REMINDER: GYM-MAXXING IS NOT A COPE

protomogger9873

protomogger9873

Banned
Joined
Apr 28, 2024
Posts
1,203
Reputation
1,355
I’ve been lifting for two years now, and the difference in perceived SMV is undeniable. Despite what these dumbasses on .org say, women still love musculature IF you’re already good looking.

I’d say that past a certain floor for facial aesthetics, gymmaxxing can serve as a SMV MULTIPLIER. It can multiply your SMV by 1.X percent, with X increasing exponentially as you’re more facially aesthetic.

Furthermore, I theorize that “female gaze bro” is applicable to physiques as LONG AS YOU’RE NATURAL. If you’re natural and sufficiently lean, you will never surpass the female gaze.

Relevant images of me (anecdotal-evidence kungfumaxxed chang :chad:) attached:
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0445.jpeg
    IMG_0445.jpeg
    1.7 MB · Views: 0
  • IMG_0447.jpeg
    IMG_0447.jpeg
    1.7 MB · Views: 0
  • IMG_0403.jpeg
    IMG_0403.jpeg
    1.6 MB · Views: 0
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Ugh..
Reactions: TalesFromTheSlums, Pento, narex054 and 2 others
In b4 the rotters say its cope
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: Deathninja328 and protomogger9873
In b4 the rotters say its cope
“yeah bro like the gym is cope and girls dont like muscles, thats why i just hang out in my bedroom and play rust all day” :lul::lul:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deathninja328 and Deleted member 94832
gymmaxing isnt a smv multiplier but it does help it's an added bonus as muscles are dimorphic.

I've been gymmaxing for a while and found the biggest SMV multipliers are genetic such as chest size, insertions, proportions, clavicle length and so on aesthetics matter for the body just as much for the face.

1739496044321


like having wide clavicles with dogshit chest insertions is pointless at that point u get mogged by anyone with decent clavicle length and a full chest

1739496117256
 
Last edited:
I’ve been lifting for two years now, and the difference in perceived SMV is undeniable. Despite what these dumbasses on .org say, women still love musculature IF you’re already good looking.

I’d say that past a certain floor for facial aesthetics, gymmaxxing can serve as a SMV MULTIPLIER. It can multiply your SMV by 1.X percent, with X increasing exponentially as you’re more facially aesthetic.

Furthermore, I theorize that “female gaze bro” is applicable to physiques as LONG AS YOU’RE NATURAL. If you’re natural and sufficiently lean, you will never surpass the female gaze.

Relevant images of me (anecdotal-evidence kungfumaxxed chang :chad:) attached:
Is this ur 2nd account bhai
 
Love how you provided exactly zero evidence that it isn't a cope with this being a hypothetical opinion post, not even anecdotal.

Ha Ha Ha Lol GIF


Opinion meaning this is just WHAT YOU THINK -- you didn't even give an anecdote, BS or not, proving your main assertion...

Which is that women like it more when you're muscular. So you just made an opinion, showed your body & claim it isn't cope...

But you provided ZERO proof/not even AN ANECDOTE ACCOUNT on if women even LIKE YOU specifically with muscles. Bruh :ROFLMAO:
 
Love how you provided exactly zero evidence that it isn't a cope with this being a hypothetical opinion post, not even anecdotal.

Ha Ha Ha Lol GIF


Opinion meaning this is just WHAT YOU THINK -- you didn't even give an anecdote, BS or not, proving your main assertion...

Which is that women like it more when you're muscular. So you just made an opinion, showed your body & claim it isn't cope...

But you provided ZERO proof/not even AN ANECDOTE ACCOUNT on if women even LIKE YOU specifically with muscles. Bruh :ROFLMAO:
dnrd your yap sesh shut up nerd :feelsgah::feelsgah:
 

Similar threads

menas
Replies
247
Views
49K
fodenglazer
F
the MOUSE
Replies
31
Views
7K
Axhar1
Axhar1
D
Replies
122
Views
43K
Its0ver_r0pe$
Its0ver_r0pe$
D
Replies
31
Views
7K
johnny4612
J

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top