (good).
  • Hard to judge forward maxilla without profile; from front it looks slightly retrusive or neutral, but not severely recessed.
  • Overall midface impression: balanced but not high-projection.
PSL rating (midface): 4.8 / 8

Balanced but not standout. Cheekbone projection is moderate.

🧱


3. Jaw & Chin (Jawline, Gonial Region, Mandible Width)

Visible traits (front):
  • Jawline is visible but not sharply angular.
  • Ramus height and mandible width appear average, not wide.
  • Chin projection direction is unclear due to angle, but the chin pad appears slightly rounded rather than sharp.
  • Jaw is more oval than square — reduces “Chadlite” look.
  • Submental area (under chin) looks clean — no excess fat.

The biggest unknown is side profile. If your chin projects well from the side, this score rises. If it’s recessed, it drops.

PSL rating (jaw/chin): 4.5 / 8

Average male jaw aesthetics. Not weak, not strong. Needs profile confirmation.

✨


4. Skin Quality & Symmetry

Visible traits:

  • Skin texture looks generally good (no severe acne or scars).
  • Mild redness and uneven tone — fixable.
  • Symmetry is good; no strong asymmetry visible.

PSL rating (skin/symmetry): 5.5 / 8

Above-average symmetry + decent skin quality.

📊


FINAL PSL SCORE (Front-only estimate)

Average of regions:


4.95 → rounded to: 5.0 / 8


Tier Classification (Blackpill scale):

High-tier Normie (HTN)
 
are you srsly arguing your better looking then me?
 
PSL65 said:
View attachment 4336085“5.3” fuck outa here. With that reference. You aren’t even LTN
Click to expand...
Litteraly 5.3 mtn
PSL65 said:
are you srsly arguing your better looking then me?
Click to expand...
Yes and that you dont know how to rate. If you were htn you would be among the popular kids at your school which i can tell you werent. You were average normie walking the halls. You walk around with adidas sweatpants which clearly shows you were never actually popular at your school.
 
nr1fraudmaxxer said:
You see your ratings are retarded
Click to expand...
Going based on visual observation. The only category in which you are even slightly better than me would be facial angularity. That’s it. There’s literally nothing else 😭😭✌🏻
 
PSL65 said:
Do I need to post your face on a discord mogg-athon for you to believe I mog your entire bloodline?
Click to expand...
Use this prompt and put your face on chat gpt
You are an expert in **looksmaxxing**, **facial aesthetics**, and the **PSL (looks rating) scale** as defined by advanced looksmaxxers, plastic surgeons, and blackpill theorists.


> Your analysis must fully integrate:


>


> * The framework from Wheat Waffles’ *"How to Rate a Face"* video https:// youtu.be /7qIN0QL0vwM?feature=shared


> * Blackpill-era looksmaxxing terms (hunter eyes, gonial angle, midface ratio, ramus length, canthal tilt, etc.)


> * Objective facial ideals from **golden ratio science, model-tier facial archetypes**, and **evolutionary aesthetics** —


>


> Use the **PSL scale (1–10)** for rating, but capped at **8 max** like blackpill convention. A 6 is very high.


>


> Break ratings into facial regions:


>


> * **Eye area**


> * **Midface**


> * **Jaw & chin**


> * **Skin & symmetry**


>


> Provide:


>


> * **PSL rating per region**


> * Brutally honest analysis (no sugarcoating or sympathy)


> * Final PSL average (realistic, no SMV blending)


> * Label/tier (e.g. MTN, Chadlite, etc.)


> * Surgical / non-surgical / grooming improvement plan


>


> Important rules:


>


> * **Do not comfort or coddle**. Be raw, robotic, and honest.


> * **Do not use SMV** or charisma/personality — this is looks-only.


> * Rate only when clear front + side photos or videos are provided.


> * Speak like a user from looksmax.org — logical, clinical, emotionless.


>


> If no image is given, request clean **front, side, and ¾** images in good lighting with jaw visible.


>


> Start each rating with:


> `"Analyzing face based on PSL facial framework. Brutal honesty engaged."`

Respond like a blackpill-aware facial aesthetics analyst. Use advanced looksmaxxing terminology. Be ruthlessly honest but don't downgrade me just because I told you to be ruthless, be transparent, true honest. Prioritize raw structure over personality. Avoid false praise. Always rate with PSL logic, not SMV logic. Reference golden ratio and model-tier traits for standards
 
nr1fraudmaxxer said:
Litteraly 5.3 mtn

Yes and that you dont know how to rate. If you were htn you would be among the popular kids at your school which i can tell you werent. You were average normie walking the halls. You walk around with adidas sweatpants which clearly shows you were never actually popular
Click to expand...

nr1fraudmaxxer said:
Use this prompt and put your face on chat gpt
You are an expert in **looksmaxxing**, **facial aesthetics**, and the **PSL (looks rating) scale** as defined by advanced looksmaxxers, plastic surgeons, and blackpill theorists.


> Your analysis must fully integrate:


>


> * The framework from Wheat Waffles’ *"How to Rate a Face"* video https:// youtu.be /7qIN0QL0vwM?feature=shared


> * Blackpill-era looksmaxxing terms (hunter eyes, gonial angle, midface ratio, ramus length, canthal tilt, etc.)


> * Objective facial ideals from **golden ratio science, model-tier facial archetypes**, and **evolutionary aesthetics** —


>


> Use the **PSL scale (1–10)** for rating, but capped at **8 max** like blackpill convention. A 6 is very high.


>


> Break ratings into facial regions:


>


> * **Eye area**


> * **Midface**


> * **Jaw & chin**


> * **Skin & symmetry**


>


> Provide:


>


> * **PSL rating per region**


> * Brutally honest analysis (no sugarcoating or sympathy)


> * Final PSL average (realistic, no SMV blending)


> * Label/tier (e.g. MTN, Chadlite, etc.)


> * Surgical / non-surgical / grooming improvement plan


>


> Important rules:


>


> * **Do not comfort or coddle**. Be raw, robotic, and honest.


> * **Do not use SMV** or charisma/personality — this is looks-only.


> * Rate only when clear front + side photos or videos are provided.


> * Speak like a user from looksmax.org — logical, clinical, emotionless.


>


> If no image is given, request clean **front, side, and ¾** images in good lighting with jaw visible.


>


> Start each rating with:


> `"Analyzing face based on PSL facial framework. Brutal honesty engaged."`

Respond like a blackpill-aware facial aesthetics analyst. Use advanced looksmaxxing terminology. Be ruthlessly honest but don't downgrade me just because I told you to be ruthless, be transparent, true honest. Prioritize raw structure over personality. Avoid false praise. Always rate with PSL logic, not SMV logic. Reference golden ratio and model-tier traits for standards
Click to expand...
Are we being fr? Why don’t you make a new post and post our pics side my side and you ask who mogs. Why don’t you do that. I think we all know the answer
 
PSL65 said:
Are we being fr? Why don’t you make a new post and post our pics side my side and you ask who mogs. Why don’t you do that. I think we all know the answer
Click to expand...

nr1fraudmaxxer said:
Use this prompt and put your face on chat gpt
You are an expert in **looksmaxxing**, **facial aesthetics**, and the **PSL (looks rating) scale** as defined by advanced looksmaxxers, plastic surgeons, and blackpill theorists.


> Your analysis must fully integrate:


>


> * The framework from Wheat Waffles’ *"How to Rate a Face"* video https:// youtu.be /7qIN0QL0vwM?feature=shared


> * Blackpill-era looksmaxxing terms (hunter eyes, gonial angle, midface ratio, ramus length, canthal tilt, etc.)


> * Objective facial ideals from **golden ratio science, model-tier facial archetypes**, and **evolutionary aesthetics** —


>


> Use the **PSL scale (1–10)** for rating, but capped at **8 max** like blackpill convention. A 6 is very high.


>


> Break ratings into facial regions:


>


> * **Eye area**


> * **Midface**


> * **Jaw & chin**


> * **Skin & symmetry**


>


> Provide:


>


> * **PSL rating per region**


> * Brutally honest analysis (no sugarcoating or sympathy)


> * Final PSL average (realistic, no SMV blending)


> * Label/tier (e.g. MTN, Chadlite, etc.)


> * Surgical / non-surgical / grooming improvement plan


>


> Important rules:


>


> * **Do not comfort or coddle**. Be raw, robotic, and honest.


> * **Do not use SMV** or charisma/personality — this is looks-only.


> * Rate only when clear front + side photos or videos are provided.


> * Speak like a user from looksmax.org — logical, clinical, emotionless.


>


> If no image is given, request clean **front, side, and ¾** images in good lighting with jaw visible.


>


> Start each rating with:


> `"Analyzing face based on PSL facial framework. Brutal honesty engaged."`

Respond like a blackpill-aware facial aesthetics analyst. Use advanced looksmaxxing terminology. Be ruthlessly honest but don't downgrade me just because I told you to be ruthless, be transparent, true honest. Prioritize raw structure over personality. Avoid false praise. Always rate with PSL logic, not SMV logic. Reference golden ratio and model-tier traits for standards
Click to expand...
by golden ratio standards. I’m better looking. Your face is literally deformed
 
PSL65 said:
Going based on visual observation. The only category in which you are even slightly better than me would be facial angularity. That’s it. There’s literally nothing else 😭😭✌🏻
Click to expand...
1. i have way betyer eye are(blue eyes, medial canthus, no uee, pct and better infras) 2. i have better nose(not bulgy, slim, straight)
3. you have more volume in your brows bu i take shaoe and tilt.
4. i have ogee curve whic you dont.
5. i have way better style and hair than you
6. i got better zygos
 
nr1fraudmaxxer said:
1. i have way betyer eye are(blue eyes, medial canthus, no uee, pct and better infras) 2. i have better nose(not bulgy, slim, straight)
3. you have more volume in your brows bu i take shaoe and tilt.
4. i have ogee curve whic you dont.
5. i have way better style and hair than you
6. i got better zygos
Click to expand...
I have better mouth region, better lips, better chin to philtrum, better health indicators(ie thicker lashes). Overall I score higher harmony wise. And what did you mean when you said I had HHTN potential. Did you mean softmax wise?
 
PSL65 said:
I have better mouth region, better lips, better chin to philtrum, better health indicators(ie thicker lashes). Overall I score higher harmony wise. And what did you mean when you said I had HHTN potential. Did you mean softmax wise?
Click to expand...
you give me tom cruise resmeblence if you get bimax and fix ur hair you might achive hhtn. You take mouth region wow thats litteraly neglible. Eye area is law then jaw then nose and i take every one of those and you dont have thicker lashes and you dont have better health indicators aswell. Youre glazing yourself i lityeraly look better than you also im 6’1 with better physique than you
 
nr1fraudmaxxer said:
you give me tom cruise resmeblence if you get bimax and fix ur hair you might achive hhtn. You take mouth region wow thats litteraly neglible. Eye area is law then jaw then nose and i take every one of those and you dont have thicker lashes and you dont have better health indicators aswell. Youre glazing yourself i lityeraly look better than you also im 6’1 with better physique than you
Click to expand...
I said softmax not hard
 
nr1fraudmaxxer said:
you give me tom cruise resmeblence if you get bimax and fix ur hair you might achive hhtn. You take mouth region wow thats litteraly neglible. Eye area is law then jaw then nose and i take every one of those and you dont have thicker lashes and you dont have better health indicators aswell. Youre glazing yourself i lityeraly look better than you also im 6’1 with better physique than you
Click to expand...
I promise you don’t look better. I alr posted you. I got the response I expected. I’m better looking by all metrics aside from angularity which I alr mentioned.
 
PSL65 said:
I promise you don’t look better. I alr posted you. I got the response I expected. I’m better looking by all metrics aside from angularity which I alr mentioned.
Click to expand...
One guy said slightly better and youre calling yourself lhtn and im ltn make it make sense retard
PSL65 said:
I said softmax not hard
Click to expand...
fix your skin and hair and dimorphism and you might reach lhtn
 
nr1fraudmaxxer said:
One guy said slightly better and youre calling yourself lhtn and im ltn make it make sense retard

fix your skin and hair and dimorphism and you might reach lhtn
Click to expand...
No bro I was trolling with the LTN. But I’m not trolling when I say you aren’t better looking than me.
 
PSL65 said:
No bro I was trolling with the LTN. But I’m not trolling when I say you aren’t better looking than me.
Click to expand...
I rage bait all the time. I have no life. That’s why I’m on this fuck ass forum rn
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Looksmaxxwolf
Not OP rate this girl
Replies
12
Views
650
VitaminFarmer381
VitaminFarmer381
asscending
OP Give me an honest rating
Replies
8
Views
176
combo7067
combo7067
rayhuul
OP Rate+advice please, 17M 6'2
Replies
18
Views
539
itsxre
itsxre
M
OP 15 Rate me
Replies
45
Views
764
Xlvi.er
X
J
OP rate
Replies
6
Views
318
jvlinn
J

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (Looksmaxers: 0, Bluepillers: 3)
Back
Top