Rating system SHD (Strong skull, hormonal profile and devolopement)

Hector

Hector

Ultraesthetics
Joined
Jul 16, 2019
Posts
2,216
Reputation
4,527
Following my last thread about the current PSL rating system

Strong skull
Hormonal profile
Devolopement


TDRL: Current PSL rating system focus on isolated facial features instead of studying the face as a whole, like we do unconsciently. Thats makes the system have some flaws and not perfect. Varying our aspie ratings with reality.

The SHD system (it only focuses on Face, you can add after neck and body halo, very important).

STRONG SKULL
(This is the one I will explain the more because is the more misunderstood)

This is mostly genetic + hormonal devolopement + being at healthy bf

Point: Strong skull isn't the classic denotation of strong skull used here, aka dismorphic. Is what I will explain here and is also applied to women.

This is a dismorphic strong skull
IMG 20200430 235956


And this is a less dismorphic strong skull
56

Strong skull is determined by the mid and high third basically, or to be more precise Orbital and zygomatic (and cheekbones).

Good orbitals aka compact orbitals. protect the eyes one of the most important things in your face. The more compact the orbitals the less UEE, the better under eye support, the better canthal tilt, do you think we are attracted or girls are attracted to these traits alone? No they subconsciently see a good compact orbitals, aka genetic advantage for protection in the environment.

The same with zygos and cheekbones. They protect your face and brain from the enviornment, they are basically a shield of bone to your most important thing in your body, your head. The bigger zygos the more genetic advantage.

Zygos and cheekbones are realted to hormonal devolopement, if you are a man with low T during puberty you will devolop worse zygos.

Zygos are also related to good devolopement, a bad maxilla can make zygos less wide, thus prominents, thus less effective as a "shield".

And finally, zygos are related to good BF, a fat person zygos aren't as visible as someone lean. But actually I think it is more about showing you healthy hormonal profile that makes people attracted to it (apart of what already mentioned).

Why I said women can have a strong skull? Because it is mostly genetic, and you can see that attractive women have good zygos (they are better protected) and have better orbitals, as well as GL men. Is just that men are more dismorphic and lets to the wrong idea of women not having strong skulls.

Adriana lima curiosidades secretos 06 a

Look at her zygos, they are big and wide, and her eye area really shows her compact orbitals. She has a strong superior skull.

30154690328 141795de19 b

Look at her now, her zygos are less devoloped, smaller and thinner, and her eye bags shows that her orbitals bones are more roundish than compact. She has a weak skull.

56

He looks "femenine" because of his nose and overall face, yet he looks handsome and attractive. This is because he has a steong skull, see how devoloped are his zygos and how comoact his orbitals are. He is "femenine" yet strong skull.

537

He is the same but more masculine looking, but notice how the base of strong skull is the same, compact orbitals (yes he has underye lines, but a women won't care that much because his orbitals look compact, thus strong). His zygos and cheekbones are perfectly devoloped.

348290 b4240dbd50936e55052a6d728914e62b

Now compare to him. He has slighly UEE, bad undereye support (roundish orbitals) and his zygos could be much better. He has an averagish or even below skull in terms of strong skull.

TDLR for Strong skull: Orbitals and zygos.


HORMONAL PROFILE

This is the most basic one, nothing more to add is basically having a good body fat and looking dismorphic (masculine or femenine is a women, not too much lean).

As long as the overall look of the face you are rating gives you a dismorphic or femenine vibe is okey, there is no need to focus more on this.

Most important thing after leaness in a man might be eyebrows (thick and dark), really shows good T levels.

You can also add hormonal devolopement here like square and protected chins, small noses on women...


DEVOLOPEMENT

This is the last main category you should look into a face. While strong skull is mostly genetic, devolopement is decided in your lifetime, soecially childhood and puberty years.

This englobes all the aspects related to devolopement, specially of the maxilla like well positioned zygos, good jawline and ramus (also hormonal devolopement), good bite (not over o underbites), wide palatte, mostly nose, not crooked teeth, good skull size...

Have you ever seen the classic guy with big zygos and not bad eyes but shit jawline? Well thats the perfect example of a strong skull but bad devolopement. Remember that each section of the SHD is equally as important.

Now we enter in the secondary part of the rate:

+HALOS
By halos now we talk sbout things like eye color, good nose (you can have a "bad" nose like Gandy or O'Pry and still be highly attractive because it doesn't affect the SHL main dection), good bread depending nn the person, race...

-FALIOS
The same buy substracting from the SHD main. Bad nose, balding, scars, acne, face tats (JFL at you), race...

And finally IDK to put it in the PSL but height (I will let body halo apart). Depending on your location you will have a span of around 5 centimeters (ex in my country 175-180) where the rating score will be untouched and depending on your height it should start lowering or increasing.

Example if you got around 5,5 score and you are 170 your final score is 5 or if you are 190 is 6. (Adjust to your own criteria this part).

It may sounds worse than the current system but trust my the more you use it and realtes this to human behaivour IRL the more sense it makes.

TDRL for lazys:
Strong skull (not dismorphism), devolopement and hormonal profile (leaness basically) equally important and then enters falios and halos

Thanks for the brahs who readed, you can add give ideas to this system, sorry for thw formsting and the lack of pics I am doing this in the phone.

@needsolution @Vidyacoper @Notuglyjustpoor
@streege
 

Attachments

  • 56.jpg
    56.jpg
    6.1 KB · Views: 8
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: GigaMog, randomvanish, Deleted member 3202 and 7 others
0
 
  • +1
Reactions: Fear
If zygos are determined by development why did you include them also in the "Strong Skull" section?

Hairline would be included in the "Hormonal Profile" section, right?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Hector
Shit thread cause example you've used is a gigamogger regardless
 
  • +1
Reactions: Kingkellz and PenileFacialSurgery
If zygos are determined by development why did you include them also in the "Strong Skull" section?

Hairline would be included in the "Hormonal Profile" section, right?
Is not about what causes it, is what they representant, good zygos means steong skull + good devolopement + good hormonal profile, thats why they are one of the most important features in the face.

Hairline is mostly genetic, so it is on the falio part.
Shit thread cause example you've used is a gigamogger regardless
Put pics of people and I will rate them so you can see gow it works.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Kingkellz
Is not about what causes it, is what they representant, good zygos means steong skull + good devolopement + good hormonal profile, thats why they are one of the most important features in the face.

Hairline is mostly genetic, so it is on the falio part.
Someone’s overall attractiveness (PSL Rating) can pretty much be determined in a split second to a few seconds, it’s not that deep, it’s overall attractiveness, everything averages out, your subconscious mind is best at that.

this really isn’t something to autistically analyze, In studies people can determine whether someone is attractive or not in a split second flashing someone’s face.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 5187 and Kingkellz
Good thread
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 5187 and Hector
Someone’s overall attractiveness (PSL Rating) can pretty much be determined in a split second to a few seconds, it’s not that deep, it’s overall attractiveness, everything averages out, your subconscious mind is best at that.

this really isn’t something to autistically analyze, In studies people can determine whether someone is attractive or not in a split second flashing someone’s face.
This is literally what I said, and this is literally why I said current rating system is flawed (because it focus on features instead of overall).

I am just here explaining what we see subconsciently in terms of seconds:
Strong skulls
Devolopement
And leanness

Thats the 3 main things your brain process in miliseconds when you see a face.
 
I kinda get what you're saying
But I can't even judge according to PSL

I can judge if you're ugly or chad lol

PSL system is probaly best to see overall flaws and how they can be fixed?
But isn't a proper system to detect attractiveness as we do this instinctly?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Hector
Why is race included in failos? The things that determine one people race are certain individual features and coloring.

Theres not such thing as "bad" or "good" race as a whole thing, there are ethnic and not ethnic features that compose the different races.
 
This is literally what I said, and this is literally why I said current rating system is flawed (because it focus on features instead of overall).

I am just here explaining what we see subconsciently in terms of seconds.
Current rating system?

You made it more complex, most people don’t rate only on specific features, it’s overall since most let their subconscious do the work.

Whats flawed is the retarded 8/8 rating, and people’s personal bias coping rating others too low or high, and nothing will fix that.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Perfect Hairline and Deleted member 5187
This is literally what I said, and this is literally why I said current rating system is flawed (because it focus on features instead of overall).
Thats why we also take into account ratios when rating.
 
I kinda get what you're saying
But I can't even judge according to PSL

I can judge if you're ugly or chad lol

PSL system is probaly best to see overall flaws and how they can be fixed?
But isn't a proper system to detect attractiveness as we do this instinctly?
For spot flaws you just need what makes a feature a flaw, nothing more.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 5187
Why is race included in failos? The things that determine one people race are certain individual features and coloring.

Theres not such thing as "bad" or "good" race as a whole thing, there are ethnic and not ethnic features that compose the different races.
Graycel

Anything other than White is a bad race, for the most part...

Saying this as facts, how most people see others. Objectively. Not my personal preference or view.

Latino and Black are most passable with no failo, probably a Halo if mixed, but their options are more limited.

Asian, Indian, and Aran are huge failos.
 
Graycel

Anything other than White is a bad race, for the most part...

Saying this as facts, how most people see others. Objectively. Not my personal preference or view.

Latino and Black are most passable with no failo, probably a Halo if mixed, but their options are more limited.

Asian, Indian, and Aran are huge failos.
Yes. Depends on your locacation race can be neutral (native) a falio or a halo (like JBW in SA)
 
  • +1
Reactions: PenileFacialSurgery
Why is race included in failos? The things that determine one people race are certain individual features and coloring.

Theres not such thing as "bad" or "good" race as a whole thing, there are ethnic and not ethnic features that compose the different races.



It shouldn't be but in probalistic terms on average caucasoids have better faces
 
  • +1
Reactions: Perfect Hairline
Anything other than White is a bad race, for the most part...

Saying this as facts, how most people see others. Objectively. Not my personal preference or view.

Latino and Black are most passable with no failo, probably a Halo if mixed, but their options are more limited.

Asian, Indian, and Aran are huge failos.
So?

I am not denying that, but what differentiates an indian guy from a white guy is individual features and coloring.

Saying "you have a bad race" is like saying "you have bad harmony"

Individual features and coloring are the things that determine what race you look like.
 
So?

I am not denying that, but what differences an indian guy from a white guy is individual features and coloring.

Saying "you have a bad race" is like saying "you have bad harmony"

Individual features and coloring are the things that determine what race you look like.
No fucking shit. That’s why an attractive Curry or Chink is always “White Passing” “Mixed Looking” looking.

Their racial phenotype, features and coloring will always failo them on a grand scale.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero
No fucking shit. That’s why an attractive Curry or Chink is always “White Passing” “Mixed Looking” looking.

Their racial phenotype, features and coloring will always failo them on a grand scale.
I agree, what i was trying to say is that you shouldnt consider race as a whole as a failo but ethnic features instead.

Dont get me wrong, being indian is clearly a failo, but the reason for it is that by being a indian you have certain ethnic features that are not considered good.

The thing is that two guys can look indian for totally different reasons, so if instead of considering being Indian a failo whe consider a failo having any of the features that make you look Indian the system would be more accurate to detect flaws.
 
I agree, what i was trying to say is that you shouldnt consider race as a whole as a failo but ethnic features instead.

Dont get me wrong, being indian is clearly a failo, but the reason for it is that by being a indian you have certain ethnic features that are not considered good.

The thing is that two guys can look indian for totally different reasons, so if instead of considering being Indian a failo whe consider a failo having any of the features that make you look Indian the system would be more accurate to detect flaws.
The failo of race isn’t just on certain specific features that can be corrected, it’s everything
Overall phenotype.

Don’t tell me Asians aren’t attractive just because a couple features that can be fixed lol.
 
Which is composed of individual features.


They are, some may have more bad features than others, also i never talked about whether the features could be fixed or not.
Okay bruh, just change every single characteristic about your face to look completely different, like a complete different race, and BOOM no one failo for your race.
 
Is not about what causes it, is what they representant, good zygos means steong skull + good devolopement + good hormonal profile, thats why they are one of the most important features in the face.

Hairline is mostly genetic, so it is on the falio part.

Put pics of people and I will rate them so you can see gow it works.
I think that I may have a smaller skull size than what's ideal, but my face seems wide and harmonizes well with it anyway. How much of a flaw is it to have a slightly smaller skull size?
 
I think that I may have a smaller skull size than what's ideal, but my face seems wide and harmonizes well with it anyway. How much of a flaw is it to have a slightly smaller skull size?
If your face is good, don't bother with it a lot.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3202

Similar threads

Teer
Replies
14
Views
96
Teer
Teer
R
Replies
0
Views
43
ro_ltn
R
supafuckfoids
Replies
1
Views
81
Jorad
Jorad
XIX
Replies
7
Views
73
Joeseminate
Joeseminate
zeph.u
Replies
8
Views
44
TheAnimal
TheAnimal

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top