
osiris00
Sam Zialite
- Joined
- May 6, 2025
- Posts
- 165
- Reputation
- 81
- OP
- #51
Decent chunk of marriages come from collegeonly matters during high school/college.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Decent chunk of marriages come from collegeonly matters during high school/college.
If you're htn you just have to build a good relationship with them first and they'll like you its probably healthier tooI’ll agree on that but if your like true adam you don’t have to approach girls at all
You could always manipulate them women love when guys mistreat themIf you're htn you just have to build a good relationship with them first and they'll like you its probably healthier too
Bringing up top 0.00001% elderly billionaires that you will never be is not the own you think it is, bro.
Yep, majority of the time the one with "high status" in a high school / college environment has good sociability, low inhibition, above average in looks or height, and other certain personality traits they've inherited from just being that guy.100% but rep/popularity comes along with looks + nt so i guess this is more of a nt/looks pill
I think the moral of this thread is just dont be NDYep, majority of the time the one with "high status" in a high school / college environment has good sociability, low inhibition, above average in looks or height, and other certain personality traits they've inherited from just being that guy.
yeah but you need to be atleast mtnRep Pill/The group of people you dress like is extremely determinant of who will be interested in you to a point where I'd argue it's equal to looks in high school.
You said high correlation nigga.Bringing up top 0.00001% elderly billionaires that you will never be is not the own you think it is, bro.
I would like you to learn the definition of correlation, then come back to me, instead of making these moronic strawmans.
Do you not understand what correlation means?You said high correlation nigga.
i could show u a ltn at my school that pulls purely off repyeah but you need to be atleast mtn
It can be; but your ability to signal that you’re in the same league as other neurotypical and high status people through the way you dress, speak and behave and groom yourself is far more important.And status is highly correlated with looks
Yet looks have been proven, over and over, to be a strong predictor of life success, and no amount of bluepilled Reddit advice about “dressing better” or “muh grooming” will override that reality. Just a fucking laughable attempt at gaslighting. Just dress better, bro. Spare us this delusional cope.It can be; but your ability to signal that you’re in the same league as other neurotypical and high status people through the way you dress, speak and behave and groom yourself is far more important.
I do nigga. It's a mutual relationship lmao. Not 'close to identical' or 'high correlation.' Also you never even mentioned that second part ever in this thread to me. But keep trying to go further to explain your reasoning using attacking fallacy's nigga. Idc. Your opinion is indeed valid but my point is there are plenty and I mean plenty of outliers, and the ones at the very top don't appear to match your statement. I voice my opinion.Do you not understand what correlation means?
You cherry-picked two ultra-rare, top 0.0001% billionaire world leaders - both elderly - as if that proves anything. That’s the most blatant strawman you could make.
You conveniently ignored the core point: men with high social status or popularity compared to the average men, tend to be better-looking than the average guy around them. That’s not some crazy take - it’s an observable, consistent pattern. Try addressing that instead of deflecting with muh Elon Musk. You yourself have been to a high school so stop being an ignorant moron. "Contributor"![]()
No, if you aren’t on the sports teams or going to every party, you’ll be left out.youll have good rep if u have high smv and arent a retard or an unlikeable prick
Yet again, another blatant strawman. Not once did I ever say 'close to identical', but you insist on putting words in my mouth to suit your narrative. It's ridiculous at this point.I do nigga. It's a mutual relationship lmao. Not 'close to identical' or 'high correlation.' Also you never even mentioned that second part ever in this thread to me. But keep trying to go further to explain your reasoning using attacking fallacy's nigga. Idc. Your opinion is indeed valid but my point is there are plenty and I mean plenty of outliers, and the ones at the very top don't appear to match your statement. I voice my opinion.
Not equal to looks but yea it does make a difference I know someone who's not good looking and he pulled a girl because he's like edgy and shitRep Pill/The group of people you dress like is extremely determinant of who will be interested in you to a point where I'd argue it's equal to looks in high school.
Notice that I said 'or'Yet again, another blatant strawman. Not once did I ever say 'close to identical', but you insist on putting words in my mouth to suit your narrative. It's ridiculous at this point.
At no point did I deny that there's hundreds of outliers, I’ve acknowledged them quite directly. What you’re doing is deliberately downplaying the scale of the reality by fixating on a handful of poorly selected corporate elderly billionaires, as if they somehow represent the entirety of higher status men. That’s not only dishonest but it’s laughably ignorant, as if you’ve conveniently erased your own memories of being in high school or any place with a natural social hierarchy from your mind altogether.
There are millions of men who rank higher in status, influence, or popularity than the average normie. But you choose muh Elon Musk & Jeff Bezos, two exceptions out of millions who don't even get thirsted over by women and are only known for their wealth. JFL.
Don't try to deflect from the main point by attempting to mock me. You quoted specifically 'close to identical', something I never said. Just because you followed it up with what I actually said doesn't change the fact that you were intentionally trying to frame my argument in a way that is more favorable for you.Notice that I said 'or'. Meaning I was implying the same thing. Muh 'strawman fallacy
'.
.
Anyway I'm talking about niggas who are famous to the public eye and at the true top of the top, not random attractive successful people that I've never heard of. I never said I disagree with you completely to an extent. But yet you keep trying to grill me for some reason. But keep trying to use personal attacks bro![]()
You know what I meant by that statement nigga. I didn't even start it I just showed some billionaires lol. And then you got mad for no reason and started using personal attacks on me like continuing to talk about my contributor like it's important that I don't deserve it over a disagreement with youDon't try to deflect from the main point by attempting to mock me. You quoted specifically 'close to identical', something I never said. Just because you followed it up with what I actually said doesn't change the fact that you were intentionally trying to frame my argument in a way that is more favorable for you.
You started this pointless argument, brought up 2 elderly corporate billionaires who of which don't even disprove my argument. Now you realize that it was a mistake, and you're backpedaling hard to try and misrepresent what I am saying so you can save face. So much for a so-called Contributor of the forum.
Just move on, bro.