Reminder of what the real blackpill is

Seth Walsh

Seth Walsh

The man in the mirror is my only threat
Contributor
Joined
Jan 12, 2020
Posts
9,245
Reputation
18,132
Evolution requires a species to EVOLVE. We got to the 20th century supposedly evolving from Homo Erectii 20,000 years ago.
Homo-erectus-rendering-Artist.jpg

Here is a homo erectus. Bad ugly face and hairy.


It is only your parents and grandparents that got to live in an era where many homo sapiens who should've been weeded out of evolution, got to reproduce.


In a woman's head, they only want the best genetics possible. They would rather have nothing than that.

Feminism was never about equal rights. It was about escaping religion and tradition (forcing marriages), getting a means to work for a living (so they wouldn't need to rely on a normie looking guy for stability). The resent from feminists is because in the past, women were forced to reproduce with bad genes (worst thing imaginable).

If you ever wonder "why are feminists still a thing? Why are they still so angry? They have equality now right?"

Equality is not the thing. They want all sub9s DEAD. I knew this for years but wanted to wait for others to start open discussion about it to make a comment about it myself.

This is why cheating happens, this is why cheating happens in marriages, this is why Chads can behave badly, because it is a woman's goal to reproduce with the best genetics, just like it is for a man.








FWOjD8CWAAAGE-v


FpVyvJyXEAEfRvR
FpVyvUhWYAAV-W5
FpVyvmwWYAIBEPb
FpVyveeXgAUTGfC
FpOYgjsXwAUaGbP
Fo158KkXoAQDEuH
FoyPkiBWIAAlHhA


FnzjXvTaIAElWiV
FnhX6f1X0AAtpOM

176d10c94fcd2cb6184b5e2d1ec72fce.png
FnQcc4oXEBM77L7
FnQcezdX0AAKnzX
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 70701, Deleted member 27772, Deleted member 8365 and 12 others
9C8EEF1E D9F0 4FC5 8686 82D825079432
 
  • +1
Reactions: horizontallytall, pardocel, Skywalker and 1 other person
Didn't read but evolution is a theory, just like Adam and Eve is a theory, yet you can show implicit proof of Adam and Eve, you can't show proof of evolution.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 70701, Deleted member 23100, Artemis and 1 other person
Didn't read but evolution is a theory, just like Adam and Eve is a theory, yet you can show implicit proof of Adam and Eve, you can't show proof of evolution.
Intersexual selection is evolution.

If we aren't meant to evolve, everyone would be having unprotected sex, there would be no looks criteria at all.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 43829 and Deleted member 23558
  • +1
  • So Sad
  • JFL
Reactions: Clown Show, Deleted member 8365, Skywalker and 2 others
Didn't read but evolution is a theory, just like Adam and Eve is a theory, yet you can show implicit proof of Adam and Eve, you can't show proof of evolution.
Damn dude is legitimately retarded
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: .*my*., Artemis and Seth Walsh
In general, I am against Islam...

But for such cases, I recommend stoning for the woman :feelsrope:

What an ungrateful bitch...
It's a sad story but elucidates how hard wired an innate attraction is. Or rather, how hardwired the contempt and disgust for unattractive or average guys is. There will come a time where women will stop pretending that they like sub 7-9s. I think that time is coming really soon.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: horizontallytall, Deleted member 14693 and Deleted member 23558
@BrahminBoss

Is that a screenshot you found or did you crop that from a pdf? I would like to read the book
 
Evolution requires a species to EVOLVE. We got to the 20th century supposedly evolving from Homo Erectii 20,000 years ago.
Homo-erectus-rendering-Artist.jpg

Here is a homo erectus. Bad ugly face and hairy.


It is only your parents and grandparents that got to live in an era where many homo sapiens who should've been weeded out of evolution, got to reproduce.


In a woman's head, they only want the best genetics possible. They would rather have nothing than that.

Feminism was never about equal rights. It was about escaping religion and tradition (forcing marriages), getting a means to work for a living (so they wouldn't need to rely on a normie looking guy for stability). The resent from feminists is because in the past, women were forced to reproduce with bad genes (worst thing imaginable).

If you ever wonder "why are feminists still a thing? Why are they still so angry? They have equality now right?"

Equality is not the thing. They want all sub9s DEAD. I knew this for years but wanted to wait for others to start open discussion about it to make a comment about it myself.

This is why cheating happens, this is why cheating happens in marriages, this is why Chads can behave badly, because it is a woman's goal to reproduce with the best genetics, just like it is for a man.








FWOjD8CWAAAGE-v


FpVyvJyXEAEfRvR
FpVyvUhWYAAV-W5
FpVyvmwWYAIBEPb
FpVyveeXgAUTGfC
FpOYgjsXwAUaGbP
Fo158KkXoAQDEuH
FoyPkiBWIAAlHhA


FnzjXvTaIAElWiV
FnhX6f1X0AAtpOM

176d10c94fcd2cb6184b5e2d1ec72fce.png
FnQcc4oXEBM77L7
FnQcezdX0AAKnzX

Why is that curry named "Aryan"?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: RichardSpencel and Artemis
Yeah women are completely worthless. I could give a shit about women at this point I just want to stay celibate and focus on looks
 
It's a sad story but elucidates how hard wired an innate attraction is. Or rather, how hardwired the contempt and disgust for unattractive or average guys is. There will come a time where women will stop pretending that they like sub 7-9s. I think that time is coming really soon.
I do not believe in this "innate attraction".

This innate attraction never mattered before. Even in non-christian societies, men simply came and took women. No one gave a shit what women thought. Plus, 99% of this "attractiveness" are shitty recessive traits which do not confer any additional survival benefit. For example, if the survival of the fittest were truly the endgame, then Indians would be #1 attractive people:

1) They are brown - low risk of cancer and heat strokes in a planet with warming-up climate
2) More compact - smaller - means more ready to survive the famine, which is coming, since population is growing, and so are the food shortages
3) More hard working - average indian is a lot more hardworking than a white dude.
4) Have stronger immune systems than whites against pathogens of warm places: self-explanatory
5) ...

But why the fuck would women then go for blue eyes and blonde hair? Shitty recessive traits which are DETRIMENTAL to survival.

So this evolution theory is all shit. Do not agree with your main message at all. But still it was a great read, so thanks for creating the thread. (y)

PS. ALso, she never said she DID NOT LIKE HIS LOOKS. She literally said: "i do not like he is a TRUCK DRIVER". This is a STATUS PILL if anything. Nothing to do with the looks-theory. At least until more info is provided.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 8365 and Seth Walsh
@BrahminBoss

Is that a screenshot you found or did you crop that from a pdf? I would like to read the book
It’s on women essay by Schopenhauer I think
 
  • +1
Reactions: Unlimited
There is no point on living if u arent chad by now fuark its done
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Seth Walsh
There is no point on living if u arent chad by now fuark its done
And if you arent Chad what does that mean. Does it mean you can not do great things in the world? Does it not mean you achieve success athletically, financially etc. No all it means is that you cant fuck jaded whores. So why is it over? Are whores the only thing that matters?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Skywalker and Deleted member 23558
Evolution requires a species to EVOLVE. We got to the 20th century supposedly evolving from Homo Erectii 20,000 years ago.
Homo-erectus-rendering-Artist.jpg

Here is a homo erectus. Bad ugly face and hairy.


It is only your parents and grandparents that got to live in an era where many homo sapiens who should've been weeded out of evolution, got to reproduce.


In a woman's head, they only want the best genetics possible. They would rather have nothing than that.

Feminism was never about equal rights. It was about escaping religion and tradition (forcing marriages), getting a means to work for a living (so they wouldn't need to rely on a normie looking guy for stability). The resent from feminists is because in the past, women were forced to reproduce with bad genes (worst thing imaginable).

If you ever wonder "why are feminists still a thing? Why are they still so angry? They have equality now right?"

Equality is not the thing. They want all sub9s DEAD. I knew this for years but wanted to wait for others to start open discussion about it to make a comment about it myself.

This is why cheating happens, this is why cheating happens in marriages, this is why Chads can behave badly, because it is a woman's goal to reproduce with the best genetics, just like it is for a man.








FWOjD8CWAAAGE-v


FpVyvJyXEAEfRvR
FpVyvUhWYAAV-W5
FpVyvmwWYAIBEPb
FpVyveeXgAUTGfC
FpOYgjsXwAUaGbP
Fo158KkXoAQDEuH
FoyPkiBWIAAlHhA


FnzjXvTaIAElWiV
FnhX6f1X0AAtpOM

176d10c94fcd2cb6184b5e2d1ec72fce.png
FnQcc4oXEBM77L7
FnQcezdX0AAKnzX

good post
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Seth Walsh
I do not believe in this "innate attraction".

This innate attraction never mattered before. Even in non-christian societies, men simply came and took women. No one gave a shit what women thought. Plus, 99% of this "attractiveness" are shitty recessive traits which do not confer any additional survival benefit. For example, if the survival of the fittest were truly the endgame, then Indians would be #1 attractive people:

1) They are brown - low risk of cancer and heat strokes in a planet with warming-up climate
2) More compact - smaller - means more ready to survive the famine, which is coming, since population is growing, and so are the food shortages
3) More hard working - average indian is a lot more hardworking than a white dude.
4) Have stronger immune systems than whites against pathogens of warm places: self-explanatory
5) ...

But why the fuck would women then go for blue eyes and blonde hair? Shitty recessive traits which are DETRIMENTAL to survival.

So this evolution theory is all shit. Do not agree with your main message at all. But still it was a great read, so thanks for creating the thread. (y)

PS. ALso, she never said she DID NOT LIKE HIS LOOKS. She literally said: "i do not like he is a TRUCK DRIVER". This is a STATUS PILL if anything. Nothing to do with the looks-theory. At least until more info is provided.
We do not need traits for survival. We need genes and traits for beauty.

COVID19 couldn't even kill 100 year olds. Survival was a thing of the ancient past. It's all about looks. Think of it as selection for good looks, not survival.

Even the lonliest incel at 90 years old can survive. Surviving is literally the easiest thing in today's day.

There point is that only a small % of people are meant to live a happy life. And that's the static factor and the constant throughout history.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23558 and Artemis
And if you arent Chad what does that mean. Does it mean you can not do great things in the world? Does it not mean you achieve success athletically, financially etc. No all it means is that you cant fuck jaded whores. So why is it over? Are whores the only thing that matters?
dn rd
 
But why the fuck would women then go for blue eyes and blonde hair? Shitty recessive traits which are DETRIMENTAL to survival.
How are blue eyes and blonde hair shitty traits that are detrimental to survival?

In fact. About 40,000 years ago one person in Kazakhstan was born with blue eyes due to a HERC2/OCA2 polymorphism and now 988 million people have blue eyes because so many women chose people who carried the gene when it first arose.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Artemis
We do not need traits for survival. We need genes and traits for beauty.

COVID19 couldn't even kill 100 year olds. Survival was a thing of the ancient past. It's all about looks. Think of it as selection for good looks, not survival.

Even the lonliest incel at 90 years old can survive. Surviving is literally the easiest thing in today's day.

There point is that only a small % of people are meant to live a happy life. And that's the static factor and the constant throughout history.
But then again, your theory is wrong.

Because EVOLUTION as a theory is BASED ON SURVIVAL.

What you describe even has a name - Fisherian Runaway. But i doubt that men are turning into peacocks tbh...

What is MORE likely... is that the nature will not leave this alone. In fact, the mass dissatisfaction of men sooner or later will resolve into spontaneous violence outbreaks. Then, these "low class genetically unfit" men will do what? THey will go and RAPE AND INSEMINATE every female they can get their hands on! That is what is going to happen.

And then all these women will give birth to "genetically inferior men". Looks will not matter the most at that point. Violence will. And THAT is dependent on muscles, low-inhib, and smarts. Because to rape, and not be raped, one needs quite a high IQ.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Clown Show, Skywalker and Deleted member 14693
How are blue eyes and blonde hair shitty traits that are detrimental to survival?

In fact. About 40,000 years ago one person in Kazakhstan was born with blue eyes due to a HERC2/OCA2 polymorphism and now 988 million people have blue eyes because so many women chose people who carried the gene when it first arose.
Because blue ares are an adaptation for low amounts of light during winter, typical for peoples in harsh northern climates.

But now the climate is quite warm, and everyone can fly whenever, and buy as much vitamin D as needed.

However, blue eyes are susceptible to UV radiation. A blue eyed person goes blind, while a dude with brown eyes continues no problem into his 60s. Same for skin color.

As for why recessive: because IT IS RECESSIVE. If one of the pair of genes is brown, and second is blue, the eyes will be brown. That's it. Brown is the dominant gene.
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Skywalker
But then again, your theory is wrong.

Because EVOLUTION as a theory is BASED ON SURVIVAL.

What you describe even has a name - Fisherian Runaway. But i doubt that men are turning into peacocks tbh...

What is MORE likely... is that the nature will not leave this alone. In fact, the mass dissatisfaction of men sooner or later will resolve into spontaneous violence outbreaks. Then, these "low class genetically unfit" men will do what? THey will go and RAPE AND INSEMINATE every female they can get their hands on! That is what is going to happen.

And then all these women will give birth to "genetically inferior men". Looks will not matter the most at that point. Violence will. And THAT is dependent on muscles, low-inhib, and smarts. Because to rape, and not be raped, one needs quite a high IQ.
Yeah I'm talking about that form of evolution. Not the survival of the fittest or some sort of survival based evolution in the modern age. We have no issue surviving and that's clear.

I'm talking about Fisherian Runaway, sexy son hypothesis, selfish gene principal etc.

Evolution just means the genetic arms race and the divergence and narrowing in preference for attractive features as time plays out. I'm not talking about some ancient theory of survival.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Artemis
blackpill autism tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: Skywalker
Because blue ares are an adaptation for low amounts of light during winter, typical for peoples in harsh northern climates.

But now the climate is quite warm, and everyone can fly whenever, and buy as much vitamin D as needed.

However, blue eyes are susceptible to UV radiation. A blue eyed person goes blind, while a dude with brown eyes continues no problem into his 60s. Same for skin color.

As for why recessive: because IT IS RECESSIVE. If one of the pair of genes is brown, and second is blue, the eyes will be brown. That's it. Brown is the dominant gene.
Yeah but blue eyes are more attractive and will be chosen for more in the future.

Also blue eyes are due to variances in the MCR1 OCA1 and HERC1 genes and were brought into existence through a gene mutation. I never heard about being born with blue eyes being an adaptation to winter weather.
 
True, feminism is good tho. Kills off subhuman genes it SHUDA existed long ago
 
>cherrypicked examples

the truth is that the majority are ugly, and Women still date the ugly by and large. if anything our secular societies are dysgenic
 
  • +1
Reactions: Seth Walsh
>cherrypicked examples

the truth is that the majority are ugly, and Women still date the ugly by and large. if anything our secular societies are dysgenic
Fm2hUwJXwAAPJDZ
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23100

this doesn't mean anything in particular. we never praised or preferred ugliness throughout history, we tolerate it. that's why classic architecture is the way it is. it's not exclusive to Women or biology
 
Evolution requires a species to EVOLVE. We got to the 20th century supposedly evolving from Homo Erectii 20,000 years ago.
Homo-erectus-rendering-Artist.jpg

Here is a homo erectus. Bad ugly face and hairy.


It is only your parents and grandparents that got to live in an era where many homo sapiens who should've been weeded out of evolution, got to reproduce.


In a woman's head, they only want the best genetics possible. They would rather have nothing than that.

Feminism was never about equal rights. It was about escaping religion and tradition (forcing marriages), getting a means to work for a living (so they wouldn't need to rely on a normie looking guy for stability). The resent from feminists is because in the past, women were forced to reproduce with bad genes (worst thing imaginable).

If you ever wonder "why are feminists still a thing? Why are they still so angry? They have equality now right?"

Equality is not the thing. They want all sub9s DEAD. I knew this for years but wanted to wait for others to start open discussion about it to make a comment about it myself.

This is why cheating happens, this is why cheating happens in marriages, this is why Chads can behave badly, because it is a woman's goal to reproduce with the best genetics, just like it is for a man.








FWOjD8CWAAAGE-v


FpVyvJyXEAEfRvR
FpVyvUhWYAAV-W5
FpVyvmwWYAIBEPb
FpVyveeXgAUTGfC
FpOYgjsXwAUaGbP
Fo158KkXoAQDEuH
FoyPkiBWIAAlHhA


FnzjXvTaIAElWiV
FnhX6f1X0AAtpOM

176d10c94fcd2cb6184b5e2d1ec72fce.png
FnQcc4oXEBM77L7
FnQcezdX0AAKnzX

narcissism is the reason of this. if we humans were that good at choosing a mate with good genetics then why did chads and stacies back then produced disabled babies?
 
narcissism is the reason of this. if we humans were that good at choosing a mate with good genetics then why did chads and stacies back then produced disabled babies?

there's this misconception that Stacies and Chads produce good looking children, wait until they realize that Hollywood has been trying this for so long with no noticeable improvement over non-selective mating

 
  • +1
Reactions: Skywalker
I know which gym this Chad goes to

FnQcezdX0AAKnzX
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Seth Walsh
  • Love it
Reactions: Skywalker
Bruh you got a full on SQL database of all the UK maesthetic Chads. Mirin
He goes to the same gym as my old work colleague, never been there myself
 
  • +1
Reactions: Seth Walsh
Finally eugenics are getting practiced

Future generations will mog
 
  • +1
Reactions: Seth Walsh
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 8365
Evolution requires a species to EVOLVE. We got to the 20th century supposedly evolving from Homo Erectii 20,000 years ago.
Homo-erectus-rendering-Artist.jpg

Here is a homo erectus. Bad ugly face and hairy.


It is only your parents and grandparents that got to live in an era where many homo sapiens who should've been weeded out of evolution, got to reproduce.


In a woman's head, they only want the best genetics possible. They would rather have nothing than that.

Feminism was never about equal rights. It was about escaping religion and tradition (forcing marriages), getting a means to work for a living (so they wouldn't need to rely on a normie looking guy for stability). The resent from feminists is because in the past, women were forced to reproduce with bad genes (worst thing imaginable).

If you ever wonder "why are feminists still a thing? Why are they still so angry? They have equality now right?"

Equality is not the thing. They want all sub9s DEAD. I knew this for years but wanted to wait for others to start open discussion about it to make a comment about it myself.

This is why cheating happens, this is why cheating happens in marriages, this is why Chads can behave badly, because it is a woman's goal to reproduce with the best genetics, just like it is for a man.








FWOjD8CWAAAGE-v


FpVyvJyXEAEfRvR
FpVyvUhWYAAV-W5
FpVyvmwWYAIBEPb
FpVyveeXgAUTGfC
FpOYgjsXwAUaGbP
Fo158KkXoAQDEuH
FoyPkiBWIAAlHhA


FnzjXvTaIAElWiV
FnhX6f1X0AAtpOM

176d10c94fcd2cb6184b5e2d1ec72fce.png
FnQcc4oXEBM77L7
FnQcezdX0AAKnzX

My Blood is boiling rn

I want to kill subhumans
 
And if you arent Chad what does that mean. Does it mean you can not do great things in the world? Does it not mean you achieve success athletically, financially etc. No all it means is that you cant fuck jaded whores. So why is it over? Are whores the only thing that matters?
based and high iq
 
precisely; stacy+ chad=// CHAD/ STACY ; its all a LOTTERY; @MoggerChad is retarded as is anyone who is thinking like this

But then again, your theory is wrong.

Because EVOLUTION as a theory is BASED ON SURVIVAL.

What you describe even has a name - Fisherian Runaway. But i doubt that men are turning into peacocks tbh...

What is MORE likely... is that the nature will not leave this alone. In fact, the mass dissatisfaction of men sooner or later will resolve into spontaneous violence outbreaks. Then, these "low class genetically unfit" men will do what? THey will go and RAPE AND INSEMINATE every female they can get their hands on! That is what is going to happen.

And then all these women will give birth to "genetically inferior men". Looks will not matter the most at that point. Violence will. And THAT is dependent on muscles, low-inhib, and smarts. Because to rape, and not be raped, one needs quite a high IQ.
100% on point; imagine thinking we aren't gonna revert to sharia Islam very soon :LOL: = 99% of humanity, basically

male AGGRESION and TESTOSTERONE is the basis of homo sapiens
female "options" or low t low inhib male opinions and pencil pushing nerdism, looksmaxxing.org autism, etc. doesnt matter at all when forced with the ultimate decider:
BRUTE VIOLENCE/ force of low inhib men
therefore as you said in a couple of decades we will either revert to sharia islam or extreme, Neanderthal type violence

its literally impossible otherwise, if the elites decide not to then men will revert to tribalism and non compliance due to higher test levels than foids/ beta males...

who tf is so low IQ here , on this forum, to think otherwise, like really :LOL::feelstastyman:
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Artemis
Being a genetic chad is literal generational wealth.
 
Anyone can prove opposite with few cherry-picked screenshots
 
Evolution requires a species to EVOLVE. We got to the 20th century supposedly evolving from Homo Erectii 20,000 years ago.
Homo-erectus-rendering-Artist.jpg

Here is a homo erectus. Bad ugly face and hairy.


It is only your parents and grandparents that got to live in an era where many homo sapiens who should've been weeded out of evolution, got to reproduce.


In a woman's head, they only want the best genetics possible. They would rather have nothing than that.

Feminism was never about equal rights. It was about escaping religion and tradition (forcing marriages), getting a means to work for a living (so they wouldn't need to rely on a normie looking guy for stability). The resent from feminists is because in the past, women were forced to reproduce with bad genes (worst thing imaginable).

If you ever wonder "why are feminists still a thing? Why are they still so angry? They have equality now right?"

Equality is not the thing. They want all sub9s DEAD. I knew this for years but wanted to wait for others to start open discussion about it to make a comment about it myself.

This is why cheating happens, this is why cheating happens in marriages, this is why Chads can behave badly, because it is a woman's goal to reproduce with the best genetics, just like it is for a man.








FWOjD8CWAAAGE-v


FpVyvJyXEAEfRvR
FpVyvUhWYAAV-W5
FpVyvmwWYAIBEPb
FpVyveeXgAUTGfC
FpOYgjsXwAUaGbP
Fo158KkXoAQDEuH
FoyPkiBWIAAlHhA


FnzjXvTaIAElWiV
FnhX6f1X0AAtpOM

176d10c94fcd2cb6184b5e2d1ec72fce.png
FnQcc4oXEBM77L7
FnQcezdX0AAKnzX

Holy moly this post is too powerful

BLACKPILL IS THE ONLY TRUTH

THE ONLY WAY
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Seth Walsh
Ur forgetting about invasions and who invaded and won most. That type of looks are selected for . Its systematic programming.You can even give a guy homo desires if u have immense knowledge about brain chemistry and psychology
I do not believe in this "innate attraction".

This innate attraction never mattered before. Even in non-christian societies, men simply came and took women. No one gave a shit what women thought. Plus, 99% of this "attractiveness" are shitty recessive traits which do not confer any additional survival benefit. For example, if the survival of the fittest were truly the endgame, then Indians would be #1 attractive people:

1) They are brown - low risk of cancer and heat strokes in a planet with warming-up climate
2) More compact - smaller - means more ready to survive the famine, which is coming, since population is growing, and so are the food shortages
3) More hard working - average indian is a lot more hardworking than a white dude.
4) Have stronger immune systems than whites against pathogens of warm places: self-explanatory
5) ...

But why the fuck would women then go for blue eyes and blonde hair? Shitty recessive traits which are DETRIMENTAL to survival.

So this evolution theory is all shit. Do not agree with your main message at all. But still it was a great read, so thanks for creating the thread. (y)

PS. ALso, she never said she DID NOT LIKE HIS LOOKS. She literally said: "i do not like he is a TRUCK DRIVER". This is a STATUS PILL if anything. Nothing to do with the looks-theory. At least until more info is provided.
 
Ur forgetting about invasions and who invaded and won most. That type of looks are selected for . Its systematic programming.You can even give a guy homo desires if u have immense knowledge about brain chemistry and psychology
Elab
 

Similar threads

itsherlossNVM
Replies
105
Views
4K
itsherlossNVM
itsherlossNVM
got.daim
Replies
27
Views
1K
Gr8
Gr8

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top