Red lips are a striking feature.

faxilla

faxilla

aryan
Joined
Jun 7, 2023
Posts
600
Reputation
534
IMG 1335
IMG 1336
 
  • +1
Reactions: edodalic29, AverageCurryEnjoyer, jeremyy and 2 others
I cringe how looksmax popularity has made white boys even more narcy than they already were
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Rabbi, AverageCurryEnjoyer, FBl and 3 others
No.
It signals high estrogen.
It's not masculine.
Striking =/= Dimorphic.
You want to have masculine dimorphism and send dimorphic signals like tan skin, wide skull, narrow eyes, etc.
Maximising dimorphic signals is highest EV move you could make according to mating game theory.

Case in point:
Would you also say pink rosacea Dudley cheeks are a striking feature?
Just no.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2024-11-04 at 14.37.34.jpg
    Screenshot 2024-11-04 at 14.37.34.jpg
    116.6 KB · Views: 0
just because a feature is striking doesn't mean it's positive for men.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Rabbi, VolcelFTW, greycel and 2 others
just because a feature is striking doesn't mean it's positive for men.
This guy gets it. Lipstick and eyeshadow would also be striking.
 
No.
It signals high estrogen.
It's not masculine.
Striking =/= Dimorphic.
You want to have masculine dimorphism and send dimorphic signals like tan skin, wide skull, narrow eyes, etc.
Maximising dimorphic signals is highest EV move you could make according to mating game theory.

Case in point:
Would you also say pink rosacea Dudley cheeks are a striking feature?
Just no.
just because a feature is striking doesn't mean it's positive for men.
Still may be positive since it can be a health indicator
It's likely more important in women tho since it gives more contrast, it could be a similar case to eyebrows
 
  • +1
Reactions: faxilla and ectomorpher
Still may be positive since it can be a health indicator
It's likely more important in women tho since it gives more contrast, it could be a similar case to eyebrows
it's not really an indicator of the right hormonal health for men since it's caused by estrogen.

it's like calling gyno an indicator of health, because that's what breasts in women are when you apply it to men.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LVZZO
IMG 2682
 
  • Love it
Reactions: metacognitivist
it's not really an indicator of the right hormonal health for men since it's caused by estrogen.

it's like calling gyno an indicator of health, because that's what breasts in women are when you apply it to men.
That may be a factor but there a genetic role as well, mine are way more red than average, I was always like that (no signs of high estrogen)
It's a plus for me at least, I'm sure
 
  • +1
Reactions: faxilla
No.
It signals high estrogen.
It's not masculine.
Striking =/= Dimorphic.
You want to have masculine dimorphism and send dimorphic signals like tan skin, wide skull, narrow eyes, etc.
Maximising dimorphic signals is highest EV move you could make according to mating game theory.

Case in point:
Would you also say pink rosacea Dudley cheeks are a striking feature?
Just no.
you must have both. dimorphic features and “feminine“. Otherwise you look like an ogre
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mumbhai and faxilla
Are you not white? :lul:
Yeah, and I feel pure cringe when I see all the fluffy faggy white boys thinking they are God's gift to women
 
That may be a factor but there a genetic role as well, mine are way more red than average, I was always like that (no signs of high estrogen)
It's a plus for me at least, I'm sure
The reason girls simp vinnie hacker, his lips. Anyone who says lips don't matter is talking bullshit
 
  • +1
Reactions: faxilla
you must have both. dimorphic features and “feminine“. Otherwise you look like an ogre
this ^^ people talk down on feminine features on men so much, when nearly all PSL gods have feminine features
 

Similar threads

TariiqBih
Replies
10
Views
202
bc123456
B
manhattanbound
Replies
2
Views
88
manhattanbound
manhattanbound
AuggyDauggy
Replies
9
Views
173
AuggyDauggy
AuggyDauggy

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top