I buy it from Amazon. I thought that there was an effect too but then it stopped working when I place next to my balls. I was going to save money for a joov but I think it is better saved for other looksmaxes
This is in rats. I see very few result with humans online.
it's good. for oldcells
unbelievable. I think I am doing something wrong then. that is a big change almost more than botoxhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3926176/
After 30days of sessions lasting 15-30minutes
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2687728/
are you old?
morning sun, fucks up collagen. While red light therapy boosts it.
Buccal fat loss is good for most peoples right because it helps with hollow cheeks? I have been trying it for hair loss and it has not helped me with anything so far. Those pictures you posted are a big difference I think I will try to get a different device now
really? i thought morning sun gave off a lot of infrared light.
no.
I use redlight also, in the ast more regulalry.
I dunno about this.
must be oldcel or really shit skin to see significant results maybe maybe I should use it on balls more though Cheaper ones don't emit enough red light to be comparable to any of the studies that were done. The ones comparable to the studies cost thousands of dollars.
idk mein neger if I put my face all up in the panel it's really fucking bright. meanwhile even the expensive ones don't claim to emit much more.Cheaper ones don't emit enough red light to be comparable to any of the studies that were done. The ones comparable to the studies cost thousands of dollars.
If you're a cheapcel like me, just go outside for 10 mins when your shadow is longer than your height. The sun emits far more red light than even the expensive machines, literally for free, with blue spectrum light benefits as well. They're trying to sell you sunlight.
Your body has DNA repair, as long as your exposure isn't too much you can repair faster and your skin won't age. I just wrote a giant post on this (click for link).
And don't forget Vit C supplementation, your body needs that to make collagen.
NM is wavelength. That's the frequency of light. That number is not how much lux is being emitted.idk mein neger if I put my face all up in the panel it's really fucking bright. meanwhile even the expensive ones don't claim to emit much more.
sciencing.com
I know. but you're pretty fucking far from the sun while the device is right up in your face. usually wattage is given for intensity.NM is wavelength. That's the frequency of light. That number is not how much lux is being emitted.
What Is Light Measured In? - Sciencing
Light is measured in many units. Its wavelength, λ, is measured in both ...ngstroms and nanometers. Its frequency is measured in Hertz. Its energy is usually measured in electron-volts (eV), since Joules are too large to be practical. Its red-shift is measured in either short-distance units...
I can't find any number for how much lux these devices are emitting, but I have heard the ones less than a thousand dollars do not emit enough, and that the sun emits more than any device.
Here's an example of a cheap one:
cheap ones have 225 leds, expensive have 360 but the blue is useless so 240 in reality. google says red leds emit 25-55 lumens, let's say the chink shit gives off 25 and the fancy $2.5k one gives off 55. doubtful but let's say (it's probably the exact same). you only have to be 2/3rds as close to the chink one as the fancy one to get the same intensity according to the inverse square law.
The inverse square law applies to electromagnetic radiation. I don't think it applies red spectrum light.
journals.lww.com
in the megathread posted here it looked legit. didn't look too deep into it but my point is if one device works, all should work since it's just leds lmaoThe inverse square law applies to electromagnetic radiation. I don't think it applies red spectrum light.
127,000 lumens reach you from the sun, when you're standing on the surface of earth. Kinda pointless to pay for 55 lumins when you could just go outside for like 2 seconds and get that.
That got me looking for a decent study of Red light. Here's what I found:
(Above) No placebo group. No control group. Worthless study.The Efficacy and Safety of 660 nm and 411 to 777 nm... : Dermatologic Surgery
he treatment of facial wrinkles. MATERIALS AND METHODS A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, comparative clinical trial involving 52 adult female subjects was performed. The faces of the subjects were irradiated daily with 5.17 J of red or white LEDs for 12 weeks. RESULTS In both groups...
https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/pho.2013.3616
(Above) Control group received no placebo. Worthless study.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14764170500370059
(Above) No placebo. No control group. Worthless study designed to sell something you know is shit.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/php.12316
(Above) study on human cultured skin cells. Doesn't apply to humans that go outside and get 1000x times that much redlight by being outside for 10 seconds in the morning when they walk to their car. Also doesn't apply to humans, who have many layers of skin with various functions (all humans).
I could easily be missing something, but I don't think there's any actual study supporting these devices.
backreaction.blogspot.com
You're right. That's a good point. I had also heard something about more expensive devices having more Lux, and also didn't look deep into it. I'm glad we had this conversation. I think they're all cope now. XDin the megathread posted here it looked legit. didn't look too deep into it but my point is if one device works, all should work since it's just leds lmao
https://www.nasa.gov/pdf/583137main_Inverse_Square_Law_of_Light.pdfanyway I found this
1000x at 3m which means exactly as bright up close like I use itLight Bulbs and the Solar Energy Production
Science News, Physics, Science, Philosophy, Philosophy of Science
