Reddit is such a shitty side, someone writes a good article but they deleted it to let retards continue coping

[Deleted member 14693]

That thread was good and destroyed the "muhh average dick is 5,5 inches" cope

 

[mortis]

didn't you copy the text

 

[Deleted member 14693]

over this dude got gaslighted that his dick was big enough but after reading that post wanted to rope.

 

[Deleted member 14693]

didn't you copy the text

Could have been the case. Can you sent the thread?

 

[Deleted member 24940]

Link the source

 

[5OuttaTen]

Well how big is the average then

 

[Deleted member 14693]

Link the source

 

[Deleted member 14693]

Well how big is the average then

Accourding to the guy who wrote the post 6.2 inches

 

[St.TikTokcel]

Accourding to the guy who wrote the post 6.2 inches

Inb4 @TRUE_CEL comes in and says that the average is 5 (disability-tier).

 

[slayer69]

its not on any reddit archive site too

 

[Gengar]

Inb4 @TRUE_CEL comes in and says that the average is 5 (disability-tier).

It’s not 5, it’s 5.17”.

 

[Gengar]

Accourding to the guy who wrote the post 6.2 inches

What a retard.

 

[Gengar]

That thread was good and destroyed the "muhh average dick is 5,5 inches" cope
View attachment 2189544

Average isn’t 5.5”, it’s 5.17”. Keep coping guys.

 

[RetardSubhuman]

white dickcels coping

 

[Deleted member 14693]

It’s not 5, it’s 5.17”.

What a retard.

Good for you that the post was deleted, otherwise all your copes would fall apart

 

[Deleted member 14693]

Average isn’t 5.5”, it’s 5.17”. Keep coping guys.

Different studies about penile lenght. None are 5.17

Schneider 2001 5.7" (111 18-19 year olds, BPEL)
Gabrich 2007 5.7" (84 18 year olds, BPSFL, 20% hadn't reached Tanner Stage 5 yet, which means they still have some growing to do and I might remove that study as well)
Stewart 2009 5.9" (225 men, BPSFL)
Pereira 2004 6" (498 18-25 year olds, BPSFL)
Wessels 1996 6.2" (80 men, BPEL, BPSFL was 6")
Barboza 2013 6.3" (450 men, BPSFL)
Vasconcelos 2012 6.5" (105 men, BPSFL)
Bondil 1992 6.6" (905 men, BPSFL)

 

[Gengar]

Good for you that the post was deleted, otherwise all your copes would fall apart

Not really.

Different studies about penile lenght. None are 5.17

Schneider 2001 5.7" (111 18-19 year olds, BPEL)
Gabrich 2007 5.7" (84 18 year olds, BPSFL, 20% hadn't reached Tanner Stage 5 yet, which means they still have some growing to do and I might remove that study as well)
Stewart 2009 5.9" (225 men, BPSFL)
Pereira 2004 6" (498 18-25 year olds, BPSFL)
Wessels 1996 6.2" (80 men, BPEL, BPSFL was 6")
Barboza 2013 6.3" (450 men, BPSFL)
Vasconcelos 2012 6.5" (105 men, BPSFL)
Bondil 1992 6.6" (905 men, BPSFL)

1) Probably self-reported like most are

2) Small sample sizes.

3) What’s the exclusion criteria?

In other words; keep coping boy.

 

[MentalistKebab]

Accourding to the guy who wrote the post 6.2 inches

He is a retard ngl, average is 5 if not lower.

Still tho, its no reason to make yourself feel sad, its not like girls reject him because of his dick size

 

[Magnum Opus]

That thread was good and destroyed the "muhh average dick is 5,5 inches" cope
View attachment 2189544

Funny how the majority of redditors are not only delusionally bluepilled, but also claim to be advocates of "science" (which is why most of them justify being atheists). They always say "science science!", "actually ... " and once literature opposing their standpoint gets released / discussed about, they silence it.

 

[Deleted member 14693]

1) Probably self-reported like most are

2) Small sample sizes.

3) What’s the exclusion criteria?

In other words; keep coping b

Most aren't self-reported, all of them are measured.

The sample sizes are big enough, which studies do you refer too for your size claim and how big is there sample size?

Exclusion criteria is erectile dysfunction

 

[Gengar]

Most aren't self-reported, all of them are measured.

The sample sizes are big enough, which studies do you refer too for your size claim and how big is there sample size?

Exclusion criteria is erectile dysfunction

I use the mega-study that assessed 15,321 men: all were measured by a third party.
So unless you can bring me a sample size with as many people, I’ll believe you. Until then you can cope all you want.

 

[Deleted member 14693]

I use the mega-study that assessed 15,321 men: all were measured by a third party.
So unless you can bring me a sample size with as many people, I’ll believe you. Until then you can cope all you want.

Name the study

 

[Gengar]

Name the study

Google “average 5.17” penis size.”

 

[High Cortisol Chad]

Mods deleted it to keep community from roping

 

[Deleted member 14693]

Google “average 5.17” penis size.”

thats not a study thats just a paper that included different studies that have been shown to include ED patients and use BPEL and NBEL so not reliable.

 

[Gengar]

thats not a study thats just a paper that included different studies that have been shown to include ED patients and use BPEL and NBEL so not reliable.

Completely wrong. There was an extensive exclusion criteria, you clearly didn’t read it. ED patients were excluded and everything was BPEL.

 

[Deleted member 14693]

its not on any reddit archive site too

View attachment 2189659View attachment 2189660

Lifefuel I found it

r/bigdickproblems - The most commonly cited penis size studies are incredibly flawed

0 votes and 0 comments so far on Reddit

web.archive.org