Recent dickpill study

Reckless Turtle

Reckless Turtle

Kraken
Joined
Jul 29, 2021
Posts
17,355
Reputation
24,042
The study is not great (small sample size and weird methodology).

Results​

On average, reducing the depth of penetration led to a statistically significant 18% reduction of overall sexual pleasure with an average 15% reduction in length of the penis. The longer the erect penis, the less likely the rings were to have an impact on sexual pleasure. There was a range of individual responses, however, with a minority of women reporting that reducing the depth of penetration was more pleasurable on some occasions.


 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 11604 and Beetlejuice
Just be her biggest theory
 
These guys are trying to cope on a :blackpill: subreddit lol. I tried to make a new Reddit account to destroy them, but the sub doesn't allow new accounts.



Go figure, he's on IncelExit :lul::

 
god-tier erection quality or death
 
  • +1
Reactions: ShowerMaxxing and volcelfatcel
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 15060
girth >>> length. u can't have girth without an insane amount of blood flow
Both length and girth are important for different aspects. Length is necessary for sufficient strokes and deeper vaginal orgasms and girth is necessary for applying pressure along her walls. Comparing them is pointless.
 
Both length and girth are important for different aspects. Length is necessary for sufficient strokes and deeper vaginal orgasms and girth is necessary for applying pressure along her walls. Comparing them is pointless.
what's adequate length in ur opinion?
 
  • +1
Reactions: thickdickdaddy27
What's all this talk about dicks
Are you fellows gay?
Lol
 
Jfl at that study not reporting any of the women wanting their partners to be smaller but 14% wanted them to be larger, proof that "too large" almost isn't even a thing.
 
Jfl at that study not reporting any of the women wanting their partners to be smaller but 14% wanted them to be larger, proof that "too large" almost isn't even a thing.
In another study by one of the same authors:

21% of the study's participants also admitted they had terminated a relationship for, among other reasons, the partner's penis being "too small," compared to only 7% saying the same for a partner's penis that was "too big."

 
21% of the study's participants also admitted they had terminated a relationship for, among other reasons, the partner's penis being "too small"
Thermonuclear dickpill.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Baldingman1998, thisend and RetardSubhuman
Thermonuclear dickpill.
Some of the participants were not very sexually experienced too, which means that they were less likely to have had as many opportunities to reject a man based on his penis size.
Another limitation is sexual inexperience among some participants. Fifteen women in our sample indicated that they had never experienced sexual intercourse. This inexperience could underlie some of the size preferences observed. For example, women generally anticipate more pain with their first intercourse than they actually experience [82], so they may show risk-averse penis size preferences (for shorter length and thinner circumference than they may prefer with experience). Less experienced women may also be less accurate in their size estimates. However, a follow-up analysis showed that having had sexual intercourse (yes or no) did not predict penis size preferences, arguing against this possibility. A related limitation is that the experimental protocol necessarily limited the sample size, and these women were recruited largely near a college campus. There may be other biases in the sample related to the recruitment method and sample size that were not identified.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Baldingman1998
So what is dicklet cutoff according to this study??
 

Similar threads

Nazi Germany
Replies
34
Views
2K
Debetro
Debetro
maxxerlord
Replies
28
Views
1K
PARISIEN
PARISIEN
D
Replies
24
Views
8K
Maalik
Maalik
D
Replies
19
Views
6K
magdel
magdel
Zenis
Replies
87
Views
11K
crushing sluts@100%
crushing sluts@100%

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top