angrycel737
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2021
- Posts
- 194
- Reputation
- 362
I'd do it but i'd feel super gay. Thinking about it feels gayer than getting spitroasted by four 12 inch cocks. Anyone else feel this way?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I don't want to disappoint Allah.You go to hell for roping.
Nothing low inhib about giving up when the hard times strike, fighting the odds stacking against you even to the bitter end is manly. That's like being WW2 German soldier, those mfs were still fighting in 1945 to defend the fatherland even though there were like 10 times more Soviets with far more weaponry. Holy fuck that was manly, it makes me almost shed tears to even imagine the amounts of testosterone it takes to do that.men do it more so it isn’t gay it’s actually the most low inhib thing u can do
Nothing low inhib about giving up when the hard times strike, fighting the odds stacking against you even to the bitter end is manly. That's like being WW2 German soldier, those mfs were still fighting in 1945 to defend the fatherland even though there were like 10 times more Soviets with far more weaponry. Holy fuck that was manly, it makes me almost shed tears to even imagine the amounts of testosterone it takes to do that.
Only reason god could probably forgive roping is if your nervous system is so fucked after some burn injuries or something, that the pain is impossible to live with.
But at what cost to soviets? If you're gonna lose, at least make the enemy pay grave cost for it. And it was never given that Soviets would win. Germans could've turned the war around even in 1944, there was like 40 assassination attempts to Hitler so the generals could take over the war effort, but dude was just lucky as shit jfl.They got bucked hard by Soviet badboys though, didn't make a difference in the end.
hell doesnt existYou go to hell
Yea it does thohell doesnt exist
where?Yea it does tho
Never been there mate, and don't intend going.where?
How lmao? The only shot Germans had was at the very start of Barbarossa when the Soviets were fingering their assholes. Even if Barbarossa went flawlessly, Russia is still way too big to control and they would've gotten bucked by the atomic bomb anyway.
What would Hitler dying in 1944 change?But at what cost to soviets? If you're gonna lose, at least make the enemy pay grave cost for it. And it was never given that Soviets would win. Germans could've turned the war around even in 1944, there was like 40 assassination attempts to Hitler so the generals could take over the war effort, but dude was just lucky as shit jfl.
View attachment 1397523
There were numerous times the Germans could've won the war, do I need to remind you that German Army size in 1944 was over 9 million, not much fewer than Soviets. Germans had more advanced weaponry, like the first fighter jet in the world Me 262, the first assault rifle in the world, Sturmgewehr 44, from which AK47 was copied from. German tanks were far superior to allied tanks, they were totally in their own class. Kurt Snipel destroyed 168 allied tanks with 1 Tiger II tank. Some of the tanks were completely impregnable with allied gunnery.How lmao? The only shot Germans had was at the very start of Barbarossa when the Soviets were fingering their assholes. Even if Barbarossa went flawlessly, Russia is still way too big to control and they would've gotten bucked by the atomic bomb anyway.
There's no timeline in which Germany won the war.
"more advanced weaponry" is up for debate, like their tanks being autistically hard to maintain and fix. Any advantages they had didn't matter after Kursk, let alone 1944 when they were on the retreat. They were being outproduced and invaded from all sides. Also much of their army by then was old men and children, compared to young Soviet buck breakers. They're lucky they were defeated when they were, otherwise they would've ended up like Japan.There were numerous times the Germans could've won the war, do I need to remind you that German Army size in 1944 was over 9 million, not much fewer than Soviets. Germans had more advanced weaponry, like the first fighter jet in the world Me 262, the first assault rifle in the world, Sturmgewehr 44, from which AK47 was copied from. German tanks were far superior to allied tanks, they were totally in their own class. Kurt Snipel destroyed 168 allied tanks with 1 Tiger II tank. Some of the tanks were completely impregnable with allied gunnery.
View attachment 1397529
Granted, soviet tanks were easier to fix, but they also broke more often, even in critical moments. Soviets had a lot of women in their ranks even in 1943 and both the oldest and youngest soldier participated in the war were soviets, 6 year old boy and 90+ year old man. But I agree, soviets should've been finished by 1941. Letting the war continue so long turned to be Germanys disadvantage. And it's unlikely Germany would've been nuked. They knew Hitler would never surrender no matter if they nuked all of Germany, so that would've just made America look bad to their own citizens from who 90+ million claimed German ancestry during that time. With Japan the 2 nukes avoided a bloodbath for the Americans, since Japanese had 3 million soldiers waiting for them to land, it would've turned out to be a disaster."more advanced weaponry" is up for debate, like their tanks being autistically hard to maintain and fix. Any advantages they had didn't matter after Kursk, let alone 1944 when they were on the retreat. They were being outproduced and invaded from all sides. Also much of their army by then was old men and children, compared to young Soviet buck breakers. They're lucky they were defeated when they were, otherwise they would've ended up like Japan.
This is extreme wehraboo cope, brah.