Raw Meat and Raw Milk Cope Proof (GTFIH)

Raw milk & raw meat is cope, stop falling for this dumb shit​

---

RAW MILK​

the cope: "raw milk is good to ascend"​

Reality​

Pasteurisation barely changes the nutrition, its literally heating up the milk for 15 seconds to kill the bacteria.The amount of vitamins and nutrients being lost in this process does not matter in real diets.

Spoiler

Study:
Claeys et al., 2013 review comparing raw vs pasteurised milk. Conclusion: no meaningful nutritional advantage for raw milk XD.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22054181/

When some manlet argues that "oh no the enzymes going to get denatured", they don't know how the fucking body works because the stomach acid is strong enough to absolutely obliterate them too.

Raw milk isn’t fermented, so the probiotic angle is also cope, If you really want probiotics, drink kefir and have yoghurt.

No cope data:​

Raw milk causes way more food poisoning per serving than pasteurised milk, not debatable. It suprises me how some idiot doesn't realise that raw milk has more than 150 times pathogens than normal milk

Spoiler

CDC data:
https://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/rawmilk/raw-milk-outbreaks.html

---

RAW MEAT​

The cope:​

“Cooking kills nutrients . Our ancestors ate raw meat”
We haven't gone through tens of thousands of years of evolution just to fucking eat raw meat, our bodies aren't adapted to that shit.

Reality​

There is zero human evidence that raw meat improves testosterone, muscle, bones, immunity so its not optimal for looks.

Cooking meat actually makes protein easier to digest and lets you extract more calories which should be common sense by now.

Spoiler: Proof

Study:
Carmody & Wrangham, 2009 . cooking increases net energy gain from food.
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0905277106

Humans have invented cooking to kill pathogens, have better tasting food, have more readily available nutrition and by not having it will not make you edgy or cool.

The nutrient loss thing is so exaggerated. Iron, zinc, creatine, taurine still there, this can be easily dealt with having just cheap supplements or having more cooked meat but its so negligible, it doesn't make sense. You are not losing anything if you cook your meat

Risk vs benefit​

Raw meat has documented higher illness risk idk why it doesn't register with people but there is clear proof.

Spoiler: proof

CDC guidance:
https://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/foods/raw-meat.html

And before someone brings up steak tartare, its heavily controlled. It's still risky and doesn't have anything crazy good.

If raw meat worked, bodybuilders and athletes would be eating it .

food born illnesses linked to unpasteurised milk

---

WHY PEOPLE FALL FOR THIS​

Because it feels anti-normie and edgy and they just want to try coping with their recessed facial structure.

It sounds cool. But it's retarded :/

salmonella cases

---

TLDR FOR LOW ATTENTION SPANS​

• Raw milk has no significant proven benefit, higher risk
• Raw meat has no significant proven benefit, higher risk
• “Ancient” ≠ optimal
• your feelings ≠ data

Cook your food. Eat properly. Stop trying to undo 10000's of evolution

If you think your raw milk or raw meat comes from a good and safe source, its probably cope because bacteria grows on them itself without needing any unhygienic environment.



Don't give copes, use science and lets have a logical argument behind it.

 

[ts1]

Raw milk & raw meat is cope, stop falling for this dumb shit​

---

RAW MILK​

the cope: "raw milk is good to ascend"​

Reality​

Pasteurisation barely changes the nutrition, its literally heating up the milk for 15 seconds to kill the bacteria.The amount of vitamins and nutrients being lost in this process does not matter in real diets.

Spoiler

Study:
Claeys et al., 2013 review comparing raw vs pasteurised milk. Conclusion: no meaningful nutritional advantage for raw milk XD.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22054181/

When some manlet argues that "oh no the enzymes going to get denatured", they don't know how the fucking body works because the stomach acid is strong enough to absolutely obliterate them too.

Raw milk isn’t fermented, so the probiotic angle is also cope, If you really want probiotics, drink kefir and have yoghurt.

No cope data:​

Raw milk causes way more food poisoning per serving than pasteurised milk, not debatable. It suprises me how some idiot doesn't realise that raw milk has more than 150 times pathogens than normal milk

Spoiler

CDC data:
https://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/rawmilk/raw-milk-outbreaks.html

---

RAW MEAT​

The cope:​

“Cooking kills nutrients . Our ancestors ate raw meat”
We haven't gone through tens of thousands of years of evolution just to fucking eat raw meat, our bodies aren't adapted to that shit.

Reality​

There is zero human evidence that raw meat improves testosterone, muscle, bones, immunity so its not optimal for looks.

Cooking meat actually makes protein easier to digest and lets you extract more calories which should be common sense by now.

Spoiler: Proof

Study:
Carmody & Wrangham, 2009 . cooking increases net energy gain from food.
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0905277106

Humans have invented cooking to kill pathogens, have better tasting food, have more readily available nutrition and by not having it will not make you edgy or cool.

The nutrient loss thing is so exaggerated. Iron, zinc, creatine, taurine still there, this can be easily dealt with having just cheap supplements or having more cooked meat but its so negligible, it doesn't make sense. You are not losing anything if you cook your meat

Risk vs benefit​

Raw meat has documented higher illness risk idk why it doesn't register with people but there is clear proof.

Spoiler: proof

CDC guidance:
https://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/foods/raw-meat.html

And before someone brings up steak tartare, its heavily controlled. It's still risky and doesn't have anything crazy good.

If raw meat worked, bodybuilders and athletes would be eating it .

food born illnesses linked to unpasteurised milk

---

WHY PEOPLE FALL FOR THIS​

Because it feels anti-normie and edgy and they just want to try coping with their recessed facial structure.

It sounds cool. But it's retarded :/

salmonella cases

---

TLDR FOR LOW ATTENTION SPANS​

• Raw milk has no significant proven benefit, higher risk
• Raw meat has no significant proven benefit, higher risk
• “Ancient” ≠ optimal
• your feelings ≠ data

Cook your food. Eat properly. Stop trying to undo 10000's of evolution

If you think your raw milk or raw meat comes from a good and safe source, its probably cope because bacteria grows on them itself without needing any unhygienic environment.



Don't give copes, use science and lets have a logical argument behind it.

Uht or pasteurised milk