Rating my subscribers and people from .org

[6'5 HTN]

 

[negawattlol]

autism tbh

 

[6'5 HTN]

autism tbh

wart

 

[negawattlol]

wart

analyzing faces is autism rating faces should be instinctive

 

[Blackgymmax]

Nice

 

[Blackgymmax]

analyzing faces is autism rating faces should be instinctive

I remember years back people saying there's no objective way to measure beauty
Now using objective measures you as a straight male who wants to fuck women wants to tell us what women want to fuck based on that
Nigger iq

 

[6'5 HTN]

analyzing faces is autism rating faces should be instinctive

The overall ratings were based visually; I pointed out the positives and negatives of the faces and did not use elements in isolation as reasoning for the overall scores.

Good formulas exist for mathematically rating overall objective beauty now, though.

 

[UrGirlsMcm]

Nigger iq

 

[Blackgymmax]

View attachment 2857511

Mogs u doesn't he

 

[grief]

I remember years back people saying there's no objective way to measure beauty
Now using objective measures you as a straight male who wants to fuck women wants to tell us what women want to fuck based on that
Nigger iq

but do you think women look at someone and rate it subconsciously in some scale? or just respulsive - average - hot

 

[UrGirlsMcm]

Mogs u doesn't he

Not difficult tbh

 

[negawattlol]

I remember years back people saying there's no objective way to measure beauty
Now using objective measures you as a straight male who wants to fuck women wants to tell us what women want to fuck based on that
Nigger iq

 

[6'5 HTN]

but do you think women look at someone and rate it subconsciously in some scale? or just respulsive - average - hot

they rate the same as men subconsciously; ofc, id say its one of these options:

-repulsive
-midly unattractive
-plain looking
-mildly attractive
-attractive
-very attractive

 

[grief]

they rate the same as men subconsciously; ofc, id say its one of these options:

-repulsive
-midly unattractive
-plain looking
-mildly attractive
-attractive
-very attractive

that's the sub-5 to chad scale aint it

 

[6'5 HTN]

that's the sub-5 to chad scale aint it

yeah u could break it down like this id say

0-3 -repulsive
4 -midly unattractive
5 -plain looking
6 -mildly attractive
7 -attractive
8+ -very attractive

 

[Ricky212]

Very good video

 

[6'5 HTN]

Very good video

thank you, appreciate it

 

[grief]

yeah u could break it down like this id say

0-3 -repulsive
4 -midly unattractive
5 -plain looking
6 -mildly attractive
7 -attractive
8+ -very attractive

if girls rate me 8.5 on average what they are tryna say is that i'm just mildly attractive right

 

[negawattlol]

The overall ratings were based visually; I pointed out the positives and negatives of the faces and did not use elements in isolation as reasoning for the overall scores.

Good formulas exist for mathematically rating overall objective beauty now, though.

I just think that rating objectively is a loophole tbh because it condradicts itself alot, because sometimes people who have ideal ratios could be mogged by people with not ideal ratios, so I just think rating based upon 3 seconds of seeing the person makes more sense

 

[butterworld]

Mirin the autism, did watch.

 

[6'5 HTN]

I just think that rating objectively is a loophole tbh because it condradicts itself alot, because sometimes people who have ideal ratios could be mogged by people with not ideal ratios, so I just think rating based upon 3 seconds of seeing the person makes more sense

I agree; most "objective" raters use terrible formulas and end up worse than just eyeballing a rate.


good objective rating doesn't just encompass ratios of course, if that were the case ryan gosling would be a LTN, it encompasses ratios, angularity, dimorphism, and features (coloring, eyebrow density, nose shape, lashes, etc)

 

[Thebbcmaxxer]

Mogs u doesn't he

lord gymmax how can I morph my face @Blackgymmax

 

[Phillybeard1996]

Sent dm

 

[negawattlol]

I agree; most "objective" raters use terrible formulas and end up worse than just eyeballing a rate.


good objective rating doesn't just encompass ratios of course, if that were the case ryan gosling would be a LTN, it encompasses ratios, angularity, dimorphism, and features (coloring, eyebrow density, nose shape, lashes, etc)

you seem like a chill dude tbh, you ever posted your face in here?

 

[6'5 HTN]

you seem like a chill dude tbh, you ever posted your face in here?

I had a face cam video posted at one point, but it was a bad video.

I will do facecam videos and analyze my own face for a video once i finish my accutane cycle

 

[negawattlol]

I had a face cam video posted at one point, but it was a bad video.

I will do facecam videos and analyze my own face for a video once i finish my accutane cycle

I also did accutane I still have dry lips and skin, it's bad poision for your body but it clears you pretty good tbh

 

[6'5 HTN]

I also did accutane I still have dry lips and skin, it's bad poision for your body but it clears you pretty good tbh

I think a low dose long-term is a pretty good option; the only side effects you would ever get are just from vitamin A toxicity, which can typically be avoided with a lower dose.

 

[Blackgymmax]

lord gymmax how can I morph my face @Blackgymmax

Use face app and see what happens

 

[Blackgymmax]

yeah u could break it down like this id say

0-3 -repulsive
4 -midly unattractive
5 -plain looking
6 -mildly attractive
7 -attractive
8+ -very attractive

0-5 unattractive
5.5 mildly unattractive (can be offset if tall like jacob elordi highmtn)
6 mildly attractive
7 attractive
8+ v attractive

 

[axttt_]

analyzing faces is autism rating faces should be instinctive

fr no one gonna fucking scientifically measure ur face irl gonna automatically rank ur attractiveness by what they see

 

[aesthetic beauty]

Love the vid even tho I disagree with some of the ratings.

 

[6'5 HTN]

fr no one gonna fucking scientifically measure ur face irl gonna automatically rank ur attractiveness by what they see

Wow, you have realized how science works!

In the same way, people used to think the earth was flat or that air didn't exist because it was invisible; we also thought facial attractiveness was random until modern science.

Facial aesthetics covers the basis of what subconsciously goes into facial attractiveness. No girl is measuring your canthal tilt, but it subconsciously impacts how attractive you are.

 

[Phillybeard1996]

Wow, you have realized how science works!

In the same way, people used to think the earth was flat or that air didn't exist because it was invisible; we also thought facial attractiveness was random until modern science.

Facial aesthetics covers the basis of what subconsciously goes into facial attractiveness. No girl is measuring your canthal tilt, but it subconsciously impacts how attractive you are.

I just sent you a email