Ratings are so shit and should be changed

[Deleted member 31934]

Autists spend hours to analyze ratios and individual features to give a “proper” rating when it can be in reality done in about 3 seconds.
A first impression of people irl is based on your physical looks and the way you dress, and it takes about 7 seconds. For people here judging a face should take about 3 seconds. Are your eyes not enough to judge if someone looks good or not jfl? Rarely, very rarely it happens to me where im stuck between if someone is gl/normal or normal/ugly. Rare cases.

Another thing is all this subhuman/ltn/mtn/htn/chadlite/chad. At some point this has to be a meme. Ratings should be ugly normal above average and attractive.
Then people add high mtn with htn appeal but could be low chadlite psl wise with chad smv like what the fuck are you talking about. Scrap the terms PSL and SMV and rate attractive to women or not attractive to women. It can be that simple

 

[LowTrust]

appeal is everything

 

[Reformed]

Jaw, height, frame is all that matters irl

 

[Deleted member 23359]

thats why oofy doofy is everything

they have the biggest appeal of all even mogs so called psl gods

 

[Deleted member 31934]

Jaw, height, frame is all that matters irl

Close minded way of thinking. Everything matters, this forum is just bad at determining how and why

 

[wonderwhy]

Jaw, height, frame is all that matters irl

Eyes , height , frame . Jaw as long as it's not blackops2cel tier you good

 

[czwarty]

If someone wants to be rated here then he wants it to know what are his good sides and failos. Simply calling him an ugly subhuman adds nothing. The "autistic" analysis gives him base to what to fix and what to expose and emphasize (or to cut his losses and give up if it's really over).

Although it's true the autistic ratings of celebrities or other people is useless and retarded idle talk

 

[Deleted member 31934]

If someone wants to be rated here then he wants it to know what are his good sides and failos. Simply calling him an ugly subhuman adds nothing. The "autistic" analysis gives him base to what to fix and what to expose and emphasize (or to cut his losses and give up if it's really over).

Although it's true the autistic ratings of celebrities or other people is useless and retarded idle talk

You can rate him and tell him his failos and halos. As soon as you start typing out “MTN but HTN appeal” or some retarded shit like that you should immediately delete the comment and close the forum. You can point out his positive and negative features and tell him “you are normal/attractive, potential to be very attractive after these softmaxxes/hardmaxxes”. Thats it

 

[sergeant blackpill]

Autists spend hours to analyze ratios and individual features to give a “proper” rating when it can be in reality done in about 3 seconds.
A first impression of people irl is based on your physical looks and the way you dress, and it takes about 7 seconds. For people here judging a face should take about 3 seconds. Are your eyes not enough to judge if someone looks good or not jfl? Rarely, very rarely it happens to me where im stuck between if someone is gl/normal or normal/ugly. Rare cases.

Another thing is all this subhuman/ltn/mtn/htn/chadlite/chad. At some point this has to be a meme. Ratings should be ugly normal above average and attractive.
Then people add high mtn with htn appeal but could be low chadlite psl wise with chad smv like what the fuck are you talking about. Scrap the terms PSL and SMV and rate attractive to women or not attractive to women. It can be that simple

i prefer to see attractiveness in binary, it takes 154 ms according to a study to make a judgement on the attractiveness of a face

 

[Deleted member 31934]

i prefer to see attractiveness in binary, it takes 154 ms according to a study to make a judgement on the attractiveness of a face

Can you show me the study that claims that? Would support my thread even more in that case

 

[Lebgfinal]

I agree but did u know that
Subhuman/Truecel = Ugly
LTN = Below average
MTN = Normal
HTN = Above average
Chadlite = Good looking
Chad = Strickingly good looking
Gigachad = Can't be better looking than this

 

[sergeant blackpill]

Can you show me the study that claims that? Would support my thread even more in that case

Scientific Blackpill

The Scientific Blackpill is about understanding the nature of human social and sexual behavior with a particular focus on evolutionary psychological perspectives...

incels.wiki

 

[Deleted member 31934]

I agree but did u know that
Subhuman/Truecel = Ugly
LTN = Below average
MTN = Normal
HTN = Above average
Chadlite = Good looking
Chad = Strickingly good looking
Gigachad = Can't be better looking than this

below average is ugly

good looking is just good look no need for strikingly or whatever. Maybe over good looking there can be “super model” but again thats just attractive. At that point to women its all subjective

 

[klamus]

Autists spend hours to analyze ratios and individual features to give a “proper” rating when it can be in reality done in about 3 seconds.
A first impression of people irl is based on your physical looks and the way you dress, and it takes about 7 seconds. For people here judging a face should take about 3 seconds. Are your eyes not enough to judge if someone looks good or not jfl? Rarely, very rarely it happens to me where im stuck between if someone is gl/normal or normal/ugly. Rare cases.

Another thing is all this subhuman/ltn/mtn/htn/chadlite/chad. At some point this has to be a meme. Ratings should be ugly normal above average and attractive.
Then people add high mtn with htn appeal but could be low chadlite psl wise with chad smv like what the fuck are you talking about. Scrap the terms PSL and SMV and rate attractive to women or not attractive to women. It can be that simple

7 seconds? What? Takes literally one second

 

[jflsnowdzz]

No one spends hours analysing retard everyone can tell if someone is good looking or not in one look. Analysing is just for pointing out failos to fix or what makes him look like shit.

Another thing is all this subhuman/ltn/mtn/htn/chadlite/chad. At some point this has to be a meme. Ratings should be ugly normal above average and attractive.

theres different levels of ugly and different levels of attractive lol this is so dumb

 

[Deleted member 31934]

theres different levels of ugly and different levels of attractive lol this is so dumb

consider roping

 

[Deleted member 24789]

High iq thread

 

[Deleted member 24789]

below average is ugly

good looking is just good look no need for strikingly or whatever. Maybe over good looking there can be “super model” but again thats just attractive. At that point to women its all subjective

Exactly

 

[tombradylover]

Ur right girls look at u for a few seconds and immediately know if they wanna fuck or not. It’s not rocket science

 

[goo25]

I agree but did u know that
Subhuman/Truecel = Ugly
LTN = Below average
MTN = Normal
HTN = Above average
Chadlite = Good looking
Chad = Strickingly good looking
Gigachad = Can't be better looking than this

htn Is good looking for most of the people

 

[Deleted member 24789]

Ur right girls look at u for a few seconds and immediately know if they wanna fuck or not. It’s not rocket science

Too extreme

Anything between strong mtn strong htn is subjective

you can be sexually attractive to one girl and less to another

Normies are not attractive , and from chadlite it's just "universally attractive"

Thats how i see things

 

[Deleted member 24789]

htn Is good looking for most of the people

Its in the range above average, a htn can be less beautiful for one girl than for another. On the other hand very handsome guys are for all girls without exception

 

[tombradylover]

Too extreme

Anything between strong mtn strong htn is subjective

you can be sexually attractive to one girl and less to another

Normies are not attractive , and from chadlite it's just "universally attractive"

Thats how i see things

Not a bad way to look at it at all. Still only takes the girl a few seconds to determine if they are attracted to u or not

 

[Deleted member 24789]

Not a bad way to look at it at all. Still only takes the girl a few seconds to determine if they are attracted to u or not

apparently a girl judges you in 2 seconds something like that jfl

 

[Deleted member 31934]

Too extreme

Anything between strong mtn strong htn is subjective

you can be sexually attractive to one girl and less to another

Normies are not attractive , and from chadlite it's just "universally attractive"

Thats how i see things

“mtn” is just a normal guy on the street. You wont be sticking out to women but you wont be looked at as a ugly weirdo or something. Like almost anybody can achieve this. “htn” and “chadlite” (jfl) are above average and at this point you are attractive and will be attractive to most women. Chad is basically the best looking guys, the models etc. Anything above average honestly becomes subjective to women in terms of which above average/attractive guys they prefer more. It comes to personal preference anout some features and other things aside from face

 

[Deleted member 24789]

“mtn” is just a normal guy on the street. You wont be sticking out to women but you wont be looked at as a ugly weirdo or something. Like almost anybody can achieve this. “htn” and “chadlite” (jfl) are above average and at this point you are attractive and will be attractive to most women. Chad is basically the best looking guys, the models etc. Anything above average honestly becomes subjective to women in terms of which above average/attractive guys they prefer more. It comes to personal preference anout some features and other things aside from face

Imo there is a big gap between htn and chadlite. But I see what you mean

For me htn guys are above average daily life people and chadlites are the really gl guys you see from time to time. @tombradylover is a good ex of chadlite imo

Chad dont even exist lol, 1 per month at best

 

[Deleted member 31934]

Imo there is a big gap between htn and chadlite. But I see what you mean

For me htn guys are above average daily life people and chadlites are the really gl guys you see from time to time. @tombradylover is a good ex of chadlite imo

Chad dont even exist lol, 1 per month at best

fair but i still really dislike those terms jfl

Chad dont even exist lol, 1 per month at best

Chad is basically the influencers that get famous because of looks, or models

 

[Deleted member 24789]

fair but i still really dislike those terms jfl


Chad is basically the influencers that get famous because of looks, or models

this is chad level

1 every 3 months if you go out everyday lol (and even, not even sure)

 

[Issou]

Leonardo da Vinci established the golden ratio. There's a mathematically proven method to rate faces so people use it

 

[Deleted member 31934]

Leonardo da Vinci established the golden ratio. There's a mathematically proven method to rate faces so people use it

I use the “eyesight theory”. Complicated method where i have to look into a persons face basically

 

[Deleted member 31934]

View attachment 2306301 this is chad level

1 every 3 months if you go out everyday lol (and even, not even sure)

I’ve never seen anyone close to that irl tbh, only online

 

[Issou]

I use the “eyesight theory”. Complicated method where i have to look into a persons face basically

Even with eyesight, people are mathematically good looking or not

 

[tombradylover]

Imo there is a big gap between htn and chadlite. But I see what you mean

For me htn guys are above average daily life people and chadlites are the really gl guys you see from time to time. @tombradylover is a good ex of chadlite imo

Chad dont even exist lol, 1 per month at best

Yea chad is so fucking rare it’s almost pointless. They do exist but when u see them it’s so cortisol inducing bro. So rare and these ppl have their looks carry them in all facets of life. Thx for kind words btw

 

[Deleted member 31944]

i prefer to see attractiveness in binary, it takes 154 ms according to a study to make a judgement on the attractiveness of a face

Over when you know this by heart.