Rollo Tomassi making the case that old men have more SMV than younger men.

eduardkoopman

eduardkoopman

Kraken
Joined
Aug 29, 2019
Posts
22,780
Reputation
28,548
Enjoy the looksmaxxing advice of Rollo, to just looksmaxx by:
* be old looking,
* get bald,
* and wrinkled and fat.

Than you look like the average older man, whom slay the younger women.


 
Last edited:
  • JFL
Reactions: 5'8manlet, Pumanator, Jason Voorhees and 2 others
i saw rollo tomassi in the title and immediately caged

1633604455506


peak SMV bro, 20 year old JBs can't resist
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Jason Voorhees, Deleted member 15099 and eduardkoopman
Assuming you age well and have a good career, yes. But most men can't get these two
 
  • +1
Reactions: highT, Jason Voorhees, hebbewem and 2 others
Black pill is starting to normalize

Neal Ames

Neal Ames

há 3 semanas
Evolutionary Psychology states that in a resource rich environment females (of all complex species) will revert to a short-term mating strategy i.e. lots of sex with High Value Men, because females have the resources that they need. In a resource poor environment females implement a long-term mating strategy i.e. pair-bond with the best male they can get and stay with them, because they need the resources of the male. We are currently in the most resource rich environment our species has ever seen.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees, TrestIsBest and eduardkoopman
Assuming you age well and have a good career, yes. But most men can't get these two
LOL.
Yeah, assuming a guy is the 20% exception category. That doesn't get 1 or more of these things: bald, fat, ugly skin, broke, etc..
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
men get more status and money as time goes by, so older men can have decent SMV, women love money and clout
 
  • +1
Reactions: gamma and Jason Voorhees
i hate this cunt so much, irrational wannabe asshole
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees, Lolcel, EverythingMattersCel and 1 other person
  • +1
Reactions: gamma, Jason Voorhees, Deleted member 15099 and 1 other person
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
Same tbh. Just looking at him irritates me.

I wonder if he believes his own BS.
to be fair, what he's saying in general were true back then.

not anymore. things have changed. instead of adapting, this guy trying to "bluepill" people like frame, game and other bullshits he spread.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Schizoidcel, Jason Voorhees and Elvisandreaa
The thing he doesn't understand is that most women nowadays do not need/want a family like they did 50 years ago plus they make their own money. Essentially there is no need for a stable 'provider' type at all... there are still some women who go exclusively for rich men but most guys can't attain that type of wealth in their own.
 
  • +1
Reactions: highT and Jason Voorhees
The thing he doesn't understand is that most women nowadays do not need/want a family like they did 50 years ago plus they make their own money. Essentially there is no need for a stable 'provider' type at all... there are still some women who go exclusively for rich men but most guys can't attain that type of wealth in their own.
Plus they also forget to mention.
How often, these type of relationships with golddigger women, are horrible relationships for the man.
Whereas Chad has more enjoyable relationships

 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
Enjoy the looksmaxxing advice of Rollo, to just looksmaxx by:
* be old looking,
* get bald,
* and wrinkled and fat.

Than you look like the average older man, whom slay the younger women.



What he's saying is dumb. BUT

My SMV is much higher at 26 vs 21.
The thing he doesn't understand is that most women nowadays do not need/want a family like they did 50 years ago plus they make their own money. Essentially there is no need for a stable 'provider' type at all... there are still some women who go exclusively for rich men but most guys can't attain that type of wealth in their own.
This is always a cope. Wagecelling is soulcrushing and wrecks your happiness. MOST women are intrested in a betabux HTN not wageslaving.

The ones that cope with "muh career" find themselves late 20s and all the quality guys are fucking youngins and their left with old farts and super betas. You can always point these women out. Their old bags of skin and look nothing like they use too, wageslaving and having to date normal/broke mid 30s guys.
 
What he's saying is dumb. BUT

My SMV is much higher at 26 vs 21.
Mine is now at late 30's my highest ever. But I realize fully imo, that I am an exceptions case
This is always a cope. Wagecelling is soulcrushing and wrecks your happiness.
it's brutals for the man, I agree
MOST women are intrested in a betabux HTN not wageslaving.
sounds like a good deal for a woman
The ones that cope with "muh career" find themselves late 20s and all the quality guys are fucking youngins and their left with old farts and super betas.
"quality guys"; imo basically means: good looking men that support themselfes. And they do obviously prefer younger women in SMV context.
"old farts and super betas"; imo mean: unattractive men. I dont believe much in Beta/Alpha concept. It usually means beta = not good looking and frailer looking men. And means alpha = good looking and, tall, good msucles mass.

You can always point these women out. Their old bags of skin and look nothing like they use too, wageslaving and having to date normal/broke mid 30s guys.
it's a little bit fun to watch.
you can see in these women eyes, thinking; "how the fuck did I end up (settling) for such a ugly mf dude? "
 

Similar threads

Sloppyseconds
Replies
20
Views
1K
disillusioned
disillusioned
Replies
25
Views
1K
kasrkin
K
IntelligentCel
Replies
37
Views
3K
chriswalkerthegoat
chriswalkerthegoat

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top