D
Deleted member 5145
ㅤ
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2020
- Posts
- 2,706
- Reputation
- 4,345
I'm savednot pedo because pedo is prepubescent
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I'm savednot pedo because pedo is prepubescent
oh yeah female facially are msot attractive around 14-17this was talking faces though
most males don't because they are unhealthy and their collagen rips from all the weed/cigarretes20's
true tbhmost males don't because they are unhealthy and their collagen rips from all the weed/cigarretes
also they are above 15% bf, 99% of 20' year olds.
my prime was wasted, all i can do now is looksmax and try to bang late teens girls, no cute lolis for meImagine wasting your prime being ugly, amd continuing being ugly as an oldcel
This is the reality for most
cope its not just 11-15 its also 12-14.Lol at grouping 11 and 15, as well as 19 to 30
The pedo cope is real
We can naturally know that 15 looks great. Even US has some states put age of consent at 16cope its not just 11-15 its also 12-14.
not pedo studies GrAYcelWe can naturally know that 15 looks great. Even US has some states put age of consent at 16
We don't need pedo studies to tell us
Shutup nerdnot pedo studies GrAYcel
Shutup nerd
this thread is about faces, not bodies my man.Busty MILF or death.
Inject T OP.
this thread is about faces, not bodies my man.
those age groups are not attractive and normal men do not find undeveloped (mentally and physically) teens attractive, you are a pedophile@KostyaRin thoughts on this thread? the most attractive are 11-15, or 12-14. in both cases you'd rrrrreee "muh pedo"
@alexjones @Proex @Syobevoli
View attachment 752482
SAGE Journals: Your gateway to world-class research journals
Subscription and open access journals from SAGE Publishing, the world's leading independent academic publisher.journals.sagepub.com
@Proex @AlwaysHaveQuestions @Chadelite @joeveniro @OhWellMaxing @Rope2647
that is false. statistically falsethose age groups are not attractive and normal men do not find undeveloped (mentally and physically) teens attractive, you are a pedophile
Oh wow what a suprise
I’m saying I knew rhis bro and
considering the fact that women start puberty at ages 9-11 and are finished developing body wise by ages 13-15, there's no real problem with finding girls that are 15-17 attractive, in many states it's legal, and in many other countries as well, only in the modern feminist society is it seen as wrong or gross, we all know that girls start fucking at age 10 right after elementary school, so what difference does it make tbh, @personalityinkwellthat is false. statistically false
View attachment 899517
![]()
The structure of erotic preference in the nondeviant male
Penis volume changes in response to pictures of nude females and males of various ages provided a basis for determining the order of erotic appeal ...eurekamag.com
View attachment 899519
exactly tbh. only idiots think a prime 15yo jb is a "child"considering the fact that women start puberty at ages 9-11 and are finished developing body wise by ages 13-15, there's no real problem with finding girls that are 15-17 attractive, in many states it's legal, and in many other countries as well, only in the modern feminist society is it seen as wrong or gross, we all know that girls start fucking at age 10 right after elementary school, so what difference does it make tbh, @personalityinkwell
she's not a child when she's sucking dick of varisty football chads in the locker room, serious this deadass happened in the lockeroom one day, I had to leave the lockerroom cuz a nigga wasn't getting nothing from JB's tbh, @personalityinkwell suicidefuel ngl, played varisty football Junior year the only "action" I got was some drunk girl giving me head at an aftergame party, then the next day she told me to never talk to her again or tell anyone about that, JFLexactly tbh. only idiots think a prime 15yo jb is a "child"
Those studies are a small group of men and they selected for teenagers with developed bodies and even then they were less attractive than adult women.that is false. statistically false
View attachment 899517
![]()
The structure of erotic preference in the nondeviant male
Penis volume changes in response to pictures of nude females and males of various ages provided a basis for determining the order of erotic appeal ...eurekamag.com
I will support feminists 24/7 against pedophiles until I am 150 and nothing will ever stop me as they are right and you are wrong and they are only winning too. By 2025, all pedophiles will be slaves in camps.considering the fact that women start puberty at ages 9-11 and are finished developing body wise by ages 13-15, there's no real problem with finding girls that are 15-17 attractive, in many states it's legal, and in many other countries as well, only in the modern feminist society is it seen as wrong or gross, we all know that girls start fucking at age 10 right after elementary school, so what difference does it make tbh, @personalityinkwell
lmao by 5% you stupid fuck. still 83% of men compared to 88%Those studies are a small group of men and they selected for teenagers with developed bodies and even then they were less attractive than adult women.
nothing will ever stop you? what happens if someone sneaks into your house and slits your throat stupid bitch?I will support feminists 24/7 against pedophiles until I am 150 and nothing will ever stop me as they are right and you are wrong and they are only winning too. By 2025, all pedophiles will be slaves in camps.
the proof is there jflany proof they selected for teenagers with developed bodies?
i'd flay anyone alive who even tried to go near my residence including you and watch them screamnothing will ever stop you? what happens if someone sneaks into your house and slits your throat stupid bitch?
i dont see the proof. seems like a baseless claim by youthe proof is there jfl
JUST LEAVE ME FOR SOMEBODY ELSE
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHHAHAHAretard u can't even betabuxx a 40 yo post wal roastie
so why are u so obsessed with ''jbs''
you're factoring in body development probablyimho its 14-17
no i meant facially. ive compared girls when they were 14-17 and 18-21, they always end up looking uglier than they used to.you're factoring in body development probably
this one is 13, amazing faceno i meant facially. ive compared girls when they were 14-17 and 18-21, they always end up looking uglier than they used to.
this one is 13, amazing face
she looks 11 lol, in a year it will look even better trust me
her face does yes
nigga i dont know how you determine her face to be 11. i think its simply young and pretty. i mean she's 13 so 11 is kinda close but i dont think her face looks "too young". besides, 11 is in the range of what is researched as most attractive faces anywayher face does yes
its not attractive at all. look at the first thing you showed me. she looks like an actual kid facially speaking and if you think thats gl then you probably think prepubescent kids are attractive too lolnigga i dont know how you determine her face to be 11. i think its simply young and pretty. i mean she's 13 so 11 is kinda close but i dont think her face looks "too young". besides, 11 is in the range of what is researched as most attractive faces anyway