Johnnybegood
Mistral
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2021
- Posts
- 2,010
- Reputation
- 2,612
I was thinking the other day about what the Sexual Market Value (SMV) of an avg Joe truly is.
We know that face is the number one most important thing, followed by height and lastly pheno.
But we also know of cases of tall guys (6ft+) that are sub 5, and good looking guys that are below 5ft7, which in the west is very below avg. By eliminating these two "populations", doesn't that make someone of avg face (5-6/10) and avg height (5ft7-5ft11) have a SMV above avg? Because to be avg in both face and height cumulatively should actually (mathematically) be much harder than one would think, right? Doesn't that explain why a lot of regular dudes are walking with Beckys and Stacylites on college campuses, shopping malls, etc.
Am I missing something? Is it just cope, or is there a grain of truth in my hypotheses?
We know that face is the number one most important thing, followed by height and lastly pheno.
But we also know of cases of tall guys (6ft+) that are sub 5, and good looking guys that are below 5ft7, which in the west is very below avg. By eliminating these two "populations", doesn't that make someone of avg face (5-6/10) and avg height (5ft7-5ft11) have a SMV above avg? Because to be avg in both face and height cumulatively should actually (mathematically) be much harder than one would think, right? Doesn't that explain why a lot of regular dudes are walking with Beckys and Stacylites on college campuses, shopping malls, etc.
Am I missing something? Is it just cope, or is there a grain of truth in my hypotheses?
