Roiding vs Natty

HighIQ ubermensch

HighIQ ubermensch

Master
Joined
Jul 3, 2025
Posts
1,509
Reputation
1,275
Which is better?

doing one 12-20 weeks cycle at age 18 & building up muscle then getting off steroids
risking permanently fucking up lipid profile & Youthful Skin

or
Being Natty for 4 years & getting good physique at age 22 when you're out of uni
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bl0odKn1ght and Hexxon
Natty
Anybody saying roiding is better is either trolling or a retard.
 
  • +1
Reactions: HighIQ ubermensch and Bl0odKn1ght
If i ever start working out again i would 100% do compounds

Natty lifting, especially when not a manlet is brutal
 
  • +1
Reactions: HighIQ ubermensch
Which is better?

doing one 12-20 weeks cycle at age 18 & building up muscle then getting off steroids
risking permanently fucking up lipid profile & Youthful Skin

or
Being Natty for 4 years & getting good physique at age 22 when you're out of uni
this is exactly what im thinking rn:ROFLMAO:
 
  • +1
Reactions: HighIQ ubermensch
Which is better?

doing one 12-20 weeks cycle at age 18 & building up muscle then getting off steroids
risking permanently fucking up lipid profile & Youthful Skin

or
Being Natty for 4 years & getting good physique at age 22 when you're out of uni
Just start working out at 14-15. Also medschool in my country lasts until 25 and real looksmaxxers become doctors for statusmaxxing
 
  • +1
Reactions: HighIQ ubermensch
Anybody saying roiding is better is either trolling or a retard.
Nah roiding is top tier especially if you're over 5'9", not worth working out for 5 years at 6'4" just to have newbie gains at the end of it
 
  • +1
Reactions: HighIQ ubermensch
bones and insertions are better
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: xela2008 and HighIQ ubermensch
At 18 is cuck activity
I mean to each their own, I think getting overly shredded looks like shit but getting an aesthetic physique when you're tall and have long bones is near impossible without cycling unless you're doing it for years on end

My brother is 6'8" and has been working out consistently for the past 4 years and looks like he's never picked up a weight in his life, subsequentially my dad is 6'4" and has been working out for the past 30 years and just looks like a larger dude, but definitely not shredded. If both of them started a cycle they'd look like Gods by now with half the time put in, it's just a better ROI if you don't go overboard
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: slaters, HighIQ ubermensch and MaracasMogs
Also you niggas are severely misinformed about height & physique. they are completely unrelated
 
Which is better?

doing one 12-20 weeks cycle at age 18 & building up muscle then getting off steroids
risking permanently fucking up lipid profile & Youthful Skin

or
Being Natty for 4 years & getting good physique at age 22 when you're out of uni
You won’t beat exogenous hormones

The gap between natty and enhanced is going to get wider as the drugs and routines become better
 
  • +1
Reactions: HighIQ ubermensch
Natty
Anybody saying roiding is better is either trolling or a retard.
If your genes are good enough to get this natty, sure. Otherwise it’s cope.
IMG 1624
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: HighIQ ubermensch and MaracasMogs
congratulations, u just posted an untrained insertion and frame mogger

thx for proving my point

JFL david laid untrained is literal BBC physique fuckinig retard

him untrained mogs the avg cuck like u who will blast tren and wonder why u dont have 1 million followers on instagram

just fucking lol.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Saint Casanova
You won’t beat exogenous hormones

The gap between natty and enhanced is going to get wider as the drugs and routines become better
Also Faustian bargain that is worth thinking about

The more work you do, the more drugs you research and the earlier you do them, the greater and more permanent the results will be.

You are going to start seeing pharmacological freaks and physiques that are naturally unattainable
 
  • +1
Reactions: HighIQ ubermensch
congratulations, u just posted an untrained insertion and frame mogger

thx for proving my point

JFL david laid untrained is literal BBC physique fuckinig retard

him untrained mogs the avg cuck like u who will blast tren and wonder why u dont have 1 million followers on instagram

just fucking lol.
Jesse James west has a 1 million plus followers and he has a terrible frame/inserts jfl
 
  • +1
Reactions: HighIQ ubermensch
Jesse James west has a 1 million plus followers and he has a terrible frame/inserts jfl
99% of his content is collabing with other fitness influencers, his followage isnt from his physique
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Saint Casanova
congratulations, u just posted an untrained insertion and frame mogger

thx for proving my point

JFL david laid untrained is literal BBC physique fuckinig retard

him untrained mogs the avg cuck like u who will blast tren and wonder why u dont have 1 million followers on instagram

just fucking lol.
69319637 11922987 Jordan Barrett showed off his very slender frame as he worked up m 2 1680240

kys retarded subhuman,
JFL If you think frame will carry anybody without muscles
 
View attachment 3976703
kys retarded subhuman,
JFL If you think frame will carry anybody without muscles
so fucking low iq

jordan has the most dogshit insertions on this planet

avg bbc with his frame has full belly long insertions

ur gonna learn the hard way

take ur tren bud, avg bbc untrained will mog u

just fucking lol.

bluepill redditors on this forum now
 
Which is better?

doing one 12-20 weeks cycle at age 18 & building up muscle then getting off steroids
risking permanently fucking up lipid profile & Youthful Skin

or
Being Natty for 4 years & getting good physique at age 22 when you're out of uni
just roid nobody gaf if you're natty or not
 

Similar threads

ota.27
Replies
10
Views
218
Asoka
Asoka
zygomatiic
Replies
58
Views
635
lukePILL
lukePILL
org3cel.RR
Replies
140
Views
1K
org3cel.RR
org3cel.RR
S
Replies
27
Views
736
Healthmax01
Healthmax01
jeff1234
Replies
134
Views
2K
ScienceCel
S

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top