ROBERT PATTINSON HAS A SUB5 SIDE 😱😂🤣 SIDE ANALYSIS RATERS GITFH LIFEFUEL FOR FLATCELS🥶 (title isnt clickbait)

[SilvioMoltisantiDan]

FC 183 T4
TFC 155 T6
NFC 181 T6
Nasomental 144 T6
Nasofacial 22 T5
Nasofrontal 141 T5
Nasolabial 89 T4
Mentolabial 122 T1
Facial depth 1.20 T4
Nasal projection 56 T4
Nasal tip angle 112 T1
Nasal H W ratio 64 T1.5
Ramus length 73 T2
Gonial angle 116 T1
mandibular plane angle 23 T1
maxilar projection 24 T5
LTP 59 T1
SNA 71 T4
SNB 89 T4
Dev SNA/SNB 15 T6
IBA angle 64 T1
NSBA SNA 15 T1
facial depth angle 58 T2
A facial Depth angle 76 T4
bimaxilary upwing angle 91 T3
browridge inclination 16 T1
Orbital vector slightly negative T3
No reccesion frankfurt plane No? T1
Gonion below mouth Yes T1
Z line 85 T2
Ramus tilt 3 T1
Rickets Slightly fail T2
Burstone T1 pass
Holdaway T1.5 very slightly fail
Steiner pass T1
submental angle 94 T1
Cranial base:123 T1
37 measurements
pattison's score 125
33% Harmony I'm IMPRESSED
low-mid sub5!? idk, never saw someone with that poor harmony side JFL, although is front is like 90% Harmony

 

[Jordan Barrett]

Dnr but thanks

 

[SilvioMoltisantiDan]

@PeenoResurrected not over if you are flat proof here

 

[bigfatuglyc6nt]

holy fucking shit your a genius

 

[SilvioMoltisantiDan]

Dnr but thanks

barret's next bitch.

 

[Psl King]

FC 183 T4
TFC 155 T6
NFC 181 T6
Nasomental 144 T6
Nasofacial 22 T5
Nasofrontal 141 T5
Nasolabial 89 T4
Mentolabial 122 T1
Facial depth 1.20 T4
Nasal projection 56 T4
Nasal tip angle 112 T1
Nasal H W ratio 64 T1.5
Ramus length 73 T2
Gonial angle 116 T1
mandibular plane angle 23 T1
maxilar projection 24 T5
LTP 59 T1
SNA 71 T4
SNB 89 T4
Dev SNA/SNB 15 T6
IBA angle 64 T1
NSBA SNA 15 T1
facial depth angle 58 T2
A facial Depth angle 76 T4
bimaxilary upwing angle 91 T3
browridge inclination 16 T1
Orbital vector slightly negative T3
No reccesion frankfurt plane No? T1
Gonion below mouth Yes T1
Z line 85 T2
Ramus tilt 3 T1
Rickets Slightly fail T2
Burstone T1 pass
Holdaway T1.5 very slightly fail
Steiner pass T1
submental angle 94 T1
Cranial base:123 T1
37 measurements
pattison's score 125
33% Harmony I'm IMPRESSED
low-mid sub5!? idk, never saw someone with that poor harmony side JFL, although is front is like 90% Harmony

Real proof that I’m Chad. Mirin

 

[SilvioMoltisantiDan]

holy fucking shit your a genius

thanks bhai

 

[SilvioMoltisantiDan]

@pfl @xye @killcry

 

[SilvioMoltisantiDan]

bump

 

[Jordan Barrett]

barret's next bitch.

Next what ??? He cant be eviscerated

 

[killuacel]

i have never seen his side analysed b4, and i haven't done it myself but 33% is shocking

 

[SilvioMoltisantiDan]

i have never seen his side analysed b4, and i haven't done it myself but 33% is shocking

his convexities and depth are very, very bad

Next what ??? He cant be eviscerated

his front can.

 

[SilvioMoltisantiDan]

@valentine you saying he was chad side?

 

[Jordan Barrett]

his convexities and depth are very, very bad

his front can.

If Jordan can be eviscerated than everyone can look bad in some angle

 

[SilvioMoltisantiDan]

If Jordan can be eviscerated than everyone can look bad in some angle

nah, he just has 70% front harm (which i respect. but hes very overrated)

 

[Jordan Barrett]

nah, he just has 70% front harm (which i respect. but hes very overrated)

Overated when he’s literally the god of modern lookism
Im sure @valentine can agree

 

[SilvioMoltisantiDan]

Overated when he’s literally the god of modern lookism
Im sure @valentine can agree

valentine said esr 47 is unideal and <43 esr masculine trait and a ideal range

 

[Jordan Barrett]

valentine said esr 47 is unideal and <43 esr masculine trait and a ideal range

Everyone have flaws

 

[SilvioMoltisantiDan]

i dont see any coper here saying he looks fine i wonder why

 

[SilvioMoltisantiDan]

bump fucking niggas high effort

 

[valentine]

@valentine you saying he was chad side?

i never said that
his side is bad he's overrated

 

[valentine]

Overated when he’s literally the god of modern lookism
Im sure @valentine can agree

 

[Jordan Barrett]

View attachment 5643634

 

[SilvioMoltisantiDan]

View attachment 5643634

View attachment 5643647

no chad for that shit tfwhr im sorry

 

[xye]

FC 183 T4
TFC 155 T6
NFC 181 T6
Nasomental 144 T6
Nasofacial 22 T5
Nasofrontal 141 T5
Nasolabial 89 T4
Mentolabial 122 T1
Facial depth 1.20 T4
Nasal projection 56 T4
Nasal tip angle 112 T1
Nasal H W ratio 64 T1.5
Ramus length 73 T2
Gonial angle 116 T1
mandibular plane angle 23 T1
maxilar projection 24 T5
LTP 59 T1
SNA 71 T4
SNB 89 T4
Dev SNA/SNB 15 T6
IBA angle 64 T1
NSBA SNA 15 T1
facial depth angle 58 T2
A facial Depth angle 76 T4
bimaxilary upwing angle 91 T3
browridge inclination 16 T1
Orbital vector slightly negative T3
No reccesion frankfurt plane No? T1
Gonion below mouth Yes T1
Z line 85 T2
Ramus tilt 3 T1
Rickets Slightly fail T2
Burstone T1 pass
Holdaway T1.5 very slightly fail
Steiner pass T1
submental angle 94 T1
Cranial base:123 T1
37 measurements
pattison's score 125
33% Harmony I'm IMPRESSED
low-mid sub5!? idk, never saw someone with that poor harmony side JFL, although is front is like 90% Harmony

side isnt as important as people think so

 

[xanlack]

FC 183 T4
TFC 155 T6
NFC 181 T6
Nasomental 144 T6
Nasofacial 22 T5
Nasofrontal 141 T5
Nasolabial 89 T4
Mentolabial 122 T1
Facial depth 1.20 T4
Nasal projection 56 T4
Nasal tip angle 112 T1
Nasal H W ratio 64 T1.5
Ramus length 73 T2
Gonial angle 116 T1
mandibular plane angle 23 T1
maxilar projection 24 T5
LTP 59 T1
SNA 71 T4
SNB 89 T4
Dev SNA/SNB 15 T6
IBA angle 64 T1
NSBA SNA 15 T1
facial depth angle 58 T2
A facial Depth angle 76 T4
bimaxilary upwing angle 91 T3
browridge inclination 16 T1
Orbital vector slightly negative T3
No reccesion frankfurt plane No? T1
Gonion below mouth Yes T1
Z line 85 T2
Ramus tilt 3 T1
Rickets Slightly fail T2
Burstone T1 pass
Holdaway T1.5 very slightly fail
Steiner pass T1
submental angle 94 T1
Cranial base:123 T1
37 measurements
pattison's score 125
33% Harmony I'm IMPRESSED
low-mid sub5!? idk, never saw someone with that poor harmony side JFL, although is front is like 90% Harmony

Shut the fuck up

 

[xye]

valentine said esr 47 is unideal and <43 esr masculine trait and a ideal range

47 is ideal, 48 is a slight failo

 

[Jordan Barrett]

side isnt as important as people think so

Appreciate it brother

 

[americanpakitruvcel]

Does gandy have bad convexities? Also what do you rate Pattinson overall

 

[SilvioMoltisantiDan]

Does gandy have bad convexities? Also what do you rate Pattinson overall

pattison Is low chad regardless of a shit side

47 is ideal, 48 is a slight failo

yes

Shut the fuck up

why?

 

[americanpakitruvcel]

pattison Is low chad regardless of a shit side

yes

why?

I think my side is worse than Pattinson tbh

 

[SilvioMoltisantiDan]

I think my side is worse than Pattinson tbh

nope, thats a sub5 side literally