Thinking_CEL
Silver
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2024
- Posts
- 614
- Reputation
- 1,009
Probably a crackhead I swear New York is full of crazies tbhhahaha mirin dog level iq
Taking the NY subway is like randomising crackhead simulator
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Probably a crackhead I swear New York is full of crazies tbhhahaha mirin dog level iq
"Per capita" is a useful measure, but it doesn't absolve you of ignoring context. Crime stats aren't just about ratios; they’re strongly tied to socioeconomic conditions, systemic disparities, and policing practices. Conveniently using "per capita" to frame entire racial groups while ignoring similar patterns in white crime stats reeks of cherry-picking. If you want an honest discussion, try looking at the full picture, not just the parts that suit your bias.Someone doesn’t understand per capita…
Yeah, your study come directly from your ass anyway, impossible to find itstrawman tier argument. Child molestations comes under non bailable offences all the cases get reported in the US
It’s absolutely relevant because ignoring crimes where whites are overrepresented exposes the bad faith in arguments like yours. If whites are 80% of the population but commit 60% of a crime like child molestation (assuming that's even the case) that’s underperforming relative to their population size but still represents the majority of offenders. Conveniently dismissing this while focusing on “per capita” metrics for other groups just highlights how the goal isn’t truth; it’s selectively spinning stats to push a biased narrative.i read that aswell, but its kinda irrelevant
if whites are 80% of the population but commit 60% of child molestation, then they are still not overrepresented. whereas if 10% commit 20% of rape, then they oveoverrepresentet.
Great argument. It's also per capita btw so your argument of that percentage example also falls apart. Also this is the studyhahaha mirin dog level iq
Your culture is your problem. African American culture is a disease to the black population of America. I work with a lot of Kenyans who are intelligent and traditional people that work very hard. I also have African American co workers who are absolute fucking clowns. This is a culture issue not a racial one."Per capita" is a useful measure, but it doesn't absolve you of ignoring context. Crime stats aren't just about ratios; they’re strongly tied to socioeconomic conditions, systemic disparities, and policing practices. Conveniently using "per capita" to frame entire racial groups while ignoring similar patterns in white crime stats reeks of cherry-picking. If you want an honest discussion, try looking at the full picture, not just the parts that suit your bias.
High quality, high iq threads and you still are able to make threads like this. Based. Goat user honestly.
Blaming culture is a lazy excuse that ignores systemic factors like poverty, discrimination, and historical oppression (despite me agreeing that the culture plays a big role). Your anecdote is just confirmation bias, not a valid argument.Your culture is your problem. African American culture is a disease to the black population of America. I work with a lot of Kenyans who are intelligent and traditional people that work very hard. I also have African American co workers who are absolute fucking clowns. This is a culture issue not a racial one.
Yeah, your study come directly from your ass anyway, impossible to find it
Black = poorer
Its common knowledge that the poorer you are, the less likely you'll ask help of the police.
You act as if native Kenyans haven’t also been dealt an unfair hand in this equation. I would actually argue they are much worse off when it comes to unfair factors than a black man born in America. They had to go to college and get a degree to work here and many being born into extreme poverty.Blaming culture is a lazy excuse that ignores systemic factors like poverty, discrimination, and historical oppression (despite me agreeing that the culture plays a big role). Your anecdote is just confirmation bias, not a valid argument.
Just take the most specific types of crimes possible theory
You’re completely missing the point. Kenyan immigrants and African Americans aren’t even in the same situation. Kenyan immigrants often come here already with degrees or the means to pursue education; they're a self-selected group.You act as if native Kenyans haven’t also been dealt an unfair hand in this equation. I would actually argue they are much worse off when it comes to unfair factors than a black man born in America. They had to go to college and get a degree to work here and many being born into extreme poverty.
wether i include dui and what not in this argument changes nothingIt’s absolutely relevant because ignoring crimes where whites are overrepresented exposes the bad faith in arguments like yours.
just made up numbers, but you get the idea, whites are not overrepresented.If whites are 80% of the population but commit 60% of a crime like child molestation (assuming that's even the case)
the focus on per capita statistics is about providing a fair and accurate comparison of races with different population size. Per capita rates show if a set of people is disproportionately involved in crime, which raw numbers dont show.that’s underperforming relative to their population size but still represents the majority of offenders. Conveniently dismissing this while focusing on “per capita” metrics for other groups just highlights how the goal isn’t truth; it’s selectively spinning stats to push a biased narrative.
Don't waste your time with him, some peoples are not willing to know the truth, only to comfort themselves in what they already believewether i include dui and what not in this argument changes nothing
just made up numbers, but you get the idea, whites are not overrepresented.
the focus on per capita statistics is about providing a fair and accurate comparison of races with different population size. Per capita rates show if a set of people is disproportionately involved in crime, which raw numbers dont show.
You are right this isn’t the general population of Kenya these are high performers for sure. I think it’s kind of a cop out to just be like “yeah we were oppressed that’s why we kill eachother in the street in record numbers”. Why not band together as a community and pursue higher education to foster generational wealth for future generations. It’s not like you can’t get financial aid or find ways to school. Hell DEI would actually give you more opportunities in some ways. I want everyone to succeed but you have to take some ownership of your own short comings ar the end of the day.You’re completely missing the point. Kenyan immigrants and African Americans aren’t even in the same situation. Kenyan immigrants often come here already with degrees or the means to pursue education; they're a self-selected group.
African Americans, on the other hand, have endured generations of systemic oppression and poverty within the U.S., making upward mobility a completely different battle.
Not to say there's no relevant culture differences, there are, but in this case they're overstated.
Those studies are from pdfs and studies. You can't download them by going to a link. Also all your arguments are baseless things that you have 0 proof off. If you wantonly disagree with basic stats there's no argument to be had at all because of your circular reasoning.Just take the most specific types of crimes possible theory
Whites are as likely to be crazy niggers. You have to be crazy to do those specific kind of things, its an useless argument
And again
View attachment 3325513
It’s bad faith to highlight disproportionate crime rates without context while downplaying whites’ absolute majority in crimes just because it’s “not overrepresented” (if that’s even true). You might then say: "Well, isn’t it fine to point out disproportionalities if they’re true?"wether i include dui and what not in this argument changes nothing
just made up numbers, but you get the idea, whites are not overrepresented.
the focus on per capita statistics is about providing a fair and accurate comparison of races with different population size. Per capita rates show if a set of people is disproportionately involved in crime, which raw numbers dont show.
Yes, the link is the source of the picture, if i cant access the source, the study is almost 100% bullshit.Those studies are from pdfs and studies. You can't download them by going to a link. Also all your arguments are baseless things that you have 0 proof off. If you wantonly disagree with basic stats there's no argument to be had at all because of your circular reasoning.
of course whites are gonna be majority if they make up the majority of the populationIt’s bad faith to highlight disproportionate crime rates without context while downplaying whites’ absolute majority in crimes just because it’s “not overrepresented”
it is(if that’s even true).
youre literally the one misrepresenting statistics and demonising whitesYou might then say: "Well, isn’t it fine to point out disproportionalities if they’re true?"
Sure, if that’s all it was. The problem is people here extrapolate and misrepresent those numbers, ignoring the systemic and social factors that create them, using stats to push misleading narratives rather than understand reality.
You’re opening a can of worms here, one that can’t be answered satisfactorily because there are so many layers of history and systemic factors involved. Generational trauma, structural inequality, and centuries of disenfranchisement can’t just be fixed by “banding together” (well, to some extent they could with this, really) or accessing DEI programs.You are right this isn’t the general population of Kenya these are high performers for sure. I think it’s kind of a cop out to just be like “yeah we were oppressed that’s why we kill eachother in the street in record numbers”. Why not band together as a community and pursue higher education to foster generational wealth for future generations. It’s not like you can’t get financial aid or find ways to school. Hell DEI would actually give you more opportunities in some ways. I want everyone to succeed but you have to take some ownership of your own short comings ar the end of the day.
It’s not self-evident that a population being the majority automatically means they’d commit the majority of certain crimes. Crime rates aren’t purely proportional to population size; they’re influenced by factors like socioeconomic status, systemic issues, and cultural dynamics. On top of that, the U.S. “majority” white population isn’t overwhelming; it’s slight, especially when you factor in how the census includes groups like Arabs under “white.” So no, it’s not as straightforward as you’re trying to make it. Context matters.of course whites are gonna be majority if they make up the majority of the population
it is
youre literally the one misrepresenting statistics and demonising whites
Most of the people on here are fucking edge lords who never actually talk to people irl. Blatantly retarded to think that an entire race would just be stupid or dumb, don’t like racial assumptions about any race. I definitely don’t have the same perspective you do though considering I grew up as a middle class white dude but it’s important to have discussions like this for the future and betterment of our citizens.You’re opening a can of worms here, one that can’t be answered satisfactorily because there are so many layers of history and systemic factors involved. Generational trauma, structural inequality, and centuries of disenfranchisement can’t just be fixed by “banding together” (well, to some extent they could with this, really) or accessing DEI programs.
While individual effort is important, it’s naive to overlook how deep the barriers run. That said, from our interaction, you seem more reasonable than most here; at least you’re engaging with the topic beyond blatant bad faith, which is rare in this space.
Everything I posted ITT is per capitawether i include dui and what not in this argument changes nothing
just made up numbers, but you get the idea, whites are not overrepresented.
the focus on per capita statistics is about providing a fair and accurate comparison of races with different population size. Per capita rates show if a set of people is disproportionately involved in crime, which raw numbers dont show.
Yes, the link is the source of the picture, if i cant access the source, the study is almost 100% bullshit.
Im just being nice with you here, everything goes to say that black are dumber and crazier than whites, im saying its equivalent, only difference being because of environmental factors. Im not racist neither am i trying to put you down.
a groups proportional share of a crime is generally tied to their proportion of the population. "slight" majority of whites in the U.S. they're 60% of the populationIt’s not self-evident that a population being the majority automatically means they’d commit the majority of certain crimes.
youre ignoring statistics and pure logic.Crime rates aren’t purely proportional to population size; they’re influenced by factors like socioeconomic status, systemic issues, and cultural dynamics.
its very slight and doesnt change the fact that whites are the majorityOn top of that, the U.S. “majority” white population isn’t overwhelming; it’s slight, especially when you factor in how the census includes groups like Arabs under “white.”
context matters sure, but doesnt change the fact that population size influences crime ratesSo no, it’s not as straightforward as you’re trying to make it. Context matters.
totally unbiased and not nitpickedEverything I posted ITT is per capita
View attachment 3325523View attachment 3325524View attachment 3325530
Thats not the source of the pictures you sent me but okay,
Population size might influence crime rates, but it doesn’t make the majority-to-crime correlation self-evident. If it did, all crime types would follow the same proportional logic, which they clearly don’t. The issue is far more nuanced; factors like socioeconomic inequality, systemic bias, and policy enforcement distort simple proportionality arguments. Ignoring these complexities and reducing everything to “majority population equals majority crime” isn’t logic; it’s oversimplification masquerading as insight.a groups proportional share of a crime is generally tied to their proportion of the population. "slight" majority of whites in the U.S. they're 60% of the population
youre ignoring statistics and pure logic.
its very slight and doesnt change the fact that whites are the majority
context matters sure, but doesnt change the fact that population size influences crime rates
Are you a retard nigga? Why are you comparing it with the entire white population of the US. It should only be compared to the white population living in the same vicinity as the victim. Also the pdf I linked is for another study. Click on the link for the source of that pic.Thats not the source of the pictures you sent me but okay,
The source state that 57% of SA are committed by whites. 13% of the population is black in north america. ×2 ( 27% ). Whites are 60%. Less than a 1× ratio. ( if the study is even true jfl)
different types of crimes might be influenced by the factors you claim, it doesn’t change the fact that overall crime rates are corelated with population size.Population size might influence crime rates, but it doesn’t make the majority-to-crime correlation self-evident.
do you really think the average person cares about what causes black to commit more crime? they commit more crime and thats simply a fact.gnoring these complexities and reducing everything to “majority population equals majority crime” isn’t logic; it’s oversimplification masquerading as insight.
?Now she is dirty forever
Sad for the Guy that will breed her
You make literally no sens, this study doesnt specify any region, only that its done in the US.Are you a retard nigga? Why are you comparing it with the entire white population of the US. It should only be compared to the white population living in the same vicinity as the victim. Also the pdf I linked is for another study. Click on the link for the source of that pic.
Your argument has consistently hinged on the claim that crime rates are proportional to population size. But as soon as I pointed out that crime doesn’t happen in a vacuum; that it’s shaped by systemic, socioeconomic, and cultural factors; you shifted to acknowledging these influences only to dismiss them. If you accept that crime isn’t purely a numbers game, your "majority population = majority crime" argument falls apart.different types of crimes might be influenced by the factors you claim, it doesn’t change the fact that overall crime rates are corelated with population size.
do you really think the average person cares about what causes black to commit more crime? they commit more crime and thats simply a fact.
i am not reading thatYour argument has consistently hinged on the claim that crime rates are proportional to population size. But as soon as I pointed out that crime doesn’t happen in a vacuum; that it’s shaped by systemic, socioeconomic, and cultural factors; you shifted to acknowledging these influences only to dismiss them. If you accept that crime isn’t purely a numbers game, your "majority population = majority crime" argument falls apart.
Also, your “average person doesn’t care” quip says more about the intellectual laziness of the so-called average person than it does about Black communities. If people don’t care to understand the why behind crime rates, that’s not on Black people; that’s a indictment of their intellectual laziness and their willingness to accept oversimplifications as truth.
This entire exchange started with me challenging bad-faith narratives that cherry-pick stats to scapegoat groups. You’ve mellowed your tone, but you’re still trying to oversimplify the discussion. Crime stats, like any data, require nuance and context; two things you’ve continually sidestepped here.
Ahahahahaha if i seen a black guy randomly running after a foid with his cock out irl i would die of laughter
You refusing to read just proves my original point; people here aren’t invested in truth, only in narratives that confirm their biases. Thanks for demonstrating that so clearly.i am not reading that
no im just tired of reading your arguments especially when you make them twice as long as beforeYou refusing to read just proves my original point; people here aren’t invested in truth, only in narratives that confirm their biases. Thanks for demonstrating that so clearly.
That’s what happens when you move past oversimplifications and confront reality. If you’re too intellectually lazy to engage with that, then so be it.no im just tired of reading your arguments especially when you make them twice as long as before
if u had started with this then i would have read it and even now i wont respond to your next reply since idcThat’s what happens when you move past oversimplifications and confront reality. If you’re too intellectually lazy to engage with that, then so be it.
You fit right into this forum. This entire exchange has only proven my original point... People here aren’t interested in truth, just parroting oversimplifications as truth, knowing most won’t bother to fact-check. Oh well.if u had started with this then i would have read it and even now i wont respond to your next reply since idc
Yea that’s actually very trueIt's the double standards. Most child molesters, producers of child pornography, sex tourists, etc. are white but you'll almost never see a thread about it here, and if you do then its not 'pattern recognition' but 'individual' white men.
I don't even know why people attempt to look objective when any rational person knows this forum is white supremacy central...
watch this and then rethink your argumentYou fit right into this forum. This entire exchange has only proven my original point... People here aren’t interested in truth, just parroting oversimplifications as truth, knowing most won’t bother to fact-check. Oh well.
Yea reading true crime I noticed when it was white cases it was more disturbing n brutalWhite people are evil in other ways. Whites don't commit crimes often but when they do it's some of the most heinous and evil shit ever. It's like they are mentally disturbed, mentally unwell. White criminals are actually unhinged and crazy
. Yes blacks commit more crimes but it's usually petty crimes like shoplifting or drug peddling but when a white commits a crime he does it because he derives pleasure out of causing harm to other people. White crimes are more calculated and sinister too. A white man with a few screws loose is 100 times more dangerous than a black man
This isnt the argument you think it isAfrican Americans, on the other hand, have endured generations of systemic oppression and poverty within the U.S., making upward mobility a completely different battle.
It’s absolutely relevant because ignoring crimes where whites are overrepresented exposes the bad faith in arguments like yours. If whites are 80% of the population but commit 60% of a crime like child molestation (assuming that's even the case) that’s underperforming relative to their population size but still represents the majority of offenders. Conveniently dismissing this while focusing on “per capita” metrics for other groups just highlights how the goal isn’t truth; it’s selectively spinning stats to push a biased narrative.
The first chart is completely made up probably by some black guy, it doesnt even make sense , and the pdf link doesnt even talk about child molestation.Everything I posted ITT is per capita
View attachment 3325523View attachment 3325524View attachment 3325530
Lets be honest if law enforcement wasn't an issue you'd be posting nigger hate threads on here all day. U know us whites all hate them equallyPeople like this should genuinely never be entered back into society
Its the type of crime that is just too much