Reconciling popular research with roid ascension as a late teen

[beefsupreme]

Thinking about hopping on SARMS for minimal ancillaries and basic peps as well. Every popular paper in existence says the risks are outlandish for someone starting at 16-17.

Do the jews just not want me to ascend? Is it just the risk you gotta take to surpass mediocrity?

 

[Deleted member 393383]

Thinking about hopping on SARMS for minimal ancillaries and basic peps as well. Every popular paper in existence says the risks are outlandish for someone starting at 16-17.

Do the jews just not want me to ascend? Is it just the risk you gotta take to surpass mediocrity?

Jews dont give a fuck about you boyo

 

[beefsupreme]

Jews dont give a fuck about you boyo

Oy vey

 

[Deleted member 393383]

Oy vey

Bad goy

 

[ReformedChad]

Do roids not Sarms, and what peptides?

 

[beefsupreme]

Do roids not Sarms, and what peptides?

For peps ill probably start with the basics, wolverine + ghk and build from there

I do like that sarms target strictly bone and muscle systems and have minimal test suppression on the milder side of things. Is it worth bumping up the risk profile to start roids?

 

[ReformedChad]

For peps ill probably start with the basics, wolverine + ghk and build from there

I do like that sarms target strictly bone and muscle systems and have minimal test suppression on the milder side of things. Is it worth bumping up the risk profile to start roids?

sarms have a larger risk profile than roids

rep my shit bruh

 

[Deleted member 210071]

For peps ill probably start with the basics, wolverine + ghk and build from there

I do like that sarms target strictly bone and muscle systems and have minimal test suppression on the milder side of things. Is it worth bumping up the risk profile to start roids?

You will need a test base on sarms anyway. Just inject.

 

[Vass]

For peps ill probably start with the basics, wolverine + ghk and build from there

I do like that sarms target strictly bone and muscle systems and have minimal test suppression on the milder side of things. Is it worth bumping up the risk profile to start roids?

SARMs do not have minimal test suppression lmao. You will need a test base.

And you do need ancillaries. If you're taking it orally you should have TUDCA to protect your liver.

like the dude above said sarms have a larger risk profile than test

 

[beefsupreme]

Plenty of people run sarms without test bases, PCT and liver support is all you need for the most part. What's the increased risk profile?