MisterMercedes
Kraken
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2020
- Posts
- 3,661
- Reputation
- 3,837
DiCaprio mogs the living shit out of O’ Pry and Barrett combined.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Another guy who goes to the cliche insult when they have no rebuttal. Go back to the pen with the rest of sheep.
Another guy who goes to the cliche insult when they have no rebuttal. Go back to the pen with the rest of sheep.
No need to refute what you said
Only thing dicaprio is eye area
You are probably boneless twink that has decent eye area that thinks you can get away with shit bones
And you have to go to another insult. You are a .me approved little sheep. Keep baaing for my eye area.
Ask girls which one they prefer. It’ll almost always be DiCaprio.No need to refute what you said
Only thing dicaprio has is eye area
You are probably boneless twink that has decent eye area that thinks you can get away with shit bones
he even brags about his eye area jfl. I swear this guy has some delusional type mental illness lolMirin non existent eyelashes tbh
Still haven’t posted your eye area?Mirin non existent eyelashes tbh
Have you ever considered that people shit on you because you are in the wrong, and not because .me is a bunch of sheep? Fucking retarded tbh. Egocentric af, probs some fat 15 yr old tbhAnd you have to go to another insult. You are a .me approved little sheep. Keep baaing for my eye area.
Prove it’s status halo rather than looks.Status halo ez
Aren't you smart? Why don't you understand well established concepts
Except all you have said is “you have a bad post-reputation ratio” and “nice eye area haha”. Nothing substantive. Try again sheep.Have you ever considered that people shit on you because you are in the wrong, and not because .me is a bunch of sheep? Fucking retarded tbh. Egocentric af, probs some fat 15 yr old tbh
lol every girl automatically likes every famous actor. combine that with an actual good looking actor and nothing can beat itProve it’s status halo rather than looks.
Again, prove it’s status halo rather than looks.lol every girl automatically likes every famous actor. combine that with an actual good looking actor and nothing can beat it
prove its not status halo faggotAgain, prove it’s status halo rather than looks.
Look up “proving a negative”.prove its not status halo faggot
lol just evade what i said and pretend to be smart theoryLook up “proving a negative”.
Since you didn’t look it up, I’ll explain it. I’m not obligated to prove a negative, or the negation of a claim. If you make a claim (girls rate DiCaprio higher in attractiveness because of his status) you are obligated to prove it. I am not obligated to refute it.lol just evade what i said and pretend to be smart theory
you first made a claim that di caprio mogs opry not because of statusSince you didn’t look it up, I’ll explain it. I’m not obligated to prove a negative, or the negation of a claim. If you make a claim (girls rate DiCaprio higher in attractiveness because of his status) you are obligated to prove it. I am not obligated to refute it.
Again, that’s asking to prove a negative (DiCaprio mogs O’ Pry not because of status). I am not obligated to prove it’s not because of status, as that’s proving a negative. If you are claiming it’s because of status, prove it.you first made a claim that di caprio mogs opry not because of status
youre the one that has to prove it buddy
remember, youre the one making the thread
Agreed. O’ Pry has the better face by the textbook ideal. Girls still rate DiCaprio higher.You shouldn't need an explanation
Look, these are both non modeling photos
It's pretty obvious who has the better face
In fact, even if girls preferred Leo's face without status halo, I still wouldn't concede it's a better face
Just look at them
View attachment 664494View attachment 664495
lol u make no sense. you should just kys tbhAgain, that’s asking to prove a negative (DiCaprio mogs O’ Pry not because of status). I am not obligated to prove it’s not because of status, as that’s proving a negative. If you are claiming it’s because of status, prove it.
Great rebuttal!lol u make no sense. you should just kys tbh
I’m not obligated to prove it’s not because of status. If girls say they find DiCaprio more attractive, I’ll think that’s the case until someone can prove other factors are causing their rating.You haven't shown that they would without status influencing it
I’m not claiming it’s not status, as claiming that would mean I’m making a negative claim that I can’t say with certainly. I’m simply saying girls rate DiCaprio higher, and I’m not going to think that’s because of status until that can be proven.youre the one claiming its looks and not status. wtf do I have to prove?
I’m not obligated to prove it’s not because of status. If girls say they find DiCaprio more attractive, I’ll think that’s the case until someone can prove other factors are causing their rating.
Wrong. I’m not obligated to prove it’s not because of status. If girls rate DiCaprio higher, I’ll think they find him more attractive until it can be proven that status is causing their rating.
so he is not obliged to prove anything and we just gotta accept his opinion as fact even tho he is making the thread claiming leo mogs opry
just ignore him @abmonger
I think it’s more complicated. PSL standards are a guideline, but violating some of the standards doesn’t mean you can’t have a top tier face. Standards should fit what people in real life find attractive, not the other way around.Your reasoning is faulty
Let's take it from the beginning
Why do we have psl standards of attractiveness?
So we can standardize attractiveness and identify what we as men need to improve on
If psl standards are to be true, then using those standards, o pry has a better face than Leo, and thus given a level playing field, females should find o prys face more attractive
You can say psl standards are wrong, but I always see you making threads about eye area and Ramus and shit like that, so I assume you agree with psl
That's my proof
dn rd kysYour reasoning is faulty
Let's take it from the beginning
Why do we have psl standards of attractiveness?
So we can standardize attractiveness and identify what we as men need to improve on
If psl standards are to be true, then using those standards, o pry has a better face than Leo, and thus given a level playing field, females should find o prys face more attractive
You can say psl standards are wrong, but I always see you making threads about eye area and Ramus and shit like that, so I assume you agree with psl
That's my proof
Also why did you say that’s your proof? Proof that status is the reason girls rate DiCaprio higher? If so, that did not at all prove that.I think it’s more complicated. PSL standards are a guideline, but violating some of the standards doesn’t mean you can’t have a top tier face. Standards should fit what people in real life find attractive, not the other way around.
If you can’t calculate it or even prove status is causing their rating, why should I believe your claim that it is?There's no way we can calculate to what degree status has influenced ratings
Thus, even if you think psl are just guidelines, it's pretty safe to err on the side of status playing a role
There are people worse looking than Leo like timothee chalamet that have millions of female fans as well
But he obviously is not as Good looking as o pry
Again, no I don’t. I don’t know what you mean by PSL standards being “objective”. I clearly said that they are guidelines that should follow what is attractive in real life, not the other way around. If girls rate DiCaprio higher than O’ Pry or Barrett, I’m not going to assume other factors are at play unless it is proven.My proof is that assuming psl standards are true, they're objective
And objectively o pry has better psl criteria
All of that assumes psl standards are true which like I said you've shown to agree with
If one face is "objectively" more attractive than another, but the other face is being responded more positively to, you have to assume other factors are at play
Ask girls if you don’t believe me, although I’m sure you wouldn’t report back accurately if it proved my case. I asked girls in person, and the vast majority said Barrett looked creepy and O’ Pry was “pretty cute” but not in a sexual way. They rated Dicaprio higher than both.You honestly haven't even proven girls rate dicaprio higher than o pry (where are the screenshot?)
But even if you did, it's really stupid to believe no other factors are at play
In the real world there are many variables at play, disregarding psl
I'm sure you know status plays a role so for you to willfully pretend that has no influence on the ratings is pretty dumb
Yea sure they would think a masculine guy like opry is just cute but a pretty boy twink is a fucking machineAsk girls if you don’t believe me, although I’m sure you wouldn’t report back accurately if it proved my case. I asked girls in person, and the vast majority said Barrett looked creepy and O’ Pry was “pretty cute” but not in a sexual way. They rated Dicaprio higher than both.
And, again, if you are claiming status is the reason they are rating him higher and not because he is better looking, you are obligated to prove it. I am not going to assume it without evidence.
If that’s what they said, why would I disbelieve them?Yea sure they would think a masculine guy like opry is just cute but a pretty boy twink is a fucking machine
Where the screenshots at?If that’s what they said, why would I disbelieve them?
Again, this was in person. Ask around if you want confirmation and try not to lie about the results.Where the screenshots at?
His eyes are above average jfl
Thing is I’m not saying you should believe me. In fact, I encourage you to ask girls yourself if you genuinely doubt they rate DiCaprio higher than Barrett or O’ Pry.I mean it's just your word for it
In the same way you wouldnt believe my findings, I dont believe yours
You keep saying you're not obligated to prove that status isn't playing a role
That's technically true
But at the same time, if you think rationally, you should know that in the real world, there are other factors at play that influence attractiveness beyond the face itself
There's ultimately no point in furthering this discussion with you, but given what we know about psl and about what status can do to influence a males perceived attractiveness in a females eyes, it's safe to assume that status is playing a role
So u cant prove anything. Ok lolAgain, this was in person. Ask around if you want confirmation and try not to lie about the results.
Of course they are gonna rate dicaprio higher than gay alien barret. Why should that even be a question?Thing is I’m not saying you should believe me. In fact, I encourage you to ask girls yourself if you genuinely doubt they rate DiCaprio higher than Barrett or O’ Pry.
Once again, I will not assume status is the reason they rate DiCaprio higher unless evidence suggests that.
I said the same thing to the other guy debating me: I’m not saying you should take my word as you said I should. If you genuinely doubt girls rate DiCaprio higher than Barrett or O’ Pry, ask them yourself if you want the truth.So u cant prove anything. Ok lol
Oh and O’ Pry. Remember when I said that about two words after I said Barrett?Of course they are gonna rate dicaprio higher than gay alien barret. Why should that even be a question?
Yea I saw that im not blind. Im saying barret vs dicaprio shouldnt even be a question. Barret has no irl appealOh and O’ Pry. Remember when I said that about two words after I said Barrett?
Several problems. I never denied other factors don’t play any role (although you would need to be specific and prove that as well). You claimed status was why DiCaprio was rated higher than Barrett and O’ Pry. I will not assume that is true unless you can prove it.You are being willfully obstinate
The fact that you assume that there are no other variables at play in the female ratings shows a really limited understanding of how status and even other variables can influence attractiveness to a women
So again, you can keep assuming there are no other factors in the ratings, but it's a pretty stupid assumption