Reminder That Women Will Always Eventually Lose Interest, Even If You're Chad

[Deleted member 6403]

Even though women's sexual strategy is often purported to be slower, this really only seems to apply to their more coy, passive and choosy sex drive and much more limited reproductive rate. In truth, women lose interest in long-term romantic investment a lot sooner than men[1] and yield nearly the same rate of affairs.[2] In fact, biochemical research points to a natural four-year sexual cycle for the human female. A woman’s natural tendency is to “liberate” herself from her mate after that point.[3] This is in line with divorce statistics where women are the initiator 75% of the time.[3] Moreover, women mature sooner than men,[4] which is a fast LH trait. This, however, may simply be a result of men selecting for neoteny for paternity assurance.

So, even though women's life history speed is slower in terms of reproductive rate and choosiness, their long-term strategy seems to be actually less r-selected than men's, implying less long-term investment in the offspring and hence less compatible with modern, highly ordered and structured civilization.

This may stem from the fact that women have overall been less subject to selective pressures as they reproduced twice as often as men. For this reason, women's sexuality may be stuck in a more r-selected past. Women's tendency to switch mates has also been explained by the mate switching hypothesis[5] as a means to ensure a suitable provider and protector all the time, which women are thought to depend on by bodyguard hypothesis. Another explanation could be that modern requirements are simply a an evolutionary mismatch that only emerges when women are economically independent and liberated such that their hypergamy, choosiness and fickleness becomes more exposed.

@Hozay @Idfkbruh

 

[Deleted member 275]

To keep a woman interested, you have to keep her pregnant.

 

[goat2x]

no tag no a pixel of this shit thread kill yourself niger

 

[SMVbender]

Its fantastic how people backing up cope with science for being divorcerobbed

 

[turkproducer]

i don’t want a family, will get surrogate mother with good genes and just have a son. i will then live to slay (if i even can after 35) and maybe have a gf that doesn’t live with me

 

[Hozay]

I just looksmax for myself so I look my best and not look like shit. Looksmaxxing to keep woman is pointless

 

[Deleted member 7076]

a thread by this user which isn’t one sentence long? that’s new

 

[Doober]

Even though women's sexual strategy is often purported to be slower, this really only seems to apply to their more coy, passive and choosy sex drive and much more limited reproductive rate. In truth, women lose interest in long-term romantic investment a lot sooner than men[1] and yield nearly the same rate of affairs.[2] In fact, biochemical research points to a natural four-year sexual cycle for the human female. A woman’s natural tendency is to “liberate” herself from her mate after that point.[3] This is in line with divorce statistics where women are the initiator 75% of the time.[3] Moreover, women mature sooner than men,[4] which is a fast LH trait. This, however, may simply be a result of men selecting for neoteny for paternity assurance.

So, even though women's life history speed is slower in terms of reproductive rate and choosiness, their long-term strategy seems to be actually less r-selected than men's, implying less long-term investment in the offspring and hence less compatible with modern, highly ordered and structured civilization.

This may stem from the fact that women have overall been less subject to selective pressures as they reproduced twice as often as men. For this reason, women's sexuality may be stuck in a more r-selected past. Women's tendency to switch mates has also been explained by the mate switching hypothesis[5] as a means to ensure a suitable provider and protector all the time, which women are thought to depend on by bodyguard hypothesis. Another explanation could be that modern requirements are simply a an evolutionary mismatch that only emerges when women are economically independent and liberated such that their hypergamy, choosiness and fickleness becomes more exposed.

@Hozay @Idfkbruh

Economically independent is key. Also this results in alpha widows running stray on the playing feild

 

[Chadeep]

That's why Chad's get cucked by manlet normies with good personality.

 

[FascisstChad]

Impregnate any attractive girl you fuck make your ancestors proud!!

 

[ifyouwannabemylover]

sauce?

 

[Deleted member 10104]

Impregnate any attractive girl you fuck make your ancestors proud!!

Even though women's sexual strategy is often purported to be slower, this really only seems to apply to their more coy, passive and choosy sex drive and much more limited reproductive rate. In truth, women lose interest in long-term romantic investment a lot sooner than men[1] and yield nearly the same rate of affairs.[2] In fact, biochemical research points to a natural four-year sexual cycle for the human female. A woman’s natural tendency is to “liberate” herself from her mate after that point.[3] This is in line with divorce statistics where women are the initiator 75% of the time.[3] Moreover, women mature sooner than men,[4] which is a fast LH trait. This, however, may simply be a result of men selecting for neoteny for paternity assurance.

So, even though women's life history speed is slower in terms of reproductive rate and choosiness, their long-term strategy seems to be actually less r-selected than men's, implying less long-term investment in the offspring and hence less compatible with modern, highly ordered and structured civilization.

This may stem from the fact that women have overall been less subject to selective pressures as they reproduced twice as often as men. For this reason, women's sexuality may be stuck in a more r-selected past. Women's tendency to switch mates has also been explained by the mate switching hypothesis[5] as a means to ensure a suitable provider and protector all the time, which women are thought to depend on by bodyguard hypothesis. Another explanation could be that modern requirements are simply a an evolutionary mismatch that only emerges when women are economically independent and liberated such that their hypergamy, choosiness and fickleness becomes more exposed.

@Hozay @Idfkbruh

in a relationship, one partner is always chasing the other one. love is never completely matched. to keep a woman's interest, it's as simple as keeping her as the one chasing... making a woman fear for your loyalty is the easiest way. making her think you could get another girl and cheat on her at a moments notice is the easiest way.

but this only works with HQNP girls which is the only type you should be ltring in thefirst place