Repcism (Rep racism) against GREYS and why it's GOOD

loseratgenes

loseratgenes

Verified TikTokcel
Joined
Jan 18, 2026
Posts
1,943
Reputation
2,231
As we all know, except the greys, this site operates as a hierarchy. The hierarchy is formed based on the members' rep count as well as some contributing factors like post count and the leading factor behind rep count being the PTR ratio (aka. Post To Rep Ratio).

--- NOTE: If you don't want to read water, scroll to the "Repcism: Introduction" title.

Most greys on org have a terrible PTR because they:

  • have colder takes than Antarctica
  • ragebait senior members (noted as Übermensch)
  • drool out words they don't know
  • act like an OGcel while not knowing the importance of rep

Having a terrible PTR in such a hostile forum like Looksmax.org is bad. It's terrible for your status since everyone will seriously look down on you.

Now, a terrible PTR can have multiple forms. It might be a less brutal form like a 0.9 or a 0.7 where the reps are just barely behind the posts because of other greyfags not repping them when replying.

However, a PTR can also be horrifyingly brutal. For example, it can be a solid 0.25 or 0.1, to the point where you're even awarded a badge described as "Disgusting, keep it up," only further motivating a move towards worse PTR. That's a discussion for another thread, though.

Repcism: Introduction

Now - repcism. Formed of two words: reputation and racism. Racism could be directly used but it could also be thought of as "discrimination".

Greys with low rep are often left without a reply, not given a rep or even spammed with "Ugh..." or "WTF" reactions that do acknowledge a read but not necessarily a positive one.

Since greys will be greys, they'll keep posting. Because of their low rep, people aren't motivated enough to rep them. As a result, the gap between posts and rep rises catastrophically fast. At low counts, getting a good PTR headstart matters a lot, since the "change" of PTR per rep/post changes a lot. This change of ratio becomes way smaller over time as increments now have a smaller total change percentually.

6202

ALT: Chart depicting a logarithmic curve

The above image represents the amount of change in ratio over time. With higher total posts and rep (further on the X coordinate), the vertical difference is smaller and smaller.

Unless you're retarded, you'll understand that with this, it's also clearly understandable that it's easier to pass a "crisis" era where you receive near to zero reps compared to posts (so for example 10 posts per rep)

Repcism: Why it's partially good

That also means this: a grey's terrible actions will reflect upon his PTR immediately. If a more well known member has similar problems, it won't matter nearly as much since he already has a strong PTR base. This, atleast in theory, encourages greys to either leave or lock the fuck in. Doing neither will mean total death of that grey's reputation here.

However, Repcism isn't always good. Since we already know that users with terrible PTR are often not given a rep, it means developing greys might be stuck on that same steep curve as observed earlier. No matter what he tries, his PTR will always be terrible and it's going to only get harder to escape the hole he's sunken into. Think of it as trying to avoid falling off an icy slope with plastic bags as your shoes - it won't help.

Repcism also has an opposite effect - we'll invent a word for just this: replove. Lots of org users tend to rep users with high PTR far more than in the opposite case. This means that someone who's successfully jestered hard enough will have enough momentum to simply keep climbing the ranks in this hierarchy while the grey falls in the opposite direction.

To sum the above: the rich get richer, the poor get poorer. Think of it as jews exploiting the untermensch to only further gain power.

TL;DR: Repcism is a concept where members with worse PTR will have a far harder time climbing out of a <1.0 ratio entirely due to the fact they're already in that hole, and members with higher PTR have massive momentum only further positively affecting their PTR and inflating it towards a "20 reps per post" ratio, for example.

The above pattern can be observed in higher-ranking users like Master who, despite only having ~900 posts, would be a grey, but due to their position here, they're looked upon as a God, hence the insane PTR.

Thank you for coming to my TED-talk :feelskek::feelskek:

@Jesus_ist_König
@CaZaDor
@Frenulum
@EvilSatanArseRapist
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Frenulum, vision_n, Divineincel and 6 others
I am above this law
 
  • +1
Reactions: sub3gooncel, loseratgenes and Orion
1000006906
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: dogshitinfras, Pelvix and loseratgenes
1000094663
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: vision_n and loseratgenes
Means you're doing well
bros trying to bump the thread , well at least you put nice effort into it . I do agree once you pass a certain popularity threshold you get reps effortlessly no matter what you say
 
  • +1
Reactions: loseratgenes
As we all know, except the greys, this site operates as a hierarchy. The hierarchy is formed based on the members' rep count as well as some contributing factors like post count and the leading factor behind rep count being the PTR ratio (aka. Post To Rep Ratio).

--- NOTE: If you don't want to read water, scroll to the "Repcism: Introduction" title.

Most greys on org have a terrible PTR because they:

  • have colder takes than Antarctica
  • ragebait senior members (noted as Übermensch)
  • drool out words they don't know
  • act like an OGcel while not knowing the importance of rep

Having a terrible PTR in such a hostile forum like Looksmax.org is bad. It's terrible for your status since everyone will seriously look down on you.

Now, a terrible PTR can have multiple forms. It might be a less brutal form like a 0.9 or a 0.7 where the reps are just barely behind the posts because of other greyfags not repping them when replying.

However, a PTR can also be horrifyingly brutal. For example, it can be a solid 0.25 or 0.1, to the point where you're even awarded a badge described as "Disgusting, keep it up," only further motivating a move towards worse PTR. That's a discussion for another thread, though.

Repcism: Introduction

Now - repcism. Formed of two words: reputation and racism. Racism could be directly used but it could also be thought of as "discrimination".

Greys with low rep are often left without a reply, not given a rep or even spammed with "Ugh..." or "WTF" reactions that do acknowledge a read but not necessarily a positive one.

Since greys will be greys, they'll keep posting. Because of their low rep, people aren't motivated enough to rep them. As a result, the gap between posts and rep rises catastrophically fast. At low counts, getting a good PTR headstart matters a lot, since the "change" of PTR per rep/post changes a lot. This change of ratio becomes way smaller over time as increments now have a smaller total change percentually.

View attachment 5151696
ALT: Chart depicting a logarithmic curve

The above image represents the amount of change in ratio over time. With higher total posts and rep (further on the X coordinate), the vertical difference is smaller and smaller.

Unless you're retarded, you'll understand that with this, it's also clearly understandable that it's easier to pass a "crisis" era where you receive near to zero reps compared to posts (so for example 10 posts per rep)

Repcism: Why it's partially good

That also means this: a grey's terrible actions will reflect upon his PTR immediately. If a more well known member has similar problems, it won't matter nearly as much since he already has a strong PTR base. This, atleast in theory, encourages greys to either leave or lock the fuck in. Doing neither will mean total death of that grey's reputation here.

However, Repcism isn't always good. Since we already know that users with terrible PTR are often not given a rep, it means developing greys might be stuck on that same steep curve as observed earlier. No matter what he tries, his PTR will always be terrible and it's going to only get harder to escape the hole he's sunken into. Think of it as trying to avoid falling off an icy slope with plastic bags as your shoes - it won't help.

Repcism also has an opposite effect - we'll invent a word for just this: replove. Lots of org users tend to rep users with high PTR far more than in the opposite case. This means that someone who's successfully jestered hard enough will have enough momentum to simply keep climbing the ranks in this hierarchy while the grey falls in the opposite direction.

To sum the above: the rich get richer, the poor get poorer. Think of it as jews exploiting the untermensch to only further gain power.

TL;DR: Repcism is a concept where members with worse PTR will have a far harder time climbing out of a <1.0 ratio entirely due to the fact they're already in that hole, and members with higher PTR have massive momentum only further positively affecting their PTR and inflating it towards a "20 reps per post" ratio, for example.

The above pattern can be observed in higher-ranking users like Master who, despite only having ~900 posts, would be a grey, but due to their position here, they're looked upon as a God, hence the insane PTR.

Thank you for coming to my TED-talk :feelskek::feelskek:

@Jesus_ist_König
@CaZaDor
@Frenulum
@EvilSatanArseRapist
I'm an exception right? :feelscry: I try my best around here
 
  • +1
Reactions: hatefoids666 and loseratgenes
bros trying to bump the thread , well at least you put nice effort into it . I do agree once you pass a certain popularity threshold you get reps effortlessly no matter what you say
Ofcourse i want to bump it im a hypergamous moid who wants reps :feelskek:
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Pelvix
As we all know, except the greys, this site operates as a hierarchy. The hierarchy is formed based on the members' rep count as well as some contributing factors like post count and the leading factor behind rep count being the PTR ratio (aka. Post To Rep Ratio).

--- NOTE: If you don't want to read water, scroll to the "Repcism: Introduction" title.

Most greys on org have a terrible PTR because they:

  • have colder takes than Antarctica
  • ragebait senior members (noted as Übermensch)
  • drool out words they don't know
  • act like an OGcel while not knowing the importance of rep

Having a terrible PTR in such a hostile forum like Looksmax.org is bad. It's terrible for your status since everyone will seriously look down on you.

Now, a terrible PTR can have multiple forms. It might be a less brutal form like a 0.9 or a 0.7 where the reps are just barely behind the posts because of other greyfags not repping them when replying.

However, a PTR can also be horrifyingly brutal. For example, it can be a solid 0.25 or 0.1, to the point where you're even awarded a badge described as "Disgusting, keep it up," only further motivating a move towards worse PTR. That's a discussion for another thread, though.

Repcism: Introduction

Now - repcism. Formed of two words: reputation and racism. Racism could be directly used but it could also be thought of as "discrimination".

Greys with low rep are often left without a reply, not given a rep or even spammed with "Ugh..." or "WTF" reactions that do acknowledge a read but not necessarily a positive one.

Since greys will be greys, they'll keep posting. Because of their low rep, people aren't motivated enough to rep them. As a result, the gap between posts and rep rises catastrophically fast. At low counts, getting a good PTR headstart matters a lot, since the "change" of PTR per rep/post changes a lot. This change of ratio becomes way smaller over time as increments now have a smaller total change percentually.

View attachment 5151696
ALT: Chart depicting a logarithmic curve

The above image represents the amount of change in ratio over time. With higher total posts and rep (further on the X coordinate), the vertical difference is smaller and smaller.

Unless you're retarded, you'll understand that with this, it's also clearly understandable that it's easier to pass a "crisis" era where you receive near to zero reps compared to posts (so for example 10 posts per rep)

Repcism: Why it's partially good

That also means this: a grey's terrible actions will reflect upon his PTR immediately. If a more well known member has similar problems, it won't matter nearly as much since he already has a strong PTR base. This, atleast in theory, encourages greys to either leave or lock the fuck in. Doing neither will mean total death of that grey's reputation here.

However, Repcism isn't always good. Since we already know that users with terrible PTR are often not given a rep, it means developing greys might be stuck on that same steep curve as observed earlier. No matter what he tries, his PTR will always be terrible and it's going to only get harder to escape the hole he's sunken into. Think of it as trying to avoid falling off an icy slope with plastic bags as your shoes - it won't help.

Repcism also has an opposite effect - we'll invent a word for just this: replove. Lots of org users tend to rep users with high PTR far more than in the opposite case. This means that someone who's successfully jestered hard enough will have enough momentum to simply keep climbing the ranks in this hierarchy while the grey falls in the opposite direction.

To sum the above: the rich get richer, the poor get poorer. Think of it as jews exploiting the untermensch to only further gain power.

TL;DR: Repcism is a concept where members with worse PTR will have a far harder time climbing out of a <1.0 ratio entirely due to the fact they're already in that hole, and members with higher PTR have massive momentum only further positively affecting their PTR and inflating it towards a "20 reps per post" ratio, for example.

The above pattern can be observed in higher-ranking users like Master who, despite only having ~900 posts, would be a grey, but due to their position here, they're looked upon as a God, hence the insane PTR.

Thank you for coming to my TED-talk :feelskek::feelskek:

@Jesus_ist_König
@CaZaDor
@Frenulum
@EvilSatanArseRapist
As im apart of said minority I would like to know if my PTR is considered okay 👌
 
  • +1
Reactions: loseratgenes
As im apart of said minority I would like to know if my PTR is considered okay 👌
Yeah it's over half so more than 2 reps per post, you're on a good run
 
  • +1
Reactions: slixzn
Yeah it's over half so more than 2 reps per post, you're on a good run
Other greys on this forum really piss me off most their “niche or based” takes are just total bullshit from tiktok but again i cant really say anything as it could be seen as hypocritical so ill keep my mouth shut
 

Similar threads

Skitsuna
Replies
13
Views
102
TheGreatDetective
TheGreatDetective
blinkers
Replies
17
Views
97
epic09
epic09
swaggyp1
Replies
1
Views
25
Throw_Away
T

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top