reminder that browridge shape matter

[SadnessWYJ]

vs

 

[Deleted member 8846]

There is only one browridge shape, O'Pry and Nessman just have small browridges

 

[Tyronecell]

I don't have browridge unfortunately

 

[Deleted member 6380]

Forget browridge shape, my forehead is half of my face

 

[SadnessWYJ]

O'Pry have small browridges

 

[Deleted member 8846]

View attachment 883257

You're confusing browridge with supra orbital projection. O'Pry has prominent and forward grown supra orbitals but a flat glabella (browridge)

 

[Deleted member 11406]

Never do squinting

 

[SadnessWYJ]

You're confusing browridge with supra orbital projection. O'Pry has prominent and forward grown supra orbitals but a flat glabella (browridge)

makes sense

 

[Deleted member 756]

I don't have browridge unfortunately

But you’re black?

 

[Deleted member 11295]

wow

 

[Deleted member 10987]

View attachment 883250
vs
View attachment 883252View attachment 883251

Just remarked that Sean has assymetry
Lifefuel

 

[AutisticBeaner]

You're confusing browridge with supra orbital projection. O'Pry has prominent and forward grown supra orbitals but a flat glabella (browridge)

no no no, he's right. there are different browridge shapes. brock lesnars browridge is more prominent than OP, yet he doesn't have this ugly bump (no offense op)

 

[Deleted member 8846]

no no no, he's right. there are different browridge shapes. brock lesnars browridge is more prominent than OP, yet he doesn't have this ugly bump (no offense op)
View attachment 883346

You just chose a picture with shit lighting and a shit angle. Brock Lesnar does have that bump, it's less noticeable from certain angles though because his supra orbitals are very prominant as is his browridge, so the supra orbital projection frauds that his forehead is slanted and flat but as we can see from a profile view he does have that "bump", basically a protruding glabella bone.

 

[Deleted member 5081]

You just chose a picture with shit lighting and a shit angle. Brock Lesnar does have that bump, it's less noticeable from certain angles though because his supra orbitals are very prominant as is his browridge, so the supra orbital projection frauds that his forehead is slanted and flat but as we can see from a profile view he does have that "bump", basically a protruding glabella bone.
View attachment 883375

jfl at brock's side tit

 

[Hightwolf]

You just chose a picture with shit lighting and a shit angle. Brock Lesnar does have that bump, it's less noticeable from certain angles though because his supra orbitals are very prominant as is his browridge, so the supra orbital projection frauds that his forehead is slanted and flat but as we can see from a profile view he does have that "bump", basically a protruding glabella bone.
View attachment 883375

WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS
I am at a loss for words at this neanderthal tier browridge and forehead.

 

[Deleted member 8846]

View attachment 883382
WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS
I am at a loss for words at this neanderthal tier browridge and forehead.

Top 0.1% warrior skull

 

[AutisticBeaner]

You just chose a picture with shit lighting and a shit angle. Brock Lesnar does have that bump, it's less noticeable from certain angles though because his supra orbitals are very prominant as is his browridge, so the supra orbital projection frauds that his forehead is slanted and flat but as we can see from a profile view he does have that "bump", basically a protruding glabella bone.
View attachment 883375

well, if you say so. where is this guy's bump then?

the name is luke kuechly, look him up

 

[Deleted member 8846]

well, if you say so. where is this guy's bump then?
View attachment 883392
the name is luke kuechly, look him up

Not a huge browridge, good supra orbital projection with average glabella mass blended in together. Thing is, you need to have massive glabella bone mass to get that browridge "bump". And that bump usually isn't visible from all angles but is always more or less visible from profile view.

It is clear as day, he has more supra orbital projection than glabella projection.

What my main point was is that the glabella bone will always be the same shape on every human skull, the glabella bone mass is what differs from person to person.

 

[AutisticBeaner]

Not a huge browridge, good supra orbital projection with average glabella mass blended in together. Thing is, you need to have massive glabella bone mass to get that browridge "bump". And that bump usually isn't visible from all angles but is always more or less visible from profile view.

It is clear as day, he has more supra orbital projection than glabella projection.
View attachment 883422View attachment 883423

What my main point was is that the glabella bone will always be the same shape on every human skull, the glabella bone mass is what differs from person to person.

isnt the glabella just the small area between the eyebrows?

 

[Deleted member 8846]

isnt the glabella just the small area between the eyebrows?

It's basically your entire lower forehead region, just above the eye sockets
View attachment frontal-bone-glabella-lateral-view-745x550.webpView attachment frontal-bone-glabella-anterior-view-745x550.webp

 

[AutisticBeaner]

It's basically your entire lower forehead region, just above the eye sockets
View attachment 883439View attachment 883444

and how are you judging how massive the glabella is?

 

[SadnessWYJ]

no no no, he's right. there are different browridge shapes. brock lesnars browridge is more prominent than OP, yet he doesn't have this ugly bump (no offense op)
View attachment 883346

that's random guy i found, mine looks like this

 

[SadnessWYJ]

that's random guy i found, mine looks like this
View attachment 883461

better than nothing atleast but not that masc

 

[Deleted member 8846]

and how are you judging how massive the glabella is?

Like I said, from profile view

 

[AutisticBeaner]

Like I said, from profile view

well yea, but what are you comparing it to? you gotta have some kind of point of reference to estimate size, no?

 

[Deleted member 8846]

well yea, but what are you comparing it to? you gotta have some kind of point of reference to estimate size, no?

Yes. I'm comparing it to the upper part of the Splanchnocranium, if a splanchnocranium doesn't have a prominent glabella, then it will look totally flat from profile view, if it does have a prominent glabella bone it will have an ogre bump like Brock Lesnar

 

[AutisticBeaner]

Yes. I'm comparing it to the upper part of the Splanchnocranium, if a splanchnocranium doesn't have a prominent glabella, then it will look totally flat from profile view, if it does have a prominent glabella bone it will have an ogre bump like Brock Lesnar

so essentially you're comparing it to the nose bridge?

 

[Deleted member 8846]

so essentially you're comparing it to the nose bridge?

No I compare it to the upper part of the forehead, the part right below the hairline. If you compared it to the nose bridge then most people have a prominent browridge

 

[herring]

my browridge might look ogre tier but its still much better than being a u dimorphic twink

 

[Deleted member 3479]

Not a huge browridge, good supra orbital projection with average glabella mass blended in together. Thing is, you need to have massive glabella bone mass to get that browridge "bump". And that bump usually isn't visible from all angles but is always more or less visible from profile view.

It is clear as day, he has more supra orbital projection than glabella projection.
View attachment 883422View attachment 883423

What my main point was is that the glabella bone will always be the same shape on every human skull, the glabella bone mass is what differs from person to person.

U studying medicine?

 

[Deleted member 8846]

U studying medicine?

No, i'm just an aspie