RATIOS ARE COMPLETE AND UTTER COPE

thecel

thecel

morph king
Joined
May 16, 2020
Posts
26,103
Reputation
56,898
Delusional autistic dwellers here still cope with muh ratios.

Gandy with Shit IPD
Ideal ratios 2cel


David Gandy with cyclops IPD (consequently, low midface ratio) mogs Saint BlackOps2cel with ideal ratios.

Ass


Ideal ratios 2cel looksrated


 
Last edited:
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: Luxury and Deleted member 13710
Bones bones bones
 
  • JFL
Reactions: thecel
Can't tell if trolling. If you want to assess the importance of a variable such as ratios you hold other variables constant or it's a misleading comparison. The David Gandy you posted looks much worse than original David Gandy hence proving the relevance of ratios.
 
  • +1
Reactions: spectacularpixlr, Acne Victim, Wallenberg and 1 other person
Can't tell if trolling. If you want to assess the importance of a variable such as ratios you hold other variables constant or it's a misleading comparison. The David Gandy you posted looks much worse than original David Gandy hence proving the relevance of ratios.

The morphed Gandy still looks better than the other guy with ideal ratios.
 
Delusional autistic dwellers here still cope with muh ratios.

View attachment 2074888View attachment 2074889

David Gandy with cyclops IPD (consequently, low midface ratio) mogs Saint BlackOps2cel with ideal ratios.

View attachment 2074894

View attachment 2074896

Lol yeah it's cope if you use an online program to manipulate someone into looking nothing like they do in real life. The problem is that he has no harmony. Ratios are just a way to quantify things into a number format by taking averages of attractive people. Even if what you were saying is true a single edited photo of a person famous for being unattractive being compared to a top model is extremely weak evidence and doesn't prove anything
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
The morphed Gandy still looks better than the other guy with ideal ratios.
Yes because there are many variables that influence beauty but the point is you always assess a feature in isolation to determine how important it is...

It's intellectually dishonest for example to say height has no impact because 5'10" Chad gets more pussy than 6'2" MTN because the impact of the height differential is overshadowed by other differences between the two subjects.

Same here. Your Cyclops DG looks better than the other guy because of a host of factors but looks descended compared to OG DG so ratios do matter.
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
both ugly asf
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
its about averagness
 
Gandy with cyclops ipd looks like maher
 
Obviously ratios are only part of the jigsaw. You can have perfect ratios and hideous features, yo.

Girls are often cursed in this way - good overall body and face ratios, & good skin...yet each main facial feature is a failio in itself. Just brutal.
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
You literally proved an opposite thing. Gandy with these ratios looks a lot uglier
 
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: thecel and Deleted member 13710

Similar threads

5bahia's_dog1
Replies
4
Views
50
LookzMaxxerSyn
LookzMaxxerSyn
P
Replies
11
Views
89
LiL 369
LiL 369
P
Replies
12
Views
117
Peco
P
mobo
Replies
10
Views
109
zap
zap
fortnitelover671
Replies
3
Views
73
Tsl
Tsl

Users who are viewing this thread

  • sig_baggot
Back
Top