raw milk isn’t dangerous. ignorance is.

holy

holy

Joined
Nov 5, 2024
Posts
485
Reputation
866
the only reason people think raw milk is some death trap is because of:

- decades of fear-mongering
- corporate lobbying and
- government intervention.


pasteurization was originally introduced as a quick fix for dirty, disease-ridden milk from industrialized, overcrowded farms, not because raw milk itself was inherently dangerous.



why raw milk is superior

raw milk is real milk, loaded with living enzymes, probiotics, and bioavailable nutrients that pasteurized milk strips away.
1742544788944

IF milk is produced cleanly, raw is not only safe but outright superior.

- full spectrum enzymes

lactase, lipase, phosphatase.
these are all natural enzymes that help digestion and nutrient absorption get destroyed by pasteurization.

1742544950663


- probiotics
raw milk has live bacteria that support gut health, while pasteurized milk is dead liquid that can lead to bloating and intolerance.

- unprocessed fats
raw milk has its natural fat globules intact, making the vitamins a, d, e, and k more bioavailable.
1742545366879


- calcium & mineral absorption
pasteurization alters milk’s natural mineral profile, making calcium less absorbable.




"but raw milk is full of harmful bacteria!"

ONLY IF you’re drinking it from filthy, low-quality farms.
properly handled raw milk from healthy, pasture-raised cows is not only safe but naturally resistant to contamination thanks to its beneficial bacteria and active enzymes.

pasteurized milk, on the other hand, is a dead liquid. if it gets contaminated post-pasteurization, it has zero defenses left.




pasteurized milk is the real scam

pasteurization extends shelf life and makes industrial-scale dairy operations more profitable, but at the cost of nutrition.

they have to fortify it with synthetic vitamins because pasteurization destroys the real ones. lactose intolerance is skyrocketing because pasteurization kills lactase,
1742545703568
the enzyme that helps digest lactose.




who actually benefits from the war on raw milk?

- big dairy corporations

they can mass-produce low-quality milk and make it "safe" through pasteurization.

- pharmaceutical companies
pasteurized milk leads to digestive issues, allergies, and weakened immune systems, feeding the medical industry.

- government regulators

banning raw milk keeps control in corporate hands and forces consumers into processed alternatives.


if raw milk is so dangerous, why is it legal in so many countries?

in countries like france, italy, and switzerland, raw milk is a staple.

in the us and some parts of the world, it’s demonized because of corrupt lobbying and outdated regulations.




how to SAFELY consume raw milk

1. source from reputable, small-scale farms that practice proper hygiene and grass-feeding.
2. ensure it's kept cold and fresh.
3. if you're unsure, do a gentle low-heat pasteurization at home (140°f for 30 mins). this preserves enzymes far better than industrial pasteurization.




bottom line

raw milk isn’t the problem. shitty industrial farming and corporate control are.

if you get raw milk from a clean, ethical source, it's one of the most nutrient-dense, gut-friendly, and natural foods you can consume.




1742547001644
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: salt.hater, lost222 and LS2019
People who think otherwise are genuine brainwashed NPCs.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Loruki
People who think otherwise are genuine brainwashed NPCs.

I agree but don't ever fucking use the word NPC in your life ever again
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Loruki, salt.hater, Alyosha.aep and 1 other person
I agree but don't ever fucking use the word NPC in your life ever again
im a frickin ohio diddyblud npc i cant help it🌹
 
  • JFL
Reactions: ricecel102
the only reason people think raw milk is some death trap is because of:

- decades of fear-mongering
- corporate lobbying and
- government intervention.


pasteurization was originally introduced as a quick fix for dirty, disease-ridden milk from industrialized, overcrowded farms, not because raw milk itself was inherently dangerous.



why raw milk is superior

raw milk is real milk, loaded with living enzymes, probiotics, and bioavailable nutrients that pasteurized milk strips away.
View attachment 3579996
IF milk is produced cleanly, raw is not only safe but outright superior.

- full spectrum enzymes

lactase, lipase, phosphatase.
these are all natural enzymes that help digestion and nutrient absorption get destroyed by pasteurization.

View attachment 3579998

- probiotics
raw milk has live bacteria that support gut health, while pasteurized milk is dead liquid that can lead to bloating and intolerance.

- unprocessed fats
raw milk has its natural fat globules intact, making the vitamins a, d, e, and k more bioavailable.
View attachment 3580009

- calcium & mineral absorption
pasteurization alters milk’s natural mineral profile, making calcium less absorbable.




"but raw milk is full of harmful bacteria!"

ONLY IF you’re drinking it from filthy, low-quality farms.
properly handled raw milk from healthy, pasture-raised cows is not only safe but naturally resistant to contamination thanks to its beneficial bacteria and active enzymes.

pasteurized milk, on the other hand, is a dead liquid. if it gets contaminated post-pasteurization, it has zero defenses left.




pasteurized milk is the real scam

pasteurization extends shelf life and makes industrial-scale dairy operations more profitable, but at the cost of nutrition.

they have to fortify it with synthetic vitamins because pasteurization destroys the real ones. lactose intolerance is skyrocketing because pasteurization kills lactase,
View attachment 3580019 the enzyme that helps digest lactose.




who actually benefits from the war on raw milk?

- big dairy corporations

they can mass-produce low-quality milk and make it "safe" through pasteurization.

- pharmaceutical companies
pasteurized milk leads to digestive issues, allergies, and weakened immune systems, feeding the medical industry.

- government regulators

banning raw milk keeps control in corporate hands and forces consumers into processed alternatives.


if raw milk is so dangerous, why is it legal in so many countries?

in countries like france, italy, and switzerland, raw milk is a staple.

in the us and some parts of the world, it’s demonized because of corrupt lobbying and outdated regulations.




how to SAFELY consume raw milk

1. source from reputable, small-scale farms that practice proper hygiene and grass-feeding.
2. ensure it's kept cold and fresh.
3. if you're unsure, do a gentle low-heat pasteurization at home (140°f for 30 mins). this preserves enzymes far better than industrial pasteurization.




bottom line

raw milk isn’t the problem. shitty industrial farming and corporate control are.

if you get raw milk from a clean, ethical source, it's one of the most nutrient-dense, gut-friendly, and natural foods you can consume.




water
 
drinking raw milk everyday while using roids = bone mass maxxing
 
Another psuedoscientific shit thread, another debunk
- probiotics
raw milk has live bacteria that support gut health, while pasteurized milk is dead liquid that can lead to bloating and intolerance.
Cow shit dont count as healthy bacteria
1743107038424

It count as unhealthy bacteria


Escherichia coli , Listeria monocytogene , Campylobacter AND MORE!!!!

To add a note: those dirty cows poop 24 every hour, they walk over it etc..... they are very unclean animals
Its impossibly to maintain a clean environnement around them

X- full spectrum enzymes

lactase, lipase, phosphatase.
these are all natural enzymes that help digestion and nutrient absorption get destroyed by pasteurization.

View attachment 3579998
WRONG!!

Conclusions: Raw milk failed to reduce lactose malabsorption or lactose intolerance symptoms compared with pasteurized milk among adults positive for lactose malabsorption. These results do not support widespread anecdotal claims that raw milk reduces the symptoms of lactose intolerance.

Raw milk is not better digestable nor will it fix you lactose intolerance

- probiotics
raw milk has live bacteria that support gut health, while pasteurized milk is dead liquid that can lead to bloating and intolerance.
Pasteurized milk lead to bloating and dairy intolerance?

Do you have any scientific studies to backup this ridiculous claims? Do you have atleast the biologic mechanism on how pasteurized milk cause this things to happen??????

- unprocessed fats
raw milk has its natural fat globules intact, making the vitamins a, d, e, and k more bioavailable.
View attachment 3580009
WRONG!!!!!!!

I cannot copy anything from this site so just use you imagination
Fat soluble vitamines , carbs are barely affected by the pasteurization process

Water soluble vitamines are barely affected by the pasteurization process and can easily by replaced with a healthy diet

To add a note
1743109410047

Number of dairy product–associated outbreaks, by year and pasteurization status of product, United States, 1993–2006.

Those infected by consuming raw milk were 13 times more likely to need hospitalization than those consuming pasteurized milk

Unpasteurized milk, consumed by only 3.2% of the population, and cheese, consumed by only 1.6% of the population, caused 96% of illnesses caused by contaminated dairy products. Unpasteurized dairy products thus cause 840 (95% CrI 611-1,158) times more illnesses and 45 (95% CrI 34-59) times more hospitalizations than pasteurized products. As consumption of unpasteurized dairy products grows, illnesses will increase steadily; a doubling in the consumption of unpasteurized milk or cheese could increase outbreak-related illnesses by 96%.

recent data has shown that raw milk or cheese causes 840 times more illnesses and 45 times more hospitalizations than pasteurized dairy

Raw milk is useless, the risks outweight the benefits
The minor vitamines loss caused by pasteurization process can easily by replaced with a healthy diet
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: piec
Another psuedoscientific shit thread, another debunk

Cow shit dont count as healthy bacteria
View attachment 3598670
It count as unhealthy bacteria


Escherichia coli , Listeria monocytogene , Campylobacter AND MORE!!!!

To add a note: those dirty cows poop 24 every hour, they walk over it etc..... they are very unclean animals
Its impossibly to maintain a clean environnement around them


WRONG!!

Conclusions: Raw milk failed to reduce lactose malabsorption or lactose intolerance symptoms compared with pasteurized milk among adults positive for lactose malabsorption. These results do not support widespread anecdotal claims that raw milk reduces the symptoms of lactose intolerance.

Raw milk is not better digestable nor will it fix you lactose intolerance


Pasteurized milk lead to bloating and dairy intolerance?

Do you have any scientific studies to backup this ridiculous claims? Do you have atleast the biologic mechanism on how pasteurized milk cause this things to happen??????


WRONG!!!!!!!

I cannot copy anything from this site so just use you imagination
Fat soluble vitamines , carbs are barely affected by the pasteurization process

Water soluble vitamines are barely affected by the pasteurization process and can easily by replaced with a healthy diet


To add a note
View attachment 3598784
Number of dairy product–associated outbreaks, by year and pasteurization status of product, United States, 1993–2006.

Those infected by consuming raw milk were 13 times more likely to need hospitalization than those consuming pasteurized milk

Unpasteurized milk, consumed by only 3.2% of the population, and cheese, consumed by only 1.6% of the population, caused 96% of illnesses caused by contaminated dairy products. Unpasteurized dairy products thus cause 840 (95% CrI 611-1,158) times more illnesses and 45 (95% CrI 34-59) times more hospitalizations than pasteurized products. As consumption of unpasteurized dairy products grows, illnesses will increase steadily; a doubling in the consumption of unpasteurized milk or cheese could increase outbreak-related illnesses by 96%.

recent data has shown that raw milk or cheese causes 840 times more illnesses and 45 times more hospitalizations than pasteurized dairy

Raw milk is useless, the risks outweight the benefits
The minor vitamines loss caused by pasteurization process can easily by replaced with a healthy diet
@piec @Hexmask @jasonblackworf
 
Another psuedoscientific shit thread, another debunk

Cow shit dont count as healthy bacteria
View attachment 3598670
It count as unhealthy bacteria


Escherichia coli , Listeria monocytogene , Campylobacter AND MORE!!!!

To add a note: those dirty cows poop 24 every hour, they walk over it etc..... they are very unclean animals
Its impossibly to maintain a clean environnement around them


WRONG!!

Conclusions: Raw milk failed to reduce lactose malabsorption or lactose intolerance symptoms compared with pasteurized milk among adults positive for lactose malabsorption. These results do not support widespread anecdotal claims that raw milk reduces the symptoms of lactose intolerance.

Raw milk is not better digestable nor will it fix you lactose intolerance


Pasteurized milk lead to bloating and dairy intolerance?

Do you have any scientific studies to backup this ridiculous claims? Do you have atleast the biologic mechanism on how pasteurized milk cause this things to happen??????


WRONG!!!!!!!

I cannot copy anything from this site so just use you imagination
Fat soluble vitamines , carbs are barely affected by the pasteurization process

Water soluble vitamines are barely affected by the pasteurization process and can easily by replaced with a healthy diet


To add a note
View attachment 3598784
Number of dairy product–associated outbreaks, by year and pasteurization status of product, United States, 1993–2006.

Those infected by consuming raw milk were 13 times more likely to need hospitalization than those consuming pasteurized milk

Unpasteurized milk, consumed by only 3.2% of the population, and cheese, consumed by only 1.6% of the population, caused 96% of illnesses caused by contaminated dairy products. Unpasteurized dairy products thus cause 840 (95% CrI 611-1,158) times more illnesses and 45 (95% CrI 34-59) times more hospitalizations than pasteurized products. As consumption of unpasteurized dairy products grows, illnesses will increase steadily; a doubling in the consumption of unpasteurized milk or cheese could increase outbreak-related illnesses by 96%.

recent data has shown that raw milk or cheese causes 840 times more illnesses and 45 times more hospitalizations than pasteurized dairy

Raw milk is useless, the risks outweight the benefits
The minor vitamines loss caused by pasteurization process can easily by replaced with a healthy diet
Jfl i cannot edit it, i wanna add so much things

Oh wel!! Time to browse tiktok
 
the only reason people think raw milk is some death trap is because of:

- decades of fear-mongering
- corporate lobbying and
- government intervention.


pasteurization was originally introduced as a quick fix for dirty, disease-ridden milk from industrialized, overcrowded farms, not because raw milk itself was inherently dangerous.



why raw milk is superior

raw milk is real milk, loaded with living enzymes, probiotics, and bioavailable nutrients that pasteurized milk strips away.
View attachment 3579996
IF milk is produced cleanly, raw is not only safe but outright superior.

- full spectrum enzymes

lactase, lipase, phosphatase.
these are all natural enzymes that help digestion and nutrient absorption get destroyed by pasteurization.

View attachment 3579998

- probiotics
raw milk has live bacteria that support gut health, while pasteurized milk is dead liquid that can lead to bloating and intolerance.

- unprocessed fats
raw milk has its natural fat globules intact, making the vitamins a, d, e, and k more bioavailable.
View attachment 3580009

- calcium & mineral absorption
pasteurization alters milk’s natural mineral profile, making calcium less absorbable.




"but raw milk is full of harmful bacteria!"

ONLY IF you’re drinking it from filthy, low-quality farms.
properly handled raw milk from healthy, pasture-raised cows is not only safe but naturally resistant to contamination thanks to its beneficial bacteria and active enzymes.

pasteurized milk, on the other hand, is a dead liquid. if it gets contaminated post-pasteurization, it has zero defenses left.




pasteurized milk is the real scam

pasteurization extends shelf life and makes industrial-scale dairy operations more profitable, but at the cost of nutrition.

they have to fortify it with synthetic vitamins because pasteurization destroys the real ones. lactose intolerance is skyrocketing because pasteurization kills lactase,
View attachment 3580019 the enzyme that helps digest lactose.




who actually benefits from the war on raw milk?

- big dairy corporations

they can mass-produce low-quality milk and make it "safe" through pasteurization.

- pharmaceutical companies
pasteurized milk leads to digestive issues, allergies, and weakened immune systems, feeding the medical industry.

- government regulators

banning raw milk keeps control in corporate hands and forces consumers into processed alternatives.


if raw milk is so dangerous, why is it legal in so many countries?

in countries like france, italy, and switzerland, raw milk is a staple.

in the us and some parts of the world, it’s demonized because of corrupt lobbying and outdated regulations.




how to SAFELY consume raw milk

1. source from reputable, small-scale farms that practice proper hygiene and grass-feeding.
2. ensure it's kept cold and fresh.
3. if you're unsure, do a gentle low-heat pasteurization at home (140°f for 30 mins). this preserves enzymes far better than industrial pasteurization.




bottom line

raw milk isn’t the problem. shitty industrial farming and corporate control are.

if you get raw milk from a clean, ethical source, it's one of the most nutrient-dense, gut-friendly, and natural foods you can consume.




real asf. These bacteria is healthy for the human body and we can digest it perfectly (only if you have test above femboy levels). So if you aren't completely sub 5 u should drink raw > pasteurization
 
the only reason people think raw milk is some death trap is because of:

- decades of fear-mongering
- corporate lobbying and
- government intervention.


pasteurization was originally introduced as a quick fix for dirty, disease-ridden milk from industrialized, overcrowded farms, not because raw milk itself was inherently dangerous.



why raw milk is superior

raw milk is real milk, loaded with living enzymes, probiotics, and bioavailable nutrients that pasteurized milk strips away.
View attachment 3579996
IF milk is produced cleanly, raw is not only safe but outright superior.

- full spectrum enzymes

lactase, lipase, phosphatase.
these are all natural enzymes that help digestion and nutrient absorption get destroyed by pasteurization.

View attachment 3579998

- probiotics
raw milk has live bacteria that support gut health, while pasteurized milk is dead liquid that can lead to bloating and intolerance.

- unprocessed fats
raw milk has its natural fat globules intact, making the vitamins a, d, e, and k more bioavailable.
View attachment 3580009

- calcium & mineral absorption
pasteurization alters milk’s natural mineral profile, making calcium less absorbable.




"but raw milk is full of harmful bacteria!"

ONLY IF you’re drinking it from filthy, low-quality farms.
properly handled raw milk from healthy, pasture-raised cows is not only safe but naturally resistant to contamination thanks to its beneficial bacteria and active enzymes.

pasteurized milk, on the other hand, is a dead liquid. if it gets contaminated post-pasteurization, it has zero defenses left.




pasteurized milk is the real scam

pasteurization extends shelf life and makes industrial-scale dairy operations more profitable, but at the cost of nutrition.

they have to fortify it with synthetic vitamins because pasteurization destroys the real ones. lactose intolerance is skyrocketing because pasteurization kills lactase,
View attachment 3580019 the enzyme that helps digest lactose.




who actually benefits from the war on raw milk?

- big dairy corporations

they can mass-produce low-quality milk and make it "safe" through pasteurization.

- pharmaceutical companies
pasteurized milk leads to digestive issues, allergies, and weakened immune systems, feeding the medical industry.

- government regulators

banning raw milk keeps control in corporate hands and forces consumers into processed alternatives.


if raw milk is so dangerous, why is it legal in so many countries?

in countries like france, italy, and switzerland, raw milk is a staple.

in the us and some parts of the world, it’s demonized because of corrupt lobbying and outdated regulations.




how to SAFELY consume raw milk

1. source from reputable, small-scale farms that practice proper hygiene and grass-feeding.
2. ensure it's kept cold and fresh.
3. if you're unsure, do a gentle low-heat pasteurization at home (140°f for 30 mins). this preserves enzymes far better than industrial pasteurization.




bottom line

raw milk isn’t the problem. shitty industrial farming and corporate control are.

if you get raw milk from a clean, ethical source, it's one of the most nutrient-dense, gut-friendly, and natural foods you can consume.




No worth to read this. There’s a reason it’s hard to get this
 
the only reason people think raw milk is some death trap is because of:

- decades of fear-mongering
- corporate lobbying and
- government intervention.


pasteurization was originally introduced as a quick fix for dirty, disease-ridden milk from industrialized, overcrowded farms, not because raw milk itself was inherently dangerous.



why raw milk is superior

raw milk is real milk, loaded with living enzymes, probiotics, and bioavailable nutrients that pasteurized milk strips away.
View attachment 3579996
IF milk is produced cleanly, raw is not only safe but outright superior.

- full spectrum enzymes

lactase, lipase, phosphatase.
these are all natural enzymes that help digestion and nutrient absorption get destroyed by pasteurization.

View attachment 3579998

- probiotics
raw milk has live bacteria that support gut health, while pasteurized milk is dead liquid that can lead to bloating and intolerance.

- unprocessed fats
raw milk has its natural fat globules intact, making the vitamins a, d, e, and k more bioavailable.
View attachment 3580009

- calcium & mineral absorption
pasteurization alters milk’s natural mineral profile, making calcium less absorbable.




"but raw milk is full of harmful bacteria!"

ONLY IF you’re drinking it from filthy, low-quality farms.
properly handled raw milk from healthy, pasture-raised cows is not only safe but naturally resistant to contamination thanks to its beneficial bacteria and active enzymes.

pasteurized milk, on the other hand, is a dead liquid. if it gets contaminated post-pasteurization, it has zero defenses left.




pasteurized milk is the real scam

pasteurization extends shelf life and makes industrial-scale dairy operations more profitable, but at the cost of nutrition.

they have to fortify it with synthetic vitamins because pasteurization destroys the real ones. lactose intolerance is skyrocketing because pasteurization kills lactase,
View attachment 3580019 the enzyme that helps digest lactose.




who actually benefits from the war on raw milk?

- big dairy corporations

they can mass-produce low-quality milk and make it "safe" through pasteurization.

- pharmaceutical companies
pasteurized milk leads to digestive issues, allergies, and weakened immune systems, feeding the medical industry.

- government regulators

banning raw milk keeps control in corporate hands and forces consumers into processed alternatives.


if raw milk is so dangerous, why is it legal in so many countries?

in countries like france, italy, and switzerland, raw milk is a staple.

in the us and some parts of the world, it’s demonized because of corrupt lobbying and outdated regulations.




how to SAFELY consume raw milk

1. source from reputable, small-scale farms that practice proper hygiene and grass-feeding.
2. ensure it's kept cold and fresh.
3. if you're unsure, do a gentle low-heat pasteurization at home (140°f for 30 mins). this preserves enzymes far better than industrial pasteurization.




bottom line

raw milk isn’t the problem. shitty industrial farming and corporate control are.

if you get raw milk from a clean, ethical source, it's one of the most nutrient-dense, gut-friendly, and natural foods you can consume.




yes raw milk and shiet will give me Chad face
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top