Researched Hitler more to find out why right wingers are so inlove with him. He was unironically borderline retarded

I don't know anything about Hitler's poltics. I've only read the mein kampf in it's original german language but besides that I don't know enough to make an informed opinion but I'll read this thread and all the replies later
 
  • +1
Reactions: mcmentalonthemic
I don't know anything about Hitler's poltics. I've only read the mein kampf in it's original german language but besides that I don't know enough to make an informed opinion but I'll read this thread and all the replies later
no reason to read replies, just one of your friends trying to one up me during an argument by @ing you for some reason, like that'd help him
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
grammar nazi'd on me then called me an ignoramus, holy geek
well no, its like saying subtracted instead of summed. remember, ur the autistic retard here w fucked up neurochemistry.
no u tagged him because you felt your ego hurt, for whatever reason. i literally do not know why, i didn't even say anything insulting to you generally or specifically
and you felt like if he, for some reason, would read my message and think of me as an idiot, it would vindicate you
either that or you're just extremely malicious in a weird way
this is ur autism coming out. he and i studied very similar disciplines hence y we tag one another in threads relating to it. its common when u share an interest.
so tell me what you were talking about loool holy dodging
von neumann architecture was extremely influenced by ww2. we had basic info abt this stuff b4 the war, but the war rlly caused a panic. largely due to artillery, as i was taught. war accelerates this tech, its hard to create something brand new during war, which is y von neumann arch is always taught as a remarkable progression as a sad consequence of the war. this is possibly the most taught part in computing.
yes. i had the processing power, and i managed to crack it after the flaws in the enigma and the idea on how to crack it was made clear to me
. they made the processing power themselves through funding, they already knew the flaw of the enigma and the idea of how to crack it, and they cracked it.
you proved my point for me, don't know what you are trying to argue..
yes, nice job retard. u learnt from history. a beginner to electronics can put a battery w a resistor n led n get it to work. just bc we know the info now doesnt mean it wasnt remarkable then. "i knew how to solve it once i saw how it was solved". u can go make a neural network w pytorch rn, it doesnt mean anything. the engineers like park n turing (another very important name 4 this time) werent doing something obvious. u should srsly learn to appreciate these things. the reasn u dont is bc u havent studied where it came from.

nonetheless "processing power" is also wrong.
yeah and im saying it wasn't worth it loool
you only think it was because you didn't have to live through it, which is incredibly selfish FYI and near subhuman tier empathy levels
never said it was worth it. sperg moment again.
yeah this is water as fuck, im arguing its not worth it jflll
something i never said. fundamentally its neutral. there is no better or worse regarding this. we dont know how long it wouldve taken.
sarcastic joke of me basically saying yeah it was not worth it jfl, literally our first interaction here

this has to be an ESL moment or you are literally dyslexic and/or retarded

keep calling me autistic to project with your own social drawbacks looooollll
holy ego from you, who even are you but a random deustch bag incel
I would be legitimately nice to you if your personality wasn't as ugly as your face
im ethnically english and born and raised in england. ur obsession witht his esl rubbish is ridiculous. u use the incorrect terms for half of what we r discussing. im not german, i simply studied the languageat uni, like jason did too.

last sentence is cringe, give it a break.
 
well no, its like saying subtracted instead of summed. remember, ur the autistic retard here w fucked up neurochemistry.

this is ur autism coming out. he and i studied very similar disciplines hence y we tag one another in threads relating to it. its common when u share an interest.

von neumann architecture was extremely influenced by ww2. we had basic info abt this stuff b4 the war, but the war rlly caused a panic. largely due to artillery, as i was taught. war accelerates this tech, its hard to create something brand new during war, which is y von neumann arch is always taught as a remarkable progression as a sad consequence of the war. this is possibly the most taught part in computing.

yes, nice job retard. u learnt from history. a beginner to electronics can put a battery w a resistor n led n get it to work. just bc we know the info now doesnt mean it wasnt remarkable then. "i knew how to solve it once i saw how it was solved". u can go make a neural network w pytorch rn, it doesnt mean anything. the engineers like park n turing (another very important name 4 this time) were doing something obvious. u should srsly learn to appreciate these things. the reasn u dont is bc u havent studied where it came from.

nonetheless "processing power" is also wrong.

never said it was worth it. sperg moment again.

something i never said. fundamentally its neutral. there is no better or worse regarding this. we dont know how long it wouldve taken.

im ethnically english and born and raised in england. ur obsession witht his esl rubbish is ridiculous. u use the incorrect terms for half of what we r discussing. im not german, i simply studied the languageat uni, like jason did too.

last sentence is cringe, give it a break.
d-d-d-d-d-d-DID NOT READ

You may cope now.
 
no reason to read replies, just one of your friends trying to one up me during an argument by @ing you for some reason, like that'd help him
I just skimmed through the thread and I disagree with enigma machine not being significant. It was very hard break for it's time. You are only able to call it meh almost 100 years after because of the advances in cryptography, while the field of study didn't even exist back then. So I agree with @imontheloose just because AES exists now doesn't make the enigma not highly sophisticated and difficult to break for its time.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Reinhard_Heini and imontheloose
I just skimmed through the thread and I disagree with enigma machine not being significant. It was very hard break for it's time. You are only able to call it meh almost 100 years after because of the advanced in cryptography when the field of study didn't even exist back then. So I agree with @imontheloose just because AES exists now doesn't make the enigma not highly sophisticated and difficult to break for its time.
Yeah I disagree, they knew it's flaws before it was broken, the only issue was processing power. The machine itself is impressive, the methods, not so much. They literally knew exactly how to do it. If you gave them a modern machine, they would've broken it immediately. The only issue was processing power.
And such a machine that had that processing power, a machine that could not only decrypt but, but decrypt it quick enough for the military to act on the intelligence [20 minutes at the time] would've been created a few years later without the war. Not anything to write home about, especially when we are so far into the future.
 
If you read his book you would guess his IQ was above average but not genius level either
โ€œNot Geniusโ€.
C7D3492C 5E1B 4CCD 9F48 A8E73F4B406D
 
I just skimmed through the thread and I disagree with enigma machine not being significant. It was very hard break for his type. You are only able to call it meh almost 100 years after because of the advanced in cryptography when the field of study didn't even exist back then. So I agree with @imontheloose just because AES exists now doesn't make the enigma not highly sophisticated and difficult to break for its time.
i have no idea why he said that srsly. guess his spergy reddit plan failed. realistically, even basic semiconductor quantum is absurd to explain to som1 50yrs ago. now its trivial stuff to us.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
i have no idea why he said that srsly. guess his spergy plan failed. realistically, even basic semiconductor quantum is absurd to explain to som1 50yrs ago. now its trivial stuff to us.
translation: daddy please insult him with me for me, i need my ego saved!! :pepeHA::pepeHA:
 
You know itโ€™s funny, if Hitler was average he would be killed right after 1938, also after the tschechische escalation, but he wasnโ€™t in 1938 [ he was planned to be arrested, yet it didnโ€™t HAPPENED cause Hitler was a genius, he knew hacha would follow his order and donโ€™t go against him, only benes the bastard was a problem by time, the same man who wanted to start the WW2 by escalating udssr in the conflict, aka letting them in, yet it also didnโ€™t happened cause nobody allowed Russian troops into their countries, also not even the POLAKS ], nor was he in 1944.
Itโ€™s just funny
 
translation: daddy please insult him with me for me, i need my ego saved!! :pepeHA::pepeHA:
translation: two ppl w actual qualifications in this field told u the reality n ur autistic, fried nafri brain cant handle it.
>jason wont agree w u bc muh hitler
>agrees w me bc its a basic module taught in all computing degrees
ok, sperg. time to logoff n stop drooling on ur keyboard. its bed time.
 
Yeah I disagree, they knew it's flaws before it was broken, the only issue was processing power. The machine itself is impressive, the methods, not so much. They literally knew exactly how to do it. If you gave them a modern machine, they would've broken it immediately. The only issue was processing power.
And such a machine that had that processing power, a machine that could not only decrypt but, but decrypt it quick enough for the military to act on the intelligence [20 minutes at the time] would've been created a few years later without the war. Not anything to write home about, especially when we are so far into the future.
In tech you can't separate the machine from the method. Saying they just needed a modern machine is like saying the Wright brothers weren't impressive because they just needed a jet engine. Also inventions don't happen in a vaccum. The war gave them a reason, the funding and a sense of urgency to invent without these things we would have waited for decades for the computer age to arrive
 
  • +1
Reactions: mcmentalonthemic and imontheloose
translation: two ppl w actual qualifications in this field told u the reality n ur autistic, fried nafri brain cant handle it.
>jason wont agree w u bc muh hitler
>agrees w me bc its a basic module taught in all computing degrees
ok, sperg. time to logoff n stop drooling on ur keyboard. its bed time.
jason and me had a friendly disagreement, both of us are explaining why we believe the other is wrong

you are the only one sperging
do not know what type of qualifications you have in cryptography...
 
In tech you can't separate the machine from the method. Saying they just needed a modern machine is like saying the Wright brothers weren't impressive because they just needed a jet engine. Also inventions don't happen in a vaccum. The war gave them a reason, the funding and a sense of urgency to invent without these things we would have waited for decades for the computer age to arrive
Yes, though a jet engine came way after the wright brothers who were using wooden planes
I am not arguing that the wright brothers aren't impressive, because if they had modern jet engines they would have soured way further

I am more arguing that if THEY didn't have the incentives they had, and didn't discover human flight, it would've been discovered a few years later anyway. And those few years saved isn't worth the tragedy of WWII
 
jason and me had
esl moment.
both of us are explaining why we believe the other is wrong
when did i insult u in my op? u began making odd remarks insulting my statement in which i never stated ww2 was worth it, i labelled it a sad truth. again, ur the one with aspergers, not me.
do not know what type of qualifications you have in cryptography...
pffffft. this is taught in electrical eng classes n compsci classes. im in disbelief how ignorant u r to this. autism provides strange self-confidence.
 
esl moment.

when did i insult u in my op? u began making odd remarks insulting my statement in which i never stated ww2 was worth it, i labelled it a sad truth. again, ur the one with aspergers, not me.

pffffft. this is taught in electric eng classes n compsci classes. im in disbelief how ignorant u r to this. autism provides strange self-confidence.
i already dnr you.. keep jerking your dick calling me autistic to cope with an ugly recessed face? LOL!
ez
 
esl moment again. see how pathetic u sound u autistic mutt faggot? ur very existence is an abomination hence y u cope w muh ur ugly despite never seeing me.. zzz, ur drooling on ur keyboard again.
 
esl moment again. see how pathetic u sound u autistic mutt faggot? ur very existence is an abomination hence y u cope w muh ur ugly despite never seeing me.. zzz, ur drooling on ur keyboard again.
mirin the way you compulsively reply to me, literally can't stop
ok, i feel bad for insulting your face.. too far to be honest
would be healthy for you to take a deep breath and to stop caring about this convo. just tell yourself you won and move on lol
 
Yes, though a jet engine came way after the wright brothers who were using wooden planes
I am not arguing that the wright brothers aren't impressive, because if they had modern jet engines they would have soured way further

I am more arguing that if THEY didn't have the incentives they had, and didn't discover human flight, it would've been discovered a few years later anyway. And those few years saved isn't worth the tragedy of WWII
You are shifting the goal post now. I never said it was worth a war or anything like that,your it would have happened anyway in a few years is not true. Tech and fields of studies stagnate when there's no incentive. Steam engine was used as toy in rome and Egypt what did they do with that tech nothing. Only after almost a 1000 years the steam engine trains came into being



When a bunch of smart people get together it's to solve a real world problem that is plaguing the world in the present or for some huge incentive. Today billions of dollars and the world's best minds are pouring into Al because there is a massive profit incentive. In the 1940s, the incentive was survival as simple as that.
 
  • +1
Reactions: imontheloose
You are shifting the goal post now. I never said it was worth a war or anything like that,
yeah but it's what i was arguing originally in the convo lol
when there's no incentive. Steam engine was used as toy in rome and Egypt what did they do with that tech nothing. Only after almost a 1000 years the steam engine trains came into being
the incentive was the fact that these mathematicians were already researching this and were on track to reaching this innovation already
IBM made it's first computer somewhere around the 1940s, early to mid
I think it would of made it in the 50's, maybe late 50's, in my opinion [though all speculative]

we weren't in ancient egypt either
I believe that the people who were responsible for the creation for the enigma and the enigma machine were on track to making similar innovations in computing already, but did not have the budget. those innovations would have to be made over a longer period of time
I do not think those innovations would be put towards cryptography, I think that computing would be put much more into accounting, which it was
 

Similar threads

mcmentalonthemic
Replies
80
Views
378
Whatever
Whatever
L(oser)ooksmaxxer
Replies
19
Views
130
pawn
pawn
truejester271
Replies
0
Views
47
truejester271
truejester271
160cmcurry
Replies
9
Views
61
dsaliron
dsaliron

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top